Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,401 through 7,420 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #197256
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 16 2010,10:25)
    Jack,

    God does not 'become' anything.

    God does not change, so how can he 'become'. He 'Is'.

    The YHVH, means 'he was, is and always will be'
    It means, 'He is'.
    It means, 'He will be'…always…

    “I will be what I Am'
    “I am what I Am”
    “I am what I Will be”
    “I will be what I will be”

    It's not about change to become, in fact it's the opposite. It is 'None Change'. A rock, how do you cling to a rock that changes…? How can you believe in a God that can Change, if He can change then He is not complete, is not final (Think if your thesis, a perfect thesis, why would you dumb it down, perfection dumbed dowm, no way…then why apply it, you and WJ, to God Almighty?)


    I agree. YHWH means He exists. It is to say that God exists and will continue to exist, unchanging non morpheable to human or anything else.

    #197261
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ June 16 2010,11:09)
    Some try to say that God had to become a man in order understand our suffering and sacrifice himself for our salvation.  Firstly God understands us. He created us. Sacrificing oneself is a deep concept. We give medals to men in service that do such things. I wonder how many of those men would be willing to sacrifice their son for the same reasons?
    I cannot believe that any man would be able to sacrifice even their own imperfect sons. How much more difficult would it be for God to sacrifice his perfect son. A son that had fulfilled all he ask of him. A son that had never disappointed his father and always done what pleased him. If I had a son like that it would be much more difficult for me to sacrifice my son then to give up my life.
    God does not need to prove his sacrifice by become mortal and dieing. He made a more meaningful sacrifice in his perfect son.


    The fact that God created us does not imply that He can understand us. The book of Hebrews says our high priest can be “touched with the feeling” of our infirmities.  If God could not become a man, then He could not be “touched with the feeling” of our infirmities and Jesus understands us better than God Himself. I repeat: Martian's view implies that Jesus understands us better than God.

    Martian's view is gnostic because he denies that God can become one of us. His view is deistic because he denies that God could get personally involved. God had to send someone else who could get personally involved.

    This is the problem with the anti-christian view. It was Christ who personally suffered. So how can God be my personal Savior if Christ was not God? Our personal Savior must be the very one who personally suffered.

    Martian's assertion that God understands us just because He is our creator is not verifiable if Jesus was not God. Martian has to find how he can demonstrate that God understands us. Bare assertion is not enough!

    Kangaroo Jack

    #197268
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KJ,
    Is it gnostic to disagree with what scripture does not say?
    God was not Jesus.

    God must suffer for you to be saved? Now that is gnostic

    #197282
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 16 2010,11:41)

    Quote (martian @ June 16 2010,11:09)
    Some try to say that God had to become a man in order understand our suffering and sacrifice himself for our salvation.  Firstly God understands us. He created us. Sacrificing oneself is a deep concept. We give medals to men in service that do such things. I wonder how many of those men would be willing to sacrifice their son for the same reasons?
    I cannot believe that any man would be able to sacrifice even their own imperfect sons. How much more difficult would it be for God to sacrifice his perfect son. A son that had fulfilled all he ask of him. A son that had never disappointed his father and always done what pleased him. If I had a son like that it would be much more difficult for me to sacrifice my son then to give up my life.
    God does not need to prove his sacrifice by become mortal and dieing. He made a more meaningful sacrifice in his perfect son.


    The fact that God created us does not imply that He can understand us. The book of Hebrews says our high priest can be “touched with the feeling” of our infirmities.  If God could not become a man, then He could not be “touched with the feeling” of our infirmities and Jesus understands us better than God Himself. I repeat: Martian's view implies that Jesus understands us better than God.

    Martian's view is gnostic because he denies that God can become one of us. His view is deistic because he denies that God could get personally involved. God had to send someone else who could get personally involved.

    This is the problem with the anti-christian view. It was Christ who personally suffered. So how can God be my personal Savior if Christ was not God? Our personal Savior must be the very one who personally suffered.

    Martian's assertion that God understands us just because He is our creator is not verifiable if Jesus was not God. Martian has to find how he can demonstrate that God understands us. Bare assertion is not enough!

    Kangaroo Jack


    JK

    in your world the King serves the individual,even the lowest of them,

    in God s world ,God bring to you the way to achieve your acceptance to him so he may give you your live back,if not you lose.
    who are men to be of any value to God unless he can use them in his world not ours.

    God is God and men is only men no comparison.

    Pierre

    #197309
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 16 2010,12:16)
    Hi KJ,
    Is it gnostic to disagree with what scripture does not say?
    God was not Jesus.

