Flat Earthers gather in New Zealand

Flat Earthers hold a conference in Auckland, with speakers from around the globe.

Flat Earth celebrities have flown across the globe to speak at the Flat Earth Expo in Auckland, New Zealand. Flat Earthers believe that we live on a flat plane rather than the accepted globe model. Flat Earthers also believe that most evidence to the contrary is controlled by a giant conspiracy of which NASA is at the forefront.

The Flat Earth model has the north pole in the centre of a flat circular disc and the South Pole as not existing at all. Instead, they believe that Antarctica is a giant encircling ice wall that hems in the world’s oceans. They point out that nearly all of us have never visited Antarctica, thus we rely on the testimony of a few who claim to have visited the frozen continent, and who are mostly lying to us and are part of the conspiracy. Flat Earthers are quick to point out that it is illegal to visit Antarctica. Whether this is true or not, the fact is, it is illegal to do a number of things in any protected wilderness areas of the world of which Antarctica is a special one.

This conference in Auckland comes with a huge opportunity. Flat Earthers flying to New Zealand from the Northern Hemisphere have a unique opportunity to prove to themselves that the Earth is not flat and instead the mostly accepted globe. They only need to travel via South America to New Zealand and note the hours spent getting there will be way less than their Flat Earth model would have you believe. You see, the Flat Earth disc with no south pole has New Zealand, Australia, South America, and Africa many times apart in distance from each other as the globe suggests, simply because, instead of reducing down to a single point we call the South Pole, the area of land in the Southern Hemisphere expands out to the giant ice wall circumference of the whole disc. This projection is similar to how we view Canada, Russia, or even Antarctica on most world maps where they are many times larger on these maps than they are in reality . This is because maps have difficulty projecting a 3D globe onto their 2D canvas. In essence, the Flat Earth model is a 2D construct as it is a flat surface albeit disc shape, so it has the Southern Hemisphere as being much larger in area than it really is.

Sitting in an isolated spot in the Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand gives these Flat Earthers travelling to Auckland the unique opportunity to debunk their own belief. But how many will actually test this out? I am thinking perhaps a few, but most of these guys will just be looking forward to rubbing shoulders with their Flat Earth brothers when they get here and on-route looking out toward the flat horizon because they are simply not flying high enough to see the curve.

Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 6,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #822833
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    And to answer your question, “Yes”, Nick.  Just as “my science” would be better if Gene insisted that the value of pi was 4.5 instead of 3.14.

    #822834
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Same as you.

    My opinion.

    #822835
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Okay, the history lesson ended with the Ptolemaic stationary earth system, which was an “accurate predictive model“, and generally accepted “until the Earth was displaced from the centre of the universe in the 16th and 17th centuries by the Copernican system and by Kepler’s laws of planetary motion“.

    Copernican system, in astronomy, model of the solar system centred on the Sun, with Earth and other planets moving around it, formulated by Nicolaus Copernicus, and published in 1543.

    https://www.britannica.com/science/Copernican-system

    Copernicus didn’t really “discover” anything new.  He just decided that Ptolemy’s system of the heavenly bodies moving around a centralized earth could also be explained by imagining the sun was the centralized figure, with the earth and everything else moving around it.  But let me stress that there is no possible way of knowing this unless we could go outside of the system, and look at it from afar… something that wasn’t done until the 1970’s – if at all.

    Kepler’s addition to modern cosmology was to change Copernicus’ circular orbits to elliptical ones in 1609.  And then in 1685, Isaac Newton proposed a theoretical force called “gravity” to explain how all these orbiting motions could be kept in check.  It’s called the “Law of Gravitation”, but it is anything but.  No experiment on earth could prove such a thing even existed, and so again, it wasn’t validated until the 1970’s – if at all.

    Are you starting to get the picture here?  For many thousands of years, everyone “knew” the earth was fixed and stationary, with heavenly luminaries circling around it on appointed circuits – like the Bible says and like their own observations told them.  And only for the last 475 years (a mere 7% of mankind’s history) has the heliocentric model even been seriously considered.

    So this flat earth thing isn’t some crazy idea formed by ignorant goat farmers – nor is it a brand new movement.  Despite what the mainstream media and big science would have you believe, the heliocentric model has never been “settled science”, and brilliant people have been exposing the many flaws associated with it since it was concocted within the minds of a few flawed mortal men.

    More to come…

     

     

     

    #822836
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Nick:  Same as you.

    My opinion.

    Really?  Is it only a matter of opinion that 2+2=4?   Is 3.14 as the value of pi just a matter of opinion – and any other opinion as to its value is equally valid?  Hmm…

    #822837
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    True Science keeps developing new knowledge.

    But you seem to offer us old ignorant historical opinions and anecdotal experience.

     

    The glue that holds it together for you is is your impassioned belief.

