• Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Just a short point. We see in scripture descriptions for earth and the heavens. They are from our perspective of course because they are written for us. In reality, it could be a matrix and a bunch of code for all we know. But God who created the heavens is not going to divulge what it really is from where he is. No, he is going to speak to us…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Dude, I hate to tell you this again, but I think you’ve taken a picture of the entire mountain from 127 miles away – an impossible feat if we lived on a ball 25,000 miles in circumference.  I’m going to post your photo and name all over YouTube!  You’re going to be the biggest flat earth hero there ever was!

    All things are possible with God right?

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Mike, here is a half decent debunking video that has a nice explanation as to how you can see beyond the horizon. It has to do with water and there is a lot of water in my image and lots of other images that show supposedly too distant city skylines and mountains.

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Hey T8, I did a little “expert” analysis on the photos.  🙂  Do you see the same three landmarks/boulders that I have circled?  Do you see the same treeline I drew an oval around in each photo?  Do you see the same 5 peaks that I do?

     

    Dude, I hate to tell you this again, but I think you’ve taken a picture of the entire mountain from 127 miles…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    That’s interesting, since you have yet to provide one piece of evidence for the globe that you and I can personally verify – while I’ve already offered three pieces that anyone can verify, and which refute the globe you say has the weight in its corner.

    First off Mike, I think it is great that we can challenge even the most accepted notions in ou…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    I think it would have been detected by now if the so-called south had 1000s to millions of more auroras than the north. Just another fantastic unlikely thing you need to believe in the Flat Earth model. I believe the overwhelming weight is in the corner of a Globe Earth. You have to discard so much science, information, and experience to write it…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    But scripture does say the earth is fixed and cannot be moved, right? And it does say the earth rests on pillars, right? And Joshua did command the sun and the moon to stand still in the sky – as opposed to commanding both the earth and moon to stop rotating and orbiting, right? And Jesus did say “the sun will be darkened, the moon will not giv…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    t8, you may be right but 3,100 cubic miles of water makes a pretty large bucketful.

    In your description though, it sounds more like bouyancy and density than gravity. Just an observation.

    The point is density. To give an extreme example, it was hypothesised mathematically decades ago that a star could collapse when its fuel was nearly spent and…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Thats not necessarily so. Auroras are limited to where the excitement of the atmosphere is located. Just because there is a lot of area doesn’t mean that it must be covered by auroras.

    The globe earth explains it better though and it is very simple. Both poles have the same properties and experience about the same amount of auroras. In the Flat E…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Nick, Believers and followers of Christ can have varying views about other things that are not important to salvation. But I believe that we can be led into all truth, but that is not to say any of us have arrived yet. Testing all things to see of they are so.

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Without checking this, I would argue that liquid water is way more denser, but I admit that I could be wrong, but do not have time to research this. My thinking is a bucket of water in one hand and a bucket of atmosphere in the other, would lead to to the view that the bucket containing liquid water would weigh much more. In fact, if I was to…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    I tried it again using a simple table mat on a level table. I placed the table mat in the exact position so that the back of it was in direct sunlight and the rest in shadow. This helps a lot because you can then get the edge of the mat to obscure the back edge which is lit up and helps you to do this exactly because the moment the light is…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    You are correct that if you are not perfectly level to the tabletop then you would probably see the coin all the way.

    I argue the other way. If you are truly level, you will see it all the way. That is because light travels in straight lines and if this guy is correct, then the inescapable conclusion is not so much that the Earth is flat, rather…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    How can a force act on a much denser material (water) and not act on a much lighter  material (atmosphere)?

    My guess is the scientific fact (if I can call it that at this stage), is that everything physical has mass even the water and atmosphere. But the water below has more mass and itself more gravitational power than the atmosphere. Unlike a t…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    I performed that experiment in the video Dig4Truth and got a completely different result.

    I used a table and placed my smart phone on top as it has a straight edge. I moved it back and I could see the bottom edge of the phone the whole time. However, I found that if you placed the back of the table lower than the front even slightly, then it went…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Thanks Dig4truth.

    I like the name BTW.

    Nice example in the video and point taken. However, I also saw a video of a boat going over the horizon, but the boat was brought into view by a telescope or binoculars. So why can’t we do that with the sun?

    If the sun is 3000 miles away or so and it lights up a good part of the disk, then when it…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Mike. There is an explanation for seeing mountains that should be hidden by the curvature of the Earth. I explained it before, but I am not convinced you understood what I was saying. I will; try and make it easier this time, so you or others don’t lose interest. This explanation works for the mountain I photographed…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    In your video Mike you say where was the third well that Eratosthenes end up finding for his experiments. I didn’t think Neil was saying he used 3 wells, but that 3 wells gives the proof. I guess that is something Flat Earthers could test. Maybe try 5 wells. Would require 5 Flat Earthers with a spade each. They could…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Mike, this is a picture taken from the city I come from. You can see the centre of the Milky Way where most of the stars are. It is visible with the naked eye. It looks like a cloud of light even now as it is  a clear night here. What is the explanation for this in the Flat Earth theory? A crack in the glass…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    No direct individual proof either way
    Mike said:

    There is no proof of a ball earth,

    Personally there is no or little direct individual proof or experience, but same goes for the Flat Earth.

    I believe that there is a city called Cairo. I haven’t been there and and have no personal proof its existence. But there are photos, videos, and all kinds of…[Read more]

  • Load More

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account