D4T:  Hey Mike, I thought this was interesting.

 

Man measures star distances using parallax trigonometry. By choosing two measurable observation points and making an imaginary triangle to a third point, and using simple trigonometry, man calculates the distance to the third point.
The most distant observation points available to an earthbound o…

[Read more]

D4T: Hey Mike, about how long do you think that moon transit was? I would guess maybe several to 6 hours of time? Maybe more?

Funny but the clouds didn’t change shape. Hmm.

According to NASA, it was 5 hours.  And funny indeed that none of the cloud formations changed in that time.  I’ve never experienced a day when the clouds in the sky stay…[Read more]

t8: “Good question. A quick google showed me this:

the vacuum of space does not exert any force on the atmosphere at all. It does not “suck” the air. We associate the word “suck” with “vacuums” but it’s a misnomer. That’s not what vacuums do.
Consider an example where we’ve pumped all of the air out of some box and created a vacuum inside of it…

[Read more]

T8:  The fact remains, you should still observe the sun after it dissappears, and at varying distances, because the sun would eventually be blocked by mountains at random distances.

Did you watch the video of the sun being lifted back up from “setting behind the horizon”?  Because you didn’t comment on it.  Or on the one where the sun shrinks dra…[Read more]

T8:  By that reckoning, we should observe auroras thousands if not millions of times more in my part of the world than the north pole.

You’re in NZ, looking south towards a very small fragment of the ice wall.  Why then should you see auroras any more frequently?  Who else is out that far from the center, besides Argentina?  So imagine the enti…[Read more]

Gene:  Mike even if my calculation figures were wrong, the formula works exactly as it should… The formula workd the same.

Gene, is 24 inches the same as 8 inches?  Yes or no, please?

Gene:  SHOW ME ONE TRUE MATHMATION THAT DOESN’T KNOW THAT…

Rather, you show me the true mathematician that doesn’t agree with the 8 inches per mile squared formu…[Read more]

T8:  …the famous and perplexing Double Slit Experiment in physics even alludes to observation being of primary importance before anything becomes even physical.

Are they suggesting that a flower doesn’t actually exist unless someone happens to be looking at it?

Kathi:  I am amazed anytime I fly in an airplane…how do I feel like I am staying still when it goes at such great speeds…how can I even walk around in the airplane?

Try opening a door or taking the roof off, and see how still you feel then.  🙂

Kathi:  My opinion of the measurements are really worthless…

Don’t sell yourself short.  If someone…[Read more]

miia:  Here are some supposed examples where the Earth itself becomes invisible, and the sun becomes a pixel in size when compared to some others planets in our solar system.

So let’s do a thought experiment.  Imagine the sun was right next to the earth.  If we looked up in the sky, we’d see nothing but sun, right?  Now, move it back to where it…[Read more]

miia:  My youngest is a high achiever, but he is not too keen on school every day.

My oldest was a straight A student, and is now a NZ police recruit.

I would love to talk more to my youngest like you do. But he tends to listen more to his computer headphones these days, sadly.

You’re a Kiwi, miia?  For some reason I was thinking that you were f…[Read more]

miia: You would think NASA would be able to get movies of the Earth moving?

Apparently, they can only capture video of it spinning, like this wonderful footage of the dark side of the moon from one million miles away…

How believable is that?  You’d think for 52 million dollars a day, NASA would be able to p…[Read more]

miia:  Ha ha. Was thinking about my second oldest son when he was about three. He was sitting on the doorstep, and said “Mum, mum, the house is moving”. I said “What?” He said “The house is moving”. I went out to find him looking at the sky, and said “No son, the house isn’t moving, the clouds are!”

At least he had the excuse of only being three…[Read more]

miia: Dig4Truth I know. Plus, the first apple computer sold for $666, and there’s more (but that’s another subject :D)

There’s a lot more, and the heliocentric model is a big part of the entire deception.  The rabbit hole runs very, very deep.

T8:  Mike, one of the commenters in that discussion pointed me to this Youtube Channel. I thought the guy in this channel was quite talented.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnle0nUC3Fx0lkchpmZy0Lw

He’s an Aussie transplant living in Spain right now.  He sings like an American southern boy, but talks like a regular old Australian.  His songs are…[Read more]

A better side by side crop…

Anyone else think T8 has captured pretty much the entire mountain?  Anyone think his photo only shows the top third of it?

The red is the distance across the four main peaks in both photos.  The blue is from peak to lower treeline.  The length of red and blue are almost identical in both photos, and we can see the blue hit the treeline in both.  I know this cheesy drawing wouldn’t hold up in court, but I think it’s good enough for us to see that you’ve captured th…[Read more]

Here’s another version…

1.  The red on the left is the same shadowed slope.  Look how much of it is in your photo.
2.   Pink is the same triangular shadow from the peak.
3.   Orange shows the same snow-covered ridge.  Again, look how far it goes down in yours.
4.   Yellow is the treeline in the foreground.
5.   Blue to yellow is the transi…

[Read more]

Hey T8, I did a little “expert” analysis on the photos.  🙂  Do you see the same three landmarks/boulders that I have circled?  Do you see the same treeline I drew an oval around in each photo?  Do you see the same 5 peaks that I do?

Dude, I hate to tell you this again, but I think you’ve taken a picture of the entire mountain from 127 mil…[Read more]

 T8:  The basic shape of the mountain starts at 600 metres above sea level…

What do you mean by “sea level”?  Does it start 600 meters above the Pacific?  The Atlantic?  The Indian?  There is no such thing as “sea level” in a ball earth, T8.  In the globe model, it is “sea curve”, in which case the idea of measuring the height of things above “…[Read more]

T8:  Mike, I am going to chalk one up for the Spherical Earth with this one simply because the same phenomena is observed in both poles, while the Flat Earth has one North Pole and no South Pole, thus two completely different places and yet the same phenomena. In other words, the Globe Earth has a simple answer, while the Flat Earth needs a c…

[Read more]