Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,101 through 7,120 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #185814
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 02 2010,06:14)

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 31 2010,20:15)
    OK, here it is laid out before you. There is no excuse.

    One group here says that Jesus is God and part of the Trinity. This group adds to the Word of God, their words.
    Another group here says that Jesus did not have glory with the Father before the world begun. They deny what it means when Jesus said, “before Abraham, I am”. This group is taking away from scripture.

    So when these 2 groups spar over the issue of this topic, one group sees the other as taking away from the word of God and the other as adding to the word of God. So each group feels justified in their position, because they know the other group is wrong.

    Here is the kicker. YOU ARE BOTH WRONG and you can argue to the cows come home, but proving your opponent wrong doesn't equate to making your point right.

    Do you really need to discover this on Judgement Day, that there is no Trinity and that indeed the Word was with God and came in the flesh.

    I honestly do not expect that either group will be able to see the reality here and accept that there is no Trinity and that Jesus as the Word was with God before the world began. I am sure that pride will see to that. But you have been warned and so you have no excuse. So now, you await Judgement Day to see your error?

    Does anyone want to place a bet. One talent in the next life?  :D


    Hi t8,
    Touche' on your post with one exception…God can have a son who is as much his nature as God Himself.  We see it in the created world ALL the time.  One nature begets one of the same nature.  Thus if they both have the same nature, they are both deity albeit one is older than the other.  The Son of God will never have the unique quality of always existing and be the source of all things good but that doesn't mean that He isn't God, as the Son.  He isn't God as the Father, He is God as the Son of God would be.

    In the OT we see the Father and the Son.
    The Father is the Lord God
    The Son is the outstretched arm of the Lord God
    In the OT that combination was referred to as the only God…two beings together as the only God.  The Jews did not understand two beings together as being the only God…it was revealed when the Father bared His arm and revealed the Son in the NT.  Isaiah foresaw this glory and wrote about it, John also mentioned this.

    In the NT the two are distinguished as the Father and the Son…both being deity, one greater than the other.

    The Son revealed the Father and the Father reveals and continues to reveal the Son.

    When it all comes down at the end, the Almighty God and the Lamb are the temple…together as one temple for us.  Together they act as one rule.  Both are called God in Revelations but they both have taken different roles since the beginning.

    As I understand things, the Father was the designer and gave the commands, the Son carries them out faithfully and perfectly empowered and guided by the inner person of the Father-the Holy Spirit.


    LU

    you saying ;When it all comes down at the end, the Almighty God and the Lamb are the temple…together as one temple for us. Together they act as one rule. Both are called God in

    just think ,in a temple it takes ;a God = God the father

    a high priest = Jesus

    services priests = 144 000

    total temple = the heavenly

    Jerusalem .

    thats the way i see it in scriptures

    #185817
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,10:51)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,18:37)
    I know that Jesus came down from heaven.  First of all his body was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is the Sprit of God my Father whose throne is in heaven.  Secondly, the spirit of the Son is the Word of God which he learned to obey and did obey even unto death of the cross.  This Word that he obeyed came down from heaven.  It was God who was speaking to humanity through Jesus and it was God who was dwelling within him that he was obeying.


    Hi All

    This is a total denial of the Greek text and Greek Grammatical rules which do not allow for this kind of translation.

    If it did the Translators could have took the liberty to do so, but no credible translation reads what is made in these statements!

    Blessings WJ


    Hi WJ:

    But the scriptures support that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost, and that God was dwelling within in him and speaking the Word of God to humanity. Do you deny this?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #185822
    942767
    Participant

    Hi WJ:

    Ok., show me what it means that “he came down from heaven”, and show me “how he came down from heaven”.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #185827

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,19:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,10:51)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,18:37)
    I know that Jesus came down from heaven.  First of all his body was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is the Sprit of God my Father whose throne is in heaven.  Secondly, the spirit of the Son is the Word of God which he learned to obey and did obey even unto death of the cross.  This Word that he obeyed came down from heaven.  It was God who was speaking to humanity through Jesus and it was God who was dwelling within him that he was obeying.


    Hi All

    This is a total denial of the Greek text and Greek Grammatical rules which do not allow for this kind of translation.

    If it did the Translators could have took the liberty to do so, but no credible translation reads what is made in these statements!

