Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 15,341 through 15,360 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #305374
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,07:59)
    Marty,

    It's interesting that you can admit Jesus was God's only begotten Son in this thread while denying it in the other thread.  ???

    But tell me, if the existing in the form of God was when Jesus was a human being, what does it mean that he was made into the likeness of a human being?


    Hi Mike:

    This is what I have stated in this thread and I have never denied this:

    Quote
    Jesus as God's Only Begotten Son and His Christ was sent by God

    He was and is the “Only Son of God” to be Begotten by God in the womb a virgin, and there will never be another to be begotten by God in this way, but we who are born again Christians, have also been born of God, and so, that is what I have stated.

    And you say:

    Quote
    But tell me, if the existing in the form of God was when Jesus was a human being, what does it mean that he was made into the likeness of a human being?

    He was a human being but not just any ordinary human being. He was “the Christ, the Son of the Living God”, but although he was in the form of God in this position, the scripture that he did not use this fact to make himself a reputation, but he took the form of a bond servant. The Greek word for form in each case “in the form of God” and the “form a bond servant” is “morphe” () the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision).

    Quote
    Phl 2:5 ¶ Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

    Phl 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

    Phl 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant

    He did not change from being a man here, but just willingly took upon himself the role of a servant which is defined:

    Quote
    1) a slave, bondman, man of servile condition

    a) a slave

    b) metaph., one who gives himself up to another's will those whose service is used by Christ in extending and advancing his cause among men

    c) devoted to another to the disregard of one's own interests

    2) a servant, attendant

    Quote
    Phl 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

    He was not just any ordinary man, He was the Son of the Loving God, but he identified himself with sinners. And this is what is meant by saying the phrase “and was made in the likeness of men”.

    Quote
    Hbr 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto [his] brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things [pertaining] to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
    Hbr 2:18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.

    Quote
    Phl 2:8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

    “found in fashion as a man”

    fashion = shema in greek

    1) the habitus, as comprising everything in a person which strikes the senses, the figure, bearing, discourse, actions, manner of life etc.

    This does not indicate that he pre-existed in some other state before he became a man, but shows the attitude of his mind. His humility is what this scripture is about.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #305399
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………. Where did i “EVER” say it was the FATHER that said that. It was Jesus saying that but the difference is I Believe what Jesus said YOU don't and there lies the problem with you. I knew your would not deal with what i quoted Jesus saying , Please give us your rendition of what i quoted if you can? It was not Jesus speaking through Jesus it was GOD the FATHER HIMSELF or don't you believe the FATHER WAS INDEED (IN) Christ Jesus speaking “through” HIM and directly at times as Jesus said He was (IN) HIM. This you can't understand “IT WILL NOT BE YOU SPEAKING BUT The Spirit Speaking (IN) you”. Why try to distort His word by changing subject Matter? A technique you always seem to use when confronted with a direct quote you can't understand or just do not want to acknowledge it as the truth.

    Mike your problem is you simply do not understand what a SPIRIT is , if you could understand that you would have no problem with the words of Jesus, becasue it all makes sense if you understand what a SPIRIT really is. Rather you or anyone ease can't believe Jesus, that the FATHER was truly (IN) HIM doing the WORKS makes no difference to Me, it is your loss not mine or those that do understand it.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………………………………………………….gene

    #305509
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 10 2012,07:09)
    Mike………. Where did i “EVER” say it was the FATHER that said that. It was Jesus saying that but the difference is I Believe what Jesus said YOU don't and there lies the problem with you. I knew your would not deal with what i quoted Jesus saying , Please give us your rendition of what i quoted if you can? It was not Jesus speaking through Jesus it was GOD the FATHER HIMSELF or don't you believe the FATHER WAS INDEED (IN) Christ Jesus speaking “through” HIM and directly at times as Jesus said He was (IN) HIM. This you can't understand “IT WILL NOT BE YOU SPEAKING BUT The Spirit Speaking (IN) you”. Why try to distort His word by changing subject Matter? A technique you always seem to use when confronted with a direct quote you can't understand or just do not want to acknowledge it as  the truth.

