- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Posted: July 27 2011,04:02 by KJ to me Princess
his quote is taken by the anti jesus god fallicies thread that WJ started and is now getting upset because the thread has gone off track, and Mike stated that I should respect WJ wishes, so being a princess proper protocol must be attained.
let us proceed.princess,
I was setting you up. The subordination of the woman to the man principle was Mosaic and not Christ-like. Paul used the subordinate role of Christ to God as the basis for the subordinate role of the woman to the man. If the subordinate role of the woman has passed away, then Christ's subordinate role to God has also passed away.
Just as the woman is NOT inferior to the man, so Christ is NOT inferior to God. If Christ is inferior to God, then the woman is inferior to the man and you are COMMANDED to shut up!
You have unwittingly helped me prove that Christ is equal to God because the woman is indeed equal to the man. I have given this explanation before and you still took the bait.
Jack
adding this post also, it seems WJ is very touchy about T.
Quote (princess @ July 27 2011,05:38)
Jack,I tend to think you have had a bit much to drink, for your memory seems to be lacking. I have not told you such things as you write, have I. So you are accusing me falsely. Chin up Jack, pay attention.
I study ancient religion Jack yours is a copycat of ancient religions. Most likely a woman told Paul the same thing that I have said, hence the need to quiet them. Cant upset the new world order, now could we.
Tis not very christian to pull the Man card Jack, however I understand it cannot be helped, tis what is in your heart, and I tend to think that is what WJ called 'fruit', yes?
However, I am most assurely Stuart willl be most proud of you for proving him correct, and myself. That Christianity thinks very little of women, and when all else fails with them, pull the man is above women card, then wait does not scripture tell you who is above your god?
Remove the bitterness Jack, does not suit you.
Princess
when you give your comment to KJ were you not wearing a cover over your head ?
I am sure you always use proper practice no??
of cause they could not see it because being on the Internet so KJ should take back his comment .
Pierre
Princess and Peirre
First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
T,
Believe it or not, at one time i really tried to figure out that verse, however to no avail, limits the many different hair styles one can have, now mind you hats are all the rage, which I must admit a slight fetish has overcome me.
No need for KJ to retract his statement, I hold nothing against him.
By the by, why is WJ all bent out of shape over you posting, what did you do T?
Quote (Stu @ July 26 2011,17:25) Good grief. God would be spinning in her grave over all this. Stuart
(Apologies to Nietzsche)
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
Since you are so strict on posting WJ, should you not note your changes in the post, most others do.Mike or T8, could you please remove WJ editing rights, I think he is abusing them.
Thank you none the less for placing my name in your greeting. Truly WJ, when will you stop.
If anyone is abusing editing rights, please provide the proof. Make it easy for me to follow. I haven't got time for doing the work myself.
Just provide the original post and then the edited one. And where it is located.
Cheers.
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
WJ,See what you did, now we are in the hot seat. Been sent to the corner by pops.
So, instead of playing tear the scriptures apart how about we have a comparison battle, you give me a part of your belief and I will give you a comparison of a ancient belief that is the same.
What you say, you in?
hi all
what is that i did not like is that WJ use T8 quote and use him as a fallacies”to be debunked.
this is not right ,if we can not go in is territory he should not be able at the least our names to beat up ,
without any of us to respond ,
===================================================================
T8 has recently brought up one of those “Jesus isn’t God fallacies” which goes like this…Jesus can’t be God because he is not the “source” but the “agent” of God.
==================================================================he could have used the quote without the name ,finger pointing.
Pierre
Hi Pierre,
I've addressed your point on Keith's thread already. If someone mentions you by name on that thread, then feel free to defend yourself on that thread.
Hey All,
I deleted the last couple of pages of that thread. Keith requested I do so. Princess said she didn't care. Pierre said he didn't care. Shimmer's post was only in passing and makes no sense without the other ones, so I don't think she'll care.
So the only one who can be mad at me is Jack, and he's always mad at me anyway – so what did I have to lose? (Besides being mod, if t8 decides that wasn't the way to handle the situation.)
Anyway Princess, sorry to disrupt YOUR thread, as I'm really interested in seeing this thing happen:
“WJ,
So, instead of playing tear the scriptures apart how about we have a comparison battle, you give me a part of your belief and I will give you a comparison of a ancient belief that is the same.
What you say, you in?”
Well Keith?
Mike
Quote Hi Pierre, I've addressed your point on Keith's thread already. If someone mentions you by name on that thread, then feel free to defend yourself on that thread.