    Blessings WJ


    Hi WJ:

    But the scriptures support that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost, and that God was dwelling within in him and speaking the Word of God to humanity.  Do you deny this?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    You are only speaking half truths and not the whole council of God, for instance you say Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost but you leave out the fact that it was a virgin that the Holy Spirit created his body in.

    The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. Job 33:4

    The Father prepared a body for Jesus so that Jesus the Word that was with the Father could come into this world by taking on the likeness of sinful flesh! John 1:1, 14 – Phil 2:6-8 – Heb 10:5

    Every conception is a part of the creation process. The Holy Spirit caused the conception and the Power of the highest over shadowed her. Luke 1:35

    The miracle of the incarnation of Jesus is why Jesus is the second Adam!

    WJ

    #185833

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,19:28)
    Hi WJ:

    Ok., show me what it means that “he came down from heaven”, and show me “how he came down from heaven”.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    I started a thread to address this very thing in the debates thread.

    So I will be happy to continue that conversation there when you answer my last post!

    WJ

    #185836
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,11:41)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,19:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,10:51)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,18:37)
    I know that Jesus came down from heaven.  First of all his body was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is the Sprit of God my Father whose throne is in heaven.  Secondly, the spirit of the Son is the Word of God which he learned to obey and did obey even unto death of the cross.  This Word that he obeyed came down from heaven.  It was God who was speaking to humanity through Jesus and it was God who was dwelling within him that he was obeying.


    Hi All

    This is a total denial of the Greek text and Greek Grammatical rules which do not allow for this kind of translation.

    If it did the Translators could have took the liberty to do so, but no credible translation reads what is made in these statements!

    Blessings WJ


    Hi WJ:

    But the scriptures support that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost, and that God was dwelling within in him and speaking the Word of God to humanity.  Do you deny this?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    You are only speaking half truths and not the whole council of God, for instance you say Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost but you leave out the fact that it was a virgin that the Holy Spirit created his body in.

    The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. Job 33:4

    The Father prepared a body for Jesus so that Jesus the Word that was with the Father could come into this world by taking on the likeness of sinful flesh! John 1:1, 14 – Phil 2:6-8 – Heb 10:5

    Every conception is a part of the creation process. The Holy Spirit caused the conception and the Power of the highest over shadowed her. Luke 1:35

    The miracle of the incarnation of Jesus is why Jesus is the second Adam!

    WJ


    Hi WJ:

    And so, I spoke a half truth because I failed to mention that the Holy Ghost overshadowed the virgin Mary and the body of Jesus was conceived in her womb?

    The point was to show how he came from heaven, and so, if what I have written is not true, show me how he came down from heaven or even if what I said is a half truth. Expound on it and give us the whole truth.

    And also, what he means in Hebrews 10 when he says to God, “a body thou has prepared for me”. What is he saying when he says “me”?

    And for you the kicker scripture, is Philippians 2:6. Show me how he was “in the form of God” prior to his birth into this world. That scripture does not read, “he was in the form of God before he was born into this world…”, and so, you are adding to the scriptures in order to support your doctrine.

    He is the last Adam, because He is the “Only Begotten Son of the Living God” who is the express image of God's person as manifest through the works that he did in obedience to God our heavenly Father. And we also, who are born again, are being made in his image as we learn to apply the Word of God in our daily life. We will be like him when he comes for the church if we continue in the faith.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #185837

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,20:18)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,11:41)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,19:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,10:51)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,18:37)
    I know that Jesus came down from heaven.  First of all his body was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is the Sprit of God my Father whose throne is in heaven.  Secondly, the spirit of the Son is the Word of God which he learned to obey and did obey even unto death of the cross.  This Word that he obeyed came down from heaven.  It was God who was speaking to humanity through Jesus and it was God who was dwelling within him that he was obeying.


    Hi All

    This is a total denial of the Greek text and Greek Grammatical rules which do not allow for this kind of translation.

    If it did the Translators could have took the liberty to do so, but no credible translation reads what is made in these statements!

    Blessings WJ


    Hi WJ:

    But the scriptures support that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost, and that God was dwelling within in him and speaking the Word of God to humanity.  Do you deny this?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    You are only speaking half truths and not the whole council of God, for instance you say Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost but you leave out the fact that it was a virgin that the Holy Spirit created his body in.