    Mike your problem is you simply do not understand what a SPIRIT is , if you could understand that you would have no problem with the words of Jesus, becasue it all makes sense if you understand what a SPIRIT really is. Rather you or anyone ease can't believe Jesus, that  the FATHER was truly (IN) HIM doing the WORKS makes no difference to Me, it is your loss not mine or those that do understand it.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………………………………………………….gene


    gene

    Quote

    Group: Regular Members
    Posts: 8678
    Joined: June 2007
    Posted: July 10 2012,07:09
    Mike………. Where did i “EVER” say it was the FATHER that said that. It was Jesus saying that but the difference is I Believe what Jesus said YOU don't and there lies the problem with you

    well let see your argument under the light of scriptures without men interpretation to them ;

    so you said ;

    Quote
    T8………That was GOD the FATHER (IN) Jesus Speaking (Through) him, (HIS WORDS). Do not Jesus say the FATHER “IN” ME HE doth the Works. and again Jesus said the words i am telling you are Spirit and “LIFE” , and again the word I am telling you are “NOT” My Words but the “WORDS” of Him who sent me. Making Jesus the “Words he was speaking is a false teaching.

    so who his Christ ???

    God is in him ,and works through him ,

    #305591
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Terricca………..I tis not “WHO” is Christ , it is “WHAT” is CHRIST, Christ is the Anointing or CHRISTOS that was ON and IN Jesus (IT) was GOD the FATHER HIMSELF who through the ANOINTING was “REALLY” (IN) Jesus and was Speaking “THROUGH HIM and sometimes in the “FIRST PERSON” as i have brought out here many times. Some of the Things Jesus spoke it was NOT Jesus saying it , it was God the FATHER Speaking First person “Through Him. Once you come to see this Pierre, many scriptures will be opened up to you and all who understand this. God is SPIRIT and can Be(IN) anyone of US BY the CHRISTOS or anointing Spirit. Is that not what we were to supposed to have recieved after Baptism was it not the Gift of the Holy Spirit, is that not the SAME Spirit that Jesus was Anointed with?

    peace and love to you and yours Pierre…………………………………………………………………gene

    #305629
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 09 2012,15:53)
    He was a human being but not just any ordinary human being. He was “the Christ, the Son of the Living God”, but although he was in the form of God in this position, the scripture that he did not use this fact to make himself a reputation, but he took the form of a bond servant. The Greek word for form in each case “in the form of God” and the “form a bond servant” is “morphe” () the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision).


    Thanks for saying this clearly. I don't think anyone else has made this stance as clear as you have.

    However, I have a question. Why does this particular view never quote the next part of the verse, “and was made in the likeness of men:”

    Because that puts it into context and perhaps a context that this view is arguing against.

    #305638
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    This is what I have stated in this thread and I have never denied this:

    “Jesus as God's Only Begotten Son and His Christ was sent by God”.


    I think Ed will surely attest to the fact that you DID deny it when I point blank asked you if Jesus dwelled on earth as the only begotten Son of God, and you said, “No”.  I could pull up the post from the “Word” thread, but there's no use crying over spilled milk.  What's important is that we are both now in agreement with scripture that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God.  

    (I wouldn't have even commented on this, but the words you used in response to my quoted words made it seem like I was lying about what I said.)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    He was not just any ordinary man, He was the Son of the Loving God, but he identified himself with sinners. And this is what is meant by saying the phrase “and was made in the likeness of men”.


    Marty, I thank you for your direct answer, weak though it may be.  Are you saying that Jesus was existing as a human being, but then “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being”?

    Does that truly make sense to you?

    #305639
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 09 2012,07:09)
    Mike………. Where did i “EVER” say it was the FATHER that said that. It was Jesus saying that………..


    Okay Gene.

    I'm just clarifying for all that the Father didn't literally speak through the mouth of Jesus, but Jesus spoke the words that the Father taught him to speak. Many times, the words of Jesus were his own personal words, like the two instances I pointed out for you.

    Now, I'm waiting for an answer to my question:

    John 6:38
    For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.

    Was this the Father speaking through Jesus? If not, then WHO came DOWN from heaven, and WHOSE will did that one come DOWN from heaven to do?

