Thanks for those post Ed J.

I noticed only Gene had posted so didn’t want to waste my time reading what is likely to be a load of rubbish. But like reading your posts except when you do the number thing too much.

5 times we saw too far debunked again
Following up on the response.

6 Times We Saw Too Far Utterly Debunked
The first mountain that we shouldn’t see is Ruapehu and we know that was debunked some time ago.

Now in one short and interesting video, we have 5 more mountains debunked.  Some of these mountains have been quoted as evidence to promote the Flat Earth by Mike.

Enjoy.

I feel…[Read more]

Do you suppose Google Earth can afford $2000 for their Loon program?

Do you mean that Loon program you use all the time?

Google get images from third party providers. Do you think it possible that they may not have every square inch of earth at the lowest altitude?

I’ve been using Google Earth almost at the moment they purchased it off Keyhole Maps and then made it free. All images were okay but then pixelated when you wanted to look at your house. Slowly but…[Read more]

Yes, that was part of my moon argument.  Why is it that my $500 camera can take fairly hi res photos of the moon from 240,000 miles away

Try zooming in on your pic to an area that would hypothetically fit 30 houses. What do you see? It’s called pixelation.

Your not reading my posts or you are just not smart enough to debate this topic. Read my lips.

Low res shots are high res shots that you are zooming in on. Screen capture a high res image from GE that shows streets and houses and zoom in on a house using photoshop. Notice that it now looks low res due to pixelation?

Btw, how high are the hills in the foreground of Ruapehu in your photo?  More or less than 900 meters tall?  Tick tock….

You can find that info out using Google Earth. Remember that from the coast, there is a gradual rise in elevation because the base of Ruapehu sits on a high plateau. Further proof of the high plateau is you get snow at gro…[Read more]

Are you seriously saying that these thousands of satellites can take good photos of everywhere on earth except Antarctica?

Wrong. I’m saying lots of places have bad quality low res shots and they are mostly low in population. Antarctica should fare worst given that it has zero citizens or close to zero. And it makes perfect sense.

Mike, it’s not a point related to Antarctica so what is being hidden in other areas like the area 8 live in.

And your point about high res and low res is moot. The reason for pixelation is mostly because some areas do not have low altitude satellite footage so you are zooming in on an image at higher altitude. And why is that?

My guess is it…[Read more]

Debunk Log
It’s a fact. the more humans there are, the greater the quality of images. It’s obvious. You can see it for yourself. Case closed. Another debunk.

I think all arguments are debunked. Anythings outstanding. And I am not talking about a particular lighthouse in England or whatever because obviously I cannot check every claim out. But…[Read more]

Contrary to what you might think Mike, Google doesn’t have satellites or take the photos themselves.  They get the satellite imagery from third party providers. Google Earth is wasn’t designed for UFO hunting or flat earth clues. My guess is satellite image providers concentrate their content on populated areas and less so in areas of zero p…[Read more]

Do YOU have a setting on YOUR camera that allows you to shoot higher quality only where the subject is in the viewfinder? And everything else just gets filled in with crappy 1980s style pixels?

This argument falls flat like your earth when you consider one simple thing. Pixelated images still exist all over the globe. Not just an Antarctic thing.…[Read more]

Quick question.

Can lizard people be saved? Or are they 100% the spawn of Satan?

Read my post again. Flat white plains is not high priority on image upgrades when populated areas are in need of attention.

If you can’t see that, then you have to be blind. It’s obvious.

See, you picked a spot on the edge.  We all agree the edge exists.  Flat earthers believe that edge forms a great circle that encompasses the earth – the “outer ring” of earth.

With the trillions spent by the lizard people on keeping the conspiracy alive you would think they could CGI in the centre of Antarctica. But no, they screwed up and now…[Read more]

So you have no proof that Australia exists Mike. Yet you believe it exists despite no proof. You are not adhering to your own standards.

Yep, just zoomed in on a little town called Warburton in the middle of nowhere. Real houses, roads, rocks and trees.  Now let’s do Antarctica.

Yep, just zoomed in to Antarctica on Google Earth because it shows the continent in the correct projection and saw mountains, glaciers, flat ice plains, areas with no ice, icebergs, and even roads, bu…[Read more]

Yep, just zoomed in on a little town called Warburton in the middle of nowhere. Real houses, roads, rocks and trees.  Now let’s do Antarctica.

I see. So Google up the image quality depending on population density and the Outback while not that great still out does the Antarctica that has zero population in the areas without imagery. Hmm what is go…[Read more]

I see. So you give this as proof that Australia exists and when we show videos or photos of the globe and of Antarctica, they don’t exist.

Got it mate. Lol.