What about:1) Babylonian influence2) Greek thinking3) Roman enforcement

I think what you are saying is that these words are not passing the filter on another or other Boards.If so, I have no idea why.It's not like these words need to be filtered.

Hi IM4Truth.Thanks for your input. I do not agree but still it is food for thought.I think the harlot is a worldly organisation(s) but religious in nature.Virgins are dressed in white and are awaiting the bridegroom.Harlots are dressed in purple because they have not waited for the bridegroom but have married or committed spiritual adultery with…[Read more]

What about Anglican?Is that Devil angel?

No comprehendo MichaelTheeArchAngel.What do you mean?

Quote …and yet YHWH has been seen by men….. So the paradox for you Is, is that John, Paul, and Timothy believed differently to you. John and Paul's teachings are very clear and they don't agree with you.

I asked you if the only GOD is invisible which is the topic at hand. And your final answer is YES and NO.Before we move on from this point we need to fully look at the answer you have given, which is also keeping with the topic and is good for accountability. Please be patient.Look at these scripture again.1 John 4:12 No one has ever seen God;…[Read more]

Matthew 5:37Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.Yes or no.

Can't answer the question so ask other questions. The old diversionary tactic trick.Yes or no, is the ONLY GOD invisible?The scripture in Revelation you ask about would be a good candidate for your next proof text and I look forward to it, if it is.But I would like an answer to the Invisible God being the only God. After all that is the topic…[Read more]

Good one. Yes Paul.The problem is that the ONLY GOD is invisible according to him.But you seem to disagree.

In other words 1 Timothy 1:17 is not correct.Is that because Timothy didn't know what he was talking about, or is this a translation issue to your mind?

To Is.Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 02 2007,17:28)1. It’s true that the Father has never been seen but another, also named YHWH, has.Above is what you said.Now look at 1 Timothy 1:17Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.Amen.You now have no choice but to admit that the Father is the ONLY GOD, or a…[Read more]

To Is.Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 05 2007,03:49)So….you thought I wouldn't exploit a gapping hole in your argument, because you anticipated I would do it?Get real t8.Yes I knew that you would take that path because it appeared to be the only way to keep your doctrine as believable as possible while opposing the scriptures that say that no one has seen…[Read more]

Quote (Tim2 @ June 04 2007,12:29)Quote My understanding is that the scripture does not mean that Jesus has seen God in the sense that you see something with the eye. God is invisible and is no one can see Him in that sense. But Jesus has seen him that is he has seen his character.Actually it says Jesus has seen the Father. John 6:46. It…[Read more]

To Tim2.Quote (Tim2 @ June 03 2007,10:59)Jesus is explicitly declaring Himself to be YHWH here.No he is not.Yeshua is the visible representation of the invisible God.God works primarily through his only begotten.Jesus also said that he only does that which he sees his Father doing and says what his Father says.You should get with the New…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ May 21 2007,12:03)Now I expect that Isaiah will try and nullify the scriptures that teach that God is invisible and no one has seen him, by quoting other scriptures that seem to say that people actually saw God. In other words Isaiah may try and ignore these scriptures by using other ones. The purpose here is to ignore these scriptures…[Read more]

Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 02 2007,17:28)Quote This scripture is a slap in the face for those who promote the Trinity Doctrine.….once read “This scripture is a slap in the face with a wet bus ticketYes I removed that because I realised it might be confusing to non NZ citizens. Of course this change didn't change the post in the respect of what was bei…[Read more]

Pay her back twice what she gave you.

Hi Kenrch.I think you just need to be more clear.You make it sound like worshipping God on Sunday is of the devil that is all.Your message needs to be clear as to what you are condemning and condoning. Otherwise people may get the wrong message if your words are not clear.Is it worshipping God on a Sunday that you condemn, or is it following the…[Read more]

OK a hypothetical question:What do we need to do to embrace the Trinitarian faith.Do we need to become Catholics and embrace the Catholic Faith, which is that we worship one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity. Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. …Or is it that we are to join one of the daughter organisations from this…[Read more]