@ DT

You say

If the last week of the “70 week” prophecy is about the Jesus’ death, please explain why this prophecy isn’t a focus in the NT. The only time the name Daniel is mentioned is in the Jesus’ dialogue when he’s speaking about the destruction of the Temple……

Me

Jesus referred to Daniel 9 without naming him…[Read more]

@Berean,

“The desire of every true Jewish woman was to be the mother of this Messiah. Whenever a baby boy was born, the relatives would gather hoping he might become the Savior.” Wieland

“Every” Jewish woman desired to be the mother of this Messiah!?!? The only Jewish woman, if they even thought about it, would be one who married a man from th…[Read more]

@Berean,

If the last week of the “70 week” prophecy is about the Jesus’ death, please explain why this prophecy isn’t a focus in the NT. The only time the name Daniel is mentioned is in the Jesus’ dialogue when he’s speaking about the destruction of the Temple and specifically states when the disciples see “a desolating abomination” in the “hol…[Read more]

@Berean,

Tell me, would it have hurt to write a simple response to what you believe the 70 week prophecy is? The first 483 years, most agree it’s about the temple being rebuilt; it’s the last seven where doctrines have been created and everyone disagrees…everyone with their own “truth.” How painful would it have been to write the first three a…[Read more]

If you would only take the time to read about Daniel 9 (the 70 weeks and the context) in Pastor Wieland’s book, you would understand something unique in the world and which goes hand in hand with the story.

🙏

@Berean,

Where do I begin

If you don’t want to do what I tell you, then do what you want.

First, you don’t demand people to do what you want; you ask, you guide, you teach. It’s more pleasant that way.

But I won’t waste my time trying to convince you about Daniel 9

You wouldn’t be convincing me of anything; I wanted to know what you believe wit…[Read more]

@ DT

Comme je l’ai déjà dit, je ne perdais pas mon temps…

Me

Ok

If you don’t want to do what I tell you, then do what you want.
But I won’t waste my time trying to convince you about Daniel 9 OR ANYTHING ELSE BECAUSE YOU’RE NOT WILLING TO LEARN ANYWAY.
APPROPRIATELY YOU’VE FOUND YOUR WAY
YOU DON’T REALLY WANT TO KNOW ANYTHING ELSE.

Like I already said, I wasn’t wasting my time reading another’s opinion of what they believe it means; especially when you could give a condensed version of it by summarizing what he said. Don’t you explain your belief when “witnessing” to others or do you hand them a book and say, “read it for yourself.”

Daniel chapter 9 is discussed in Pastor Wieland’s book, Chapter 9.
Read and you will see.

@Berean ,

So put your prejudices aside and go to chapter 9 of the book of Daniel, and you will be surprised to discover that the SDA does not believe in this Futurist heresy.

I have read chapter 9 and there is nothing concerning what the SDA believes. What do you believe of the 70 week prophecy told to Daniel?

What have you studied concerning Isa…[Read more]

@ DT

YOU

Since you believe the last week is a future event, please provide the passage where G-d paused this prophecy and pushed it off thousands of years into the future.

ME

I never said I believed in this false doctrine initiated by the Jesuits and which has spread widely in Protestantism.
So how can you say such a thing without knowing?
So…[Read more]

@Berean,

It’s a little perplexing how people are unable to answer questions; nothing in your response tells me how or why you believe Revelation is speaking of “papal Rome”; Rome isn’t mentioned by name or even alluded to by John and telling me to read two books isn’t an answer to a question. Besides, I don’t have time to waste on reading alm…[Read more]

@DT

Daniel and Revelation are 2 complementary Books .

It is URGENT FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY THAT YOU BECOME AWARE OF THESE PROPHECIES (DANIEL AND REVELATION but not only….)

With these two books by Pastor Wieland you have something to quench your thirst for…[Read more]

@Berean,

How do you know Revelation is speaking of “papal Rome”? Is this a teaching of your religion that you’ve come to believe as truth or do we have evidence that makes your belief truth?

When reading Revelation, chapters 1:1,3 and 22:10 present an major issue for the futurist’s interpretation of the book as the events spoken of in John’s…[Read more]

@DT

You ….You’re going to have to be a little more specific; an article on Catholicism, the Seventh-day Adventist Church, or something you wrote?

….

You seem to have an extremely negative stance toward Catholics and constantly point out the religion’s flaws. How do you follow this “official” statement?

me

A considerable portion of the…[Read more]

@Berean,

Show me a particular article that shocks you or that you find unfair.

You’re going to have to be a little more specific; an article on Catholicism, SDA, or something you wrote?

The “Official Statements – April 15, 1997” on “How Seventh-day Adventists View Roman Catholicism” says: “Seventh-day Adventists seek to take a positive ap…[Read more]

Show me a particular article that shocks you or that you find unfair.

@Berean,

So it’s okay for you to bash other faiths; but when it comes to yours, don’t critique it?!?!? Did the truth hit a nerve and open your eyes; did it cause you to stop and ponder the validity of your faith and become your moniker “Berean”; or will you continue to sweep the truth under the carpet, holding fast to a belief system and not G-d…[Read more]

Let me tell you, you’re giving a very bad review on this forum.
Don’t continue wasting your time and that of others; time is too precious.

@Berean,

Someone has to say it as you continue to bash the Catholic faith week after week. You’re a Seventh Day Adventist, should we begin pointing out the falsehood and errors of your faith system? One could look at how your religious movement was born out of a failed “prophetic” prediction of the coming of the Jesus (not once, but twice); which…[Read more]