Adam:  I think that is a gentle man’s agreement.

Agreed. 👍

Was Paasover Lamb meant for sin Atonement?

Mike……I read it as the perishable,  spiritually energized can replicate itself over and over endlessly. So in that sense ” this perishable becomes ” imperishable “.

The sown seed becomes another body of it’s “own” kind,  not a different kind,  so is it with the resurrection brother .  Why do you think scriptures say “for ever hair on you head is…[Read more]

I never made any such claim.  I claim that flesh and blood (also known as “flesh and bone” – both of which are poetic ways of saying “human being”) cannot see, enter, or inherit the kingdom of God.  If Jesus is a human being, then he’s ineligible.

As for the new bodies of those who will receive eternal life…

1 Cor 15…

38But God gives it a bo…

[Read more]

Adam here is what Jesus said concerning those Jews ,

Mat 23; 15…….” woe unto you, scribe and Pharisees , hypocrites ! For you compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made,  you Make him twofold more the child of hell then yourselves “,
Adam be very very careful not to fall into  their trap brother, they have rejected every one…

[Read more]

This is why the law was given. So that when grace came, it would be understood and appreciated.

This was purely Christian misinterpretation of the Torah, first by Paul then by his followers.

The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.

The same thing applies to any one here as they are sticking to their age old myths which are not based on the Hebrew Bible. I too can quote the same…[Read more]

I’ve already explained it to you. New revelation fits with old revelation as long as it is not contradictory.

This is what I am questing on the writings and the new secret revelation of the NT as they had deviated much from their primary source the Hebrew Bible on Messiah.

Adam:  The book of Daniel is a non-prophetic book in the Hebrew Bible written in 2nd BCE by a pseudo writer.

Proof please?

Dating of Daniel as per the Historians
The Book of Daniel is a 2nd-century BCE biblical apocalypse with an ostensible 6th century BCE setting. The prophecies of Daniel are accurate down to the career of Antiochus IV E…[Read more]

Adam: In the Hebrew Bible ‘son of God’ never meant a literal divine being as imagined by the NT writers.

Gen 6:2… the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took as wives whomever they chose.

Deut 32:8… When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peop…

[Read more]

Hi To all

What is Jesus doing now? Considering that he is the Son of God, and that he suffered indescribable agony on this earth, until the cross, it seems right that he can enjoy a long vacation. We can imagine him enjoying a deserved rest, receiving the praises of the heavenly armies, and also that of a few faithful on earth.

But the book to…[Read more]

Polytheism?

And denial that Jesus is the son of YHWH?

No to both. The one great God YHVH is both God and Lord, Father and Son, who alone created the cosmos.

So I say again… there is no need for the word “LIE” to ever leave your mouth in reference to anyone on this site – as if you know their heart or intent. And there is no need for you to talk down to anyone here – as if you have more “Holy Spirit” than them or enlightenment or whatever.  You do fine making solid scriptural based arguments here…

[Read more]

So I say again… there is no need for the word “LIE” to ever leave your mouth in reference to anyone on this site – as if you know their heart or intent. And there is no need for you to talk down to anyone here – as if you have more “Holy Spirit” than them or enlightenment or whatever.  You do fine making solid scriptural based arguments here…

[Read more]

Now, if everyone who was called “theos” was also called “YHVH.” that is where the mass confusion would come. So we are to follow after the theos who is YHVH. It just so happens that the Father is the theos who is identified as YHVH and the Son is the theos who is identified as YHVH. They are both identified as the theos in the NT and they are bot…

[Read more]

I will repeat this in case my post is too long for you to read.

So yes, many can be called ‘theos’ (singular), just not when referencing them in plural.

Move on please.

“It simply is saying that ‘theos’ can be applied to one or many.”

That is what is not true because the plural is not spelled t h e o s, as you finally realized, as well as the fact that you included theos as an example of a word that is spelled the same in the plural as in the singular in your “sheep list.”

Yes I have already acknowledged the plu…[Read more]

I’ll explain it another way.

First came the law, then came grace.

You are free to not believe.

For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

By the way, the plan is still in action. There is further revelation to come.

Your view appears to be more about the constraints of your own mind than what the Old…[Read more]

See?  After your brother in Christ demands that you don’t call him a liar, you went post after post after post talking about how it is your duty to call out lies – again making it abundantly clear that I was the “liar” you were calling out.

And in the middle of your condescension against me, you even admitted that I had corrected you… which…[Read more]

Then you question your Old Testament my friend. If the NT writers claimed to have got new secret revelation as often quoted by you here they could have very well done without quoting the so called Old Testament. If you want a new revelation and a new religion we have plenty here in our India. We need not look to the Christian one.

I’ve already…[Read more]