    The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. Job 33:4

    The Father prepared a body for Jesus so that Jesus the Word that was with the Father could come into this world by taking on the likeness of sinful flesh! John 1:1, 14 – Phil 2:6-8 – Heb 10:5

    Every conception is a part of the creation process. The Holy Spirit caused the conception and the Power of the highest over shadowed her. Luke 1:35

    The miracle of the incarnation of Jesus is why Jesus is the second Adam!

    WJ


    Hi WJ:

    And so, I spoke a half truth because I failed to mention that the Holy Ghost overshadowed the virgin Mary and the body of Jesus was conceived in her womb?

    The point was to show how he came from heaven, and so, if what I have written is not true, show me how he came down from heaven or even if what I said is a half truth.  Expound on it and give us the whole truth.

    And also, what he means in Hebrews 10 when he says to God, “a body thou has prepared for me”.  What is he saying when he says “me”?

    And for you the kicker scripture, is Philippians 2:6.  Show me how he was “in the form of God” prior to his birth into this world.  That scripture does not read, “he was in the form of God before he was born into this world…”, and so, you are adding to the scriptures in order to support your doctrine.  

    He is the last Adam, because He is the “Only Begotten Son of the Living God” who is the express image of God's person as manifest through the works that he did in obedience to God our heavenly Father.  And we also, who are born again, are being made in his image as we learn to apply the Word of God in our daily life.  We will be like him when he comes for the church if we continue in the faith.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    I will respond to you in the debates thread. That way there is no interference by all the hacklers here that do nothing but yip at your ankles like an anoying chua wa!

    WJ

    #185840
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,12:21)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,20:18)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,11:41)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,19:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,10:51)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,18:37)
    I know that Jesus came down from heaven.  First of all his body was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  The Holy Ghost is the Sprit of God my Father whose throne is in heaven.  Secondly, the spirit of the Son is the Word of God which he learned to obey and did obey even unto death of the cross.  This Word that he obeyed came down from heaven.  It was God who was speaking to humanity through Jesus and it was God who was dwelling within him that he was obeying.


    Hi All

    This is a total denial of the Greek text and Greek Grammatical rules which do not allow for this kind of translation.

    If it did the Translators could have took the liberty to do so, but no credible translation reads what is made in these statements!

    Blessings WJ


    Hi WJ:

    But the scriptures support that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost, and that God was dwelling within in him and speaking the Word of God to humanity.  Do you deny this?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    You are only speaking half truths and not the whole council of God, for instance you say Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost but you leave out the fact that it was a virgin that the Holy Spirit created his body in.

    The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life. Job 33:4

    The Father prepared a body for Jesus so that Jesus the Word that was with the Father could come into this world by taking on the likeness of sinful flesh! John 1:1, 14 – Phil 2:6-8 – Heb 10:5

    Every conception is a part of the creation process. The Holy Spirit caused the conception and the Power of the highest over shadowed her. Luke 1:35

    The miracle of the incarnation of Jesus is why Jesus is the second Adam!

    WJ


    Hi WJ:

    And so, I spoke a half truth because I failed to mention that the Holy Ghost overshadowed the virgin Mary and the body of Jesus was conceived in her womb?

    The point was to show how he came from heaven, and so, if what I have written is not true, show me how he came down from heaven or even if what I said is a half truth.  Expound on it and give us the whole truth.

    And also, what he means in Hebrews 10 when he says to God, “a body thou has prepared for me”.  What is he saying when he says “me”?

    And for you the kicker scripture, is Philippians 2:6.  Show me how he was “in the form of God” prior to his birth into this world.  That scripture does not read, “he was in the form of God before he was born into this world…”, and so, you are adding to the scriptures in order to support your doctrine.  

    He is the last Adam, because He is the “Only Begotten Son of the Living God” who is the express image of God's person as manifest through the works that he did in obedience to God our heavenly Father.  And we also, who are born again, are being made in his image as we learn to apply the Word of God in our daily life.  We will be like him when he comes for the church if we continue in the faith.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    I will respond to you in the debates thread. That way there is no interference by all the hacklers here that do nothing but yip at your ankles like an anoying chua wa!

    WJ


    Hi WJ:

    I haven't seen anyone try to come in on our discussion. I don't like the term “debate”. It gives me the impression that someone is trying to win some sort of a contest, and that should not be our goal, but it should be to study God's Word so that we can teach the Word of God in truth.

    If I am not teaching the truth, I am not running away from correction but toward it, but I have given you my understanding. I can't do any more than that.

