Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,701 through 5,720 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #161754

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 02 2009,00:16)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 02 2009,02:28)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 30 2009,22:22)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 30 2009,20:59)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 30 2009,17:05)
    Marty

    That is how you see it. But an honest look at Phil 2:6-8 and John 1:1, 14 and other scriptures does not agree with you IMO!

    Jesus forgave sins against God because only God could do that! No other had power to forgive sins against God.

    We can only forgive those who sin against us!

    Not so with Jesus our Great God and Saviour! Titus 2:13

    WJ


    Why have the Jews and all others of time since the Old Testament believe in “ONE” 'elohim for over 6000 years, and you believe in three gods?

    Why do you only subscribe to the the councils descisision of three gods set forth by the Romans?

    And you only find a problem with us.


    Con

    Plurality of Unity! The entire universe reveals the Glory of God!

    The molecular structure of the Universe is triune!

    The Atom is one yet 3, proton, neutron, and electron!

    One cannot do without the other, or the Atom would fly apart.

    Scientist know nothing of the Mystery of the Atom and what holds it together!

    By Jesus all things consist” and are upheld by the word of HIS power. Col 1:16, 17, Heb 1:3

    Just as scientist know nothing of the mystery of the Atom, so does the “carnal man” know nothing of the Plural nature of God!

    Great is the Mystery of Godliness, God was manifest in the flesh!

    WJ


    So Yahweh cannot exist without Yeshua HaMoshiach? Will he fly apart too?

    Quote
    Just as scientist know nothing of the mystery of the Atom, so does the “carnal man” know nothing of the Plural nature of God!

    Maybe it's because he isn't plural. If Yahweh elightens you to know the things you should, then why hasn't cleared up this thing about plurality?

    Also the bible in itself discusses and debates just about everything one can think of, why is it the bible is silent on this discussion?


    Con

    The Scriptures as always are silent to those who do not have ears to hear.

    Jesus spoke many things that were hard to be understood, but to the pure in heart they believed his words!

    WJ


    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    #161756
    kerwin
    Participant

    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree. I also agree that God is not an illogical God.

    #161760

    Mystery: Occurs 22 times in 22 verses in the KJV, every instance “The Mystery” is revealed to the saints.

    Quote
    MYSTERY: Greek, μυστήριον Mystērion:

    1) hidden thing, secret, mystery
    a) generally mysteries, religious secrets, confided only to the initiated and not to ordinary mortals
    b) a hidden or secret thing, not obvious to the understanding
    c) a hidden purpose or counsel

    1) secret will
    a) of men
    b) of G-d: the secret counsels which govern G-d in dealing with the righteous, which are hidden from ungodly and wicked men but plain to the godly

    2) in rabbinic writings, it denotes the mystic or hidden sense
    a) of an OT saying
    b) of an image or form seen in a vision
    c) of a dream

    According to the Greek, a mystery is only to and/or for the ungodly.

    According to the Greek, a mystery is always revealed to the righteous, hence there is no “mystery” unto the righteous.

    Quote
    Vines Exspository Dictionary of New Testament Words:

    Mystery:

    Primarily that which is known to the mustes, “the initiated” (from mueo, “to initiate into the mysteries;” cp. Phl 4:12, mueomai, “I have learned the secret,” RV).

    In the NT it denotes, not the mysterious (as with the Eng. word), but that which, being outside the range of unassisted natural apprehension, can be made known only by Divine revelation, and is made known in a manner and at a time appointed by G-d, and to those only who are illumined by His Spirit.

    In the ordinary sense a “mystery” implies knowledge withheld; its Scriptual significance is truth revealed.

    Hence the terms especially associated with the subject are:
    *made  known,” “manifested,” “revealed,” “preached,” “understand,”
    “dispensation.”

    The definition given above may be best illustrated by the following passage: “the mystery which hath been hid from all ages and generations: but now hath it been manifested to His saints” (Col 1:26, RV).

    “It is used of:

    “(a) spiritual truth generally, as revealed in the gospel, 1Cr 13:2; 14:2 (cp. 1Ti 3:9).

    Among the ancient Greeks 'the mysteries' were religious rites and ceremonies practiced by secret societies into which any one who so desired might be received.