    God must suffer for you to be saved? Now that is gnostic


    Hi brother Nick,
    I wonder who is Gnostic here. Everyone blames the other. Can you see how Christianity has become a mess. They left the true religion of Israel.

    Please think over
    Adam

    #197312
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GM,
    But you never had access to their hope.
    You do have in the perfect Jew Jesus but it seems you have no faith in him.

    #197314
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Brother Terra, and Martian, are right.

    And Nick is right.

    Jesus came as a witness of God, a witness to God.

    Jesus himself says that he speaks what the father taught him to speak.

    Silly point, but how is Jesus 'God' if God taught him.

    The answer is 'not'.

    Only by forcing scriptures can Jesus be 'God'. Even, even, even, if,…even if, Jesus were God, scriptures says he 'emptied himself and became man in then flesh'. This means he would no longer be 'God' but 'man'.

    Scriptures also says that anyone who does not believe that Jesus came (Jesus, not God) in the flesh, suffered, died and was raised again by God, is denying God and condemns Jesus. Basically, calling God a liar and desiring that Jesus be again crucified for that person's sake alone.

    God cannot change, God cannot die. To die is also to change and God does not change state.

    Ha! If God died as Jesus, where then is the Trinity?

    #197350

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:01)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2010,09:11)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,16:44)
    WJ,

    God does not become anything he wants to be.

    God does not change.

    God changes neither his mind nor his person.

    What other thing can God become. Everything is 'Within' God, what need is there ever, for God to become something within himself. If he were to do that then he would not be God.

    Does a field marshall become one of the troops?Does a Man become a Child, or a Woman?

    God nearly always does his work through a third party. The main 'third party' is his Son, Jesus Christ, his 'perfect servant' and begotten heir.
    (In the film, 'The Godfather', did the Godfather, once he became the Godfather) ever do anything 'outside'? No, he 'spoke' and the Caporegime (The Princes) acted out his 'Word' on his behalf


    JA

    To say that God cannot change form or be what he wants is to limit God.

    It is a false concept that God cannot interact and become one with his creation if he so chooses!

    It is also false to believe that God created something out of nothing, for everything that came into being came from him who is the source of all things!

    Would you limit God to be less than his Angels, when even the Angels can appear as a man?

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form.

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ


    How idiotic is this post !!!!!
    WJ and others continue to preach lies about God. They teach a God other then the true Christian God. There are things that God cannot do. Not because he is lacking in power as WJ says I project but because his nature does not permit Him to change from who he is.

    Why do you misrepresent me?  ???

    This is what I said…

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form“.

    To say that God cannot come down to meet man in his level though it be by an Angel or Man or to appear as a man as the Angels can, is to limit God!

    Your God is unreachable! Moses saw the backside of God, because he could not look on his face.

    Yet do you believe that the infinite God in all of his Glory is what Moses saw or was it a visible image of the invisible God?

    You guys believe that Jesus could change his visage so that what they saw looked like a Spirit, yet God cannot take on form without diminishing his immutable qualities?  ???

    What a small God you serve!

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ

    #197351

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:04)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2010,09:17)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,17:07)
    'Jesus' EMPTIED himself of hid Divinity and became wholly man….A perfect Man, as 'perfect' in form as God had created Adam.


    JA where is the scripture for this?

    Jesus did not empty himself of his nature!

    It's interesting that you think that Jesus could “change his nature” but that the Father couldn't change his nature? :)

    Hello!

    WJ


    We do agreed upon that.  Phil 2 has nothing to do with God emptying anything. It has to do with “attitude” as the context clearly says. It is a direct comparison between the first Adam and the second Adam (Christ)


    Martian

    Thanks, but no we do not agree!

    If Jesus could “empty himself” (which has nothing to do with changing his divine nature) and come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man, as the text clearly indicates, that in itself is proof of his Deity, The Greek text clearly reveals that it is Jesus performing the act!

    WJ

    #197359
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To All……….Question that needs to be answered, Did Jesus come as a morphed being? When John said whoever does not confess Jesus as (COMING)) in the Flesh is not of GOD. Now What is the intent of the word (coming) is it coming into existence as flesh being or is it be morphed into a flesh being from one state to another state. The gnostic who existed at the time of John were saying Jesus was a (GOD) and came from the Pelora to straighten out what the first GOD screwed up. They believe he only appeared as a Man but was in disguise and was really the true GOD. Much like Trinitarians and Preexistences believe.

