My advise to you is to never say that if you ever preach the gospel. You know the old saying:

Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt

Seriously, your reason is a foolish one to the extreme, but you are free to have an opinion. Just don’t mix Gid unto your argument because:

A little leaven leavens the whole…[Read more]

Most of us live in an age of increased knowledge and technology

Wow that was amazing, @SpaceX #FalconHeavy pic.twitter.com/Y0ozNxUtun

— Forger Stucky (@Stuck4ger) November 1, 2022

The world means ‘age’. It is aeon or eon.

But the planet is probably very old and could even have had other worlds / ages / aeons.

to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Mike it’s Monday Meme day

A good saying that should be heeded.

Genesis 1:7… Thus God made the raqia, and divided the waters which were under the raqia from the waters which were above the raqia.

Very simple question:  Does this scripture say there are waters above the raqia itself?  Yes or No?

Genesis 1:14-17…  Then God said, Let there be lights in the raqia of the heavens…  God set them in the raq…

[Read more]

What do you mean “if” he was right?  Are you saying it’s possible that he was WRONG?  Yes or No?

David would not have been a perfect man. He may be right or wrong if he was referring to the second heaven.

I cannot verify which because Webb Telescope has not imaged a water layer outside the cosmos itself. If that happens, then I could be definit…[Read more]

Mike, you need to take a long hard look in the mirror.

Life is short and we will meet our maker soon enough.

But you can only change while you are here.

Be wise and take advantage of the time you have left.

He would be right if we are talking about the first heaven.

If he is talking about the second heaven, then he may or may not be right. But if he was right and there is water outside the cosmos, then we haven’t discovered it yet. But this has no bearing on the shape of the earth, so you have lost. This is not evidence the earth is flat is…[Read more]

Tiger: I am the winner

Mike: here’s a video of a man who is a shapeshifter. Look at his eyes when he blinks.

That is pretty much what has happened here.

Okay, then you ARE saying he is right.  Great.  Then please tell us what and where these waters above the heavens are.  Thanks.

Nope. I am reminding you that you need to be careful about establishing doctrine from such words. If we did that with all words in the bible, then we would need to craft a doctrine about Jesus having a demon. That is th…[Read more]

The sun, moon and stars are IN the raqia, and the waters above are ABOVE the entire raqia.

Nope. That raqia is the division created by the waters only.

God had already created the heavens and the earth in the beginning.

Sky is what we see when we look up. It is obvious that the clouds are in the sky and stars are in the sky. Speaking of the…[Read more]

Mike, the more you argue, the more I win.

You are making me more of a winner.

But I don’t take the credit myself because I have to admit that arguing for the truth is easy.

Telling lies and more lies to cover those lies is difficult.

This is why you are consistently losing mike.

I’ve explained my rules, right?  You refused to follow them, right?  The subject is closed UNTIL you follow those rules.  End of story.

Let me translate this for you. You cannot bring back the sun.

I wonder why? Maybe because the heliocentric model is true and you cannot bring back the biggest physical light in the cosmos from our point of view.

BOOMERANG!  More insults from a person who is literally speaking about HIMSELF!

Only a clown would think that the Bible recording what the Pharisees actually DID say is somehow the Bible being wrong.

Once again you are making false assumptions. Read my post again. I am stating that men say things in the bible that are not true, but historically…[Read more]

Notice how you’re speaking scripturally now.  You’re correctly calling it THE raqia, and distinguishing it FROM “the heavens” in general by acknowledging that it is a particular part OF “the heavens”.  That’s BIG progress!

Thank you. but I never denied such in the first place. I simply stated that God called the raqia – heavens. Accepting that…[Read more]

It proves deep down, you have no confidence in your own theory. If you did, you would bring back the sun and the whole world would be in wonder. But you would prefer not to win, but instead argue about a raqia that in itself is zero proof that the world is flat.

I’m not buying it. But I can clearly see the ramblings of a man who lost.

So then what you’re saying is that this particular line of the Bible is WRONG, right?

Recording what a person says does not make the bible wrong.

The Pharisees said, “Jesus uses the power of Beelzebul to force demons out of people.

However, I am not even saying that David was wrong. He says clouds cover the heavens. Thus the context of hea…[Read more]

I tend to steer clear of wild goose chases.

The important thing here is you cannot bring back the sun because it has set. Even scripture says the sun sets. You say it means something else, but refuse to bring back the sun and put this to bed. But you are happy to bring back small boats into view that never went over the horizon in the first…[Read more]