    Those who were initiated into these 'mysteries' became possessors of certain knowledge, which was not imparted to the uninitiated, and were called 'the perfected,' cp. 1Cr 2:6-16 where the Apostle has these 'mysteries' in mind and presents the gospel in contrast thereto; here 'the perfected' are, of course, the believers, who alone can perceive the things revealed;

    (b) Christ, who is G-d Himself revealed under the conditions of human life, Col 2:2; 4:3, and submitting even to death, 1Cr 2:1 (in some mss., for marturion, testimony), 7, but raised from among the dead, 1Ti 3:16, that the will of G-d to co-ordinate the universe in Him, and subject it to Him, might in due time be accomplished, Eph 1:9 (cp. Rev 10:7), as is declared in the gospel, Rom 16:25; Eph 6:19;

    © the Church, which is Christ's Body, i.e., the union of redeemed men with G-d in Christ, Eph 5:32 (cp. Col 1:27);

    (d) the rapture into the presence of Christ of those members of the Church which is His Body who shall be alive on the earth at His Parousia, 1Cr 15:51;

    (e) the operation of those hidden forces that either retard or accelerate the Kingdom of Heaven (i.e., of G-d), Mat 13:11; Mar 4:11;

    (f) the cause of the present condition of Israel, Rom 11:25;

    (g) the spirit of disobedience to G-d, 2Th 2:7; Rev 17:5, 7; cp. Eph 2:2.” *

    [* From Notes on Thessalonians, by Hogg and Vine, pp. 256, 257.]

    To these may be added

    (h) the seven local churches, and their angels, seen in symbolism, Rev 1:20;

    (i) the ways of G-d in grace, Eph 3:9. The word is used in a comprehensive way in 1Cr 4:1. *

    [* See The Twelve Mysteries of Scripture, by Vine.]

    Quote
    Easton's Bible Dictionary:

    Mystery:

    The calling of the Gentiles into the Christian Church, so designated (Eph 1:9,10; 3:8-11; Col 1:25-27); a truth undiscoverable except by revelation, long hid, now made manifest.

    The resurrection of the dead (1Cr 15:51), and other doctrines which need to be explained but which cannot be fully understood by finite intelligence (Mat 13:11; Rom 11:25; 1Cr 13:2); the union between Christ and his people symbolized by the marriage union (Eph 5:31,32; Eph 6:19); the seven stars and the seven candlesticks (Rev 1:20); and the woman clothed in scarlet (17:7), are also in this sense mysteries.

    The anti-Christian power working in his day is called by the apostle (2Th 2:7) the “mystery of iniquity.”

    Quote
    International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia:

    Mystery:

    mis’-ter-i (musterion; from mustes, “one initiated into mysteries”; mueo “to initiate,” muo, “to close” the lips or the eyes; stem mu-, a sound produced with closed lips; compare Latin mutus, “dumb”):

    Its usual modern meaning (equals something in itself obscure or incomprehensible, difficult or impossible to understand) does not convey the exact sense of the Greek musterion, which means a secret imparted only to the initiated, what is unknown until it is revealed, whether it be easy or hard to understand.

    The idea of incomprehensibility if implied at all, is purely accidental.

    The history of the word in ancient paganism is important, and must be considered before we examine its Biblical usage.

    Cont. . .

    #161762

    Quote
    Cont. . .

    International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia:

    Mystery:

    1. In Ancient Pagan Religions:

    In the extant classics, the singular is found once only (Menander, “Do not tell thy secret (musterion) to thy friend”).

    But it is frequently found in the plural ta musteria, “the Mysteries,” the technical term for the secret rites and celebrations in ancient religions only known to, and practiced by, those who had been initiated.

    These are among the most interesting, significant, and yet baffling religious phenomena in the Greek-Roman world, especially from the 6th century BC onward.

    In proportion as the public cults of the civic and national deities fell into disrepute, their place came more and more to be filled by secret cults open only to those who voluntarily underwent elaborate preliminary preparations.

    There was scarcely one of the ancient deities in connection with whose worship there was not some subsidiary cult of this kind.

    The most famous were the Mysteries celebrated in Eleusis, under the patronage and control of the Athenian state, and associated with the worship of Demeter and her daughter Persephone.

    But there were many others of a more private character than the Eleusinian, e.g. the Orphic Mysteries, associated with the name of Dionysus. Besides the Greek Mysteries, mention should be made of the Egyptian cults of Isis and Serapis, and of Persian Mithraism, which in the 3rd century AD was widely diffused over the whole empire.

    It is difficult in a brief paragraph to characterize the Mysteries, so elaborate and varied were they, and so completely foreign to the modern mind.

    The following are some of their main features:

    (1) Their appeal was to the emotions rather than to the intellect.

    Lobeck in his famous Aglaophamus destroyed the once prevalent view that the Mysteries enshrined some profound religious truth or esoteric doctrine.

    They were rather an attempt to find a more emotional and ecstatic expression to religious aspiration than the public ceremonies provided.

    Aristotle (as quoted by Synesius) declared that the initiated did not receive definite instruction, but were put in a certain frame of mind (ou mathein ti dein alla pathein).

    This does not mean that there was no teaching, but that the teaching was vague, suggestive and symbolic, rather than didactic or dogmatic.

    (2) The chief purpose of the rites seems to have been to secure for the rotaries mystic union with some deity and a guaranty of a blissful immortality.

