Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,001 through 8,020 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #202813
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,17:17)
    Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom [1Cor15]


    Yes Nick,

    Now add that thought to 1 Cor 15 and you will begin to understand that Jesus is still the man who is mediator between us and God, but he is now clothed with a spiritual body.

    mike

    #202815
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi MB,
    I agree Jesus is not in a torn flesh and bones body as seen in lk24.
    Surely like us the perishable has inherited the imperishable.

    Now we have an ADVOCATE.[1Jn1]
    He has mediated for his brothers.

    #202907
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,16:38)
    Hi Irene,
    It was the Spirit of Christ.
    Jesus was not alive till conceived of Mary.
    But the Spirit of Christ enlightened the prophets and was the rock that was with the Israelites.[1Cor10, 1 peter1]


    Nick!  So you disagree with what t8 has written?  That rather surprises me… Yes, He was a Spirit and that Spirit was and is like Jesus now. He was very much aware what was going on. He is the Son of God and God is Spirit. So why is there a difference in Spirits. There is not. He emptied Himself it says in Phil. 2:5…..Then how do you explain the Scriptures in John 17:5 Where Jesus said that He wants the glory back which He had with the Father before the world was? Is He then now what He was before according to you simple a Spirit or a Spirit Being the firstborn of all creation….. That is what Scriptures say….. Or when John said in John 6:38 that He has come down from Heaven not to do His will but the will of Him who send Him.  First of all how did He know what His Father wanted. Since no man ever seen Jehovah God or heard His voice, only the one who came from Heaven, has seen Him…. That is Jesus……And is He not the firstborn of all creation?  And in John 1:1 it was the Word and that Word was made flesh in verse 14?  Not to speak of Rev. 19:13and verse 16.  He will come agai as that Word of God. KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS……There are several Scriptures that you and others will have to ignore or interpret the way you see fit, and not the way it is written……..Irene

    #202921
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,17:42)
    Hi MB,
    I agree Jesus is not in a torn flesh and bones body as seen in lk24.
    Surely like us the perishable has inherited the imperishable.


    Hi Nick,

    We haven't inherited it the imperishable yet. It is our hope.

    mike

    #202926
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 10 2010,17:27)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,17:17)
    Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom [1Cor15]


    Yes Nick,

    Now add that thought to 1 Cor 15 and you will begin to understand that Jesus is still the man who is mediator between us and God, but he is now clothed with a spiritual body.

    mike


    Mike,

    Very good! You once denied that Jesus is still a man. You said:

    Quote
    If Jesus didn't receive the “position of firstborn” until he was raised, (when he was no longer a man), then your whole theory falls apart.  How could he be the firstborn in relationship to man if he wasn't a man when he recieved the “title”?  Wouldn't he be the firstborn in relationship to his own kind of spirit creatures?


    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=80

    Now you correctly say that He is a man but with a spiritual body.  

    the Roo

    #202935
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 11 2010,04:06)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 10 2010,17:27)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,17:17)
    Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom [1Cor15]


    Yes Nick,

    Now add that thought to 1 Cor 15 and you will begin to understand that Jesus is still the man who is mediator between us and God, but he is now clothed with a spiritual body.

    mike


    Mike,

    Very good! You once denied that Jesus is still a man. You said:

    Quote
    If Jesus didn't receive the “position of firstborn” until he was raised, (when he was no longer a man), then your whole theory falls apart.  How could he be the firstborn in relationship to man if he wasn't a man when he recieved the “title”?  Wouldn't he be the firstborn in relationship to his own kind of spirit creatures?


    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=80

    Now you correctly say that He is a man but with a spiritual body.  

    the Roo


    Yes Roo,

    I should have said (when he was no longer a FLESH AND BLOOD man).

    Sorry for your confusion.

    mike

    #202939
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,04:42)

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 11 2010,04:06)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 10 2010,17:27)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2010,17:17)
    Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom [1Cor15]


    Yes Nick,

    Now add that thought to 1 Cor 15 and you will begin to understand that Jesus is still the man who is mediator between us and God, but he is now clothed with a spiritual body.

    mike


    Mike,

    Very good! You once denied that Jesus is still a man. You said:

    Quote
    If Jesus didn't receive the “position of firstborn” until he was raised, (when he was no longer a man), then your whole theory falls apart.  How could he be the firstborn in relationship to man if he wasn't a man when he recieved the “title”?  Wouldn't he be the firstborn in relationship to his own kind of spirit creatures?