     

    #822838
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Continuing on, in 1871, G.B. Airy set out to prove the heliocentric model by proving that the earth really was rotating.  It was the first test that would actually be able to scientifically verify that the earth was in motion.  The idea was to fill a telescope with water, since water slows down light, and determine from that whether it was the earth moving, or the stars moving over the earth.  The reasoning behind it is a little complicated to put into words, and so I recommend this 7 minute narrated documentary about it…

     

    Suffice it to say, the experiment to scientifically prove the earth was in motion is famously known as “Airy’s Failure”.  Of course it’s only a “failure” to those who believe the earth is in motion.  To those of us who believe it is stationary with stars moving around us overhead, it was a fantastic success.

    So as of 1871, we had a heliocentric theory, and a scientific experiment that concluded the earth was stationary with stars moving overhead.

     

     

    #822839
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    It would be exciting if you were telling us of the amazing work the Holy Spirit was doing through you.

    Healings, deliverances, baptisms etc.

     

    Flat earth has to be the ultimate in sidetracks.

    #822840
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Nick:  True Science keeps developing new knowledge.

    Although it’s clear you don’t even know what “science” is, may I point out that what you refer to as “true science” says we can’t see a full moon in the daytime? (Look it up for yourself.) Real science, on the other hand, demonstrates that we can.

    Nick:  But you seem to offer us old ignorant historical opinions and anecdotal experience.

    It’s actually quite the opposite, as anyone who’s been following this thread can easily see.  It is you who keeps offering opinion and theory, while I’m offering observational scientific evidence.  Which do you think carries more weight?

    Nick:  The glue that holds it together for you is is your impassioned belief.

    Again, it’s the exact opposite.  Have you considered the “arguments” against me that have been so far laid out on this thread?  Everyone of them lacks observational evidence, and is instead a desperate plea designed to hold on to this impassioned belief in a spinning ball that none of you have ever even observed or experienced.

    I offer my own eyewitness and photo of a moon being eclipsed from top to bottom, you offer condescending snark.

    I offer my own eyewitness and photo of a full moon in bright daylight, you offer tripe.

    I offer Joshua commanding the sun and moon to stand still in the sky, you offer scriptural gymnastics.

     

    I’m curious why you haven’t provided a single proof that the earth is a spinning ball flying through a near-infinite vacuum… or even a direct and honest answer as to why you believe that far fetched notion in the first place.

    #822841
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Nick: It would be exciting if you were telling us of the amazing work the Holy Spirit was doing through you.

    Healings, deliverances, baptisms etc.

     

    Flat earth has to be the ultimate in sidetracks.

    Spoken like a man who is beginning to realize that his ball is going to be taken away – like it or not – and the only thing he can think of to stop it is to change the subject and hope the ball thief forgets all about it and moves on to something else.  🙂

    Nick, why can I see a full moon in the middle of the day?

    #822842
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    No it sad to see a man who seemed to want to progress the kingdom

    wasting his energy trying convince others he is right about something less relevant.

     

     

    #822843
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Next up, the Michelson-Morley experiment to test for the alleged motion of the earth.  This one is intense, and will bring us right smack in the middle of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity… which was developed as a direct answer to their experiments.  I will go a little more in depth on this one, as it is a lot of priceless information.  So until tomorrow, cheers.

    #822844
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    The sun-worshipping heliocentric model has everything to do with the Kingdom of God, and His right to rule over His own creation.  But if you can’t even offer a reason why we can all see full moons in the daytime, how will you be able to accept the much deeper things I’m going to show you about the god of this age, and how he’s been running this earth for quite a while already?  Christians are dropping away from the faith in alarming numbers, Nick.  They are doing so because they’ve been led to believe they are insignificant pond scum that dwell on an insignificant rock in the midst of trillions of others just like it.  They’re being led to believe that our world was an accident of nature, life was an accident of nature, and God is just a silly mythological superstition made up by ignorant goat herders eons ago.  Why adhere to moral values or value life when we’re all just big accidents and a plague on the “planet” anyway?  Abortion, eugenics, assisted suicide… do these things ring a bell to you?  They all stem from the same Big Bang heliocentric model, Nick.  You don’t see it yet, but if I am successful, you will.

    Have a good day.  I’m off to dinner with my son, who turned 17 yesterday.  He’s quite a bit bigger now than he is in my avatar.  🙂

    #822845
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    If it is obvious  to you we do not understand what science is

    why do you bombard us with your version of it?

     

    #822846
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    We do not need evidence that God exists so stop worrying.

    We know Him and enjoy the harmony and order of His creation.

     

    #822847
    Miia
    Participant

    Woah Mike, your son is 17 already? My youngest is 13 now.

    But that is a good question. Why can we see the moon in the daytime. Isn’t it supposed to be on the other side of the globe by then.

     

    #822848
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Yes this might be fertile ground to plant your seeds.

    Believers are a special breed and can be naive and just like children,

    till the Spirit of Christ becomes their teacher and they learn to ignore the voice of strangers.

    #822849
    Miia
    Participant

    Hi Nick. Was that post referring to me?

    #822850
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Miia,

    No way.

    #822851
    Miia
    Participant

    Ok Nick.

    #822852
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Miia,

    Paul expressed similar concerns in Gal4.19

    We are told to be as little children to enter the kingdom.

    Then advised to be as gentle as doves and as cunning as serpents.

Viewing 20 posts - 201 through 220 (of 6,414 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account