    The initiated was made to partake mystically in the passing of the deity through death to life, and this union with his saviour-god (theos soter) became the pledge of his own passage through death to a happy life beyond.

    This was not taught as an esoteric doctrine; it was well known to outsiders that the Mysteries taught the greater blessedness of the initiated in the under-world; but in the actual ceremony the truth was vividly presented and emotionally realized.

    (3) The celebrations were marked by profuse symbolism of word and action.

    They were preceded by rites of purification through which all the mystae had to pass.

    The celebrations themselves were in the main a kind of religious drama, consisting of scenic representations illustrating the story of some deity or deities, on the basis of the old mythologies regarded as allegories of Nature’s productive forces and of human immortality; combined with the recital of certain mystic formulas by the hierophant (the priest).

    The culminating point was the epopteia, or full vision, when the hierophant revealed certain holy objects to the assembly.

    (4) The cults were marked by a strict exclusiveness and secrecy.

    None but the initiated could be present at the services, and the knowledge of what was said and done was scrupulously kept from outsiders.

    What they had seen and heard was so sacred that it was sacrilege to divulge it to the uninitiated.

    (5) Yet the Mysteries were not secret societies, but were open to all who chose to be initiated (except barbarians and criminals).

    They thus stood in marked contrast to the old civic and national cults, which were confined to states or cities.

    They substituted the principle of initiation for the more exclusive principle of birthright or nationality; and so foreshadowed the disintegration of old barriers, and prepared the way for the universal religion.

    Thus the mystery-religions strangely combined a strict exclusiveness with a kind of incipient catholicity.

    This brief account will show that the Mysteries were not devoid of noble elements.

    They formed “the serious part of pagan religion” (Renan).

    But it must also be remembered that they lent themselves to grave extravagances and abuses.

    Especially did they suffer from the fact that they were withheld from the light of healthy publicity.

    2. In the Old Testament and the Apocrypha:

    The religion of the Old Testament has no Mysteries of the above type.

    The ritual of Israel was one in which the whole people partook, through their representatives the priests.

    There was no system of ceremonial initiation by which the few had privileges denied to the many.

    G-d has His secrets, but such things as He revealed belonged to all (De 29:29); so far from silence being enjoined concerning them, they were openly proclaimed (De 6:7; Neh 8:1 ).

    True piety alone initiated men into confidential intercourse with Yahweh (Ps 25:14; Pr 3:32).

    The term “mystery” never occurs in the English Old Testament.

    The Greek word musterion occurs in the Septuagint of the Old Testament.

    Only in Daniel, where it is found several times as the translation of raza’,” a secret,” in reference to the king’s dream, the meaning of which was revealed to Daniel (2:18,19,27-30,47).

    In the Apocrypha, musterion is still used in the sense of “a secret” (a meaning practically confined to the Septuagint in extant Greek); of the secrets of private life, especially between friends (Sirach 22:22; 27:16,17,21), and of the secret plans of a king or a state (Tobit 12:7,11; Judith 2:2; 2 Macc 13:21).

    The term is also used of the hidden purpose or counsel of God or of Divine wisdom.

    The wicked “knew not the mysteries of G-d,” i.e. the secret counsels that govern G-d’s dealings with the godly (The Wisdom of Solomon 2:22); wisdom “is initiated [mustis] into the knowledge of G-d “( The Wisdom of Solomon 8:4), but (unlike the pagan mystagogues) the writer declares he “will not hide mysteries,” but will “bring the knowledge of her (wisdom) into clear light” (The Wisdom of Solomon 6:22). Hatch maintains that the analogy here is that of an oriental king’s secrets, known only to himself and his trusted friends (Essays in Biblical Greek, 58); but it is more likely that the writer here betrays the influence of the phraseology of the Greek Mysteries (without acquiescing in their teaching).

    In another passage, at any rate, he shows acquaintance with the secret rites of the Gentiles, namely, in The Wisdom of Solomon 14:15,23, where the “solemn rites” and “secret mysteries” of idolaters are referred to with abhorrence.

    The term “mystery” is not used in reference to the special ritual of Israel.

    3. In the New Testament:

    In the New Testament the word occurs 27 or (if we include the doubtful reading in 1Co 2:1) 28 times; chiefly in Paul (20 or 21 times), but also in one passage reported by each of the synoptists, and 4 times in Revelation.

    It bears its ancient sense of a revealed secret, not its modern sense of that which cannot be fathomed or comprehended.
    (1)
    In a few passages, it has reference to a symbol, allegory or parable, which conceals its meaning from those who look only at the literal sense, but is the medium of revelation to those who have the key to its interpretation (compare the rabbinic use of raza’, and codh, “the hidden or mystic sense”).

    This meaning appears in Re 1:20; 17:5,7; probably also in Eph 5:32, where marriage is called “a mystery,” i.e. a symbol to be allegorically interpreted of Christ and His church.

