Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 15,681 through 15,700 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #336764
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 23 2013,20:58)
    Neither you or T can answer me.
    One verse to show us simply and in plain English that Jesus was an Angel or a god.


    First, you haven't asked ME the question, so how can you say I haven't answered?

    Second, I have already showed you the scriptures that call Jesus a god, and you have already agreed that he is called “god”.

    As for the scriptures that call Jesus an angel of God, consider:

    Galatians 4:14
    …..you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself.

    The above scripture lists Jesus as an angel of God.  And the fact that the English word “angel” refers to spirit messengers of God, of which Jesus is one, should be enough to suffice.

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 23 2013,20:58)
    And also, the verses that i gave you do say that Jesus is the Lord, and the Lord is the Spirit, and that there is only one Spirit, so do the maths.


    None of that says the Holy Spirit of God is the Son of God, 2B.  And if you believe there is literally only one spirit, then we all must be God, because we would then all be part of that same spirit, right?

    #336765
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,23:50)
    Instead John 17:5 is Jesus asking for his glory that he had with Jehovah before the World began.


    That's right, Kerwin. And if you ask for something you ALREADY HAD, then you are OBVIOUSLY asking for the RETURN of that something.

    This really isn't rocket science. ???

    #336771
    2besee
    Participant

    Hi all,

    You have got to read this:

    <a href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:3vHkEOAfDuoJ:www.marquette.edu/maqom/bogdan2.pdf+&hl=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgbzKfPwkzSHxT9JUn1s0y1p5tc_gr2tACcoag2WOagQXoNPua34_K3ZquWUeAr2Vj1JM9URd3MFnXXzurKpr
    qXFWydmg_A4bdQQrdTS1fHv3z99ZxovSG9OcK56yIok4w8OeHl&sig=AHIEtbQIrjLTgNMxbpVkWrbiWVN6LcnOOA” target=”_blank”>https://docs.google.com/viewer?&#8230;.6LcnOOA

    It is an excellent presentation on things, including angels.

    #336782
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,17:51)
    [
    Galatians 4:14
    …..you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself.

    The above scripture lists Jesus as an angel of God.  And the fact that the English word “angel” refers to spirit messengers of God, of which Jesus is one, should be enough to suffice.


    Mike……Can't you see you are reading all kinds of thing that is not even part of what Paul was saying there. The context is not about Jesus being an angel at all. It is about how Paul was received by those  Galatians .  The words (as if) Paul was one of those things, and has nothing to do with those things being connected with each other at ALL. Jesus was and is not an angel at all, No scripture say Jesus is an angel of any kind.

    Remember where it says “the worlds to come is “NOT” Subject unto Angels” , Jesus is no Angel he is, a Son of MAN  and the Angels are subject to him, he is not one of them.

    Mike your switching “context” again to force the text to say what in fact it is not even remotely driving at. IMO

    Peace and Love to you and yours…………………………gene

    #336783
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 24 2013,20:51)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,17:51)
    [
    Galatians 4:14
    …..you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself.

    The above scripture lists Jesus as an angel of God.  And the fact that the English word “angel” refers to spirit messengers of God, of which Jesus is one, should be enough to suffice.


    Mike……Can't you see you are reading all kinds of thing that is not even part of what Paul was saying there. The context is not about Jesus being an angel at all. It is about how Paul was received by those  Galatians .  The word (as if) Paul was one of those things and has nothing to do with those things being connected with each other at ALL. Jesus was and is not an angel at all. No scripture say Jesus is an angel of any kind.

    Remember where it says “the world to come in “NOT” Subject unto Angels” , Jesus is no Angel he is ,a Son of MAN  and the Angels are subject to him, he is not one of them.

    Mike you switching context again to force the text to say what in fact it is not even remotely driving at.

    Peace and Love to you and yours…………………………gene


    Gene,

    You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S., as if I was President Obama himself.

    :cool:

    #336784
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Kerwin………..Well put brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………………………..gene

    #336826
    2besee
    Participant

    Hi Mike.

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,16:39)

    I have never said that Jesus was “half man/half god”, yet here you are, telling me how it makes no sense.

    I apologize then I must of got your posts mixed up with other things that I was reading. :)

    Quote
    What I claim is that Jesus was existing as a powerful spirit being (an angel).  And then God caused this angel to be born out of a human woman's womb.  Once born of Mary, he was indeed human.  Once raised, he again became the angel he was before – only exalted to an even higher position than the one he left, and given the name above all other names.

    This is what John 17:5 is about, 2B.  Jesus is saying he has accomplished what God sent him to accomplish, and asking God if He could now place him back in the glorious position he had previously – before the world began.

    When you say that Jesus existed as a powerful angel,
    Do you know which angel?

    #336844
    terraricca
    Participant

    k

    Quote
    T,

    You didn't quote such a scripture.