    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=80

    Now you correctly say that He is a man but with a spiritual body.  

    the Roo


    Yes Roo,

    I should have said (when he was no longer a FLESH AND BLOOD man).

    Sorry for your confusion.

    mike


    Don't tell me it was my confusion. I know very well that the JW's deny that Jesus is still a man and that it was in that context you made your statement because ot your JW background. You needed only to accept my compliment in the grace that I gave it.

    the Roo

    #202945
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 11 2010,04:56)
    Don't tell me it was my confusion. I know very well that the JW's deny that Jesus is still a man and that it was in that context you made your statement because ot your JW background.


    I'm sorry that I confused you by not spelling it out clearly enough for you.

    mike

    #202963
    martian
    Participant

    From another forum, but very good.

    There is precedent in the Old Testament that kings were worshiped and there was no contradiction because he was God's appointed representative. A good example of this is 1 Chr. 29:20,
    “And David said to all the congregation, Now bless the LORD your God. And all the congregation blessed the LORD God of their fathers, and bowed down their heads, and worshipped the LORD, and the king.”
    So it's also interesting that in the same chapter verse 23 it says this,
    “Then Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him.” (cp. 1 Chr. 28:5)
    Solomon didn't sit on his own throne. He sat on 'the throne of the LORD' being God's annointed. He was given that right or authority. The principle is stated by king Jehoshaphat in 2 Chr. 19:6,
    “And said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment.”
    So do these same principles apply to Jesus? Is he worshiped as a King appointed by God or is he worshiped because he is just God? I think Phil. 2:9-11 is pretty clear,
    “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: {10} That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; {11} And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
    So does this indicate that Jesus is worshiped because he is God? No. It shows that God has “exalted him” and “given him a name”. These are not things that were inherit with Jesus. The lesser is given authority by the greater. Time and time again we see that Jesus' authority was given to him by God (Matt. 28:18; Acts 2:36; Eph 1:20-22, to name a few).

    Another key key verse in this regards is 1 Cor. 15:28,
    “And when all things shall be subdued unto him [Jesus], then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him [God] that put all things under him [Jesus], that God may be all in all.”
    Jesus must reign until he has put all enemies under his feet (v.25). There is an end to Jesus' authority but it isn't until the very end. It's at that time that Jesus will give that authority back to God and subject himself to God. How on earth does this square with the Trinitarian concept of co-equality? But it aligns perfectly if Jesus is not God but the Son of God, a King, given authority for the glory of God.

    This also dovetails nicely into the passage in Hebrews 1:8 also used by Trinitarians. First of all verse 6 once again shows that God directs the worship of the Son.
    “And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.” (cp. 1 Peter 3:22)
    This follows the same pattern established in Phil. 2:9-11. To prove that the Son is to be worshipped the author to the Hebrews quotes Psalm 45:6-7,
    (Heb 1:8-9 KJV) “But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. {9} Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.”
    It is argued by Trinitarians that the Son is called God here in Hebrews 1:8 therefore he must be God. This is curious because verse 9 states that “God, even thy God hath anointed thee”. Does God have a God? Again the lesser is blessed (Psa. 45:5) and anointed (Psa. 45:7) by the greater.

    So why is Jesus called God in verse 8? There again is an Old Testament precedent that the leaders of the people where sometimes called God (Heb. Elohim) because they were God's representatives on earth. . The principles all apply here that God has anointed Jesus to sit in the 'throne of the Lord'… 'thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever'. Jesus now sits in that throne just like Solomon did. Jesus has been given a name above every other name therefore he is called God even though he not the 'only true God' (John 17:3). God has given him all power and authority until all enemies are put under his feet. Truly this can be said of no other man then Jesus Christ who was sinless and a perfect representation of God manifest in flesh. He is therefore uniquely qualified to be worshipped to the glory of God the Father.

    #202968
    JustAskin
    Participant

    To all,

    AGAIN AND AGAIN… Why do you all never learn.

    Worship is ONLY to God.

    All else is “OBEISANCE”.

    “Worship the Father (God) – Honor the King (Jesus)”

    What do you read:” When he again bring his firstborn into the world he says “All the Angel to do obesiance to him” – Where does it include MANKIND…?