    It also seems implied in the only passage in which the word is attributed to our Lord, “Unto you is given the mystery of the kingdom of G-d: but unto them that are without, all things are done in parables” (Mr 4:11; compare parallel Mt 13:11; Lu 8:10).

    Here parables are spoken of as a veiled or symbolic form of utterance which concealed the truth from those without the kingdom, but revealed it to those who had the key to its inner meaning (compare Mt 13:35; Joh 16:29 margin).

    (2) By far the most common meaning in the New Testament is that which is so characteristic of Paul, namely, a Divine truth once hidden, but now revealed in the gospels.

    Ro 16:25 f might almost be taken as a definition of it, “According to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which hath been kept in silence through times eternal, but now is manifested” (compare Col 1:26; Eph 3:3 ff).

    (a) It should be noted how closely “mystery” is associated with “revelation” (apokalupsis), as well as with words of similar import, e.g. “to make known” (Eph 1:9; 3:3,5,10; 6:19), “to manifest” (Col 4:3,4; Ro 16:26; 1Ti 3:16). “Mystery” and “revelation” are in fact correlative and almost synonymous terms.

    The mysteries of Christianity are its revealed doctrines, in contrast to the wisdom of worldly philosophy (see especially 1Co 2:1-16; compare Mt 11:25 f); the point of contrast being, not that the latter is comprehensible while the former are obscure, but that the latter is the product of intellectual research, while the former are the result of Divine revelation and are spiritually discerned.

    (b) From this it follows that Christianity has no secret doctrines, for what was once hidden has now been revealed.

    But here arises a seeming contradiction. On the one hand, there are passages which seem to imply a doctrine of reserve.

    The mystery revealed to some would seem to be still concealed from others.

    The doctrines of Christ and of His Kingdom are hidden from the worldly wise and the prudent (Mt 11:25; 1Co 2:6 ), and from all who are outside the kingdom (Mt 13:11 and parallel), and there are truths withheld even from Christians while in an elementary stage of development (1Co 3:1 ff; Heb 5:11-14).

    On the other hand, there are many passages in which the truths of revelation are said to be freely and unreservedly communicated to all (e.g. Mt 10:27; 28:19; Ac 20:20,27; 2Co 3:12 f; Eph 3:9, “all men”; 6:19 f; Col 1:28; 1Ti 2:4).

    The explanation is that the communication is limited, not by any secrecy in the gospel message itself or any reserve on the part of the speaker, but by the receptive capacity of the hearer. In the case of the carnally-minded, moral obtuseness or worldliness makes them blind to the light which shines on them (2Co 4:2-4).

    In the case of the “babe in Christ,” the apparent reserve is due merely to the pedagogical principle of adapting the teaching to the progressive receptivity of the disciple (Joh 16:12 f).

    There is no esoteric doctrine or intentional reserve in the New Testament.

    The strong language in Mt 13:11-15 is due to the Hebrew mode of speech by which an actual result is stated as if it were purposive.

    Â What, then, is the content of the Christian “mystery”?

    In a wide sense it is the whole gospel, God’s world-embracing purpose of redemption through Christ (e.g. Ro 16:25; Eph 6:19; Col 2:2; 1Ti 3:9).

    In a special sense it is applied to some specific doctrine or aspect of the gospel, such as the doctrine of the Cross (1Co 2:1,7), of the Incarnation (1Ti 3:16), of the indwelling of Christ as the pledge of immortality (Col 1:27), of the temporary unbelief of the Jews to be followed by their final restoration (Ro 11:25), of the transformation of the saints who will live to see the Second Advent (1Co 15:51), and of the inclusion of the Gentiles in the gospel salvation (Eph 3:3-6).

    These are the Divine secrets now at last disclosed. In direct antithesis to the Divine mystery is the “mystery of lawlessness” (2Th 2:7) culminating in the coming of the Antichrist.

    Here, too, the word means a revealed secret, only in this case the revelation belongs to the future (2Th 2:8), though the evil forces which are to bring about its consummation are already silently operative. (Besides the references in this paragraph, the word occurs in 1Co 4:1; 13:2; 14:2; Re 10:7.

    It is interesting to note that the Vulgate (Jerome’s Latin Bible, 390-405 A.D.) sometimes renders musterion by Latin sacramentum, namely, in Eph 1:9; 3:3,9; 5:32; 1Ti 3:16; Re 1:20.

    This rendering in Eph 5:32 led to the ecclesiastical doctrine that marriage is a “sacrament.”)

    4. The Pagan Mysteries and the New Testament:

    The question is now frequently discussed, how far the New Testament (and especially Paul) betrays the influence of the heathen mystery-cults.