    But John or for that matter (NO) apostle ever said Jesus preexisted his berth except for the foreordained plan of GOD, as Peter brought out Now would not they have known and spoken about this it indeed Jesus preexisted his berth on earth as some kind of angel or demigod ?.

    Jesus did speak of his (predestined) Glory that He had with the Father before the World began, he knew full well he was the (FIRST) Man to be perfected (BY) GOD and raised to eternal Life, from all Humanity , the first and with that the position afforded him (BY) GOD the Father who exulted Him above His brothers as scriptures say. But none of this has anything to do with a Preexistence as some kind of BEING or ancient past demigod or angelic existence.

    The Whole concept of Jesus' preexistence was developed by TRINITARIANS forcing and altering the text to create another GOD, a MAN GOD. It is nothing but an absolute LIE read 2Ths2 and ask GOD to understand it, it is plain to those who have eyes to see it, it is all written right there by Paul , and John backed this up also. IMO

    peace and love to you all…………………gene

    #197361

    Hi JA

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    WJ,

    I am tempted to call you a 'joke' for someone whom claims to be a pastor, but I won't.


    You just did! :D

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    First off, I never said God created something out of nothing. Where did you get that from. I said everything is within God…did you not read that part? I wrote a whole 'thing on what God is', i guess you can't have read it.


    I never said you did, I was merely making a point. Man grow up and settle down, you get your blood pressure up to easily! :)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    Secondly, WHY…why would the creator want to change…you keep going on about 'limiting God'. How is God limited when He IS everything, everything Is of Him. Why would the houseowner want to become a tenant in his own house? Who then would be the owner? Understand with wisdom WJ.

    Did you not understand the simili with the Godfather? Or did you choose to ignore it?


    You are going off the deep end again. Read with comprehension JA, this is what I said…

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form“.

    Seriously, are you saying God cannot appear to man in a form that would not kill him? If so then your God is unreachable!

    The Angels can change form and still be the Angel, right?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    Arrggh…'God come in the form of sinful flesh'… Excuse me? Are you for real? Please read that again and ask yourself what is wrong with that statement?


    Plenty, but that is not what I said is it? This is what I said…

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    You should quote me, you know that little button on the right top of the post?

    I merely quoted the scriptures. Here I’ll take my time to show you…

    For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness (homoiōma) of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: Rom 8:3

    The Greek word for “likeness” is homoiōma which means;

    1) that which has been made after the likeness of something
    a) a figure, image, likeness, representation
    b) likeness i.e. resemblance, such as amounts almost to equality or identity

    Paul is not saying Jesus was in sinful flesh, for if he was then his blood would be tainted with sin and he could not be the Sinless, Pure and perfect Lamb of God!

    That is the same word that is used in Phil 2:7…

    But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made (ginomai) in the likeness (homoiōma) of men: Phil 2:7

    The Greek word ‘made’ is “ginomai” which means…

    1) to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to be, receive being
    2) to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen

    Then we read…

    And being found in fashion (schēma) as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Phil 2:8

    The word fashion is the Greek word ‘schēma’ which means;

    1) the habitus, as comprising everything in a person which strikes the senses, the figure, bearing, discourse, actions, manner of life etc.

    Now this is what I said…

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    So let’s put this all together.

    In the beginning was the Word (who was in very nature God Phil 2:6) and the Word was with God and the Word was God. (in very nature God, of the same essence as the Father, who is also in very nature God. Heb 1:3, Phil 2:6) John 1:1

    And the Word (who is in very nature God was made (ginomai-came into existence Phil 2:7) (in the likeness of sinful Rom 8:3, Phil 2:7, ) flesh, and dwelt (Greek-tabernacle) among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. (The Word/ God revealing Glory in the likeness of sinful flesh)

    Again, I said…

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    So please explain to me how my exegesis is not scriptural?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)

    I think you are confusing scripture verses that say God will come to his people, or similar. It is not the 'person' of God that comes but His Word, what He spoke, the testament that He spoke to His Son.


    So Moses and Abraham did not see or speak to God but just his word, not the person of God?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    You, at one point adhere to this, and in another claim it is God himself…man, you are all over the place.


    Please, show me how?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    Where does it say Jesus emptied himself of his divinity…WJ, should I even answer this?


    Yes that is the question isn’t it? But scripturally you can’t answer it because the scriptures do not say that he “emptied himself of his Divinity or his Divine nature. As I said…

    It's interesting that you think that Jesus could “change his nature” but that the Father couldn't change his nature?:)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    You know what, no, I won't… You ask, only because you are attempting to deny a very basic scriptural truth, how odd?


