Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 6,021 through 6,040 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #165930

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2009,12:41)
    hi WJ
    Mat 28:16  Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them.
    Mat 28:17  And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted.
    Mat 28:18  And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
    Mat 28:19  Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
    Mat 28:20  Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
    you sure that this will be your base on your believe of the trinity????????????


    t

    No One scripture is my base for the Trinity.

    But you cannot even refute Matt 28:19 as being three can you?

    WJ

    #165936

    What were the Seven things Yeshua HaMoshiach said on the cross?

    Luke 23:34, “Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.”
    Luke 23:43, “Truly I say to you today, you shall be with Me in Paradise.”
    John 19:26-27, “Woman, behold, your son!” 27 Then He *said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother!”
    Matt. 27:46, “ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI?” that is, “MY G-D, MY G-D, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?”
    John 19:26, “I am thirsty.”
    John 19:29, “It is finished!”
    Luke 23:46, “Father, INTO YOUR HANDS I COMMIT MY SPIRIT.”

    #166076
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi ron
    is there anything we can learn from your quote,what is well quoted in deed

    #166143
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 23 2009,02:28)

    Quote (banana @ Dec. 22 2009,05:10)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 22 2009,17:05)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 21 2009,19:02)
    this go s for you to WJ


    t

    {{{{{BRRRRR}}}}} I am scared!

    Get real. You guys can't even get past Matt 28:19.

    Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in “the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost“:

    Singular name for three persons, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and all having the definite article proving there are three distinct persons.

    You do believe in the three don't you?

    Bingo! Trinity! So you believe in a Trinity, you just don't see them as “One”!

    Now all you have to do is read the scriptures that claim..

    The Father is God.

    Jesus is God.

    The Holy Spirit is God.

    Then try to prove that the three are not “One” and also try and prove that we have more than “One Spirit”!

    The contradictions are with you and the Arians and Unitarians.

    Once you think you have this one licked then maybe you can move up to John 1:1, or John 20:28, or Isa 9:6, or Heb 1:8 or 2 Peter 1:1 or Titus 2:13, of Jude 1:4, 5 or Rev 1:8, or Phil 2:6-8 or Heb 1:10 or 1 John 5:20, or John 1:18 or Acts 20:28 and the many others that imply Jesus equality with the Father, and the Holy Spirit as a seperate person from the Father.

    “But they refused to pay attention; “STUBBORNLY THEY TURNED THEIR BACKS AND STOPPED UP THEIR EARS“. Zech 7:11

    He answered and said unto them, “Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, BUT TO THEM IT IS NOT GIVEN“. For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath. “***THEREFORE SPEAK I TO THEM IN PARABLES***: BECAUSE THEY SEEING SEE NOT; AND HEARING THEY HEAR NOT, NEITHER DO THEY UNDERSTAND“. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, “BY HEARING YE SHALL HEAR, AND SHALL NOT UNDERSTAND; AND SEEING YE SHALL SEE, AND SHALL NOT PERCEIVE“: For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and “THEIR EYES THEY HAVE CLOSED; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, AND SHOULD UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART, AND SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND I SHOULD HEAL THEM“. Matt 13:11-15

    WJ


    W.J.  I have given you several Scriptures that prove the trinity wrong, yet you go by one Scripture that says only The Father and the Son and it should say, the Fathers Holy Spirit.  It contradicts all other Scriptures that I gave.  Why is it that you ignore them…..Again is the Holy Spirit Jesus Father?
    John 1:1 does not prove the trinity.  Just that He is the Word and God, even Satan is called God and so many mighty men were called in Ancient times, God.
    Same with John 20:28 and Hebrew 1:8
    God is a title.  God the Father is our God that is above all other. Just to say a few.  I am not about to do more nonsense.  
    Irene


    Irene

    Your scriptures do not disprove the Trinity.

    For the same is said about Jesus. Jesus is above all isn't he?” Jesus is at the right hand of the Father and not beneath him isn't he?

    The contradictions you have with Matt 28:19 and others is because of your own false doctrine!

    Read Matt 28:18 and it might give you some perspective on Matt 28:19!