    If you think that I need to be corrected, correct me through the scriptures.

    The scriptures state that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost in the womb of the virgin Mary. What do you mean by the term “the incarnation”?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #185842

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,21:03)
    The scriptures state that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost in the womb of the virgin Mary.  What do you mean by the term “the incarnation”?


    Marty

    I have already answered this in the debates thread.

    WJ

    #185853
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Jodi Lee @ April 02 2010,16:41)

    Quote (Elizabeth @ April 03 2010,04:21)
    Marty!  If you want to leave it at that, that is up to you.  However I am not going to stand for that you think I am interpreting Scriptures.  I am not.  I am writing them the way they are written.  And I am saying what it is written.  When I say I came down from upstairs, would you think that I did not?  NO.  But when Jesus said so, you do not believe Him?  No my friend I am not interpreting any of those Scriptures.  I am reading them to you, right from the Word of God, the Bible.  And the statement that you made that Jesus  did not say that He preexisted, is so wrong.  He did not call it that way, but what do you think when He said in John 17:5 that He wants the glory back which He had before the world was?  We know that He is a Spirit Being today, and that is what He was before the world was,  That is what Jesus said, not I.
    Math, 15:9

    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene,

    Scripture says the Son of Man ascended to where he was before

    So do you believe the pre-existing Jesus was a MAN?


    Hi Jodi,
    I hope you don't mind me taking a shot at helping you understand this by using an example from the movie, “The Sound of Music.” I am assuming that you have seen this movie…here goes:

    Maria was a nun
    She was sent to be the Von Trapp children's nanny
    She was falling in love with Captain Von Trapp who had a girlfriend
    Confused as to what to do, the children's nanny went back to where she was before (the convent).
    (that doesn't mean that she was a nanny before, does it)

    The Son of God was in the presence of the Father
    He was sent to earth to become the Son of Man
    The Son of Man died and went back to where He was before…
    in the presence of the Father.

    NET ©
    And now, Father, glorify me at your side with the glory I had with you before the world was created.

    NET ©
    Jesus replied, “Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father. Go to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’”

    Jesus was not a man before He came as a man…He was and always will be the Son of God. The Son of God became a man but never stopped being the Son of God.

    Sorta like you were and always will be the daughter of your father.

    Another example:
    A man's daughter named Sally grows up in Illinois
    Goes to college in Indiana,
    Gets married and lives in Indiana,
    Her husband dies
    the widow goes back to where she was before…Illinois to be with her father.
    That is obviously not saying that she was a widow in Illinois before.

    Sally was and always will be the daughter of her father, she went away and became a wife and then a widow, the widow then went back to her father, where she was before.

    I hope that helps :)

    #185871
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 03 2010,13:28)

    Quote (942767 @ April 02 2010,21:03)
    The scriptures state that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost in the womb of the virgin Mary.  What do you mean by the term “the incarnation”?


    Marty

    I have already answered this in the debates thread.

    WJ


    Hi WJ,

    Typical, you would rather spend your efforts telling someone they are 'wrong' than give an answer to a question?
    You also spend a lot of time complaining that people don't answer your questions, but miss the connection! (Ps.18:25-27)

    Prob.3:11-13 My son, despise not the chastening of the LORD;
    neither be weary of his correction: For whom the LORD loveth he correcteth;
    even as a father the son in whom he delighteth. Happy is the man that findeth wisdom,
    and the man that getteth understanding. (You are on the road to getting understanding though!)

    Your brother in Christ,
    Ed J
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #185881

    Quote (Ed J @ April 03 2010,00:45)
    Hi WJ,

    Typical, you would rather spend your efforts telling someone they are 'wrong' than give an answer to a question?


    ED

    This is a lie and you know it. Why don't you respond to Marty about all the questions I left him that went unanswered in the debates thread?

    Look, you often point to a link of a post that you have already answered.

    Why are you insistant on harrasing me?

    I have a lot of post to respond to because we, Jack and I are out numbered and have a life ouside of HN. So why do you find fault in what I do?

    The answer to Martys question is where I pointed him to.

