Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,121 through 5,140 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #128685
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 23 2009,13:55)
    Hi E,
    Was he man and also the God of whom he said he was the Son?

    John 10:36
    Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?

    complex question informal fallacy

    topical

    blessings,
    ken

    #128699
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi E,
    Simplicity is a key to the kingdom.

    2 Corinthians 11
    1Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly: and indeed bear with me.

    2For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.

    3But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

    4For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

    Those who would make their god a trinity have to tie themselves in knots to maintain this false facade.

    #128708
    SEEKING
    Participant

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 23 2009,10:06)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 23 2009,14:08)
    Hi E,
    Yes even my words you copy.
    Are you able to stand alone and dare to search scripture without other men to guide you?


    there is no scripture in your post at all Nick, therefore I have to say that you are writing merely the words of a sinful fallen man and there can be no truth on them….

    blessings,
    ken


    Must there be a scripture with each post in order to validate truth therin?

    I do not see scripture in several of your last posts.

    Luk 11:46  And he said, “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers.

    #128711
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Hi N

    Quote
    Simplicity is a key to the kingdom.. …Those who would make their god a trinity have to tie themselves in knots to maintain this false facade.

    This is just your interpretation and opinion and holds no weight at all…. as these are just the words of a sinful fallen man….

    blessings,
    ken

    #128712
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Quote (SEEKING @ April 24 2009,08:09)

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 23 2009,10:06)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 23 2009,14:08)
    Hi E,
    Yes even my words you copy.
    Are you able to stand alone and dare to search scripture without other men to guide you?


    there is no scripture in your post at all Nick, therefore I have to say that you are writing merely the words of a sinful fallen man and there can be no truth on them….

    blessings,
    ken


    Must there be a scripture with each post in order to validate truth therin?

    I do not see scripture in several of your last posts.

    Luk 11:46  And he said, “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers.


    Hey Seeking… of course not…. I am glad you see the folly of thinking so… but Nick offers his opinion and interpretation of the Scriptures constantly, and then thinks he can, with a wave of his hand, dismiss anyone else's words as merely the words of “scholars”, or just an “interpretation” and “opinion”, as if this fact alone actually refutes what is said!! lol…. I am merely pointing out to Nick that he constantly offers his opinion and interpretation of the Scriptures, and if he can, then so can anyone else, be they a professional biblical scholar, or a lay person like myself. And just because my interpretation differs from his, or if I post the words of a commentator or linguistic scholar that differs from his, he cannot consistently dismiss these words as being false simply because the words posted were not the Scriptures only, or “only” an interpretation of the scripture, as he himself engages in interpretation as well.

    good catch :)

    blessings,
    ken

    #128719
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Ken….> Amen, brother. Nick criticizes others for expressing their opinions but has no problem expressing (HIS) does He. Kind of Hypocritical seems to me . But we brothers and sisters have to deal with what we have, i still love HIM just don't agree with him on some things. I believe he is sincere even if He is sincerely wrong at times, but then I also could be on some things. I just post what i believe is what GOD the FATHER has given me, in my understanding, I hope i don't offend or prevent anyone. That would be a terrible thing to be attributed to my account, If i have offended anyone I ask for forgiveness of you ALL.

    Peace and love to you and all………………………..gene

    #128722
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 24 2009,08:26)
    Hi N

    Quote
    Simplicity is a key to the kingdom.. …Those who would make their god a trinity have to tie themselves in knots to maintain this false facade.

    This is just your interpretation and opinion and holds no weight at all…. as these are just the words of a sinful fallen man….

    blessings,
    ken


    Hi E,
    Judgement belongs to one greater than you.

    #128723
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick……..apply that to yourself also brother.

    love and peace to you…………………………..gene

    #128746
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 24 2009,10:20)

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 24 2009,08:26)
    Hi N

    Quote
    Simplicity is a key to the kingdom.. …Those who would make their god a trinity have to tie themselves in knots to maintain this false facade.

    This is just your interpretation and opinion and holds no weight at all…. as these are just the words of a sinful fallen man….

    blessings,
    ken


    Hi E,
    Judgement belongs to one greater than you.


    that's just your sinful fallen opinion, I see no Scripture at all to back up your claims…..

    blessings,
    ken

    #128747
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi E,
    So you would be as God and judge men?