    I wrote “accumulates” when I meant culminates.

    The bottom line is Jesus had the power to send the Spirit before his ascension but not before he went away.

    So go away may only mean his death and resurrection.

    do you think the comforter and the holy spirit is the same thing ???

    if so then why did Christ give the holy spirit to his disciples in ;JN 20:22 And when He had said this, He breathed on them and *said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit.

    #336849
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 24 2013,09:03)
    Gene,

    You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S., as if I was President Obama himself.

     :cool:


    Perfect example, Kerwin.  Thanks!  :)

    Naturally, for the comparison to work, the individual mentioned would HAVE TO BE a part of the group mentioned.

    For example, you wouldn't say, You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S, as if I were Michael Jackson himself.

    Why?  Because Michael Jackson ISN'T a “Legislator of the U.S” – and so the comparison would fall flat on it's face.

    And that's why Kerwin's example is perfect, because not only is President Obama a Legislator of the U.S., he is the HEAD Legislator of the U.S.

    Just like Jesus is the HEAD angel of God.  So Kerwin's example is a DIRECT MATCH to Paul's words.

    For once, Gene and I agree: Well put, brother Kerwin! :)

    #336851
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 24 2013,16:48)
    When you say that Jesus existed as a powerful angel,
    Do you know which angel?


    Yes 2B.  

    He was the one called “Jesus”, and “the Word of God”, and “the Lamb of God”.  He now has been given a new name that only he and God know, but he still remains an angel of God.

    Gene needs to realize that the word “angel” is an ENGLISH word, and refers to spirit messengers of God.  Revelation 1:1 makes it clear that Jesus IS a spirit messenger of his God, and therefore an “angel of God”.

    Now if you really want to get technical, you need to know that the Greek word “aggelos”, which we in English often (but not always) translate as “angel”, simply means “messenger”.

    Here is Hebrews 2:5, the verse to which Gene referred in his post, from the Young's Literal Translation:

    Hebrews 2:5 Young's Literal Translation
    For not to messengers did He subject the coming world, concerning which we speak,

    How will you understand it now, Gene?  Will you claim that Jesus is not a “messenger” of God?

    #336853
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,01:18)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,23:50)
    Instead John 17:5 is Jesus asking for his glory that he had with Jehovah before the World began.


    That's right, Kerwin.  And if you ask for something you ALREADY HAD, then you are OBVIOUSLY asking for the RETURN of that something.

    This really isn't rocket science.  ???


    Kerwin,

    I was thinking about you today, and came up with this scenario:

    Kerwin had wonderful time on vacation.  The beautiful view of the ocean made his room the best room in the hotel.  So when he checked out, he pre-booked that same room for next year's vacation.

    But when he showed up the next year to check in, they had forgotten about his reservation, and tried to give him a different room.  So Kerwin said to the front desk clerk, “Please give to me now, the room that I HAD with you last year.”

    Now here's the $64,000 question:

    Do we understand Kerwin's words to mean:

    1.  He wanted the room he actually HAD last year?

    2.  He wanted the room the hotel had been HOLDING FOR HIM since last year?

    Of course, both statements refer to the very same room – but which of the two answers match the WORDS KERWIN ACTUALLY SAID?

    IMO, the words “the room I HAD” do not come close to conveying #2.  

    On the other hand, they are a DIRECT MATCH to #1.

    What do you guys think?  (Be honest)

    #336894
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 25 2013,13:26)

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 24 2013,16:48)
    When you say that Jesus existed as a powerful angel,
    Do you know which angel?


    Yes 2B.  

    He was the one called “Jesus”, and “the Word of God”, and “the Lamb of God”.  He now has been given a new name that only he and God know, but he still remains an angel of God.

    Gene needs to realize that the word “angel” is an ENGLISH word, and refers to spirit messengers of God.  Revelation 1:1 makes it clear that Jesus IS a spirit messenger of his God, and therefore an “angel of God”.

    Now if you really want to get technical, you need to know that the Greek word “aggelos”, which we in English often (but not always) translate as “angel”, simply means “messenger”.

    Here is Hebrews 2:5, the verse to which Gene referred in his post, from the Young's Literal Translation:

    Hebrews 2:5  Young's Literal Translation
    For not to messengers did He subject the coming world, concerning which we speak,

    How will you understand it now, Gene?  Will you claim that Jesus is not a “messenger” of God?


    Mike……..There you go playing your usual Switch game again, Most all translations say ANGELS not messengers, as far as i know. But again you would do anything but admit you are wrong right Mike? As far as Messengers go , if you are considering all of Gods messengers God does subject the world to come to them all, in fact they shall rule with Jesus on this earth for 1000 Years are Joint Heirs with Him of the kingdom of God and they (saint) shall be Kings and Priest unto God. Just as it says, so that scripture could only be talking about ANGELS,  Not just messenges who God has sent and there are many messenger he has sent to speak to us all.