    WJ

    #185885
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Elizabeth @ April 02 2010,07:52)
    Well, I do believe that Jesus was in Heaven with His Father before the world was.
    By Jesus own words in
    John 6:38 “For I have come down from Heaven not to do My will, but the will of Him who send Me….
    Col.1:15 He is the firstborn of all creation…..
    Col. 1:18 He also is the firstborn of the death that in all things He may have preeminence….and more. See my previous post to Marty….
    Peace and Love Irene


    Oh yeah, I realise that there are others here such as yourself that believe that the true God is the Father and that he sent his son into the world. That the son as the Word was with God in the beginning and emptied himself and took on human nature and was born as one of us.

    This great work means that we now can become one of him (so to speak).

    :)

    #185886
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 02 2010,06:14)
    Hi t8,
    Touche' on your post with one exception…God can have a son who is as much his nature as God Himself.  We see it in the created world ALL the time.  One nature begets one of the same nature.  Thus if they both have the same nature, they are both deity albeit one is older than the other.  The Son of God will never have the unique quality of always existing and be the source of all things good but that doesn't mean that He isn't God, as the Son.  He isn't God as the Father, He is God as the Son of God would be.


    I agree Lightenup, that kind reproduces after itself and even God makes in his image.

    I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and being God though in the same sense that there is also one Devil, but there are many devils. That is to say, that there is one identified as (the) God, who is the Father, and there is one Devil who is identified as Satan/Beelzebub. There are many who are called theos, even men, just as there are many who are devils.

    The difference is identity and nature/quality. Even Judas was called a devil because in quality he was like the Devil.

    Another example is Adam who is identified as the original man, but “adam” (no article), actually means mankind. Same thing. There is one Adam, but many adams.

    Before others start accusing me of Polytheism, (as what Trinitarians tend to do when I state this), please note that I am advocating that there is one who is identified as the true God the Father, and that we can share in his divine nature and be conformed into the image of.

    Those who think this is Polytheism lack understanding. To have many God's is to have more than one true God. I think Trinitarianism is guilty of this. To believe that there is one God the Father is to believe in the one true God and in doing so respects the first commandment.

    #185891
    JustAskin
    Participant

    How quickly and easily Trinitarians go off guard.

    WJ openly admits that Jesus was born flesh and blood but then suddenly claims that Jesus is God whenever the occassion gets hairy.

    For instance:
    How is Jesus God if he needs his father to make him into a human?
    How is Jesus God if he needs his father to give him power and authority to do things?
    How is Jesus God if he can die?

    Jesys raised the dead. Does that make him God? Yes, say Trinitarians.
    So what then of Elisha, did he not raise the dead?
    Moses parted the waters, as did Elisha. Are they God because of that?
    Elisha healed the sick and caused others to be sick. Surely, only God can do those things?

    Well, we do know the answer to all those questions.

    It is 'NO' they are not God, but God was working through them.

    How many times are scriptures repeated for our benefit, so God can show us at every point that which will happen before it happens.

    Refering to the events in the old testament with care and caution greatly enhances the understanding of events in the new testament. And indeed, thus is what Jesus does when he says 'It is written…' or 'Did you not read where…' and many other undocumented times when he spoke in the temple and privately to his disciples.

    At no times does Jesus claim to be God.
    At no time does Jesus claim equality with God.
    At no time does Jesus claim that the things he does is by any other means but by the authority 'Given' to him by his father and empowered by the Holy Spirit which is the HOLY SPIRIT of the father.

    The Trinity doctrine is broken almost in every thread in this forum by the very ones who claim to uphold it.

    How many times do they make reference to the 'unity' of the three in their scriptural defence of a topic?
    Answer: Almost never. The exception is when the issue us raised and they suddenly start infering a link.

    How many times do they make a unity of the father and son in total exclusion of the third partnership of the Holy Spirit?
    Answer:Almost always. The exception is where the moment's issue is concerning the trinity.

    The long and short if it is this:
    Even Trinitarians don't believe the Trinity.
    Even Trinitarians don't uphold the trinity doctrine unless they are made to be pointedly aware that the situation requires them to make reference.

    The book of Revelation illustrates the kingdom of heaven and quite clearly shows God Almighty seated on His throne with the Lamb 'standing' in the midst of the throne of God, amongst the elders… And yet trinitarians still say that it is Jesus who is sitting on the throne????

    Revelation also show God and the Lamb being given Praise, Honor and Glory but only God is given Worship (Rev 7:11, Rev 14:7, Rev 19:4, 10, Rev: 22:9) but still they say Jesus is God and we should worship him.

    In actuallity, trinitarians do not worship Jesus – they know better than to do that. What they do, is 'Claim' that they do because the creed says that Jesus IS GOD and it is undisputed that the Scriptures say 'Worship God', ha!