    WJ


    WJ,
    They only give lip service to what Christ said in matthew 28:18.

    thinker

    #166145
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    WorshippingJesus said to terraricca:

    Quote
    Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in “the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”:

    Singular name for three persons, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and all having the definite article proving there are three distinct persons.


    thinker

    #166154
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To all………do you see what false Trinitarian and Preexistence doctrines produce and how it corrupts the minds of those who preach and teach it. Thy can't produce any soundness so they start some form of senseless ridicule, but then what else would you expect from false teachers and accusers.

    #166155

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 23 2009,13:44)
    To all………do you see what false Trinitarian and Preexistence doctrines produce and how it corrupts the minds of those who preach and teach it. Thy can't produce any soundness so they start some form of senseless ridicule, but then what else would you expect from false teachers and accusers.


    Gene

    Is it ridicule to point out scripture that disagrees with you and that you cannot refute?

    WJ

    #166162
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi WJ
    : Members
    Posts: 784
    Joined: Oct. 2009 Posted: Dec. 23 2009,14:49

    ——————————————————————————–
    hi WJ
    terraricca

    Group: Members
    Posts: 767
    Joined: Oct. 2009 Posted: Dec. 23 2009,13:58

    ——————————————————————————–
    hi all
    Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:Math;28.19

    you know this scripture if we look at it in a different angle like this ;baptizing them IN

    the FATHER
    the SON
    the Holy Spirit
    this is done in the name of………………
    so i can see what WJ;try to say that the trinity does not exist ,
    we know who is the father,we know who is the son,and we know what is the holy spirit dont we?

    this scripture says to make the father known and the son known all through the Holy spirit,….this is true

    thanks WJ i just find this out tonight.

    ————–
    PR

    #166170
    banana
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 24 2009,07:47)
    hi WJ
    : Members
    Posts: 784
    Joined: Oct. 2009  Posted: Dec. 23 2009,14:49  

    ——————————————————————————–
    hi WJ
    terraricca

    Group: Members
    Posts: 767
    Joined: Oct. 2009  Posted: Dec. 23 2009,13:58  

    ——————————————————————————–
    hi all
    Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:Math;28.19

    you know this scripture if we look at it in a different angle like this ;baptizing them IN

    the FATHER
    the SON
    the Holy Spirit
    this is done in the name of………………
    so i can see what WJ;try to say that the trinity does not exist ,
    we know who is the father,we know who is the son,and we know what is the holy spirit dont we?

    this scripture says to make the father known and the son known all through the Holy spirit,….this is true

    thanks WJ i just find this out tonight.

    ————–
    PR


    terraricca W.J. believes in the trinity doctrine. which according to Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is above all, and in us all… and by Jesus own words in
    John 14 :28…. for my Father is greater then I. I also gave Him and thinker some other Scriptures that prove the trinity wrong also, but they just say no to it.
    God is not a God of confusion. The Scripture that you quoted is only what we are baptized in. We receive God's Holy Spirit in order to understand the things of God. The Holy Spirit is not a person but an essence of God like patience, joy, kindness etc.
    Looking at Ephesians I just noticed
    Ephesians 3 14 For this reason I bow my knees to the FATHER OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST.
    verse15 from whom the whole family in Heaven is named,
    verse 16 that He would grant you according to the riches of His glory, to be straightened with might through HIS SPIRIT, in the inner man.
    That is just one Scripture that says His Spirit. And I say again, would the Holy Spirit not be the Father of Jesus if He would be a Person? But that's just it, it is the Fathers Holy Spirit. He never was and never will be a person. Look back on my post with all the Scriptures I gave. I am done here. No more. If they can't see it with all I have given them, they never will. One more thing though, the Preexisting of Jesus has noithing to do with the trinity.
    Peace adn Love Irene

    #166172
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi Irene
    i know that i just try to show that this scripture does not support the trinity view,
    that s all

    #166227
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 24 2009,05:48)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 23 2009,13:44)
    To all………do you see what false Trinitarian and Preexistence doctrines produce and how it corrupts the minds of those who preach and teach it. Thy can't produce any soundness so they start some form of senseless ridicule, but then what else would you expect from false teachers and accusers.