    God has not subjected the world to come unto ANGELS but unto Jesus and the Saints of the Most High. It is clear to me Mike,  but i know it must not be to you , with you present views.

    Jesus is not the Spirit himself Spoken of in Revelations 1,  He is the one who speaks the words of God who is the Spirit, Word are Spirit, Whosoever has ears to hear let him hear what the Spirit is saying. We are told Not what Jesus is saying but the Spirit is saying there is a difference between the Man Jesus and the Spirit speaking through Him, they are not one and the same thing as you persume they are. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene

    #336919
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene,

    I just can't keep up with all your unscriptural beliefs.  How can I explain to you that spirit messengers of God are angels, when you don't even believe spirits are beings at all?

    And how can I explain to you that Jesus is one of these spirit messengers of God, when you believe Jesus is the only flesh and blood human being living at the right hand of God, in unapproachable light?

    Can you at least understand the comparison in Galatians 4:14 that I posted? Can you understand that the comparison wouldn't even work if the individual mentioned was not also a part of the group mentioned?

    #336920
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Also Gene,

    Please answer the bolded question about “Kerwin's Hotel Saga” – three posts above this one.

    #337008
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 26 2013,10:05)
    Gene,

    I just can't keep up with all your scriptural beliefs.  How can I explain to you that spirit messengers of God are angels, when you don't even believe spirits are beings at all?

    And how can I explain to you that Jesus is one of these spirit messengers of God, when you believe Jesus is the only flesh and blood human being living at the right hand of God, in unapproachable light?

    Can you at least understand the comparison in Galatians 4:14 that I posted?  Can you understand that the comparison wouldn't even work if the individual mentioned was not also a part of the group mentioned?


    Mike………..Now your telling us there are no Angels Just Messengers and the fact is nearly “ALL” translation translate that scripture as Angels, God has NOT Subject the World to come unto ANGELS is exactly what it say and means and N ot Scripture ever said Jesus was and Angel either. Again you simply force the text to meet you doctrines.

    Even Jesus acknowledged Angels as a class of “beings”  not Just Messengers as you suppose.

    If you are going to call Jesus an Angel,  Produce the Scriptures to Prove it, and why are you not a JW that is what they also believe. David would be glad to here that .

    Scripture also says Jesus has Angels he at his disposal , and while Angels can be Messengers (as in the case of Michel or Gabriel ) they are in a class of there own IMO, and where did i ever say Jesus has Now flesh and Blood , He has flesh and Bone , Just as He said he had after his resurection.

    Peace and love to you and yours………………………gene

    #337009
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 25 2013,13:43)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,01:18)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,23:50)
    Instead John 17:5 is Jesus asking for his glory that he had with Jehovah before the World began.


    That's right, Kerwin.  And if you ask for something you ALREADY HAD, then you are OBVIOUSLY asking for the RETURN of that something.

    This really isn't rocket science.  ???


    Kerwin,

    I was thinking about you today, and came up with this scenario:

    Kerwin had wonderful time on vacation.  The beautiful view of the ocean made his room the best room in the hotel.  So when he checked out, he pre-booked that same room for next year's vacation.

    But when he showed up the next year to check in, they had forgotten about his reservation, and tried to give him a different room.  So Kerwin said to the front desk clerk, “Please give to me now, the room that I HAD with you last year.”

    Now here's the $64,000 question:

    Do we understand Kerwin's words to mean:

    1.  He wanted the room he actually HAD last year?

    2.  He wanted the room the hotel had been HOLDING FOR HIM since last year?

    Of course, both statements refer to the very same room – but which of the two answers match the WORDS KERWIN ACTUALLY SAID?

    IMO, the words “the room I HAD” do not come close to conveying #2.  

    On the other hand, they are a DIRECT MATCH to #1.

    What do you guys think?  (Be honest)


    Mike………See how you reasoning goes , fact is the closest, simplest and most accurate is 1, The room i had last year it is the most Specific statement and clearly expresses the intent of the person leaving no room for doubt. IMO

    Using the other leaves room for the Hotel to say they did know he wanted the exact same room so they reserved him another exactly like the room he had last year.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………………gene

    #337011
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,13:18)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,23:50)
    Instead John 17:5 is Jesus asking for his glory that he had with Jehovah before the World began.


    That's right, Kerwin.  And if you ask for something you ALREADY HAD, then you are OBVIOUSLY asking for the RETURN of that something.

    This really isn't rocket science.  ???


    Mike,

    A man walks into a lawyers office and states give me the inheritance I had with you before I was conceived.

    Father, give me the mansion yourself, the mansion I had with you before the world began.