    #305640
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 12 2012,08:38)
    Terricca………..I tis not “WHO” is Christ , it is “WHAT” is CHRIST, Christ is the Anointing or CHRISTOS that was ON  and IN Jesus (IT) was GOD the FATHER HIMSELF who through the ANOINTING was “REALLY” (IN) Jesus and was Speaking “THROUGH HIM and sometimes in the “FIRST PERSON” as i have brought out here many times. Some of the Things Jesus spoke it was NOT Jesus saying it , it was God the FATHER Speaking First person “Through Him.  Once you come to see this Pierre,  many scriptures will be opened up to you and all who understand this. God is SPIRIT and can Be(IN) anyone of US BY the CHRISTOS or anointing Spirit. Is that not what we were to supposed to have recieved after Baptism was it not the Gift of the Holy Spirit, is that not the SAME Spirit that Jesus was Anointed with?

    peace and love to you and yours Pierre…………………………………………………………………gene


    gene

    I can drink from it ,and can store things in it ,it walks ,it talks ,I can see through it

    WHAT IS IT ???

    #305754
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 12 2012,09:52)

    Quote (942767 @ July 09 2012,15:53)
    He was a human being but not just any ordinary human being.  He was “the Christ, the Son of the Living God”, but although he was in the form of God in this position, the scripture that he did not use this fact to make himself a reputation, but he took the form of a bond servant.  The Greek word for form in each case “in the form of God” and the “form a bond servant” is “morphe” () the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision).


    Thanks for saying this clearly. I don't think anyone else has made this stance as clear as you have.

    However, I have a question. Why does this particular view never quote the next part of the verse, “and was made in the likeness of men:”

    Because that puts it into context and perhaps a context that this view is arguing against.


    Hi t8:

    The subject of these scriptures is:

    Quote
    Phl 2:5 ¶ Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

    And so, the scriptures that follow are speaking of the “state of mind” of Christ Jesus. He was Christ Jesus as a man. The subject does not change.

    I did quote the part of the verse which states that he was made in the likeness of men and explained that although he was not born of the sperm of man but God was his Father, he did not let this fact separate him from them, but identified himself with them as being a man just like them.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #305755
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 12 2012,10:16)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    This is what I have stated in this thread and I have never denied this:

    “Jesus as God's Only Begotten Son and His Christ was sent by God”.


    I think Ed will surely attest to the fact that you DID deny it when I point blank asked you if Jesus dwelled on earth as the only begotten Son of God, and you said, “No”.  I could pull up the post from the “Word” thread, but there's no use crying over spilled milk.  What's important is that we are both now in agreement with scripture that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God.  

    (I wouldn't have even commented on this, but the words you used in response to my quoted words made it seem like I was lying about what I said.)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    He was not just any ordinary man, He was the Son of the Loving God, but he identified himself with sinners. And this is what is meant by saying the phrase “and was made in the likeness of men”.


    Marty, I thank you for your direct answer, weak though it may be.  Are you saying that Jesus was existing as a human being, but then “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being”?

    Does that truly make sense to you?


    Mike:

    I have never denied that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God. I explained to Ed. why I answered “no” to your question.
    Go back and read what I said.

    And read what I have posted in reply to t8's post.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #305876
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (942767 @ July 12 2012,20:43)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 12 2012,10:16)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    This is what I have stated in this thread and I have never denied this:

    “Jesus as God's Only Begotten Son and His Christ was sent by God”.


    I think Ed will surely attest to the fact that you DID deny it when I point blank asked you if Jesus dwelled on earth as the only begotten Son of God, and you said, “No”.  I could pull up the post from the “Word” thread, but there's no use crying over spilled milk.  What's important is that we are both now in agreement with scripture that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God.  

    (I wouldn't have even commented on this, but the words you used in response to my quoted words made it seem like I was lying about what I said.)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    He was not just any ordinary man, He was the Son of the Loving God, but he identified himself with sinners. And this is what is meant by saying the phrase “and was made in the likeness of men”.


    Marty, I thank you for your direct answer, weak though it may be.  Are you saying that Jesus was existing as a human being, but then “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being”?

    Does that truly make sense to you?


    Mike:

    I have never denied that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God.  I explained to Ed. why I answered “no” to your question.
    Go back and read what I said.

    And read what I have posted in reply to t8's post.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Quote
    Mike:

    I have never denied that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God. I explained to Ed. why I answered “no” to your question.
    Go back and read what I said.