    Gene

    Is it ridicule to point out scripture that disagrees with you and that you cannot refute?

    WJ


    WJ…….tell us why should we accept what you are trying to produce , when ypou won't even acknowledge the Simplest of scriptures post here time and time again, I have quoted where Jesus in Prayer said (“FOR THOU ART THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD. An you come up with some complicated rebuttal and fail to acknowledge this simple scripture as fact and true, as Stated without some slanted Trinitarian view point. We have ask you time and tie again did Jesus have a GOD that was greater then He as (HE) said there was. So many scripture that Show Jesus as a plain ordinary Human Being , Who (LEARNED) obedience by the things He suffered, and That He was a (SON) of GOD, Just like all who Have been impregnated with HOLY SEED are, but not matter what we say and post you just ignore it and never seem to take it to Heart. I tell you WJ with all sincerity JESUS IS NOT GOD, NOR IS ANYONE ELSE A TRUE GOD> THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUE GOD< Believe what Jesus plainly said.

    gene

    #166240
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi WJ
    don't you like my version of Mathew 28;19????

    #166267
    david
    Participant

    Mt. 28:19 “…in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit.”

    The fact that “name” is singular at Matt. 28:19 is only further proof that “authority” or “power” was meant and not a personal name. If more than one person is involved, then the plural “names” would be used (compare Rev. 21:12). Even trinitarians admit that their God is composed of 3 separate persons. And each one of those “persons” has his own personal name (except, as we have seen, the holy spirit really does not)! Therefore, if personal names were intended here for these three different “persons,” the plural “names” would have been used in this scripture.

    Since it clearly means “in recognition of the power, or authority of,” it is perfectly correct to use “name” in the singular. In fact, it must be used that way. We even recognize this in our own language today. We say, for example, “I did it in the name [singular] of love, humanity, and justice.”

    There is a famous statement in United States history that perfectly illustrates this use of the singular “name” when it is being used to mean “in recognition of power or authority.” Ethan Allen, writing about his capture of Fort Ticonderoga in 1775, quoted the words he spoke when the British commander of that fort asked him by what authority Allen had captured it.

    Ethan Allen replied:

    “In the name [singular] of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress.” – p. 100, A Book About American History, Stimpson, Fawcett Publ., 1962 printing. (Also see Rebels and Redcoats, p. 54, Scheer and Rankin, Mentor Books, 1959 printing; and p. 167, Vol. 1, Universal Standard Encyclopedia, the 1955 abridgment of the New Funk and Wagnalls Encyclopedia.)

    How ludicrous it would be to conclude that Allen really meant that Jehovah and the Continental Congress had the same personal name and were both equally God!

    To paraphrase the quote credited to trinitarian writer Reymond at the beginning of this section above:

    “What Ethan Allen does say is this … 'in the name [singular] of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress,' first asserting the unity of the two by combining them within the bounds of the single Name, and then throwing into emphasis the distinctness of each by introducing them in turn with the repeated article ['the'].”

    According to this desperate attempt by trinitarians to make trinitarian evidence from Matt. 28:19, then, the same kind of statement by Ethan Allen is evidence (because of the singular “Name” and the repeated article) that The Continental Congress is equally God! (We might also consider a British expression: “in the name of God, king and country.”)

    Also notice how Luke 9:26 (which actually says, “when [Jesus] comes in the glory [singular] of him [Jesus] and of the Father and of the holy angels”) is “first asserting the unity of the three by combining them all within the bounds of the single [glory], and then throwing into emphasis the distinctness of each by introducing them in turn with the repeated article.” But, here, of course, the angels, too, make up the “trinity.” We have, then, God the Father, God the Son, and God the holy angels!

    If Jesus were really saying that Jehovah, Jesus, and the holy spirit had personal names and these names must be used during baptism, he would have used the plural word “names” at Matt. 28:19. And we would see the Father's personal name (“Jehovah” – Is. 63:16; 64:8 – Ps. 83:18 and Luke 1:32 – Exodus 3:15 and Acts 3:13) and the Son's personal name (“Jesus” – Luke 1:31, 32) and the holy spirit's personal name (“?”) all being used in Christian baptism ceremonies for the past 1900 years.