    Clerk, give me the room yourself,  the room I had with you last week.

    I believe Americans generally use “reserved” when speaking of a room.  Believers had a room reserved in the reign of God before the world began.

    That is not the glory Jesus speaks of.

    #337012
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 25 2013,08:19)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 24 2013,09:03)
    Gene,

    You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S., as if I was President Obama himself.

     :cool:


    Perfect example, Kerwin.  Thanks!  :)

    Naturally, for the comparison to work, the individual mentioned would HAVE TO BE a part of the group mentioned.

    For example, you wouldn't say, You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S, as if I were Michael Jackson himself.

    Why?  Because Michael Jackson ISN'T a “Legislator of the U.S” – and so the comparison would fall flat on it's face.

    And that's why Kerwin's example is perfect, because not only is President Obama a Legislator of the U.S., he is the HEAD Legislator of the U.S.

    Just like Jesus is the HEAD angel of God.  So Kerwin's example is a DIRECT MATCH to Paul's words.

    For once, Gene and I agree:  Well put, brother Kerwin! :)


    Mike,

    President Obama in the Executive of the general state of the U.S. He is not a Legislator due to the separation of powers. The group is government members, not Legislators.

    #337018
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 26 2013,12:25)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 25 2013,08:19)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 24 2013,09:03)
    Gene,

    You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S., as if I was President Obama himself.

     :cool:


    Perfect example, Kerwin.  Thanks!  :)

    Naturally, for the comparison to work, the individual mentioned would HAVE TO BE a part of the group mentioned.

    For example, you wouldn't say, You welcomed me as if I was a Legislator of the U.S, as if I were Michael Jackson himself.

    Why?  Because Michael Jackson ISN'T a “Legislator of the U.S” – and so the comparison would fall flat on it's face.

    And that's why Kerwin's example is perfect, because not only is President Obama a Legislator of the U.S., he is the HEAD Legislator of the U.S.

    Just like Jesus is the HEAD angel of God.  So Kerwin's example is a DIRECT MATCH to Paul's words.


    Mike,

    President Obama in the Executive of the general state of the U.S.  He is not a Legislator due to the separation of powers.  The group is government members, not Legislators.


    Hi Kerwin,

    The Legislator-in-Chief. (role of U.S. President in legislative process)

    The State of the Union and Recommendation Clauses of Article II, Section 3 provide that the President “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” Those thirty-one words envision the President as the lead active participant in the embryonic stages of the making of laws.

    Of course we know that “legislator” actually means “maker of laws”, right?

    The article, found here, goes on to say:

    Americans today identify the President as the Legislator-in-Chief. When presidential candidates promise, We the People listen–carefully. There is much truth to the popular recognition of the President as the Legislator-in-Chief: Ever since the New Deal, we truly have had a populist, plebiscitarian presidency. (1)

    This vision of the President may seem modern, but the Constitution itself has always recognized the President as a superlegislator. The Veto Clauses of Article I, Section 7 give the President the “last word” on all legislation, absent an override by a two-thirds supermajority of both Houses of Congress. (2) The President, however, sometimes has the important “first word” on legislation, too.

    The article goes on (and on and on) to explain exactly HOW the President is the “Legislator-in-Chief”.  And there are many other articles that attest to the same general belief.  (I do recognize your “technical” argument that the executive branch of our government is not the legislative branch.  But the President of the U.S. is, without a doubt, involved in the legislative process – which makes him a “legislator” – even though he is technically a member of the executive branch of our government.)

    At any rate, to a person who DOESN'T consider the President to be the “Legislator-in-Chief”, your comparison would not have worked.

    The individual mentioned MUST BE part of the group mentioned for a comparison of that sort to work.

    So IF you are one of those like me, who believe the President IS the head legislator, your example was spot on.

    #337019
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 26 2013,10:08)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 25 2013,13:43)

    Kerwin had wonderful time on vacation.  The beautiful view of the ocean made his room the best room in the hotel.  So when he checked out, he pre-booked that same room for next year's vacation.

    But when he showed up the next year to check in, they had forgotten about his reservation, and tried to give him a different room.  So Kerwin said to the front desk clerk, “Please give to me now, the room that I HAD with you last year.”

    Now here's the $64,000 question:

    Do we understand Kerwin's words to mean:

    1.  He wanted the room he actually HAD last year?

    2.  He wanted the room the hotel had been HOLDING FOR HIM since last year?

    Of course, both statements refer to the very same room – but which of the two answers match the WORDS KERWIN ACTUALLY SAID?


    Mike………fact is the closest, simplest and most accurate is 1, The room i had last year it is the most  Specific statement and clearly expresses the intent of the person leaving no room for doubt.  IMO


    I agree Gene.  How about you, Kerwin?  2B?

Viewing 20 posts - 15,681 through 15,700 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account