    #128754
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ April 24 2009,10:00)
    Ken….> Amen, brother. Nick criticizes others for expressing their opinions but has no problem expressing (HIS) does He.  Kind of Hypocritical seems to me . But we brothers and sisters have to deal with what we have, i still love HIM just don't agree with him on some things. I believe he is sincere even if He is sincerely wrong at times, but then I also could be on some things. I just post what i believe is what GOD the FATHER has given me,  in my understanding, I hope i don't offend or prevent anyone. That would be a terrible thing to be attributed to my account, If i have offended anyone I ask for forgiveness of you ALL.

    Peace and love to you and all………………………..gene


    oh I agree Gene…. I am serious, but at the same time I am poking a bit of fun at him as well…. he does have a double standard and hopefully he can come to see that… and I appreciate your sharing that you see the situation in the same way… hopefully in the testimony of several people he will see the truth of what we say and change his ways. Hopefully he is not beyond being teachable at least in this area. And I have no doubt that nearly everyone here is sincere in their beliefs, I know you are, I know I am, and I don't doubt Nick's sincerity. Of course sincerity is no marker of truth necessarily, as Romans 10:2 shows.

    In any case, I have a very sarcastic sense of humor and I hope this does not offend anyone either, and I too ask forgiveness if I have caused offense…. to be passionate about truth, to confront what we take to be serous doctrinal error on the very essentials of the core of the Christian faith, and to do so in a way that glorifies God, is some of the finest most difficult lines we walk.

    I recently shared with a dear brother in Christ an article that also points out that we need not adopt any approach in our apologetic endeavors but than that which we see in Scripture, that is, we do not need to be as he put it “nicer than God”, we do not need to be politically or culturally correct, we need to be faithful to the Scriptures both in what they say and how they say it, and lets face it, Jesus, Paul… Peter… John… the OT prophets…. all were really really tough on those who were committing significant doctrinal error.

    Paul tells the Judiazers that if they were so concerned about circumcision that he wishes they would just go ahead and cut their own you know what off, and is pretty tough talk, if not also slightly hilarious!! Galatians 5:12 (ESV) I wish those who unsettle you would emasculate themselves!” Anyways… the point is, I want to be firm in my beliefs, firm in my confrontation with what I consider to be heresy, and just as there is no inherent contradiction is saying that God is both loving and wrathful, and that His wrath does not nullify His love, it seems that Christians can follow this, as well as Jesus' example, and that of the disciples, that firm stern rebuke does not have to be therefore unloving just because it is stern.

    I believe that telling people who deny that Trinity that they are involved in rank heresy, and that they have gone beyond the bounds of what may rightly be considered “Christianity” is the most loving thing I can do. It is not as if I am being judgmental here either, every one who identifies themselves as “Christian”, or at least most everyone realizes that at some point a person no longer can rightly call themselves a Christian…. say for instance someone who denies the existence of God or a Satanist…. the point being, we all draw our lines in the sand… mine just happens t be drawn where the church has drawn it for nearly 200 years.

    blessings,
    ken

    #128755
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi E,
    Is not heresy to teach beyond the foundation of scripture or has it been redefined to be beyond tradition?

    #128756
    epistemaniac
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 24 2009,13:35)
    Hi E,
    So you would be as God and judge men?


    I am judging your posts, and their lack of scripture, just like you judge everyone else's… if you don't like that, then I suggest that you stop being hypocritical and realize that just as you put into your own words what you believe the Scriptures to be teaching, that anyone and everyone else is entitled to do that exact same thing, whether that person be a scholar writing a commentary or lexicon, or whether it be a lay person like myself…

    blessings,
    ken

    #128759
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi E,
    Strange but I thought you judged me as a sinner thus putting yourself beyond such charges.
    Anyway how can you judge the words of another if scripture is not your foundation?
    Trinity is not of the teaching of scripture so it seems a weak foundation

    #128816
    SEEKING
    Participant

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 23 2009,13:31)

    Quote (SEEKING @ April 24 2009,08:09)

    Quote (epistemaniac @ April 23 2009,10:06)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 23 2009,14:08)
    Hi E,
    Yes even my words you copy.
    Are you able to stand alone and dare to search scripture without other men to guide you?


    there is no scripture in your post at all Nick, therefore I have to say that you are writing merely the words of a sinful fallen man and there can be no truth on them….

    blessings,
    ken


    Must there be a scripture with each post in order to validate truth therin?

    I do not see scripture in several of your last posts.

    Luk 11:46  And he said, “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers.


