This is the opening statement in this topic. It is as pertinent as ever.

This topic is really about exposing the Spirit of Error. While we know that the Trinity Doctrine is of the spirit of error, so it is with other doctrines that lie about who Jesus really is.

It seems the Spirit of error is still hard at work some 100 or more  pages later.

You t8 change who the “he” is.

The “he” is Jesus

Your not making any sense. I do not say it isn’t Jesus. Wrong again Jodi. Why do you and Gene nearly always get what we say and believe wrong. Could it be an influence on your mind by some kind of spirit perhaps?

Let your yes be yes and no be no. Anything else is from the EVIL ONE.

T8……You are right  about the first part, but wrong on the  last part,  Jesus is the “second” Adam,  so how could he preexist the “first” Adam.

Let me spell it out for you. He came in the flesh. Before that, he was not a man. The Word became flesh. And he is still called the Word of God. God created all things through him and for him.

Yes, he came in the flesh. These scriptures you quote do not debunk that Jesus was the Christ in the City of David.

Back to the drawing board Jodi.

Clearly, the notion that the Ruapehu and infrared photos point to a flat earth or disprove the globe has been debunked.

Can we move on to another point now, or is there something new in this argument that you want to introduce?

It’s simple Mike.

My photo shows the tree line near the bottom or much closer to sea level than it really is.

But when you see the whole mountain up close, the tree line is around half way up the mountain and then there is the 590 metres to consider under that.

No amount of math changes that right?

Do you now disagree with Dazza on the height…[Read more]

It is humorous to think that writing volumes to debunk a simple clear verse is going to convince anyone not to believe.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.

Amen!

we are being told that TRUTH is not to be applied to this scripture or that scripture, even when the very surrounding CONTEXT of this scripture or that scripture equates to the very TRUTH of which we speak.

I see.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.

The context here doesn’t change the truth that…[Read more]

Okay, so the infrared photo is debunked, but you would like to resurrect the Ruapehu photo back from the dead. I will address your last post when I have some time.

If your explanation relies on:  “IF the math doesn’t work out in my favor, I’ll cry refraction” – then you’ve already lost.

It doesn’t work like that Mike. If we both agree that refraction is real, then to say no to refraction at all times means you are saying there is zero refraction which I highly doubt is ever the case. I imagine that there i…[Read more]

Since when did an honest search for truth and God turn into a “I am right at all costs” pride war?

Life is too short to engage in deception and lies for the sake of one’s own pride in being right when you know you are wrong.

Pretty sad when you think about it. Our soul is of immeasurable worth, but people waste their lives on being cheap like…[Read more]

And it’s worse for Ruapehu, since it’s at 39 degrees south – so even farther off the equator, meaning an even smaller circumference, meaning even more inches per mile squared!  Of course that means you’ll have to appeal even more to rescue device number 1 for that image!

How can you with a straight face say that my Mount Ruapehu shot points t…[Read more]

Here we go. Someone else’s take on the figures and there is no prize for figuring out which one’s closer to reality.