T8, how do you know you saw the ISS?

1. I see satellites all the time on a clear night. They look like stars, but move across the sky in minutes.
2. This satelite like the others, moved across the sky quickly, but was way bigger, and looking more like a craft. The shape was blurred due to light, but there was a shape nevertheless, and uneven…

[Read more]

Science

Nothing to see here is right! Size does matter. If you can’t even come close to seeing it, by a few hundred miles, lighting it up won’t help. If it were lit up it still would be too small to see. Lighting something up does make it appear larger only brighter.

Boom. It makes it brighter. Big objects that are not lit adequately can be invisible to…[Read more]

What Flat Earthers and Moon Conspiracy buffs must see that stops them from believing:

What most people believe happened:

I saw the ISS as a fast moving giant star and you could make out an irregular shape as the light was not even.

A football field is not lit up.

You can’t even see the moon when it is not lit up.

The difference right there.

Nothing to see here folks.

Let’s not be silly about this Gene.

Salvation is a free gift of God dependant on Godly repentance.

The opportunity to accept the gift is limited to the time you have here on Earth.

If you do not accept the gift being offered, then the opportunity to accept the gift of salvation has been thrown away.

Like all missed opportunities, once missed…[Read more]

Probably not in 1 second, but I imagine he would have had in the least, a spell prompter. So when he types Y it comes up with You (if it is the most popular word that starts with Y, otherwise if it is another word, then Yo automatically become You and so on. I’m thinking he doesn’t have to type out all the letters for the words: realize, typing,…[Read more]

Hi TC,
Let the Spirit in scripture speak and listen.
You are far too keen to show us your understandings of individual verses.
But you are not the light that has come into the world so your opinions of scripture verses add nothing useful to truth.
This is good advice Nick. Have you thought about adhering to it regarding this scripture?
Today in…

[Read more]

“Show me how the Flat earth model creates an eclipse?”

Please show me a video or a gif of how an eclipse happens in the Flat Earth model.

Then explain how it fits the math. The Globe Earth model can demonstrate this. If the Flat Earth model  cannot, then it is a failed model.

1. Not sure there was any one time. Evidence accumulation led to it probably.
2. I understand your point, but it fails. The Globe Earth model visualises the predictions of eclipses in the future (and past) with 100% logical accuracy while the Flat Earth model cannot make one demonstrable visual prediction. That is, you cannot demonstrate it…

[Read more]

Mike, I noticed that your new favourite word is “obfuscation”. But in reality we are not doing that. What we are really are people who believe the earth is a globe and that denying all the evidence is paranoia. Because this subject matters little to us, when you ask questions about airplanes visible at 230 miles or whatever it is, it means nothing…[Read more]

I remember these other theories too, but Islam was not really spoken of from what I can remember at least.

While it is a significant religion and many today think it will play a definite role in the end times, I think it is fair to say that most do not know where to place it. Of course, what I wrote is only a theory.

Hi TC,

Let the Spirit in scripture speak and listen.

You are far too keen to show us your understandings of individual verses.

But you are not the light that has come into the world so your opinions of scripture verses add nothing useful to truth.

This is good advice Nick. Have you thought about adhering to it regarding this scripture?

Today…[Read more]

Yes, I think it would be possible to type that out. This looks like a line that is already typed out, thus he probably needed to say this once in every interview, so he could have just picked it out among a list of other popular replies with the flick of an eyelash or something.

Nobody explicitly told me Stephen Hawking carried on spontaneous conversations via his machine.

LOL. So you are having this conversation with yourself then. I never considered Hawking. I just believed that he was communicating using technology and he is. Never considered how it might work and obviously without even ayong anything, there would…[Read more]

Good.

They told me he could carry on spontaneous communication through his high tech Intel machine, and I just blindly believed he could.

Who told you that?

And doesn’t he have that to some degree even if he only types out 15% of it? I type in website addresses all the time into my browser, but get prompted and do not have to complete it. I still…[Read more]