    Hey Seeking… of course not…. I am glad you see the folly of thinking so… but Nick offers his opinion and interpretation of the Scriptures constantly, and then thinks he can, with a wave of his hand, dismiss anyone else's words as merely the words of “scholars”, or just an “interpretation” and “opinion”, as if this fact alone actually refutes what is said!! lol…. I am merely pointing out to Nick that he constantly offers his opinion and interpretation of the Scriptures, and if he can, then so can anyone else, be they a professional biblical scholar, or a lay person like myself. And just because my interpretation differs from his, or if I post the words of a commentator or linguistic scholar that differs from his, he cannot consistently dismiss these words as being false simply because the words posted were not the Scriptures only, or “only” an interpretation of the scripture, as he himself engages in interpretation as well.

    good catch :)

    blessings,
    ken


    Thank you for that clarification. Granting equal credence to opinion arrived at through study, lexicons, commentaries, etc.would be extending mutual respect.

    Respect, in much language used here seems vastly lacking.
    Perhaps it is because we get caught up in the fervor of our own convictions.

    We then pursue those convictions with a tenacity that forgets the Biblical principles of discourse. I fear that in that type of discussion there is only one winner and it is not God.

    2Ti 2:24  And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil,
    2Ti 2:25  correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth,

    Peace,

    Seeking :)

    #131729
    gollamudi
    Participant

    For brother T8,
    We better debate Jesus' preexistence on this wonderful thread instead on Trinity2.
    So you believe Jesus was preexisting as some being prior to his birth on this earth?

    #131730
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi all,
    “Pre-existence” is a mythological term which signifies that an entity had a real existence before its manifestation on earth, either in the mind of God or in heaven. It means that an entity is said to pre-exist because it exists with God before it's own manifestation. The same thing happened with Jesus. The word existed with God before it really manifested in the person Jesus. But whether the “word” was another being apart from God?

    Please think over
    Adam

    #131742
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Adam……….A word is not a being it is a (EXPRESSION OF INTELLECT) This is its simplest meaning. The word was with GOD because it was GOD'S Self Expression, even as our words are ourself expression and can be considered part of who we are. God brought all theings into existence through His words and powers. John 1:1 say's In the beginning (of everything) was the word (expressed intellegence) and this expressed intellegence was with God (Powers) and was GOD, Elohim or (POWERS). This intellect is also what enlightens every man coming into the earth. Jesus did not preexist His berth, He was foreordained (BUT) was manifested in our time, as Peter said, That means Jesus was in the foreknowledge of GOD or His plan from the beginning of creation, However like Jeremiah and Cyrus , He was not brought into existence until he was BORN and GOD the FATHER then gave him the fullness of the SPIRIT (INTELLECT) and He EXPRESSED those WORDS to US> But remember He said the WORDS were not His WORDS but the WORDS of HIM that sent Him. These words of GOD were in HIM, but man has turned this around and made HIM, HIMSELF the WORD and this is a way of stealing glory of the FATHER, something Jesus never did. The teaching of the Trinity, preexistence, and doctrines about demons , so-called (FREE WILLS) are all teachings of the APOSTATE CHURCHES> They plague the minds of those who buy into them and fill them with false understandings. We are told to come (OUT) of these false teaching or these plagues will work in our minds. They corrupt not only the truth of GOD but also the minds of those who believe and teach them. IMO

    peace and love to you Adam and yours……………………….gene

    #131763
    Cindy
    Participant

    To all I remember putting something down about the preexisting of Jesus, but I can't find it now. So I will put the Scriptures down how I proved it to me. Before I do that, I like to say the a J.W. first told me about that and I told Him He was stupid. God however did not leave me in that unbelief.

    Col.1:15-18 firstborn of all creation and firstborn of the dead, so in all He will have preeminence.
    Rev. 3:14 Again firstborn of all creation.
    John 1:1 this scripture in John I know Gene will not agree with. But let us see what
    verse 3 said He was the one that made all.
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory I had with You before the world was.” Jesus own word's. Unless you want to call Jesus a liar, you have to say that I am right in this, I had to not to long ago.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #132630
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi Sis Irene,
    I appreciate your concern on preexistence of Jesus. But the scriptures you quoted are well answered in this thread 'n-number of times. If you want more insights please gothrough these webpages. You may better understand them. The preexistence which the Bible infers is only the Ideal preexistence in the mind and the plan of God but not literal preexistence what brother Gene, myself, Kerwin and others believe here. P_lease understand.

    1. http://www.bibleed.com/biblete….nce.asp
    2. http://adonimessiah.blogspot.com/2008….ce.html
    3. http://www.philosophy-religion.org/faith/nature-preexistance.htm
    4. http://cdelph.org/jesus.html
    5. http://www.esnips.com/doc….ISTENCE

Viewing 20 posts - 5,121 through 5,140 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account