    What scriptural truth are you talking about? That Jesus changed his nature? Do you believe in reincarnation?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    And you quote God's name as if you are making a revelation. But you are wrong. That is not what it means. It means He is who he Is. And that is an indescribable entity that can only be 'seen' by sinless flesh or spirit. It doesn't mean that He is 'different things' as He wants,  that is not 'God'.  


    Then Moses and the others were telling lies?

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    WJ, why do you not quote scriptures where God say that He does not change…and that is right: God does not change, neither His mind, nor his form. If one claims that Jesus is 'perfect' then what of God Almighty?


    You ask for scriptures but you show none for your statements above.

    What Bible are you reading? God surely has changed his mind and his form.

    The immutable qualities of God's character cannot change but he can interact with his creation and change his form to whatever he cares to.

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,18:09)
    WJ, try to be true to Truth and not just make out nonesense just to cause dispute.


    Relax man! Am I not free to express my views here? :D

    WJ

    #197362

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 16 2010,09:55)
    To All……….Question that needs to be answered, Did Jesus come as a morphed being? When John said whoever does not confess Jesus as (COMING)) in the Flesh is not of GOD.  Now What is the intent of the word (coming) is it coming into existence as flesh being or is it be morphed into a flesh being from one state to another state. The gnostic who existed at the time of John were saying Jesus was a (GOD) and came from the Pelora to straighten out what the first GOD screwed up.  They believe he only appeared as a Man but was in disguise  and was really the true GOD. Much like Trinitarians and Preexistences believe.

    But John or for that matter (NO) apostle ever said Jesus preexisted his berth except for the foreordained plan of GOD, as Peter brought out Now would not they have known and spoken about this it indeed Jesus preexisted his berth on earth as some kind of angel or demigod ?.  

    Jesus did speak of his (predestined) Glory that He had with the Father before the World began, he knew full well he was the (FIRST) Man to be perfected (BY) GOD and raised to eternal Life, from all Humanity , the first and with that the position afforded him (BY) GOD the Father who exulted Him above His brothers as scriptures say. But none of this has anything to do with a Preexistence as some kind of BEING or ancient past demigod or angelic existence.

    The Whole concept of Jesus' preexistence was developed by TRINITARIANS forcing and altering the text to create another GOD, a MAN GOD. It is nothing but an absolute LIE read 2Ths2 and ask GOD to understand it, it is plain to those who have eyes to see it, it is all written right there by Paul , and John backed this up also. IMO

    peace and love to you all…………………gene


    Gene

    What you speak is fallacy and a strawmans argument!

    If God can live in a man and speak through him, then God could live in a body of his own and speak to man.

    Jesus blood and body is the blood and body of God. Acts 20:28

    God was manifest in the flesh! 1 Tim 3:16, John 14:7

    WJ

    #197363

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:48)
    He has met him in a salvation experience. I have no doubt that he has had some success in overcoming the evil one (despite his false doctrine) however I do doubt he knows the one who is from the beginning or he could never attempt to prove that this Christian God could change his character or mortality or worse yet that the real God could stop being God.


    That’s not at all what I said was it? Why do you deceitfully misrepresent me? It is the enemy’s tricks to bear false witness!

    Wow I had no Idea that I would stir up so much hostility! HMMM, that was normally the reaction of the Pharisees and the Sadusees when Jesus spoke the truth!

    “Sad-U-See”, :D

    WJ

    #197368
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ…….Being manifested (IN) the flesh is not the same as (BEING) Flesh now is it , so are you saying what the Gnostic's were saying that Jesus was GOD and only appeared to be in flesh form, it that more accurate in you Trinitarian belief system. So you and the Gnostic's have a lot in common right?. You both Believe Jesus is a GOD and appeared in flesh form, and in deed the Trinity concept did spring into existence through the Gnostic's. But John disagree with them it appears, he said if we don niot see Jesus as a flesh being we are (NOT) of GOD. So where do you stand WJ.

    peace and love to you and your…………………..gene

    #197369
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,02:21)

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:48)
    He has met him in a salvation experience. I have no doubt that he has had some success in overcoming the evil one (despite his false doctrine) however I do doubt he knows the one who is from the beginning or he could never attempt to prove that this Christian God could change his character or mortality or worse yet that the real God could stop being God.


    That’s not at all what I said was it? Why do you deceitfully misrepresent me? It is the enemy’s tricks to bear false witness!