Mike
I do not take offensive to anyone posting in a thread started by me, nor if the subject matter is a bit off topic. For the most part of conversations I have with others, we may tend to get a bit off subject, however, having fashionable manners to return to the topic at hand, sometimes. I am not really that uptight about the matter, for some things just lead to others, and you never know when a truth will lift a heavy burden off of someone.
I do hope WJ takes the challenge also, will be quite interesting.
However, my true desire is to have KJ answer why he must prove jesus is god.
Thank you Mike.
Quote (princess @ July 26 2011,18:03) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
Since you are so strict on posting WJ, should you not note your changes in the post, most others do.Mike or T8, could you please remove WJ editing rights, I think he is abusing them.
Thank you none the less for placing my name in your greeting. Truly WJ, when will you stop.
PeirreI realized I had addressed my post to the wrong person so instead of deleting or changing the post I added the name since the post fits you both!
That is not abusing my editing rights because I didn't delete anything or change the context!
WJ
Quote (princess @ July 26 2011,18:58) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
WJ,See what you did, now we are in the hot seat. Been sent to the corner by pops.
So, instead of playing tear the scriptures apart how about we have a comparison battle, you give me a part of your belief and I will give you a comparison of a ancient belief that is the same.
What you say, you in?
Sure if you can prove that the Trinity was derived from your ancient beliefs or was it the other way around?Debunked already since you cannot prove the “Trinity” was derived from “Ancient Beliefs” instead of Scripture.
Check the Forefathers out and see if any of them quote “ancient beleifs”.
Genesis 1 tells us God is plural when he said “Let us” make man in “our image”.
The Hebrew word “Elohyim” is the plural for “el”.
Were the “ancient beliefs” around before Genesis?
But I tell you what, since I love not “ancient beliefs” more than scriptures why not you and I go head to head on whether the Bible speaks of a “Trinity” or God being a plural Unity!
What say you?
WJ
Here is another anti Jesus is God fallacy. It goes like this,
“Jesus cannot be God because God cannot anoint God.”
The U.S. Senate may overrule the House of Representatives. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives are two chambers within the larger body which is called Congress. One Congress in two chambers.
If the Senate overrules the H of R, then Congress has acted upon Congress.
KJ
Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 28 2011,08:29) Here is another anti Jesus is God fallacy. It goes like this, “Jesus cannot be God because God cannot anoint God.”
The U.S. Senate may overrule the House of Representatives. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives are two chambers within the larger body which is called Congress. One Congress in two chambers.
If the Senate overrules the H of R, then Congress has acted upon Congress.
KJ
My post above was intended for the Anti Jesus is God thread.KJ
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2011,01:40) Quote (princess @ July 26 2011,18:58) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
WJ,See what you did, now we are in the hot seat. Been sent to the corner by pops.
So, instead of playing tear the scriptures apart how about we have a comparison battle, you give me a part of your belief and I will give you a comparison of a ancient belief that is the same.
What you say, you in?
Sure if you can prove that the Trinity was derived from your ancient beliefs or was it the other way around?Debunked already since you cannot prove the “Trinity” was derived from “Ancient Beliefs” instead of Scripture.
Check the Forefathers out and see if any of them quote “ancient beleifs”.
Genesis 1 tells us God is plural when he said “Let us” make man in “our image”.
The Hebrew word “Elohyim” is the plural for “el”.
Were the “ancient beliefs” around before Genesis?
But I tell you what, since I love not “ancient beliefs” more than scriptures why not you and I go head to head on whether the Bible speaks of a “Trinity” or God being a plural Unity!
What say you?
WJ
Hey All,Am I mistaken or has WJ declined my challenge?
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2011,01:33) Quote (princess @ July 26 2011,18:03) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 27 2011,07:55) Princess and Peirre First of all you should honor the topic of the thread.
Yes I am touchy about anti-Jesus is God people like you posting junk in a thread that was created for the Jesus is God people to post the “anti-Jesus is God fallacies” and show how they are debunked.
BTW If you don't agree with what is posted there then you can refute it in the “Jesus is God fallacies” thread Here.
No one wants to scroll through a bunch of nonsense to see the truth!
WJ
Since you are so strict on posting WJ, should you not note your changes in the post, most others do.Mike or T8, could you please remove WJ editing rights, I think he is abusing them.
Thank you none the less for placing my name in your greeting. Truly WJ, when will you stop.
PeirreI realized I had addressed my post to the wrong person so instead of deleting or changing the post I added the name since the post fits you both!
That is not abusing my editing rights because I didn't delete anything or change the context!
WJ
WJ,Truly man, I wrote the post, not T, and you added my name & not Pierre.
You still edited the post, twice. Kerwin, Mike, Shimmer most everyone notes the reason why, are you above ediquette.
On a personal note: back peddling is terrible manners.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