    Martian, Your post is good but doesn't RAM home the points but leave room for others to pry your argument apart. You need to be tighter…

    Try to focus and be in the Spirit. have a complete vision of what you are posting – like writing a picture… check your perspectives, your gradient lines, your horizons and balance, top left, bottom right.  What is the main focus and does it draw the mind's eye. Are you over colouring – to many themes – too few? is the main point being overshadowed by a distraction element in the foreground or background.
    And lastly, Frame it.

    Intro, mid point and end footer (Conclusion).

    #202979
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 11 2010,09:48)
    To all,

    AGAIN AND AGAIN… Why do you all never learn.

    Worship is ONLY to God.

    All else is “OBEISANCE”.

    “Worship the Father (God) – Honor the King (Jesus)”

    What do you read:” When he again bring his firstborn into the world he says “All the Angel to do obesiance to him” – Where does it include MANKIND…?

    Martian, Your post is good but doesn't RAM home the points but leave room for others to pry your argument apart. You need to be tighter…

    Try to focus and be in the Spirit. have a complete vision of what you are posting – like writing a picture… check your perspectives, your gradient lines, your horizons and balance, top left, bottom right.  What is the main focus and does it draw the mind's eye. Are you over colouring – to many themes – too few? is the main point being overshadowed by a distraction element in the foreground or background.
    And lastly, Frame it.

    Intro, mid point and end footer (Conclusion).


    This is a computer game, I am not writing a thesis. It is not worth all the trouble you are indicating. Come on get a life!!!

    #202984
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 11 2010,09:48)
    To all,

    AGAIN AND AGAIN… Why do you all never learn.

    Worship is ONLY to God.

    All else is “OBEISANCE”.

    “Worship the Father (God) – Honor the King (Jesus)”

    What do you read:” When he again bring his firstborn into the world he says “All the Angel to do obesiance to him” – Where does it include MANKIND…?

    Martian, Your post is good but doesn't RAM home the points but leave room for others to pry your argument apart. You need to be tighter…

    Try to focus and be in the Spirit. have a complete vision of what you are posting – like writing a picture… check your perspectives, your gradient lines, your horizons and balance, top left, bottom right.  What is the main focus and does it draw the mind's eye. Are you over colouring – to many themes – too few? is the main point being overshadowed by a distraction element in the foreground or background.
    And lastly, Frame it.

    Intro, mid point and end footer (Conclusion).


    You know my Husband has asked that Question a long time ago!!!!!! He does not post any longer because of just that point.  No one is here to learn.  They all just want to do their own thing….But for you…. You have no right to tell anybody how to make a post?  We are not written a book here!!!! We are discussing the precious Word of God and more!!!! You tend to be always criticizing others.  In my book that is not what we or I want.  I want what is written in Scriptures.  No matter how it comes out….. It is the interpretation of that Scripture is what bothers me the most.  When it says He come from Heaven for instance so many make something else out of it.  Or the firstborn of creation, is not firstborn of creation, but firstborn to be resurrected, which is not so.  That is firstborn of the death.  So on and on we go and never come to any understanding.  I asked Marty to go face to face with this subject and take one Scripture at the time, He just does not want to debate…..  What is this we are doing then??????   Today I learned something that surprised me very much and I have got no answer jet….. but that is not unusual for Nick to do.  Lets all be  little bit polite with each other.  I don't think that any of us know it all…As far as worship is concerned those who do not believe in a trinity, do not worship our Savior .   He does deserve to be honored and praised though.. Peace and Love to you Irene

    #202985
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 10 2010,17:12)

    Quote (Arnold @ July 10 2010,07:49)
    If you are game let' us debate this head on  with just you.  I think Mike would also like that….One Point at the time. One Scripture at the time.  Are you for it???? Irene


    Hi Irene and Marty,

    Yes, I would love to watch you debate this point one scripture or point at a time.  I think HN is full of people just posting their thoughts and interpretations over and over, but it seems no one wants to break it down to the “brass tacks” when someone else challenges those thoughts.

    For example, someone may state, “Jesus only pre-existed as a foreordained thought in God's mind.”  But does that mean that Jesus returned to his former glory as a “thought in God's mind”?

    John 17:5 says,
    So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.

