Wonderful.

Is there any other subjects you would like to debate now that this one has been put to rest?

Jodi, I skimmed through the scriptures that you quoted and of course I believe each one of them. But I noticed that you guys group scripture so that there are the ones you regularly quote from and the ones you regularly avoid, but only argue against them when they are brought up. Here is the tip of the iceberg.

Here’s a good reason as to why many do not venture to Antarctica
It’s called the Southern Ocean.

(DEFINITELY PHYSICALLY AS A DOVE IN A PHYSICAL WORLD)

Definitely? No.

It remains uncertain whether what was seen had the form of a dove, or descended / hovered as a descending dove.

And the Spirit descending in bodily form could be in the shape of a human body.

You quote a scripture  and then twist it to meet your own renditions, your a perfect example of who messed up a mind can get, when they change words in scriptures to fit personal convictions.

Take a long hard look in the mirror.

This is an actual size comparison of Antarctica overlaid on a photo of the moon I took.  The diameter of the moon is 2158 miles.  The diameter of Antarctica is 2768 miles.  So what you’re trying to sell us is that I, with my $500 camera that has a 28 mm² sensor can capture great detail of the moon which is 240,000 miles away from me… and NASA, w…

[Read more]

Tater, they don’t have any of the footage that I mentioned above simply because you can’t have real footage of things that don’t exist.  Maybe this will help

So you say. I guess Greenland doesn’t exist either or is not an island. Could they be hiding the entrance to the Hollow Earth Mike?

Yes / No.

Here is the evidence so far with Hollow Earth.…[Read more]

He is making the case that Google should have every square inch of earth covered in high res photography even very close to the ground but they don’t because Flat Earth. Lol.

All his ranting about cameras is just ridiculous. Mike isn’t CEO of a multinational like Google so he understands zero about logistics. He is just wasting time with this…[Read more]

Assume that I am going to answer these questions as you hope. Now what is your point. I’m betting it is not worthy, but let’s hear it now.

Your asking if Gene can see. Lol.

Do your own homework and stop wasting my time. Just tell me what the answer is in your next line of reasoning or should I say lack of reading.

And let’s put you dumb argument about crappy photos to bed right now. Please read this slowly so we don’t have to listen to your long-winded pathetic rants about this.

If you zoom in to an area without close imaging to the ground like Antarctica, Greenland, and the area around my house, then what GE does is zoom in on the preceding higher image…[Read more]

Mike has failed
Mike, I don’t know where Google get their images from and I don’t care. Explain why Greenland has bad imaging. Lol. It’s staring you in the face, but whatever.

If this is all you have then you have failed to prove the flat earth. Admit it.

You have no photos of the disc or dome.

No explanation as to how I get from New Zealand to…[Read more]

Greenland and Antarctica have bad imaging in Google Earth
Why? Here are some possible reasons for those who claim to be wise and intelligent.

1. Antarctica is not a continent and the dome and ground interface here. The lizard reptile humans do not want us to know how special we are because we sit in a snow globe.
2. Greenland houses the entrance to…

[Read more]

Your argument that Google Earth doesn’t have 100% coverage of high-res closeups of every square inch of Earth proving Antarctica is off limits thereby proving the Earth is flat is certainly entertainment with much fodder for ridicule.

But try and be sober minded for a sec. Google Earth had zero of these particular images and now much of the Earth…[Read more]

Get over it. Google have their business reasons for adding the final layer of images in stages. You could probably even Google the answer if you were really interested in the truth.

Some parts of the Sahara Desert have as bad imagery as some parts of Africa.

Could it be that there is a pillar in the Antarctica that holds up part of the glass dome?

Thoughts?

Your point is still moot. I’m betting that covering every square inch of earth in High Res close to the ground imaging increases the database many times over than all other images at all other high altitudes combined. Simple as that really. Just be patient. I’m waiting for my house to get photographed and hundreds of penguins on featureless white…[Read more]

Your wasting your time with this line of reasoning because it is not only Antarctica that has bad imaging.

And do your own homework as to why there are less images closer to the ground than higher ones. I can think of a couple off the top of my head.

1. Satellite takes say one photo at a higher altitude. But dozens to hundreds more if they zoom…

[Read more]