    Hatch maintains that the Pauline usage of the word musterion is dependent on the Septuagint, especially on the Apocrypha (op. cit.), and in this he is followed by Anrich, who declares that the attempt to trace an allusion to the Mysteries in the New Testament is wholly unsuccessful; but Lightfoot admits a verbal dependence on the pagan Mysteries (Commentary on Col 1:26).

    At present there is a strong tendency to attribute to Paul far more dependence than one of phraseology only, and to find in the Mysteries the key to the non-Jewish side of Paulinism.

    A. Loisy finds affinity to the mystery-religions in Paul’s conception of Jesus as a Saviour-God, holding a place analogous to the deities Mithra, Osiris, and Attis; in the place Paul assigns to baptism as the rite of initiation; and in his transformation of the Lord’s Supper into a symbol of mystic participation in the flesh and blood of a celestial being and a guaranty of a share in the blissful immortality of the risen Saviour.

    “In its worship as in its belief, Christianity is a religion of mystery” (article in Hibbert Journal, October, 1911). Percy Gardner traces similar analogies to the Mysteries in Paul, though he finds in these analogies, not conscious plagiarism, but “the parallel working of similar forces” (Religious Experience of Paul, chapters iv, v). Kirsopp Lake writes, “Christianity has not borrowed from the mystery-religions, because it was always, at least in Europe, mystery-religion itself” (The Earlier Epistles of Paul, 215).

    On the other hand, Schweitzer wholly denies the hypothesis of the direct or indirect influence of the Mysteries on Paul’s thought (Geschichte der Paulinischen Forschung).

    The whole question is sub judice among scholars, and until more evidence be forthcoming from inscriptions, etc., we shall perhaps vainly expect unanimous verdict.

    It can hardly be doubted that at least the language of Paul, and perhaps to some extent his thought, is colored by the phraseology current among the cults.

    Paul had a remarkably sympathetic and receptive mind, by no means closed to influences from the Greek-Roman environment of his day.

    Witness his use of illustrations drawn from the athletic festivals, the Greek theater (1Co 4:9) and the Roman camp. He must have been constantly exposed to the contagion of the mystic societies.

    Tarsus was a seat of the Mithra religion; and the chief centers of Paul’s activities, e.g. Corinth, Antioch and Ephesus, were headquarters of mystic religion. We are not surprised that he should have borrowed from t
    he vocabulary of the Mysteries, not only the word musterion, but memuemai, “I learned the secret,” literally, “I have been initiated” (Php 4:12); sphragizesthai, “to be sealed” (Eph 1:13, etc.); teleios, “perfect,” term applied in the Mysteries to the fully instructed as opposed to novices (1Co 2:6,7; Col 1:28, etc.) (note, outside of Paul, epoptai, “eye-witnesses,”2Pe 1:16).

    Further, the secret of Paul’s gospel among the Gentiles lay, humanly speaking, in the fact that it contained elements that appealed to what was best and most vital in contemporary thought; and doubtless the Mysteries, by transcending all lines of mere citizenship, prepared the way for the universal religion.

    On the other hand, we must beware of a too facile acceptance of this hypothesis in its extreme form. Christianity can be adequately explained only by reference, not to what it had in common with other religions, but to what was distinctive and original in it.

    Paul was after all a Jew (though a broad one), who always retained traces of his Pharisaic training, and who viewed idolatry with abhorrence; and the chief formative factor of his thinking was his own profound religious experience.

    It is inconceivable that such a man should so assimilate Gentile modes of thought as to be completely colored by them.

    The characteristics which his teaching has in common with the pagan religions are simply a witness to the common religious wants of mankind, and not to his indebtedness to them.

    What turned these religions into Mysteries was the secrecy of their rites; but in the New Testament there are no secret rites.

    The gospel “mystery” (as we have seen) is not a secret deliberately withheld from the multitude and revealed only to a privileged religious aristocracy, but something which was once a secret and is so no longer.

    The perfect openness of Christ and His apostles sets them in a world apart from the mystic schools.

    It is true that later the Mysteries exercised a great influence on ecclesiastical doctrine and practice, especially on baptism and the Eucharist (see Hatch, Hibbert Lectures, chapter x). But in the New Testament, acts of worship are not as yet regarded as mystic rites.

    The most we can say is that some New Testament writers (especially Paul) make use of expressions and analogies derived from the mystery-religions; but, so far as our present evidence goes, we cannot agree that the pagan cults exercised a central or formative influence on them.

    LITERATURE.