    Can a thought of God be “in His presence”?  NetNotes says,

    1 tn Or “in your presence”; Grk “with yourself.” The use of παρά (para) twice in this verse looks back to the assertion in John 1:1 that the Word (the Λόγος [Logos], who became Jesus of Nazareth in 1:14) was with God (πρὸς τὸν θεόν, pro” ton qeon). Whatever else may be said, the statement in 17:5 strongly asserts the preexistence of Jesus Christ.

    Anyway yeah, I would like to see this broken down by both of you – for what that's worth.  :)

    peace and love,
    mike


    Mike! I have no idea why it is so hard for some to come to terms with certain Scriptures. I do appreciate all the inderstanding that you show…… Irene

    #202994
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Arnold @ July 11 2010,11:27)
    Mike! I have no idea why it is so hard for some to come to terms with certain Scriptures. I do appreciate all the inderstanding that you show…… Irene


    :)

    #203145
    karmarie
    Participant

    To all,

    “did Jesus pre-exist”

    Obviously yes, the scriptures seem to suggest it. But, isnt it time to move on into the future to build on the foundations than dwell in a mysterious unknown past?

    Jesus spoke the WORDS his father gave him,

    Words…..If I spoke or wrote to someone id never met in person, all I have is their words.

    The question is, “what WAS IT with his words”

    They had 'divine eminence',

    a foundation for others to build on, I think I get it now. Are they being built on?

    They either flourish and grow – or wither and fade.

    Like a true friend you love they're 'part of your life'

    “The word was made flesh”

    (carry on).

    #203147
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Arnold,

    The reason you are upset is so that you can continue with your false doctrine.

    When the truth hits a man (“Well, I am no man” -hero daughter of a King to the chief Ringwraith – Lord of the Rings) it is often hard to stomach that all that time he has been wrong. natural kneejerk reaction is to bite back.

    It's ok, I understand. I do not write for those who do not need wisdom, but to those who seek it.
    For even wisdom, wisdom without authority, is foolishness from that one whom speaks it!
    Just as wisdom, wisdom even with authority, is foolishness to some of them who hears it!

    #203170
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ July 11 2010,11:21)

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 11 2010,09:48)
    To all,

    AGAIN AND AGAIN… Why do you all never learn.

    Worship is ONLY to God.

    All else is “OBEISANCE”.

    “Worship the Father (God) – Honor the King (Jesus)”

    What do you read:” When he again bring his firstborn into the world he says “All the Angel to do obesiance to him” – Where does it include MANKIND…?

    Martian, Your post is good but doesn't RAM home the points but leave room for others to pry your argument apart. You need to be tighter…

    Try to focus and be in the Spirit. have a complete vision of what you are posting – like writing a picture… check your perspectives, your gradient lines, your horizons and balance, top left, bottom right.  What is the main focus and does it draw the mind's eye. Are you over colouring – to many themes – too few? is the main point being overshadowed by a distraction element in the foreground or background.
    And lastly, Frame it.

    Intro, mid point and end footer (Conclusion).


    You know my Husband has asked that Question a long time ago!!!!!! He does not post any longer because of just that point.  No one is here to learn.  They all just want to do their own thing….But for you…. You have no right to tell anybody how to make a post?  We are not written a book here!!!! We are discussing the precious Word of God and more!!!! You tend to be always criticizing others.  In my book that is not what we or I want.  I want what is written in Scriptures.  No matter how it comes out….. It is the interpretation of that Scripture is what bothers me the most.  When it says He come from Heaven for instance so many make something else out of it.  Or the firstborn of creation, is not firstborn of creation, but firstborn to be resurrected, which is not so.  That is firstborn of the death.  So on and on we go and never come to any understanding.  I asked Marty to go face to face with this subject and take one Scripture at the time, He just does not want to debate…..  What is this we are doing then??????   Today I learned something that surprised me very much and I have got no answer jet….. but that is not unusual for Nick to do.  Lets all be  little bit polite with each other.  I don't think that any of us know it all…As far as worship is concerned those who do not believe in a trinity, do not worship our Savior .   He does deserve to be honored and praised though.. Peace and Love to you Irene


    I know Irene is not engaging with me right now so I post this for those that actually want to know the truth.