    I did read what you said to Ed right after you wrote it. At first you denied it, Ed posted ” ??? “, and you said that in hind sight, you realize you should have answered “YES” instead of “NO” to my question. Don't make ME out to be a liar just because YOU answered my question incorrectly and then corrected yourself later.

    As far as what you said to t8:

    Do you believe that Jesus was existing in the form of a human being, emptied himself, and was made into the likeness of a human being? YES or NO?

    #305900
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 15 2012,05:19)

    Quote (942767 @ July 12 2012,20:43)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 12 2012,10:16)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    This is what I have stated in this thread and I have never denied this:

    “Jesus as God's Only Begotten Son and His Christ was sent by God”.


    I think Ed will surely attest to the fact that you DID deny it when I point blank asked you if Jesus dwelled on earth as the only begotten Son of God, and you said, “No”.  I could pull up the post from the “Word” thread, but there's no use crying over spilled milk.  What's important is that we are both now in agreement with scripture that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God.  

    (I wouldn't have even commented on this, but the words you used in response to my quoted words made it seem like I was lying about what I said.)

    Quote (942767 @ July 08 2012,19:53)
    He was not just any ordinary man, He was the Son of the Loving God, but he identified himself with sinners. And this is what is meant by saying the phrase “and was made in the likeness of men”.


    Marty, I thank you for your direct answer, weak though it may be.  Are you saying that Jesus was existing as a human being, but then “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being”?

    Does that truly make sense to you?


    Mike:

    I have never denied that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God.  I explained to Ed. why I answered “no” to your question.
    Go back and read what I said.

    And read what I have posted in reply to t8's post.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Quote
    Mike:

    I have never denied that Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of God.  I explained to Ed. why I answered “no” to your question.
    Go back and read what I said.


    I did read what you said to Ed right after you wrote it.  At first you denied it, Ed posted ” ??? “, and you said that in hind sight, you realize you should have answered “YES” instead of “NO” to my question.  Don't make ME out to be a liar just because YOU answered my question incorrectly and then corrected yourself later.

    As far as what you said to t8:

    Do you believe that Jesus was existing in the form of a human being, emptied himself, and was made into the likeness of a human being?  YES or NO?


    Mike:

    If you insist that I have denied that Jesus is the “Monogenes” Son of the Living God, yes, you are a liar.

    I told you and Ed why I answered your question the way that I did. He is the “Monogenes Son of the Living God”, but he is not the only son of the Living God because we who are born again Christians are also born of God.

    I answered t8's post. I am not going to .answer your question yes or no. Read what I said to t8 and if you disagree with what I said to him, let's discuss that.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #305909
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Here is he exact post from the “Word” thread, Marty:

    Quote (942767 @ July 02 2012,19:52)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 03 2012,08:48)

    Quote (942767 @ July 01 2012,16:23)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 02 2012,01:14)

    Quote (942767 @ June 30 2012,20:41)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 30 2012,10:14)
    Marty,

    Is it scriptural that John the Baptist called Jesus “the Lamb of God” – even though Jesus wasn't literally a lamb?  YES or NO?


    Yes.


    Hi Marty,

    And is it scriptural that Jesus is called by the name “the Word of God” – even though he is not literally a spoke word from God?   YES or NO?


    Yes.


    And is it scriptural that, WHILE JESUS WAS ON EARTH, he was the only begotten Son of God?  YES or NO?


    No.

    Can you see my question and your answer to it?  Am I a liar?

    Here is what you said to t8:

    Quote
    I did quote the part of the verse which states that he was made in the likeness of men and explained that although he was not born of the sperm of man but God was his Father, he did not let this fact separate him from them, but identified himself with them as being a man just like them.

    Are you saying:

    A.  Jesus was not originally “in the likeness of a human being” when he was born by Mary?  YES or NO?

    B.  You truly think the words “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being” refer to Jesus “identifying himself with other men”? YES or NO?