    Wow I had no Idea that I would stir up so much hostility! HMMM, that was normally the reaction of the Pharisees and the Sadusees when Jesus spoke the truth!

    “Sad-U-See”, :D

    WJ


    You say you do not say God can become mortal yet in the post right previous to this on you say “Jesus blood and body is the blood and body of God. Acts 20:28” So you say God has blood and a body. Sure sounds like you are calling God mortal to me.
    As I have said your interpretation of that verse must be wrong if your end conclusion changes the nature or character of God.
    Thank you for proving yourself wrong so clearly.

    #197370

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 16 2010,10:29)
    WJ…….Being manifested (IN) the flesh is not the same as (BEING) Flesh now is it , so are you saying what the Gnostic's were saying that Jesus was GOD and only appeared to be in flesh form, it that more accurate in you Trinitarian belief system. So you and the Gnostic's have a lot in common right?.  You both Believe Jesus is a GOD and appeared in flesh form, and in deed the Trinity concept did spring into existence through the Gnostic's.  But John disagree with them it appears, he said if we don niot see Jesus as a flesh being we are (NOT) of GOD. So where do you stand WJ.

    peace and love to you and your…………………..gene


    So what did Jesus mean when he said…

    If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. John 14:7

    If God cannot appear in the flesh?

    WJ

    #197372

    Quote (martian @ June 16 2010,10:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,02:21)

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:48)
    He has met him in a salvation experience. I have no doubt that he has had some success in overcoming the evil one (despite his false doctrine) however I do doubt he knows the one who is from the beginning or he could never attempt to prove that this Christian God could change his character or mortality or worse yet that the real God could stop being God.


    That’s not at all what I said was it? Why do you deceitfully misrepresent me? It is the enemy’s tricks to bear false witness!

    Wow I had no Idea that I would stir up so much hostility! HMMM, that was normally the reaction of the Pharisees and the Sadusees when Jesus spoke the truth!

    “Sad-U-See”, :D

    WJ


    You say you do not say God can become mortal yet in the post right previous to this on you say “Jesus blood and body is the blood and body of God. Acts 20:28”  So you say God has blood and a body. Sure sounds like you are calling God mortal to me.
    As I have said your interpretation of that verse must be wrong if your end conclusion changes the nature or character of God.
    Thank you for proving yourself wrong so clearly.


    Martian

    What does Acts 20:28 say?

    Does “of God” mean anything to you? The scriptures clearly teach that “our bodies are his temple”. They also teach that our bodies are our tabernacle or tent, or like clothes that can be put off and changed!

    So God is a Spirit who can live in a “body” (temple) of flesh, can he not?

    WJ

    #197373
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,00:34)

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:01)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2010,09:11)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,16:44)
    WJ,

    God does not become anything he wants to be.

    God does not change.

    God changes neither his mind nor his person.

    What other thing can God become. Everything is 'Within' God, what need is there ever, for God to become something within himself. If he were to do that then he would not be God.

    Does a field marshall become one of the troops?Does a Man become a Child, or a Woman?

    God nearly always does his work through a third party. The main 'third party' is his Son, Jesus Christ, his 'perfect servant' and begotten heir.
    (In the film, 'The Godfather', did the Godfather, once he became the Godfather) ever do anything 'outside'? No, he 'spoke' and the Caporegime (The Princes) acted out his 'Word' on his behalf


    JA

    To say that God cannot change form or be what he wants is to limit God.

    It is a false concept that God cannot interact and become one with his creation if he so chooses!

    It is also false to believe that God created something out of nothing, for everything that came into being came from him who is the source of all things!

    Would you limit God to be less than his Angels, when even the Angels can appear as a man?

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form.

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ


    How idiotic is this post !!!!!
    WJ and others continue to preach lies about God. They teach a God other then the true Christian God. There are things that God cannot do. Not because he is lacking in power as WJ says I project but because his nature does not permit Him to change from who he is.

    Why do you misrepresent me?  ???

    This is what I said…

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form“.

    To say that God cannot come down to meet man in his level though it be by an Angel or Man or to appear as a man as the Angels can, is to limit God!

    Your God is unreachable! Moses saw the backside of God, because he could not look on his face.

    Yet do you believe that the infinite God in all of his Glory is what Moses saw or was it a visible image of the invisible God?

    You guys believe that Jesus could change his visage so that what they saw looked like a Spirit, yet God cannot take on form without diminishing his immutable qualities?  ???

    What a small God you serve!