    There is a large and growing literature on this subject. Its modern scientific study began with C.A. Lobeck’s Aglaophamus (1829). The following recent works may be specially mentioned: Gustav Anrich, Das antike Mysterienwesen (1894); G. Wobbermin, Religiongeschichtliche Studien zur Frage, etc. (1896); E. Hatch, Essays in Biblical Greek (1889) and Hibbert Lectures, 1888 (published 1890); F.B. Jevons, An Introduction to the History of Religion (1896); S. Cheethara, The Mysteries, Pagan and Christian (1897); R. Reitzenstein, Die hellenistischen Mysterienreligionen (1910); P. Gardner, The Religious Experience of Paul (1911); K. Lake, The Earlier Epistles of Paul (1911); articles on “Mystery” in Encyclopedia Britannica (11th edition), edition 9 (W.M. Ramsay), and edition 11 (L.R. Farnell), Encyclopedia Biblica (A. Julicher), Hastings, Dictionary of the Bible (five volumes) (A. Stewart); 1-volume Hastings, Dictionary of the Bible; (G.G. Findlay); Hastings, Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels (R.W. Bacon); articles on musterion in Cremer and Grimm-Thayer New Testament Lexicons; the commentaries, including J.B. Lightfoot on Colossians, J. Armitage Robinson on Ephesians, H. Lietzmann on 1 Corinthians; 9 articles in The Expositor on “St. Paul and the Mystery Religions” by Professor H.A.A. Kennedy (April, 1912, to February, 1913).

    http://www.blueletterbible.org/Search….14#ISBE
    Written by D. Miall Edwards

    Now, if it is a mystery to you, it is either your not of the righteous, or you made it a mystery, or you follow false teachers, or it's not from 'Elohim. There are no mystery's that 'Elohim will not reveal.

    #161763
    Tim Kraft
    Participant

    Quote (katjo @ Dec. 02 2009,00:55)
    Nick, w.j. post is scriptural.  Jesus is called our great God and Savior. And scripture does say God was manifest in the flesh! you who dont believe are denying these scriptures! there is one GOD, who is the  LORD ,who became flesh.  Mark 12; 29 THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD! (jESUS IS LORD !)You are seeing “a Son” as a son like we have, but that is not so. By the incarnation we do not mean that God was turned into a human or that Jesus ceased to be God while he was a man. The incarnation means that while remaining God, Jesus took upon a new nature – a human nature. The incarnation was the uniting the divine and the human into one being, one person. Jesus Christ was fully God and fully human.

    katjo


    Katjo: For whatever it is worth, I agree with your post! Bless you, TK

    #161775
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Tim Kraft @ Dec. 02 2009,22:13)

    Quote (katjo @ Dec. 02 2009,00:55)
    Nick, w.j. post is scriptural.  Jesus is called our great God and Savior. And scripture does say God was manifest in the flesh! you who dont believe are denying these scriptures! there is one GOD, who is the  LORD ,who became flesh.  Mark 12; 29 THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD! (jESUS IS LORD !)You are seeing “a Son” as a son like we have, but that is not so. By the incarnation we do not mean that God was turned into a human or that Jesus ceased to be God while he was a man. The incarnation means that while remaining God, Jesus took upon a new nature – a human nature. The incarnation was the uniting the divine and the human into one being, one person. Jesus Christ was fully God and fully human.

    katjo


    Katjo: For whatever it is worth, I agree with your post! Bless you, TK


    the mystery card is pulled every time a trinitarian is backed into a corner. It is from the roots of the Trinity. Gnosticism is a Greek Philosophy in which the believer has a special knowledge not available to the common person.

    #161776
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.

    #161777

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 02 2009,07:12)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.

    Im sorry, I thought I did mention that somewhere in here. You are absolutly correct, it was considered a simple and normal custom, that was practiced by many.

    #161778
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:09)

    Quote (Tim Kraft @ Dec. 02 2009,22:13)

    Quote (katjo @ Dec. 02 2009,00:55)
    Nick, w.j. post is scriptural.  Jesus is called our great God and Savior. And scripture does say God was manifest in the flesh! you who dont believe are denying these scriptures! there is one GOD, who is the  LORD ,who became flesh.  Mark 12; 29 THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD! (jESUS IS LORD !)You are seeing “a Son” as a son like we have, but that is not so. By the incarnation we do not mean that God was turned into a human or that Jesus ceased to be God while he was a man. The incarnation means that while remaining God, Jesus took upon a new nature – a human nature. The incarnation was the uniting the divine and the human into one being, one person. Jesus Christ was fully God and fully human.

    katjo


    Katjo: For whatever it is worth, I agree with your post! Bless you, TK


    the mystery card is pulled every time a trinitarian is backed into a corner. It is from the roots of the Trinity. Gnosticism is a Greek Philosophy in which the believer has a special knowledge not available to the common person.


    Martian,
    There you go speaking through the meds again. It was Paul and not WJ who said that the incarnation was a “mystery.” So if you're going to accuse someone of pulling the “mystery card” then accuse Paul. WJ was merely citing Paul.

    Paul said also that God's ways are a mystery (Rom. 11:34-35). By this he meant that God's ways are past finding out.