    #305961
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike……..Was ADAM a SON OF GOD, Created by God himself? So then Jesus was Not a MONO-GENES Son of GOD , while he was a “UNIQUELY” Born HUMAN Being he certainly is and was not the only son of God, Now or before His berth either as Scripture in many places testifies. You are confusing his status as the The “FIRST” and Only one “thus far” raised from the grave into the Kingdom of God from the Human race and Being Born “BY” God into that kingdom. with his coming into existence on this earth as a pure human being. The only Mono-genes that could be applied to his is resurrection thus far into the kingdom of God. Jesus in no way by countless scriptures is the “ONLY” SON of GOD>

    Mike………..Jesus can claim to be ALPHA and OMEGA based on this principle also, He is the First from mankind born into the kingdom of God and the Last one born into it will be just like Him also, so in that sense it can be said he is both alpha and omega when it come to being Born into the Kingdom of God. But does that mean he is Alpha and Omega of all Creation that exists, No Not at all unless you make him a God as the Trinitarians do. Do you see my point Mike?

    peace and lvoe to you and yours Brother………………………………………………..gene

    #305964
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 15 2012,10:45)
    Mike……..Was ADAM a SON OF GOD, Created by God himself? So then Jesus was Not a MONO-GENES Son of GOD…………….


    Gene,

    Is it SCRIPTURAL that Jesus is the “only begotten Son of God”?

    It certainly is scriptural, right?  It is apparently not for us to understand how God can have many sons, spiritual and fleshly, and yet Jesus is still the “only begotten” one.  I don't know how or why that is.  

    It is like Paul mentioning in Gal 4:22 that Abraham had two sons, but then saying in Heb 11:17 that he was about to sacrifice his only begotten son.  One was the son of a promise, according to Paul, and so was his “only begotten” son in a way we can't fully understand.

    Apparently Jesus, by being the very first being ever created, is God's Son in a way we can't fully understand and therefore called His “only begotten” Son.

    I'm sure this has something to do with it:
    John 10
    35 If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken— 36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’?

    Jesus has apparently been set apart as God's very own, making him DIFFERENT from any other son God has. And just as Issac was different and was called Abraham's “only begotten”, Jesus is different and called God's “only begotten”.

    peace,
    mike

    #305971
    942767
    Participant

    Hi Mike:

    I am aware of answering your question no, but if I went back and explained why I answered the way that I did, and corrected my answer, does that mean that I denied that Jesus is the “Monogenes” Son of God or does it mean that I made a mistake in answering your question?

    And this is your accusation:

    Quote
    's interesting that you can admit Jesus was God's only begotten Son in this thread while denying it in the other thread.

    And so, I do not deny that Jesus is the “Monogenes” Son of the Living God, and so, if you want to insist of accusing me of this, yes, you are a liar.

    Actually, I answered this question in our conversation here:

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….st=4320

    And you ask:

    Quote
    Are you saying:

    A. Jesus was not originally “in the likeness of a human being” when he was born by Mary? YES or NO?

    B. You truly think the words “WAS MADE in the likeness of a human being” refer to Jesus “identifying himself with other men”? YES or NO?

    I can't just answer these question with a simple yes or no, becuase these scriptures are dealing with the attitude of mind of Christ Jesus while he was in his ministry on earth, and not from changing from of a being to another type of being. Of course, Jesus was born into this world a human being, but he was not an ordinary human being, he was “The Christ the Son of the Living God”.

    The subject of the scriptures in Philippians 2:5-8 is this:

    Quote
    Phl 2:3 [Let] nothing [be done] through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.

    Phl 2:4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.

    Phl 2:5 ¶ Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #305996
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (942767 @ July 15 2012,13:11)
    Of course, Jesus was born into this world a human being…………….


    Marty,

    I've seriously grown tired of this Phil 2 discussion we've had a dozen times.  If you think it makes sense that Jesus was a human being who was “existing in the form of God”, then have at it.  If you think Paul was teaching that a human being emptied himself and was “made in the likeness of a human being”, then I can't stop you.

    To me, all of the non-preexister attempts to force clear scriptures into meaning something other than the obvious – usually with nonsensical results – clearly displays their desperation in dealing with scriptures that clearly teach the opposite of what their doctrine insists they must be teaching.

    The bottom line is that you simply don't WANT Jesus to have pre-existed (for personal reasons), and are willing to come to nonsensical interpretations of the scriptures that teach he did.

    Just always remember that, no matter how you pretty it up in your mind, you are understanding Phil 2 to be teaching that someone who ALREADY WAS a human being was made in the likeness of a human being. And if that truly makes sense in your mind, then I say your mind has been blinded.

    peace,
    mike

    #306002
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 16 2012,09:54)

    Quote (942767 @ July 15 2012,13:11)
    Of course, Jesus was born into this world a human being…………….