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ


    Yet if as you say he cannot change his character then he could never be tempted. To be tempted one must be capable of sin. Was Jesus tempted like all other men or not.
    You play with words all the time. You say his character cannot change yet demand his character change to be a temptable being.
    Double talk and nonsense.

    #197374
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,02:38)

    Quote (martian @ June 16 2010,10:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,02:21)

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:48)
    He has met him in a salvation experience. I have no doubt that he has had some success in overcoming the evil one (despite his false doctrine) however I do doubt he knows the one who is from the beginning or he could never attempt to prove that this Christian God could change his character or mortality or worse yet that the real God could stop being God.


    That’s not at all what I said was it? Why do you deceitfully misrepresent me? It is the enemy’s tricks to bear false witness!

    Wow I had no Idea that I would stir up so much hostility! HMMM, that was normally the reaction of the Pharisees and the Sadusees when Jesus spoke the truth!

    “Sad-U-See”, :D

    WJ


    You say you do not say God can become mortal yet in the post right previous to this on you say “Jesus blood and body is the blood and body of God. Acts 20:28”  So you say God has blood and a body. Sure sounds like you are calling God mortal to me.
    As I have said your interpretation of that verse must be wrong if your end conclusion changes the nature or character of God.
    Thank you for proving yourself wrong so clearly.


    Martian

    What does Acts 20:28 say?

    Does “of God” mean anything to you? The scriptures clearly teach that “our bodies are his temple”. They also teach that our bodies are our tabernacle or tent, or like clothes that can be put off and changed!

    So God is a Spirit who can live in a “body” (temple) of flesh, can he not?

    WJ


    You would have a good point if it said “of God” It says “of own”.
    You presume it means of own self but that is based on your doctrine. I could as easily say it is his own son.

    #197375

    Quote (martian @ June 16 2010,10:42)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,00:34)

    Quote (martian @ June 15 2010,18:01)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2010,09:11)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 15 2010,16:44)
    WJ,

    God does not become anything he wants to be.

    God does not change.

    God changes neither his mind nor his person.

    What other thing can God become. Everything is 'Within' God, what need is there ever, for God to become something within himself. If he were to do that then he would not be God.

    Does a field marshall become one of the troops?Does a Man become a Child, or a Woman?

    God nearly always does his work through a third party. The main 'third party' is his Son, Jesus Christ, his 'perfect servant' and begotten heir.
    (In the film, 'The Godfather', did the Godfather, once he became the Godfather) ever do anything 'outside'? No, he 'spoke' and the Caporegime (The Princes) acted out his 'Word' on his behalf


    JA

    To say that God cannot change form or be what he wants is to limit God.

    It is a false concept that God cannot interact and become one with his creation if he so chooses!

    It is also false to believe that God created something out of nothing, for everything that came into being came from him who is the source of all things!

    Would you limit God to be less than his Angels, when even the Angels can appear as a man?

    So why is it hard to believe that God can come in the likeness of sinful flesh and be found in fashion as a man if he so chooses?

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form.

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ


    How idiotic is this post !!!!!
    WJ and others continue to preach lies about God. They teach a God other then the true Christian God. There are things that God cannot do. Not because he is lacking in power as WJ says I project but because his nature does not permit Him to change from who he is.

    Why do you misrepresent me?  ???

    This is what I said…

    Yes the immutable qualities of his character cannot change, but the creator of all things can appear or become what ever he wants by changing his form“.

    To say that God cannot come down to meet man in his level though it be by an Angel or Man or to appear as a man as the Angels can, is to limit God!

    Your God is unreachable! Moses saw the backside of God, because he could not look on his face.

    Yet do you believe that the infinite God in all of his Glory is what Moses saw or was it a visible image of the invisible God?

    You guys believe that Jesus could change his visage so that what they saw looked like a Spirit, yet God cannot take on form without diminishing his immutable qualities?  ???

    What a small God you serve!

    I-shall-be that I-shall-be.

    WJ


    Yet if as you say he cannot change his character then he could never be tempted. To be tempted one must be capable of sin. Was Jesus tempted like all other men or not.
    You play with words all the time. You say his character cannot change yet demand his character change to be a temptable being.
    Double talk and nonsense.


    We have already been over this.

    Jesus could not be tempted to sin! The Tempter did the Tempting.

    But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. James 1:14

    You apparently do not believe this scripture or Jesus words when he said satan comes and finds nothing in him.

    Jesus said it is not what goes in the man that defiles the man but what comes out of the man.

    What evil would you accuse Jesus of having in himself?

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 7,401 through 7,420 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account