    Honestly now, how many religions actually use the personal names “Jehovah,” “Jesus,” and “(??)” when baptizing? – (“We baptize you in the names of 'Jehovah,' 'Jesus,' and '???'.”) Or, since a few anti-Watchtower trinitarians even claim that the singular “name” at Matt. 28:19 is really “Jehovah,” how many religions really use the personal name “Jehovah” (or “Yahweh”) when baptizing? (“We baptize you in Jehovah's name.”) Any church that does not do so, must be admitting, in effect, that “name” in this scripture does not mean personal name!

    In spite of the extreme weakness of the trinitarian “evidence” for Matt. 28:19, it is nearly always cited by trinitarians because, incredibly poor as it is, it is one of their very best trinitarian “proofs”! And it is generally hailed by trinitarians as the best evidence for the deity of the holy spirit!

    This certainly shows how extremely weak the scriptural evidence is for a trinity!

    http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009&#8230;.on.html

    #166276
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Dec. 24 2009,19:38)
    Mt. 28:19 “…in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit.”

    The fact that “name” is singular at Matt. 28:19 is only further proof that “authority” or “power” was meant and not a personal name. If more than one person is involved, then the plural “names” would be used (compare Rev. 21:12). Even trinitarians admit that their God is composed of 3 separate persons. And each one of those “persons” has his own personal name (except, as we have seen, the holy spirit really does not)! Therefore, if personal names were intended here for these three different “persons,” the plural “names” would have been used in this scripture.

    Since it clearly means “in recognition of the power, or authority of,” it is perfectly correct to use “name” in the singular. In fact, it must be used that way. We even recognize this in our own language today. We say, for example, “I did it in the name [singular] of love, humanity, and justice.”

    There is a famous statement in United States history that perfectly illustrates this use of the singular “name” when it is being used to mean “in recognition of power or authority.” Ethan Allen, writing about his capture of Fort Ticonderoga in 1775, quoted the words he spoke when the British commander of that fort asked him by what authority Allen had captured it.

    Ethan Allen replied:

    “In the name [singular] of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress.” – p. 100, A Book About American History, Stimpson, Fawcett Publ., 1962 printing. (Also see Rebels and Redcoats, p. 54, Scheer and Rankin, Mentor Books, 1959 printing; and p. 167, Vol. 1, Universal Standard Encyclopedia, the 1955 abridgment of the New Funk and Wagnalls Encyclopedia.)

    How ludicrous it would be to conclude that Allen really meant that Jehovah and the Continental Congress had the same personal name and were both equally God!

    To paraphrase the quote credited to trinitarian writer Reymond at the beginning of this section above:

    “What Ethan Allen does say is this … 'in the name [singular] of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress,' first asserting the unity of the two by combining them within the bounds of the single Name, and then throwing into emphasis the distinctness of each by introducing them in turn with the repeated article ['the'].”

    According to this desperate attempt by trinitarians to make trinitarian evidence from Matt. 28:19, then, the same kind of statement by Ethan Allen is evidence (because of the singular “Name” and the repeated article) that The Continental Congress is equally God! (We might also consider a British expression: “in the name of God, king and country.”)

    Also notice how Luke 9:26 (which actually says, “when [Jesus] comes in the glory [singular] of him [Jesus] and of the Father and of the holy angels”) is “first asserting the unity of the three by combining them all within the bounds of the single [glory], and then throwing into emphasis the distinctness of each by introducing them in turn with the repeated article.” But, here, of course, the angels, too, make up the “trinity.” We have, then, God the Father, God the Son, and God the holy angels!

    If Jesus were really saying that Jehovah, Jesus, and the holy spirit had personal names and these names must be used during baptism, he would have used the plural word “names” at Matt. 28:19. And we would see the Father's personal name (“Jehovah” – Is. 63:16; 64:8 – Ps. 83:18 and Luke 1:32 – Exodus 3:15 and Acts 3:13) and the Son's personal name (“Jesus” – Luke 1:31, 32) and the holy spirit's personal name (“?”) all being used in Christian baptism ceremonies for the past 1900 years.

