- This topic has 6,414 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
.
- Posts
And trying to compare a pressurized atmosphere adjacent a vacuum is not equivalent to a pressurized body of water adjacent to a pressurized atmosphere.
This statement is not science. It is just an opinion and a bad one at that.
Both water and air progressively change pressure being higher the further down you go. Water has an even greater range of pressure than air. Yet what you say should happen to air is not only illogical, it doesn’t fit with things that you can see with your own eyes like water.
This is another point thoroughly debunked.
The last video I posted debunks Mike’s arguments about my Mt Ruapehui shot (indirectly) Did you guys see that. If not, then ignorance is bliss right? I fast forwarded to the exact point on the video for you. He makes the claim that 8 inches per mile square is actually wrong. I don’t know if this is correct or not, but I know that your conclusions that the earth is not flat because you can see Ruapehu from 200 km (or whatever) away is incorrect.
Woe to those who lay stumbling blocks
If you guys had your way, then only scientifically illiterate people could be saved because all people who have a logical scientific mind could not accept the Bible as being true because you state that it teaches a Flat Earth. Fortunately, most Christians do not believe your foolishness, but I did note in a video I saw a while back that two-thirds of the Flat Earthers in the audience claimed to be Christians, that was very unfortunate. You guys are Atheists best friends. You are doing more damage than they can do against the truth. So stupid because they say Christians are stupid and then what do you do, you be stupid. Atheists combined with foolish believers inflicting damage on the truth by laying stumbling blocks, so that some will not consider the truth in the Bible. Woe woe woe.
Sometimes I think you could have an argument with yourself t8. No need for anyone else to get involved.
Sometimes that is a good idea. You need to test all things.
Team Globe wins the debate
By my estimation, all evidence given for the Flat Earth has been debunked here either by me trying an experiment, by arguing with simple logic, or pointing to another person’s argument or video debunking Flat Earth claims.
I cannot think of one outstanding argument left.
The debate is finished I think.
Victory for the truth.
The Earth is a globe or thereabouts.
What next?
Shall we move on from this debate and start arguing for and debunking shape shifting lizard people?
T8(er) ; ) Yet what you say should happen to air is not only illogical, it doesn’t fit with things that you can see with your own eyes like water.
So saying that a pressurized system adjacent to another pressurized system is different than a pressurized system adjacent to a vacuum is illogical? Really?
We can see or in this case measure what happens to pressurized air when it comes into contact with a vacuum. It finds equilibrium. Every time! Testable, measurable and repeatable. That is science.
I guess taters do have eyes but they cannot see.
T8: Sometimes that is a good idea. You need to test all things.
You should really take the time to listen to yourself as well. If it sounds demonstrably wrong it probably is.
Remember taters don’t have ears, corn does.Well if I’m a tater I should be scared of you Dig, but I’m not because you don’t dig at all. You simply believe what Mike and others say. You have been led astray by other shepherds. Jesus said that his sheep hear his voice. Return to the fold and leave the cult is my advice.
Cults claim to have the truth that most usually think the message is pretty weird when they first hear it. But members join despite their heart telling them it was wrong because their ears get tickled something that can’t happen to me because I’m a tater.
A lesson on pressure
At sea level, the air that surrounds us presses down on our bodies at 14.5 pounds per square inch . The deeper you go under the sea, the greater the pressure of the water pushing down on you. For every 33 feet (10.06 meters) you go down, the pressure increases by 14.5 psi .
See that. Every 10 feet of decent is the difference between sea level and zero pressure, that is, 14.5 psi.
Your evidence doesn’t match observation and science. Yes higher pressure areas fill up lower pressure areas, but there is more at play here. Both water and air have higher pressure because of the weight of air or water above. This is a gradual change of pressure. You don’t see 14.5 difference in PSI next to each other. It is gradual. You never factored that in did you. Back to the drawing board guys.
Is there anything that hasn’t been debunked now? I think this debate is finished.
T8:Â I think you will find that T8 said objects brought back were on the near side of the horizon to begin with and they only disappeared because they were too tiny to see without a visual aid.
Yeah… about that…  Do you realize that at a camera/eye height of 1 foot, the horizon is only 1.2 miles away? And did you know that a boat at only 4 miles away would be hidden behind 5 feet of curvature? Did you know that the profile of your average small fishing or ski boat is only 2.5 feet above the water? So even at 4 miles away, the entire boat (and then some) would be entirely behind the curve?
Now, do you think a boat 4 miles away is too small to see with the 83x zoom of the P900 or the 125x zoom of the P1000? Well, here are some cars I shot from 15 miles away on my way back from Salton Sea last year.
Widest shot…
30% zoom. Do you see the cars going up the hill in the distance in the top center of the photo? Those are 15 miles away.
90% zoom. Can you see them… and the difference between cars and semi trucks? Remember, 15 miles away.
100% zoom. Pretty hazy now, but can you still see that they are cars, and see the difference between cars and trucks? That’s at 15 miles, dude. Do you still think a boat would be too tiny to zoom into view at only 4 miles away? Because that’s your argument, right? The ones we can zoom back in are on the near side of the curve, ie: less than 4 miles away from us, right? But we can zoom a boat back in at 15 miles, T8! And at 15 miles, it would be 126 feet below earth curve. So I hope you can understand how your argument doesn’t hold up.
Here’s the Google Earth to show the distance. I was in the blue circle, and the cars disappeared behind the mountain in the green circle. Red circle shows the distance.
Now compare those cars and trucks to this fishing boat I shot in San Diego. Don’t you think that boat has to be much father than 4 miles? Because it would be completely behind the curve at about 5 miles. And note that in the video I even point out how the horizon is BEHIND the boat. So again, your argument doesn’t hold water – pun intended. 😉
Now compare those cars to this boat I shot in San Diego. (Video in next post because it wouldn’t post with the link in this post. 😣🙄🤔) At less than 5 miles, that boat would be 100% behind the curve. But now we know that we can zoom that boat back in from as far as 15 miles away, right?  Plus, I even show in the video that the horizon is actually BEHIND the boat.  So no, disappearing due to size on THIS SIDE OF THE CURVE is not the answer. Back to the drawing board.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
