- This topic has 25,905 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 2 days, 9 hours ago by
.
- Posts
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:34) Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 06 2012,12:32) Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:18) frank, have you finished your homework? did u find any transation that says in john 1.1 that the word is he father??
you need further studies LOL
As I had said previously, I have never said that there is a translation of Yahchahan [John] 1:1 that says “the word is 'HE' father.” Have you found a “TRANSATION” of Yahchanan [John] 1:1 that says “The word is the son.”?
Do you need a spelling lesson?
thanks for accepting that you can not read any translation that says that the word in john 1.1 is the father.now you ask me if i can read any translation that says that the word in john 1.1 is the God's son.
here is your request.
John 1:1
Wycliffe Bible (WYC)
John 1
1 In the beginning was the word, and the word was at God, and God was the word. [In the beginning was the word, that is, God's Son, and the word was at God, and God was the word.]better luck next time boy LOL
jammin,FYI, the words in brackets were added as a personal side note by the translator and is not a translation. This is why these words were placed in brackets.
I'm not into “luck”!
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:39) study hard frank LOL
jammin,So, you can not find any such translation, right?
LOL
bec it does not support your doctrine, you will not accept it.im done with you boy. you have admitted that you cant read any translation that says that the word in john 1.1 is the father. so better luck next time boy LOL
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:49) LOL
bec it does not support your doctrine, you will not accept it.im done with you boy. you have admitted that you cant read any translation that says that the word in john 1.1 is the father. so better luck next time boy LOL
jammin,I am so glad that you are done with me!
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:17) Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 06 2012,11:46) Hi Jammin,
Your parroting of a mantra shows how thin your doctrine is.
what doctrine do you want?? a doctrine which cant be read? LOLif you want that kind of doctrine then it is all yours. LOL
i want what is written in the bible.
Hi Jammin, here read this then…“The Spirit, which is the word of God” (Eph 6:17)
See you can read “The Spirit” is the word,
it is just that you refuse to believe.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (jammin @ April 06 2012,12:58) if you can read your imagination, then you can talk to me again LOL
jammin,I thought you were done with me? You mean that I still have to put up with your foolishness?
as you have said, you CANT READ ANY TRANSLATION THAT THE WORD IS THE FATHER IN JOHN 1.1
so im done with you
but if you can publish your own version saying that the word in john 1.1 is the father, you may talk to me again LOL
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:02) as you have said, you CANT READ ANY TRANSLATION THAT THE WORD IS THE FATHER IN JOHN 1.1 so im done with you
but if you can publish your own version saying that the word in john 1.1 is the father, you may talk to me again LOL
jammin,Now you are misquoting me in saying that I said “you CANT READ ANY TRANSLATION THAT THE WORD IS THE FATHER IN JOHN 1.1”?
I certainly never said such foolishness as this!
How many times are you going to tell me that you are done with me until you are truly done with me?
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:02) as you have said, you CANT READ ANY TRANSLATION THAT THE WORD IS THE FATHER IN JOHN 1.1 so im done with you
but if you can publish your own version saying that the word in john 1.1 is the father, you may talk to me again LOL
Hi Jammin, you speak false truths, which amounts to deception.If he were to publish a version as you suggest, you would not
be any more accepting of it as your FALSE WORDS suggest.
Therefore, you've proved yourself to be a false teacher.Quote (Ed J @ April 06 2012,13:12) Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:02) as you have said, you CANT READ ANY TRANSLATION THAT THE WORD IS THE FATHER IN JOHN 1.1 so im done with you
but if you can publish your own version saying that the word in john 1.1 is the father, you may talk to me again LOL
Hi Jammin, you speak false truths, which amounts to deception.If he were to publish a version as you suggest, you would not
be any more accepting of it as your FALSE WORDS suggest.
Therefore, you've proved yourself to be a false teacher.
Ed J,And I was just getting ready to publish my own version saying “that the word in john 1.1 is the father” so I could talk to jammin again!
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:13) better luck next time frank boy LOL
jammin,I'm not into “luck” and not the next time or the next time or all of the other next times after that!
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:20) now frank is talking.. he is getting ready to publish his own version LOL
jammin,Well, I can hold off long enough for you to publish your own version that says “that the word in john 1.1 is the son” if you like.
i already posted that the word is the son of God.
and i dont need to publish my own version bec the bible supports my teachings.
unlike you b0y, you should do your own version bec your man made doctrine cant be read in the bible. LOLHey kerwin?,
How am I doing on your request that I simplify my message without compromising YOUR “God's” message so that the simple ones of this world can understand my language? Am I doing better or what?
Quote (jammin @ April 06 2012,13:27) i already posted that the word is the son of God.
and i dont need to publish my own version bec the bible supports my teachings.
unlike you b0y, you should do your own version bec your man made doctrine cant be read in the bible. LOL
Hi Jammin,
Yes the Word IS the Son of God.What you have not proven is that the Word WAS the son of God.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
