@Lightenup,

If I were to say: Israel is Jacob and sons. Would you agree that the statement shows that Israel is more than one person?

You’re reaching and your analogy doesn’t work; you’re using an example of two physical separate identities and trying to make them one. Whereas G-d NEVER refers to HIMSELF as a multi “being”; christianity created t…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

“For the LORD your God is the God of gods and the Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the awesome God, who does not show partiality, nor take a bribe.”

I understand that verse to show that YHWH is God and Lord, two persons.

If I were to say my shirt is black and white, does that mean I have two shirts? Absolutely not!!!! It mea…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

You realize “Yahweh” is translated to “Lord”…right? So wouldn’t “Lord” also be an appropriate name to use?

When you understand that YHWH is a name for the fullness of God as well as the name of each presence of God, i.e. Father, Son and Holy Spirit

YHWH is yud, hei, vav, hei (Hebrew) and is the “unpronounceable” name of G-d; wher…[Read more]

@Berean,

Still attacking the catholic church and its leader; please explain Paul’s words concerning the Sabbath.

Col 2:16,17a “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; Here Paul states one isn’t to judge another of the…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

Let’s start here:

There is a theme of unity throughout scripture. Do you agree?

Unity in relation to what? Please be more specific.

@Berean,

In nothing you quoted does it say it’s the Catholic church or the pope! This is your religion projecting; prove with the Tanakh G-d said what you believe.

Please note, you still haven’t scripturally explained how the pope is the “foot soldier” of Satan. Still waiting for an explanation of the Jesus’ words in Rev 1:1 “the things which m…[Read more]

@Berean,

Not at all, I have no hatred towards Catholics.

Yet, virtually every post is a negative comment disparaging the religion and its leader. This is what is called “hate.”

I only protest against false teachings and those who propagate them.

Yet, you follow after the teachings of an individual who said the Jesus was returning when she was ali…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

The New Testament is precise…

Yet, I have pointed out over the last 1.5+ years the errors of the NT and how it doesn’t align with the Tanakh or how passages quoted from the Tanakh are taken out of context and/or twisted to fit the christian narrative. I have shown Paul is a liar and manipulator. I have proven the Jesus canNOT be t…[Read more]

@Berean,

Once again you quote your goddess as proof and not scripture. You quote her more than you do the bible; how do you not see that as an issue?

@Proclaimer,

And there it is!!!! Finally someone went out and studied a scriptural passage!! There is hope for one finding the truth!

Now what you need to do is apply this same method to EVERYTHING you have been told is truth! Like I have said, spend your time in the Tanakh and NOT the NT and study what G-d said. G-d never once spoke in the NT…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

Que?!!?

I didn’t say verse 4, but day 4 was when G-d created natural light; where HE placed the sun, moon, and stars to govern the day and the night. Nothing in the creation account does it speak of “clouds thinning out” and there being light. There’s a theory which states there was a “cloud” that covered the entire planet crea…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

Your original statement of G-d being “two persons” is false (some will say three – that trinity thing…huge false). I don’t understand how you come to that conclusion quoting Deut 10:17. This passage states G-d is G-d and Lord (don’t throw out the conjunction) and when read in context (verses 12-22) HE is telling Israel they are t…[Read more]

Using AI to answer your questions…what could go wrong!?!?

On the first day G-d created light and darkness, HE separated the two; can time, as we understand it, exist without “light”? Theoretically it can, but it would be unobservable. So, on the first day G-d created time when HE separated light from darkness and it was so man could observe it.

On the fourth day HE created heavenly bodies to govern the…[Read more]

@Berean,

“The Sabbath will be the great test of loyalty; for it is the point of truth especially controverted. When the final test shall be brought to bear upon men, then the line of distinction will be drawn between those who serve God and those who serve him not. While the observance of the false sabbath in compliance with the law of the S…

[Read more]

@Berean,

Did you just politicize the death of Charlie Kirk? Have you no shame!??!

How does a memorial service for a man gunned down in his prime suddenly being an event to enact a Sunday law? Your cult leader said this was going to happen in her time (150 years ago) and you’re still waiting. May want to reevaluate what you believe and begin…[Read more]

@Berean,

The article would have to be truth for truth to be understood.

Fact, G-d is addressing the king.

Fact, there is no transition to reference Satan; G-d is speaking to the king figuratively.

Fact, you still haven’t explained why Satan was wearing a covering of precious stones…what the what!?!

Fact, the cherub in this passage is a…[Read more]

@Berean,

Still stuck on what Ezk 28 is saying? You like “gotquestions” interpretation because it agrees with your religion, NOT because it’s truth. You just confirmed the interpretations of man is more to you than G-d’s words.

Did you read chapters 26 and 27 before you got to 28 and place this entire prophecy in context or did you parachute ont…[Read more]

@Berean,

I’m glad you found the number of times the term “Satan” occurred in the Tanakh, but the point of that exercise was what? What was asked was where does it state Satan rebelled against G-d?

In the Job passages we read Satan was only allowed to do what G-d said he could do; which sounds like he did as G-d commanded verses rebelled again…[Read more]