https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/34128

https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/34151

miia,

I don’t know about an ancient prophecy, but here’s a 2008 prophecy from Kim Clement about two presidents…

I was never into politics.  I voted one time for Ross Perot – and never again until 2020.  I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, because I figured he was just another elite… although I must admit that the w…[Read more]

1)

Here is a photo that shows a volcano called Mount Taranaki that is partly obscured by the curve of the earth. One of these photos was taken by an ex-work colleague of mine. I am pretty certain he is not a shape shifter or elite who is trying to hide the globe from us.He is an ordinary bloke and he believes in God.
Mt Taranaki as seen from…[Read more]

Okay, I have the next 6 questions. Thank you. Although you can respond to my answers. But no questions please.

PROCLAIMER, ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE FROM THE SCRIPTURAL WORDS ABOVE THAT, BEFORE THE APPEARANCE OF THE SUN, GOD CREATED LIGHT AND SEPARATED IT FROM THE DARKNESS?

ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THAT HE CALLED THE LIGHT “DAY”, AND THE DARKNESS “NIGHT”?

AND ARE YOU ABLE TO SEE THAT HE CALLED THE VERY FIRST DAY-NIGHT CYCLE, WHICH INCLUDED A SINGLE MORNING AND A S…

[Read more]

Here is a good video about science and how we came to understand the speed of light or the fastest speed anything physical can travel.

The thing is, if you test something multiple ways and it always comes out as true, then that goes a long way to prove a truth about the physical universe. If under some conditions the answer is different, then…[Read more]

Very easy “Yes or No” questions that were ignored by Proclaimer (as usual)…

PROCLAIMER, DO YOU NOW UNDERSTAND THAT BIG BANG, DEEP TIME UNIFORMITARIANISM, AND COMMON DESCENT EVOLUTION ARE NOT EVEN A PART OF SCIENCE, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT OBSERVABLE, TESTABLE, AND REPEATABLE?
DO YOU FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT SCIENCE IS THE COLLECTION OF DATA – WHICH M…

[Read more]

AND FINALLY, HAVE YOU NOW COME TO UNDERSTAND THAT BY REJECTING A BLIND, UNQUESTIONING, FAITH-BASED BELIEF IN THE INTERPRETATIONS OF FLAWED MEN, I DON’T DENY SCIENCE ITSELF, BUT RATHER THE RELIGION OF SCIENTISM?

I disagree with your statement. You most certainly deny science. Even the most predictable and repeatable of observations are denied by you.

DO YOU FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT SCIENCE IS THE COLLECTION OF DATA – WHICH MAKES NO CONCLUSIONS – WHILE SCIENTISM IS A FAITH-BASED BELIEF IN THE INTERPRETATIONS OF THOSE DATA BY FLAWED HUMAN BEINGS

I do not agree with your definition. Science is the application and process of gaining knowledge, particular natural knowledge. Scientism is bel…[Read more]

BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT OBSERVABLE, TESTABLE, AND REPEATABLE?

Then God is unscientific. But he is observable through the things he has made. So I cannot see him, but I know he is there. This type of observation is how we arrive at the Big Bang. It doesn’t mean it is correct, but that there is a lot of evidence pointing to this hypothesis.

Science means knowledge. But it is more accurately defined as the pursuit and application of knowledge. Science is not the truth itself, but often it discovers or arrives at the truth through investigation, testing, and successful predictions. I would also argue that knowledge can be gained by revelation. But at that point, it is yet to be proven.…[Read more]

Mike,

If you are going to judge me as anything but honestly trying to answer you with sincere integrity, then this conversation is wasting my valuable time.

If you want to continue this discussion, you can show me that by treating me with respect and assuming that I am genuinely trying to thoughtfully respond to your posts in a sincere and…[Read more]

LU:  …are you wanting me to show you places where the context doesn’t make it clear who is the speaker saying what is quoted?

Not sure I understand the wording there.  I’m asking for other times in the Bible where a NAMED person or party is directly quoted as saying something, and we have to pick and choose between two or more choices said the…[Read more]

LU:  You wrote that as a fact, do you mean to write that as an opinion? If as a fact, prove it to be a fact, otherwise re-write it as an opinion…

Funny you should say that, since I truly and honestly had “IMO” after the statement at first – but then removed it because there is no doubt in my mind that you exactly what I was asking for, and that…[Read more]

Yes, there is more to this conflict that meets the eye. But we are brainwashed to see the Russians and the baddies.

LU: <span style=”color: #ff0000;”>Deuteronomy 32:6…  Is this the way you repay Yahweh (the God of gods and the Lord of lords), you foolish and unwise people? Is he (the God of gods and the Lord of lords) not your Father, your Creator, who made you and formed you?</span>

Are you making the claim that “Yahweh the Son”  is also our heavenly Fathe…[Read more]

Hi, Mike,

Cont.

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Also, try this much better translation of the Greek words…</span>

<span style=”color: #ff0000;”>2 Peter 3:5… But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word</span>

<span style=”color: #ff0000;”>the HEAVENS came into being and the earth was FORMED from water and by water.…[Read more]

And I actually don’t mind Trump anymore lol, because I have many Trump supporter friends online

The political elite painted Trump as a sexist, racist, white pig. In reality, he is an astute business man who loves America, the common people, and he is pretty generous. He has more in common with the taxi driver taking him home than political e…[Read more]

Mike,

You said:

1.  You imply that it’s completely normal and very common to read a verse in the Bible and have to pick and choose of your own desire who is doing the speaking.

This is what I said:

LU:  The whole Bible calls for the reader to follow along and seek to understand who is speaking and to whom. Nothing new when it comes to the word…

[Read more]