- This topic has 125 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 7 months ago by Ed J.
- AuthorPosts
- March 25, 2012 at 12:28 am#287338NickHassanParticipant
Hi,
False teaching needs no human justification.
The trinity god is not the God of Israel that Jesus worshiped.
Babylonian idols and their harlot source have no place in the body of ChristMarch 25, 2012 at 12:52 am#287348Ed JParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 25 2012,11:28) Hi,
False teaching needs no human justification.
The trinity god is not the God of Israel that Jesus worshiped.
Babylonian idols and their harlot source have no place in the body of Christ
Hi Nick,All truth passes through three stages. (Link)
- First, it is ridiculed.
- Second, it is violently opposed.
- Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 12:58 am#287351NickHassanParticipantHi Ed,
The problem with trinity is that what is taught is not written.
It introduces MYSTERY to what is simple.March 25, 2012 at 1:02 am#287353Ed JParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 25 2012,11:58) Hi Ed,
The problem with trinity is that what is taught is not written.
It introduces MYSTERY to what is simple.
Hi Nick,Do the meaning of these names introduce MYSTERY to you?
An illustration of “The Trinity”
Isaiah …Isaiah’s name means “Jehovah’s Salvation”
(this book's name illustrates JESUS, because Jesus is the means of “Jehovah’s Salvation”) (1John 2:2)Jeremiah …Jeremiah’s name means “Jehovah is High”
(this books name illustrates GOD THE FATHER, because JEHOVAH GOD is the Highest) (Psalm 83:18)Ezekiel …Ezekiel’s name means “EL (GOD) will strengthen”
(this books name illustrates the HOLY SPIRIT, because the Holy Spirit strengthens us all in GOD) (Luke 24:49)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 1:09 am#287357NickHassanParticipantHi ED,
You can derive and describe babylonian gods all you like.
But for us there is one God, the Father.March 25, 2012 at 2:41 am#287377Ed JParticipantHi Nick, what Babylonian god?
HolySpirit is “GOD: The Father” of Jesus Christ
One Spirit: GOD
LORD of Hosts=151 (the AKJV Bible)
Jesus Christ=151 (The New Testament)
Holy Spirit=151 (Old and New Testament)
The LORD JEHOVAH=151 (Isaiah 12:2, 26:4)Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 5:55 am#287439NickHassanParticipantHi Ed,
Yes the Spirit is of God and from that Spirit came the Word.
There is no separation just diversity.But now joined in Spirit with each other and chosen remnants of mankind there are two.
Father and SonMarch 25, 2012 at 7:14 am#287477Ed JParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 25 2012,16:55) Hi Ed,
Yes the Spirit is of God and from that Spirit came the Word.
There is no separation just diversity.
Hi Nick, Quite right! …I agree totally.But this part of your quote is worded 'fuzzy' once again…
Quote But now joined in Spirit with each other and chosen remnants of mankind there are two.
Father and SonI have a lot more information to produce, but I have to give it slowly because
everyone seems to be stuck on believing they know all there is on this topic.
As I said: we are not going to regurgitate what has been said in the past.Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 8:01 am#287482NickHassanParticipantHi ED,
God is never separate from His Spirit.
He has joined the man Jesus with the Word as Jesus Christ.
The Word is different, as the servant to God, yet one with the Spirit of God.
Men can now share in this eternal unity through becoming one in Spirit with Christ JesusMarch 25, 2012 at 8:09 am#287484Ed JParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 25 2012,19:01) Hi ED,
God is never separate from His Spirit.
He has joined the man Jesus with the Word as Jesus Christ.Men can now share in this eternal unity through becoming one in Spirit with Christ Jesus
Hi Nick, I agree with all this.But I don't agree with this…
Quote The Word is different, as the servant to God, yet one with the Spirit of God.
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 8:23 am#287486NickHassanParticipantHi Ed,
OK
Phil 2
Read JESUS CHRIST as THE WORDMarch 25, 2012 at 8:35 am#287488Ed JParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 25 2012,19:23) Hi Ed,
OK
Phil 2
Read JESUS CHRIST as THE WORD
Hi Nick,Wrong thread. Please try to
keep the threads different; OKYour brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 25, 2012 at 9:55 am#287490seekingtruthParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 15 2012,19:13) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 14 2012,16:46)
First let me ask, do you believe that some Scripture is written on more than one level?I ask this question, because I believe we should be starting from a point of agreement.
Hi Everyone,I would like to see everyone weigh in this premise.