    Do they then worship the Holy Spirit? Of course not!
    But the scriptures say… Ah, and, ha!

    What benefit or truth is there in a doctrine that varies according to the discussion and the believers are only reminded of their belief when their backs are against the wall.

    Fear God, all his creation.

    Worship God, all his creation.

    Who fears Jesus? Only the Wicked when He executes the word of God and brings about their Judgement.

    (Read the scriptures and make a note of this, fear God!)

    #185904
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ April 03 2010,05:05)

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 02 2010,06:14)
    Hi t8,
    Touche' on your post with one exception…God can have a son who is as much his nature as God Himself.  We see it in the created world ALL the time.  One nature begets one of the same nature.  Thus if they both have the same nature, they are both deity albeit one is older than the other.  The Son of God will never have the unique quality of always existing and be the source of all things good but that doesn't mean that He isn't God, as the Son.  He isn't God as the Father, He is God as the Son of God would be.


    I agree Lightenup, that kind reproduces after itself and even God makes in his image.

    I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and being God though in the same sense that there is also one Devil, but there are many devils. That is to say, that there is one identified as (the) God, who is the Father, and there is one Devil who is identified as Satan/Beelzebub. There are many who are called theos, even men, just as there are many who are devils.

    The difference is identity and nature/quality. Even Judas was called a devil because in quality he was like the Devil.

    Another example is Adam who is identified as the original man, but “adam” (no article), actually means mankind. Same thing. There is one Adam, but many adams.

    Before others start accusing me of Polytheism, (as what Trinitarians tend to do when I state this), please note that I am advocating that there is one who is identified as the true God the Father, and that we can share in his divine nature and be conformed into the image of.

    Those who think this is Polytheism lack understanding. To have many God's is to have more than one true God. I think Trinitarianism is guilty of this. To believe that there is one God the Father is to believe in the one true God and in doing so respects the first commandment.


    Hi t8,

    You said:

    Quote
    I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and being God though in the same sense that there is also one Devil, but there are many devils. That is to say, that there is one identified as (the) God, who is the Father, and there is one Devil who is identified as Satan/Beelzebub. There are many who are called theos, even men, just as there are many who are devils.

    I understand what you are saying but I would change your first sentence to read: “I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and having divine nature combined with always existing and being the source of all that is good.” I think that is an important difference between the Father and the Son. The Father always existed and is the source of all things good. As I understand it, the Son did not always exist and was not the source of all things good even though all things were created by Him…those things that were created by Him originally came from the Father.

    It is true that others are called theos however it is clear that they are not by original nature, theos, but they are acting by authority over others like God does.

    The Son of God does not fit into the category of not having the original nature of theos so I don't think your argument is valid. He is in no way equal to those in that category. Angels have an angelic nature and men have a human nature. The Son of God has a deity nature which automatically makes Him of the same kind as His Father, deity.

    There is one identified as the true God…the Father, and one identified as the only Son of God…Jesus. In the OT, the Father and the Son were called “the Lord God with the outstretched Arm” and were together worshiped and thought of as one God and that is the way the Father portrayed the one God that was spoken about in the first commandment. The Jews thought that God was one being but we know now, after the Father “bared His Arm,” that His Arm was indeed a separate being all along…His only Son. Isaiah saw that truth and John also confirms this.

    You say that there is one Adam, but many adams. True and they all have the nature of a human.

    There is one true God, but two gods that have the nature of a god and those two gods make up one Godhead together with the Holy Spirit (inner person) of the one true God. One is greater than the other but the other is greater than everything else. So, see how we have two that are greater than everything and only two with the original nature as deity? Neither one of them could be equal to anything that might be “called” deity who don't actually have a deity nature as their original nature.

    I realize that believers will be partakers of the divine nature but the Son of God always had it and that is a huge difference.

    Believer's with a human nature will “partake” of the divine nature in the future. The Son of God with a deity nature “partook” of the human nature but remained the Son of God at the same time. To make that work, He gave (for a time) up what He needed to give up, i.e. his supernatural ability, memories and His body form, for example.

    Jesus has always been the only God alongside the True God.

    #185982
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ April 03 2010,22:01)
    How quickly and easily Trinitarians go off guard.

    WJ openly admits that Jesus was born flesh and blood but then suddenly claims that Jesus is God whenever the occassion gets hairy.

