The world means ‘age’. It is aeon or eon.

But the planet is probably very old and could even have had other worlds / ages / aeons.

to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Mike it’s Monday Meme day

A good saying that should be heeded.

Mike, does the sun travel at mach 2.7 or thereabouts?

Genesis 1:7… Thus God made the raqia, and divided the waters which were under the raqia from the waters which were above the raqia.

Very simple question:  Does this scripture say there are waters above the raqia itself?  Yes or No?

Genesis 1:14-17…  Then God said, Let there be lights in the raqia of the heavens…  God set them in the raq…

[Read more]

What do you mean “if” he was right?  Are you saying it’s possible that he was WRONG?  Yes or No?

David would not have been a perfect man. He may be right or wrong if he was referring to the second heaven.

I cannot verify which because Webb Telescope has not imaged a water layer outside the cosmos itself. If that happens, then I could be definit…[Read more]

Mike, you need to take a long hard look in the mirror.

Life is short and we will meet our maker soon enough.

But you can only change while you are here.

Be wise and take advantage of the time you have left.

Pretender: He would be right if we are talking about the first heaven…

And what does the context tell us?  He has intentionally broken the psalm up into “things of heaven” and “thing of earth”.  The sun, moon, stars and waters above the heavens are all listed in the “things of heaven” category, while he lists clouds, not only in the “things of…[Read more]

Mike:  The sun, moon and stars are IN the raqia, and the waters above are ABOVE the entire raqia.

 

Proclaimer:  Nope.

Okay, here we go again…

Genesis 1:7… Thus God made the raqia, and divided the waters which were under the raqia from the waters which were above the raqia.

Very simple question:  Does this scripture say there are waters ab…[Read more]

He would be right if we are talking about the first heaven.

If he is talking about the second heaven, then he may or may not be right. But if he was right and there is water outside the cosmos, then we haven’t discovered it yet. But this has no bearing on the shape of the earth, so you have lost. This is not evidence the earth is flat is…[Read more]

Mike:  Okay, then you ARE saying he is right.  Great.  Then please tell us what and where these waters above the heavens are.  Thanks.

 

Pretender:  Nope. I am reminding you that you need to be careful about establishing doctrine from such words.

Actually, you’re trying to stall.  Just tell me plainly if the writer of Psalm 148 was right or wr…[Read more]

Tiger: I am the winner

Mike: here’s a video of a man who is a shapeshifter. Look at his eyes when he blinks.

That is pretty much what has happened here.

Okay, then you ARE saying he is right.  Great.  Then please tell us what and where these waters above the heavens are.  Thanks.

Nope. I am reminding you that you need to be careful about establishing doctrine from such words. If we did that with all words in the bible, then we would need to craft a doctrine about Jesus having a demon. That is th…[Read more]

Pretender:  <span style=”color: #ff0000;”>I win, you lose.</span>

Really?

Mike:  <span style=”color: #0000ff;”>Here’s a way you and I can actually have a respectable discussion about this issue.</span>

Pretender:  <span style=”color: #ff0000;”>NO!  I’m not interested in an actual discussion about it because you’ll likely expose my premise as fla…[Read more]

The sun, moon and stars are IN the raqia, and the waters above are ABOVE the entire raqia.

Nope. That raqia is the division created by the waters only.

God had already created the heavens and the earth in the beginning.

Sky is what we see when we look up. It is obvious that the clouds are in the sky and stars are in the sky. Speaking of the…[Read more]

Pretender:  I am stating that men say things in the bible that are not true…

We’re talking about a writer OF scripture making HIS OWN claim about our Biblical earth.  We’re NOT talking about a writer of scripture QUOTING Satan or someone else telling a lie.

You are trying to conflate the two, and I’m merely exposing your flawed plan.

So f…[Read more]

Mike, the more you argue, the more I win.

You are making me more of a winner.

But I don’t take the credit myself because I have to admit that arguing for the truth is easy.

Telling lies and more lies to cover those lies is difficult.

This is why you are consistently losing mike.

I’ve explained my rules, right?  You refused to follow them, right?  The subject is closed UNTIL you follow those rules.  End of story.

Let me translate this for you. You cannot bring back the sun.

I wonder why? Maybe because the heliocentric model is true and you cannot bring back the biggest physical light in the cosmos from our point of view.

Pretender:  Personally speaking, and God is my witness, my opinion was the raqia being most likely the first and second heaven.

Okay.  I guess it’s fine by me if you want to think the ONE raqia is BOTH the first AND second heavens.  Just remember that it still all boils down to one very simple thing…

The sun, moon and stars are IN the raqia, an…[Read more]

BOOMERANG!  More insults from a person who is literally speaking about HIMSELF!

Only a clown would think that the Bible recording what the Pharisees actually DID say is somehow the Bible being wrong.

Once again you are making false assumptions. Read my post again. I am stating that men say things in the bible that are not true, but historically…[Read more]