Do you agree with me so far? David, T8, Mike, Pierre, Jack,
Marty, Wm, George, WJ and anyone else whose name I left out?+1 = Yes
-1 = NoGod bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd J,
After a manner I can agree with you to a point. The Father is the one true “God”, but He has expressions of Himself so that God is “understood” by us in three forms. I just posted this Link which should explain what I believe.Wm
November 25, 2012 at 3:38 pm#321857Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Nov. 24 2012,19:22) Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 16 2012,01:53) Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 13 2012,09:41) Discussing the Trinity Doctrine …still results in heated arguments. And it seems no one ever adjusts their beliefs in the end.
Hi Mike,I'm still working on helping both sides to see clearer. (Link)
“My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distil as the dew,
as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass:” (Deut 32:2)God bless
Ed J
Ed J.We only have to merge our correctnesses and it is a win win.
Thanks Ed J.
Hi T8, quite correct.Luke 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be FIVE IN ONE HOUSE divided,
three(Trins) against two(non-Trins), and two(non-Trins) against three(Trins).The Trins see God as three… <– An incomplete picture
The non-Trins see God as One… <– and Jesus as a smaller version of God
The complete picture –> <– Merge the two ideas together, and the big picture begins to emerge
“And the [HolyCity] lieth “FourSquare”, and the length is as large as the breadth:” (Rev 21:16)
Ezekiel 43:16: And the altar shall be twelve cubits long, twelve broad, square in the “Four Squares” thereof.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 16, 2012 at 4:05 pm#324547barleyParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 13 2012,17:20) Hi Everyone, Trinity and non-Trinity, can both views be correct?
Me and David have been discussing if this is possible.
I say it is not only possible, but true as well.
It can be compared to a “Paradox”.Instead of arguing past misconceptions, are both sides now
willing to look at the evidence that I will produce concerning this?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Reason for edit: I added the title into the post.
No, both cannot be right.They are contradictory.
Neither is it question of view point. As in the fable of five blind men touching a different part of an elephant and describing what they perceive.
See I Timothy 2:4-5
We are to be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, then MAN Christ Jesus.
God is God
Men are men
the mediator between God and men is THE MAN Christ Jesus
That leaves no room for Jesus to be God.
The word “god” being a title, not a name, does leave room for there being other gods besides the Creator/Lord/Almighty/most high God
The word “god” referring to some one superior or of prominence or authority.
The God told Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharoah.
Thus Moses was a god, but not “The God”
Sarah called Abraham “lord” or kurios, as I Peter 3:6 states, so in that use of kurios, Sarah acknowledged Abe to be in charge. but that does not make Abe to be “the Lord (kurios) God”, but simply one in authority, some one to respected.
Likewise with Hebrews 1:8 “Thy throne, O god, is forever…”
“The God” calls His son “god”
Why not? why would not the Father call His son after His own name.
Thus illustrating that the trinitarian doctrine and the one God doctrine are not compatible whatsoever.
barley
January 25, 2014 at 4:11 am#368406Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 16 2012,11:42) Ed, just show us how they can both be right. OK…
Luke 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be FIVE IN ONE HOUSE divided,
three(Trins) against two(non-Trins), and two(non-Trins) against three(Trins).The Trins see God as three… <– An incomplete picture
The non-Trins see God as One… <– and Jesus as a smaller version of God
The complete picture –> <– Merge the two ideas together, and the big picture begins to emerge
“And the [HolyCity] lieth “FourSquare”, and the length is as large as the breadth:” (Rev 21:16)
Ezekiel 43:16: And the altar shall be twelve cubits long, twelve broad, square in the “Four Squares” thereof.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgOctober 6, 2014 at 2:06 am#779354Ed JParticipantBump for T8
June 15, 2016 at 2:44 pm#814903hoghead1ParticipantWell, Ed, have you considered any new ways of viewing God as he or she is in his or her own nature? Have you considered anything beyond the classical model of God/ Have you considered the possibility that God is a social-relational being, needs the universe, and is continually changing? Have you considered the possibility that creation is God’s own self-evolution from unconsciousness and mere potentiality into self-consciousness, personality, and self-actualization? Those are intriguing possibilities I am interested in.
June 15, 2016 at 2:51 pm#814905NickHassanParticipantHi hoghead 1,
Why build towers of speculation about our God?
There are more important matters like seeking to be rescued from His impending wrath.
June 15, 2016 at 4:39 pm#814911Ed JParticipantHave you considered the possibility that creation is God’s own self-evolution from unconsciousness and mere potentiality into self-consciousness, personality, and self-actualization? Those are intriguing possibilities I am interested in.
Hi Hoghead1,
The culture you describe is here:
Have you read the book of Urantia? - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.