    Marty,

    I've seriously grown tired of this Phil 2 discussion we've had a dozen times.  If you think it makes sense that Jesus was a human being who was “existing in the form of God”, then have at it.  If you think Paul was teaching that a human being emptied himself and was “made in the likeness of a human being”, then I can't stop you.

    To me, all of the non-preexister attempts to force clear scriptures into meaning something other than the obvious – usually with nonsensical results – clearly displays their desperation in dealing with scriptures that clearly teach the opposite of what their doctrine insists they must be teaching.

    The bottom line is that you simply don't WANT Jesus to have pre-existed (for personal reasons), and are willing to come to nonsensical interpretations of the scriptures that teach he did.

    Just always remember that, no matter how you pretty it up in your mind, you are understanding Phil 2 to be teaching that someone who ALREADY WAS a human being was made in the likeness of a human being.  And if that truly makes sense in your mind, then I say your mind has been blinded.

    peace,
    mike


    Hi Mike:

    Could it possibly be you who is in error? Paul is teaching the Philippian church about humility by using the life of Jesus Christ as an example for they and us to follow.

    That is a bottom line.

    No, I do not a personal issue with Jesus pre-existing, but I do not believe that he did, and I want to teach God's Word in truth.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #306008
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    I'm in error?  YOU'RE the one insisting that someone who already was existing in the likeness of a human being was “made in the likenes of a human being”.  ???  There are no two ways around it, Marty.  That is what you believe, no matter how you try to pretty it up.  And to me, that belief is utter nonsense.

    And the humility Paul was teaching about Jesus is that he was existing as a powerful spirit being, second only to God.  Paul taught that Jesus didn't “rest on his laurels”, but instead allowed himself to be made as a much lower life form for the will of God and the benefit of us.

    In your understanding, Jesus couldn't have “humbled himself” anyway, because in your understanding, Jesus was born to a poor family, was always poor, and therefore always humble.  In your understanding, Jesus had no “high place” to humble himself down from.  In fact, your understanding teaches quite the opposite.  Your teaching depicts a Jesus who was a regular old Joe, but then hit the jackpot of all jackpots when he became the ONE human being out of billions to whom God offered a trade:  One day of severe suffering for eternity at God's right hand.  My Jesus suffered humility – yours won the greatest lottery of all time.

    But all that is neither here nor there. Just rememeber that your understanding of Phil 2 calls for someone who ALREADY WAS in the likeness of a human being to BE MADE in the likeness of a human being. If you're okay with that, who am I to judge?

    #306010
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 16 2012,17:43)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 16 2012,09:54)

    Quote (942767 @ July 15 2012,13:11)
    Of course, Jesus was born into this world a human being…………….


    Marty,

    I've seriously grown tired of this Phil 2 discussion we've had a dozen times.  If you think it makes sense that Jesus was a human being who was “existing in the form of God”, then have at it.  If you think Paul was teaching that a human being emptied himself and was “made in the likeness of a human being”, then I can't stop you.

    To me, all of the non-preexister attempts to force clear scriptures into meaning something other than the obvious – usually with nonsensical results – clearly displays their desperation in dealing with scriptures that clearly teach the opposite of what their doctrine insists they must be teaching.

    The bottom line is that you simply don't WANT Jesus to have pre-existed (for personal reasons), and are willing to come to nonsensical interpretations of the scriptures that teach he did.

    Just always remember that, no matter how you pretty it up in your mind, you are understanding Phil 2 to be teaching that someone who ALREADY WAS a human being was made in the likeness of a human being.  And if that truly makes sense in your mind, then I say your mind has been blinded.

    peace,
    mike


    Hi Mike:

    Could it possibly be you who is in error?  Paul is teaching the Philippian church about humility by using the life of Jesus Christ as an example for they and us to follow.  

    That is a bottom line.

    No, I do not a personal issue with Jesus pre-existing, but I do not believe that he did, and I want to teach God's Word in truth.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty

    would you imply that Paul use lies in his description of Christ his Lord ???

Viewing 20 posts - 15,341 through 15,360 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account