    For instance:
    How is Jesus God if he needs his father to make him into a human?
    How is Jesus God if he needs his father to give him power and authority to do things?
    How is Jesus God if he can die?

    Jesys raised the dead. Does that make him God? Yes, say Trinitarians.
    So what then of Elisha, did he not raise the dead?
    Moses parted the waters, as did Elisha. Are they God because of that?
    Elisha healed the sick and caused others to be sick. Surely, only God can do those things?

    Well, we do know the answer to all those questions.

    It is 'NO' they are not God, but God was working through them.

    How many times are scriptures repeated for our benefit, so God can show us at every point that which will happen before it happens.

    Refering to the events in the old testament with care and caution greatly enhances the understanding of events in the new testament. And indeed, thus is what Jesus does when he says 'It is written…' or 'Did you not read where…' and many other undocumented times when he spoke in the temple and privately to his disciples.

    At no times does Jesus claim to be God.
    At no time does Jesus claim equality with God.
    At no time does Jesus claim that the things he does is by any other means but by the authority 'Given' to him by his father and empowered by the Holy Spirit which is the HOLY SPIRIT of the father.

    The Trinity doctrine is broken almost in every thread in this forum by the very ones who claim to uphold it.

    How many times do they make reference to the 'unity' of the three in their scriptural defence of a topic?
    Answer: Almost never. The exception is when the issue us raised and they suddenly start infering a link.

    How many times do they make a unity of the father and son in total exclusion of the third partnership of the Holy Spirit?
    Answer:Almost always. The exception is where the moment's issue is concerning the trinity.

    The long and short if it is this:
    Even Trinitarians don't believe the Trinity.
    Even Trinitarians don't uphold the trinity doctrine unless they are made to be pointedly aware that the situation requires them to make reference.

    The book of Revelation illustrates the kingdom of heaven and quite clearly shows God Almighty seated on His throne with the Lamb 'standing' in the midst of the throne of God, amongst the elders… And yet trinitarians still say that it is Jesus who is sitting on the throne????

    Revelation also show God and the Lamb being given Praise, Honor and Glory but only God is given Worship (Rev 7:11, Rev 14:7, Rev 19:4, 10, Rev: 22:9) but still they say Jesus is God and we should worship him.

    In actuallity, trinitarians do not worship Jesus – they know better than to do that. What they do, is 'Claim' that they do because the creed says that Jesus IS GOD and it is undisputed that the Scriptures say 'Worship God', ha!

    Do they then worship the Holy Spirit? Of course not!
    But the scriptures say… Ah, and, ha!

    What benefit or truth is there in a doctrine that varies according to the discussion and the believers are only reminded of their belief when their backs are against the wall.

    Fear God, all his creation.

    Worship God, all his creation.

    Who fears Jesus? Only the Wicked when He executes the word of God and brings about their Judgement.

    (Read the scriptures and make a note of this, fear God!)


    JA……….Well Said, They just do not understand Jesus was one of US in (EVERY) WAY without exception, and had GOD chose another they would have performed Just as Jesus DID. Preexistences do as much damage to the work of GOD and Jesus as TRINITARIANS DO , in fact the TRINITARIANS are the One who have always pushed Jesus Preexistence as if that shouldn't even give them a clue of it falseness.

    peace and love to you and yours…………….gene

    #185997
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2010,03:41)

    Quote (t8 @ April 03 2010,05:05)

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 02 2010,06:14)
    Hi t8,
    Touche' on your post with one exception…God can have a son who is as much his nature as God Himself.  We see it in the created world ALL the time.  One nature begets one of the same nature.  Thus if they both have the same nature, they are both deity albeit one is older than the other.  The Son of God will never have the unique quality of always existing and be the source of all things good but that doesn't mean that He isn't God, as the Son.  He isn't God as the Father, He is God as the Son of God would be.


    I agree Lightenup, that kind reproduces after itself and even God makes in his image.

    I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and being God though in the same sense that there is also one Devil, but there are many devils. That is to say, that there is one identified as (the) God, who is the Father, and there is one Devil who is identified as Satan/Beelzebub. There are many who are called theos, even men, just as there are many who are devils.

    The difference is identity and nature/quality. Even Judas was called a devil because in quality he was like the Devil.

    Another example is Adam who is identified as the original man, but “adam” (no article), actually means mankind. Same thing. There is one Adam, but many adams.