    Honestly now, how many religions actually use the personal names “Jehovah,” “Jesus,” and “(??)” when baptizing? – (“We baptize you in the names of 'Jehovah,' 'Jesus,' and '???'.”) Or, since a few anti-Watchtower trinitarians even claim that the singular “name” at Matt. 28:19 is really “Jehovah,” how many religions really use the personal name “Jehovah” (or “Yahweh”) when baptizing? (“We baptize you in Jehovah's name.”) Any church that does not do so, must be admitting, in effect, that “name” in this scripture does not mean personal name!

    In spite of the extreme weakness of the trinitarian “evidence” for Matt. 28:19, it is nearly always cited by trinitarians because, incredibly poor as it is, it is one of their very best trinitarian “proofs”! And it is generally hailed by trinitarians as the best evidence for the deity of the holy spirit!

    This certainly shows how extremely weak the scriptural evidence is for a trinity!

    http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009&#8230;.on.html


    There is an abundabce of proof that Matthew was originally written in Hebrew and not Greek. When one translates the Great Commission back to Hebrew it takes on a different meaning then what we find in English.

    Matthew 28:19
    Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

    First let’s define some of the key words from Hebrew.

    Disciple = Follower
    Name = Character trait
    Father = He who gives strength to the family.
    Son = offspring who is like the father
    Holy = Set asside for a special purpose
    Spirit = breath/ source of life
    Baptize = emmerse (Gr)

    With these understandings in place look at the verse again.

    Go therefore and make followers of all the nations, immersing them in the character traits of the one who gives strength to the family and of his offspring who is like Him and of the special breath which is set asside for the purpose of being the source of life.

    This ties in very clearly with
    Isa 9:6. Unto you a child is born and a son is given and his name (shem Hb.) shall be called Everlasting father mighty God ect.

    The Isa verse is talking about Christ having the character of God not that he is literally God.

    The “Great Commission” is neither a Trinitarian proof text nor even a complete water baptism verse. Water baptism is only a shadow of the deeper emersion we are to have in the Character of God as shown through His son Jesus.

    #166292
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi martian
    you mostly right but very few will believe that,the spirit means also something els.

    #166293
    terraricca
    Participant

    david
    i agree the JW use the name JEHOVAH in there baptism but you also have to accept the faithful slave ' thing. and this is a addition to the scriptures,and know the JW are not disciples of Christ but prozelites of the Wachtower t. what men said is what goes.

    #166297
    banana
    Participant

    Let me give you all my understanding of that Scripture.
    I believe it should say:”  In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of His Holy Spirit.”
    It is the Fathers Spirit that we are talking about.  There are several Scriptures like
    Ephesians 3:15
    from whom the whole Family in Heaven and Earth is named,
    verse 16
    that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory to strengthen with might through His Spirit, in the inner man.
    That is what we receive at Baptism.  Then we can understand the things of God.  Only then can God work with us to become more like Christ.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #166312
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 25 2009,03:47)
    hi martian
    you mostly right but very few will believe that,the spirit means also something els.


    Most people try to personify the Term Spirit. Spirit simply means breath or wind. It is the breath or wind of God (YHWH)
    Holy means set aside for a special purpose. the same Hebrew word translated Holy is used to describe temple prostitutes because they are set aside for special purposes. There is nothing spiritual about the word.
    Holy Spirit simple means the breath of God set aside for a special purpose.

    #166317
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi martian
    the spirit of God was moving about the earth 'Genesis 1
    this quote means what you think??

    #166349
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 25 2009,06:20)
    hi martian
    the spirit of God was moving about the earth 'Genesis 1
    this quote means what you think??


    The Mechanical translation of the Hebrew is as follows —
    …. and the wind of Elohiym was much fluttering upon the face of the water.

    As with many Hebrew words they have several meanings depending on the context. Spirit as it is translated in English can mean character, essence of life, or power. In the above verse it can be all three. God's character is portrayed in his creation. Life comes from the breath of God even as Adam became a living soul when God breathed the breath of life in him. God's power is seen in his creation.

Viewing 20 posts - 6,021 through 6,040 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account