    Irene says –
    I want what is written in Scriptures. No matter how it comes out….. It is the interpretation of that Scripture is what bothers me the most.
    Reply-
    I really wish you really wanted what scripture says. The problem is that you have no interpretation of scripture. You read what an English interpreter has written or go by what some one else has said and roll it around in your Greek thinking mind and think you know something.
    You have never considered the culture or history of the Bible. You act as if it was written ten years ago in America instead of 1000 years ago in a complete different culture. You do not follow any rules of interpretation except what you think is correct. You do no study and except no correction from those that do.
    As far as those unwilling to learn you are chief among them. What you accuse others of doing is your normal method of operation.
    You have no clue what firstborn of creation means outside of your English culture and translation. You go no farther because you do not care to change your opinion no matter what proof is stacked up against it. You ignore scriptures that speak of the same subject as “sent from heaven” because they put your theory to the test and you are unwilling to have your theory tested. You have ignored answering all the questions that your theory produces because you do not know the answers. Like what happened to the memories and experiences of Christ from his prior life or how much did his prior experience effect his walk on Earth. You ignore the most basic of Christ ministries to be our example by making him something other then normal humanity.

    Worst of all if you truly do not believe that Christ physically rose from the dead, in his mortal body, then you risk not being saved at all.

    To tell you the truth debating with you has been very much like the experiences I have had when Moonies or Mormons have come to my door. They have their plastic smile and just repeat the same rhetoric over and over again. Brainwashed and lost.

    #203171
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (martian @ July 12 2010,02:37)
    You have no clue what firstborn of creation means outside of your English culture and translation. You go no farther because you do not care to change your opinion no matter what proof is stacked up against it.


    Hi Martian,

    Wow, that's a lot of accusation for one post!  I detect that you are among those who have to come up with alternate meanings for “only begotten Son of God” and “firstborn of all creation” and “the beginning of the creation of God” to make your understanding fit in with scripture.  You do make a good point that we should try to understand what “firstborn of every creature” and “begotten of God” meant 2000 years ago when it was written.  

    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,

    This is a man who grew up less than 300 years after Jesus speaking the same language that the NT was written in and was a learned Bible student and teacher – and he took “firstborn of every creature” to literally mean Jesus was “the firstborn of every creature BEFORE ALL THE AGES”.

    Neither of these early church fathers seemed to think that “firstborn of every creature” meant “preeminent over mankind” or “begotten of God” meant Jesus was “placed in an esteemed postition by God” like the newer trinitarian scholars like to claim.

    There's the support for my and Irene's understanding of what “firstborn of all creation” REALLY meant in the scriptures.  Where's your proof that the Greek words mean something different than their literal translation?

    peace and love,
    mike

    #203177
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    LOL…it amuses me how you keep citing quotes that refute what you're trying to prove. You do understand, Mike, that if a personage exists before time He is, by definition, timeless in His origin, don't you?

    :D

    #203182
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 12 2010,04:00)

    Quote (martian @ July 12 2010,02:37)
    You have no clue what firstborn of creation means outside of your English culture and translation. You go no farther because you do not care to change your opinion no matter what proof is stacked up against it.


    Hi Martian,

    Wow, that's a lot of accusation for one post!  I detect that you are among those who have to come up with alternate meanings for “only begotten Son of God” and “firstborn of all creation” and “the beginning of the creation of God” to make your understanding fit in with scripture.  You do make a good point that we should try to understand what “firstborn of every creature” and “begotten of God” meant 2000 years ago when it was written.  

    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,

    This is a man who grew up less than 300 years after Jesus speaking the same language that the NT was written in and was a learned Bible student and teacher – and he took “firstborn of every creature” to literally mean Jesus was “the firstborn of every creature BEFORE ALL THE AGES”.

    Neither of these early church fathers seemed to think that “firstborn of every creature” meant “preeminent over mankind” or “begotten of God” meant Jesus was “placed in an esteemed postition by God” like the newer trinitarian scholars like to claim.

    There's the support for my and Irene's understanding of what “firstborn of all creation” REALLY meant in the scriptures.  Where's your proof that the Greek words mean something different than their literal translation?

    peace and love,
    mike


    I am not interested in trying to fit my doctrine into scripture. I leave that to the Trinitarians and the preexisiters. What I am interested in is what scripture says within it's original languages, culture and history. Explanations of the firstborn have been made several times that include these things. They were ignored.

    Here it is —
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….st=7930

Viewing 20 posts - 8,001 through 8,020 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account