    Before others start accusing me of Polytheism, (as what Trinitarians tend to do when I state this), please note that I am advocating that there is one who is identified as the true God the Father, and that we can share in his divine nature and be conformed into the image of.

    Those who think this is Polytheism lack understanding. To have many God's is to have more than one true God. I think Trinitarianism is guilty of this. To believe that there is one God the Father is to believe in the one true God and in doing so respects the first commandment.


    Hi t8,

    You said:

    Quote
    I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and being God though in the same sense that there is also one Devil, but there are many devils. That is to say, that there is one identified as (the) God, who is the Father, and there is one Devil who is identified as Satan/Beelzebub. There are many who are called theos, even men, just as there are many who are devils.

    I understand what you are saying but I would change your first sentence to read: “I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and having divine nature combined with always existing and being the source of all that is good.”  I think that is an important difference between the Father and the Son.  The Father always existed and is the source of all things good.  As I understand it, the Son did not always exist and was not the source of all things good even though all things were created by Him…those things that were created by Him originally came from the Father.

    It is true that others are called theos however it is clear that they are not by original nature, theos, but they are acting by authority over others like God does.

    The Son of God does not fit into the category of not having the original nature of theos so I don't think your argument is valid.  He is in no way equal to those in that category.  Angels have an angelic nature and men have a human nature.  The Son of God has a deity nature which automatically makes Him of the same kind as His Father, deity.

    There is one identified as the true God…the Father, and one identified as the only Son of God…Jesus.  In the OT, the Father and the Son were called “the Lord God with the outstretched Arm” and were together worshiped and thought of as one God and that is the way the Father portrayed the one God that was spoken about in the first commandment.  The Jews thought that God was one being but we know now, after the Father “bared His Arm,” that His Arm was indeed a separate being all along…His only Son. Isaiah saw that truth and John also confirms this.

    You say that there is one Adam, but many adams.  True and they all have the nature of a human.

    There is one true God, but two gods that have the nature of a god and those two gods make up one Godhead together with the Holy Spirit (inner person) of the one true God.  One is greater than the other but the other is greater than everything else.  So, see how we have two that are greater than everything and only two with the original nature as deity?  Neither one of them could be equal to anything that might be “called” deity who don't actually have a deity nature as their original nature.

    I realize that believers will be partakers of the divine nature but the Son of God always had it and that is a huge difference.

    Believer's with a human nature will “partake” of the divine nature in the future.  The Son of God with a deity nature “partook” of the human nature but remained the Son of God at the same time.  To make that work, He gave (for a time) up what He needed to give up, i.e. his supernatural ability, memories and His body form, for example.

    Jesus has always been the only God alongside the True God.


    LU

    God use Christ to create all things ,it is just like you would build your house by using your own son to build

    it is still your house and your taste and your design,your son only provided the means ,

    it is trough your son that you would have build your house right??

    would he be the builder???if so all the workers would have the equal rights then.

    #186006
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Jesus built the house, yet the builder of all things is God. Jesus has the honor of building the house, the house of believers and ultimately the Father has built all things. Both built us…both receive the honor…they took different roles. One as the Master Architect-the Father, the other as the Master Craftsman-the Son. Only two involved there. The same with creation.

    Heb 3:1-6
    3 Therefore, holy brethren, partakers of a heavenly calling, consider Jesus, the Apostle and High Priest of our confession;
    2 He was faithful to Him who appointed Him, as Moses also was in all His house.
    3 For He has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses, by just so much as the builder of the house has more honor than the house.
    4 For every house is built by someone, but the builder of all things is God.
    5 Now Moses was faithful in all His house as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken later;
    6 but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house — whose house we are, if we hold fast our confidence and the boast of our hope firm until the end.
    NASU

    #186011
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2010,03:41)
    I understand what you are saying but I would change your first sentence to read: “I believe there is a difference between having divine nature and having divine nature combined with always existing and being the source of all that is good.” I think that is an important difference between the Father and the Son. The Father always existed and is the source of all things good. As I understand it, the Son did not always exist and was not the source of all things good even though all things were created by Him…those things that were created by Him originally came from the Father.


    Absolutely. God has divine nature and he shares that nature. He is the source and Jesus is the image.

    The son is not the original, he is of God. He is the prototype son.

Viewing 20 posts - 7,101 through 7,120 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account