    Again, it was Paul who said that the incarnation was a “mystery.” So get off the meds and try to make an intelligible argment here. You anti-trinitarians think you know the mind of the Lord but you do not (Rom. 11:34-35).

    thinker

    #161779
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:12)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.


    Matian is still on the meds I see. However you wish to define the term “worship” does not matter because Christ receives it WITH the Father:

    13 And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying:

        “ Blessing and honor and glory and power
         Be to Him who sits on the throne,
         And to the Lamb, forever and ever!”

    What part of “and to the Lamb” do you not understand? Try posting before you take your meds so you may acquire a little more coherence when you speak. It doesn't matter how you define “worship” for it is to be given to the Father “and to the Lamb.”

    And don't put too much stock in that novice Constitutionalist who tries to pass himself off as educated.

    thinker

    #161784
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,02:44)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:09)

    Quote (Tim Kraft @ Dec. 02 2009,22:13)

    Quote (katjo @ Dec. 02 2009,00:55)
    Nick, w.j. post is scriptural.  Jesus is called our great God and Savior. And scripture does say God was manifest in the flesh! you who dont believe are denying these scriptures! there is one GOD, who is the  LORD ,who became flesh.  Mark 12; 29 THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD! (jESUS IS LORD !)You are seeing “a Son” as a son like we have, but that is not so. By the incarnation we do not mean that God was turned into a human or that Jesus ceased to be God while he was a man. The incarnation means that while remaining God, Jesus took upon a new nature – a human nature. The incarnation was the uniting the divine and the human into one being, one person. Jesus Christ was fully God and fully human.

    katjo


    Katjo: For whatever it is worth, I agree with your post! Bless you, TK


    the mystery card is pulled every time a trinitarian is backed into a corner. It is from the roots of the Trinity. Gnosticism is a Greek Philosophy in which the believer has a special knowledge not available to the common person.


    Martian,
    There you go speaking through the meds again. It was Paul and not WJ who said that the incarnation was a “mystery.” So if you're going to accuse someone of pulling the “mystery card” then accuse Paul. WJ was merely citing Paul.

    Paul said also that God's ways are a mystery (Rom. 11:34-35). By this he meant that God's ways are past finding out.

    Again, it was Paul who said that the incarnation was a “mystery.” So get off the meds and try to make an intelligible argment here. You anti-trinitarians think you know the mind of the Lord but you do not (Rom. 11:34-35).

    thinker


    Funny, I do not see the word “incarnation” in the context at all. Why do you feel a need to import a word with obvious doctrinal bias into the text? Could it be that the concept of the incarnation in this context is an illusion so you must conjure it up?

    #161785
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,02:52)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:12)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.


    Matian is still on the meds I see. However you wish to define the term “worship” does not matter because Christ receives it WITH the Father:

    13 And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying:

        “ Blessing and honor and glory and power
         Be to Him who sits on the throne,
         And to the Lamb, forever and ever!”

    What part of “and to the Lamb” do you not understand? Try posting before you take your meds so you may acquire a little more coherence when you speak. It doesn't matter how you define “worship” for it is to be given to the Father “and to the Lamb.”

    And don't put too much stock in that novice Constitutionalist who tries to pass himself off as educated.

    thinker


    You know I do not remember making a personal attack on you. why are you making this personal? Is this a fruit of your doctrine?

    #161786
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,02:52)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:12)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.


    Matian is still on the meds I see. However you wish to define the term “worship” does not matter because Christ receives it WITH the Father:

    13 And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying:

        “ Blessing and honor and glory and power
         Be to Him who sits on the throne,
         And to the Lamb, forever and ever!”

    What part of “and to the Lamb” do you not understand? Try posting before you take your meds so you may acquire a little more coherence when you speak. It doesn't matter how you define “worship” for it is to be given to the Father “and to the Lamb.”

    And don't put too much stock in that novice Constitutionalist who tries to pass himself off as educated.

    thinker


    so you are saying that because worship is given to God and to the lamb that this proves that the lamb is deity?
    Ex 18:7 Mosses gives worship to his father. Is Mosses father also deity?
    Worship is simply bowing down and placing your head on the ground in respect. It can be given to God and to man. The lamb of God is very worthy of respect. All power in heaven and Earth is given to him. the creation bows to the one who has been given that authority over it.
    BTW The lamb was given the authority because he did not have the authority on his own.

    #161787
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,03:43)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,02:52)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,02:12)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2009,21:10)
    Constitutionalist wrote:

    Quote

    You did not answer my question. You say it is a mystery and know one can understand trinity! Why would 'elohim keep it a mystery? There is no reason to keep it a mystery. Well answer my question.

    If Worshiping Jesus means illogical when he states mystery I have to agree.  I also agree that God is not an illogical God.


