To all

None of the angels could have become the guarantee of the human race: their lives belong to God, they could not have abandoned him. All angels bear the yoke of obedience. They are the messengers placed by Him who is the Commander of all heaven. But Christ is equal to God; He is infinite and omnipotent. He could pay redemption for man’s…[Read more]

To all

None of the angels could have become the guarantee of the human race: their lives belong to God, they could not have abandoned him. All angels bear the yoke of obedience. They are the messengers placed by Him who is the Commander of all heaven. But Christ is equal to God; He is infinite and omnipotent. He could pay redemption for man’s…[Read more]

Gene,

1) I speak not of men of sin in the plural, but in the singular.
2) What thou sayest of Christ IS
FALSE

CHRIST EXISTED IN THE FORM OF A GOD
BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD
SEE PHILIPIENS
HE COULDN’T HAVE BEEN THE WORLD’S SAVIOR IF HE HAD ONLY BEEN A MAN… …BECAUSE TO BE
MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD AND MEN HE HAD TO BE ON BOTH SIDES…[Read more]

Gene

1) I am not a Trinitarian
2) but I believe that Jesus is God in infinity but not in personality, for the Father alone is the only true God (John 17:3).
Jesus is God= he has the divine nature of God his Father>>> John 1
Hebrews 1
God, in these last days, has spoken to us through the Son, whom he has appointed heir of all things, through whom…[Read more]

Please  Gene and every one  Read

TAKE THE TIME TO READ THE TRUTH ABOUTThe 1260 years of Papal Supremacy

Catholic writers attest to 12 centuries of Papal Supremacy and Sovereignty:

And now that the temporal power of the Roman Pontiffs belongs to the past, that the head of the Church must under heaven depend for its maintenance upon the g…[Read more]

Gene

The man of sin is the one who belittles the Son of GOD and HIS LAW and GOSPEL and exalts his human self (ego) by his false teaching.  This is what THE POPES do and what they will do as long as they live.

This is what say the book

of Daniel chap.7:25

And HE shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of…[Read more]

The Apostasy of the Christian church

The apostle Paul, in his second letter to the Thessalonians, foretold the great
apostasy which would result in the establishment of the papal power. He declared
that the day of Christ should not come, “except there come a falling away first, and that
man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth a…[Read more]

Yes, the two horns are “Sunni and Shiite” – he claims to speak in the name of God, but he wants to
to kill Christians and Jews. And the cult of the first beast is the “Conquest of the World”.

Quite simple in retrospect.
No one saw it coming except God
All parts fit together completely.

Edj

That’s your interpretation ….

Read the…[Read more]

The Internet is an instrument, a prodigious “crutch” that God has allowed to spread His Eternal Gospel. …But it is a double-edged sword. …which can become an “idol” when it is not used for the glory of God.
The beast is a kingdom with a king,
the false prophet of Revelation 13 WILL SPEAK LIKE A DRAGON For the whole world to worship the beast(1nd)

Islamists worship a false God, a God who doesn’t need a mediator.
Jesus said that no one can go to the Father except through him.
One cannot go to God without going through the merits of Christ’s righteousness.

Colossians 2
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the…[Read more]

2a) How Muhammad got his start – (2b) the fallen angel Lucifer delivering the quran
to Muhammad OPENING POST (Rev 13:13) and – (2c) Muhammad’s end (how Muhammad died).

Edj

Muhammad has nothing to do with Revelation 13:13

The false prophet of Revelation 13 is a false prophet that SPEAK FOR THE FIRST BEAST (FALSE PAPAL RELIG…[Read more]

REVELATION 9

verse 4:  And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.

Green = Flourishing (Jer 17:8. In Ps 92:14 “flourishing” means “green.” See margin). Jesus likened Himself to a “green thing.” (L…[Read more]

Correction

4-  THE BEAST THAT ASCENDETH OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT   TIME OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION UNTIL TODAY

(REVELATION 11:7) SIXTH HEAD)

In REVELATION

1- THE DRAGON    SATAN/ROME       4 HEAD   CHAPTER 12

2- THE SEA BEAST (FIRST BEAST)  5ND  HEAD  CHAPTER 13:1-10

3- THE SECOND BEAST BEFORE IT SPEAK LIKE A DRAGON…….   (1776 AD)              REVELATION 13:11-18                  (FUTUR SEVENTH HEAD)

4-  THE BEAST THAT ASCENDETH OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT   TIME OF THE…[Read more]

“Wouldn’t the first beast be the Roman Empire?

The second beast USA could fit well (a revived Roman Empire), and the image of (it) = what we see on our screens.”

Hi miia,

Evidence that the Roman Empire of emperors is not the first beast. In Revelation 12, we have the Dragon, which symbolizes both the devil and the pagan and imperial Roman…[Read more]

Hi t d j

I prefer not to deal now with Daniel 11, but first with Daniel 2; 7; 8 with Revelation 12; 13; 14; 17… etc.
First things first.

About Mohammed, he’s a false prophet , not the false prophet of Revelation 13 and 16…

the impact of Islam is seen in Revelation 9. This chapter must be understood also because it has a link with Revelation…[Read more]

Hi miia

“2nd beast /false prophet /image of the beast same thing?”

1- one beast as prophetic symbol

is a king or a kingdom

a civil and political power

or religous/political power (as papacy)

In the context of Revelation 13/17

the 2nd beast WHEN IT SPEAK LIKE A DRAGON is the false prophet and his image.

BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAY IN…[Read more]

Hi to j

No chapters 7 and 8 of Daniel do not speak of “false prophète”But there are hints in chapter 11.

Hi tdj

It’s right for Daniel 7 and 8

It’s not about the false prophet.

For chap.11  we shall see

Ed j

Muhammad is A FALSE PROPHET

BUT NOT ” THE FALSE PROPHET”

OF DANIEL(7; 8; 11) AND

REVELATION(13; 17;….)

On the other hand, don’t confuse
not “the first beast” with “the false prophet”?