    Perhaps you should define “worship”. The word is not restricted to worshiping of a God. It simply means to prostrate oneself in respect.


    Matian is still on the meds I see. However you wish to define the term “worship” does not matter because Christ receives it WITH the Father:

    13 And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, I heard saying:

        “ Blessing and honor and glory and power
         Be to Him who sits on the throne,
         And to the Lamb, forever and ever!”

    What part of “and to the Lamb” do you not understand? Try posting before you take your meds so you may acquire a little more coherence when you speak. It doesn't matter how you define “worship” for it is to be given to the Father “and to the Lamb.”

    And don't put too much stock in that novice Constitutionalist who tries to pass himself off as educated.

    thinker


    You know I do not remember making a personal attack on you.  why are you making this personal?  Is this a fruit of your doctrine?


    Martian,
    You have a poor memory. You and Con didn't pay attention to what WJ said. He cited Paul man! So why don't you just accuse Paul of pulling the “mystery card?”

    I have become quite impatient with you novices.

    thinker

    #161788
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    thinker…..you seem to be on Meds, you can't seem understand when it says GOD the FATHER (AND) Jesus Christ that the word (AND) denotes two, not ONE>:D

    martian and Con are both right on, But you mystery religious conceptions cause you to not see and understand it.  IMO

    gene

    #161790
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To All…………The trinity and Preexistence are indeed (mysterious and illogical) those who preach them don't understand them and when cornered they say well, it's a (MYSTERY) and indeed it is a MYSTERY RELIGION, and has to be taken on “FAITH”< BLIND FAITH. IMO

    peace and love to all……………..gene

    #161792
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 03 2009,04:12)
    To All…………The trinity and Preexistence are indeed (mysterious and illogical) those who preach them don't understand them and when cornered they say well, it's a (MYSTERY) and indeed it is a MYSTERY RELIGION, and has to be taken on “FAITH”< BLIND FAITH. IMO

    peace and love to all……………..gene


    Gene,
    Paul said that the ways of God are mysterious. Does this mean that His ways are illogical?

    33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and His ways past finding out!
          34 “ For who has known the mind of the LORD?
         Or who has become His counselor?”
          35 “ Or who has first given to Him
         And it shall be repaid to him?”

    By your logic God's ways are also illogical because they are mysterious. Paul said that the incarnation is a “mystery.” This is not WJ's word.

    thinker

    #161794
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,04:26)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 03 2009,04:12)
    To All…………The trinity and Preexistence are indeed (mysterious and illogical) those who preach them don't understand them and when cornered they say well, it's a (MYSTERY) and indeed it is a MYSTERY RELIGION, and has to be taken on “FAITH”< BLIND FAITH. IMO

    peace and love to all……………..gene


    Gene,
    Paul said that the ways of God are mysterious. Does this mean that His ways are illogical?

    33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and His ways past finding out!
          34 “ For who has known the mind of the LORD?
         Or who has become His counselor?”
          35 “ Or who has first given to Him
         And it shall be repaid to him?”

    By your logic God's ways are also illogical because they are mysterious. Paul said that the incarnation is a “mystery.” This is not WJ's word.

    thinker


    Again you pull out words not in scripture.
    show me where Paul uses the word “incarnation”.

    #161796
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 03 2009,04:12)
    To All…………The trinity and Preexistence are indeed (mysterious and illogical) those who preach them don't understand them and when cornered they say well, it's a (MYSTERY) and indeed it is a MYSTERY RELIGION, and has to be taken on “FAITH”< BLIND FAITH. IMO

    peace and love to all……………..gene


    Right again Gene

    #161797
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 03 2009,04:44)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 03 2009,04:26)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 03 2009,04:12)
    To All…………The trinity and Preexistence are indeed (mysterious and illogical) those who preach them don't understand them and when cornered they say well, it's a (MYSTERY) and indeed it is a MYSTERY RELIGION, and has to be taken on “FAITH”< BLIND FAITH. IMO

    peace and love to all……………..gene


    Gene,
    Paul said that the ways of God are mysterious. Does this mean that His ways are illogical?

    33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and His ways past finding out!
          34 “ For who has known the mind of the LORD?
         Or who has become His counselor?”
          35 “ Or who has first given to Him
         And it shall be repaid to him?”

    By your logic God's ways are also illogical because they are mysterious. Paul said that the incarnation is a “mystery.” This is not WJ's word.

    thinker


    Again you pull out words not in scripture.
    show me where Paul uses the word “incarnation”.


    Come on! The word “incarnation” is the word for God coming IN the flesh. Thus, you have the word “incarnation.” Paul said that His being manifested “IN the flesh” is the “great mystery of godliness.”

    Again, it is Paul you ought to be accusing of pulling out the “mystery card.” WJ is not responsible for saying it is a mystery.

    thinker

Viewing 20 posts - 5,701 through 5,720 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account