Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,421 through 11,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #257854
    seekingtruth
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 07 2011,08:03)
    That is a good point, t8.  But if God divided everytime He brough forth another being, He would be a lot less now than when He started creating.  :)  I didn't divide myself to beget my son, why would God?  


    Mike,
    Actually you did divide yourself… of the 50 trillion cells (approx) in the human body you gave up a few million so that in the end one cell could produce your son. So were you reduced? perhaps Solomon got shorter over the years   :D

    T8 is correct no matter much you remove from infinity your left with infinite and you cannot divide infinity as your left with multiple infinities.  

    Wm

    #257858
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 07 2011,15:42)
    T8,

    My argument is that God is divided because creating a being from God would make two Gods and not one.


    A couple of considerations Kerwin.

    1) God making a being from himself is not 2 Almighties but a being that has the same nature as him.

    Philippians 2:6
    Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,

    2) We will become like Jesus is now. Our lowly bodies will be transformed to a body like his. And we are specifically told that we can participate in divine nature and that we first partake of the flesh and then the spiritual body. Likewise Jesus is now back in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began. Yet we both know that we are not God and God is not divided just because Jesus or us share or partake of his nature.

    Further, some of the second century apostles looked at the Word that was with God as like fire coming from fire. The flame of the first fire is not lessened when it produces a new fire.

    Tatian (165 A.D)
    For just as from one torch many fires are lighted, but the light of the first torch is not lessened by the kindling of many torches, so the Word, coming forth from the Word-Power of the Father, has not divested of the Word-Power Him who begat Him.

    #257867
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To All………….God is SPIRIT , problem here is not understanding what SPIRIT IS> Spirit is not a Being it is what is (IN) Beings . The same Spirit can be in everyone all at the same time, rather a clean or unclean spirits, Spirits simply put, are (INTELLECTS) . They are not BEINGS they control the BEINGS MINDS they are (IN)> Why do you think it say “THAT GOD MAY BE ALL AND (IN) ALL”, GOD is the very life of all creation and is in all creation as His seven spirits direct it all. Man did not become a living SOUL until a Spirit of life from GOD entered into him and (THEN) he became a (LIVING SOUL)> IMO

    peace and love to you all…………………………………….gene

    #257875
    Lightenup
    Participant

    If the eternal Light begets more Light, that begotten Light was always there, just not brought forth until the right time.

    Think about it. :)

    #257888
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 08 2011,10:25)
    If the eternal Light begets more Light, that begotten Light was always there, just not brought forth until the right time.

    Think about it. :)


    Kathi

    Christ is not light bulb,is he ?

    Pierre

    #257892
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 08 2011,03:25)
    If the eternal Light begets more Light, that begotten Light was always there, just not brought forth until the right time.

    Think about it. :)


    Huge assumption and no scriptural backing.

    We know that Jesus came from God, but you are saying that he always was, which is different.

    John 8:42
    Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.

    I can see eventually you may well be a Trinitarian.

    Interesting to watch the transformation.

    We could learn much from observing this process sped up.
    It would probably mirror Church history in the context of the apostacy.

    Remember that the Binity preceded the Trinity.
    The Holy Spirit was added as the third person some 60 or so years after the Binity.
    Perhaps 60 days in your case?

    #257893
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 06 2011,22:42)
    My argument is that God is divided because creating a being from God would make two Gods and not one.


    Then this is simply a misunderstanding on your part, Kerwin.  1 Cor 8:6 plainly tells us that ALL THINGS came FROM God.  And none of those things that came FROM Him are also God, right?

    God begetting a spirit Son would not “divide” Him, nor would it make the Son “God”. Instead, it would make him the Son OF God.

    Imagine that Michael the archangel mated with a female angel and begot a son.  The son would be a spirit being and share a spirit nature with Michael, but the son would not BE Michael.  Nor would the son automatically be an archangel.  It would simply be a matter of a spirit being begetting a DIFFERENT spirit being – and nothing more.

    The same would apply to God, Kerwin.  God is ONE Spirit Being who begat a DIFFERENT spirit being.  The being He begot is not Him.  And since only He is God Almighty, then the being God Almighty begot is someone OTHER THAN God Almighty.

    I feel that you are putting restrictions on what God can and can't do out of your selfish desire to have Jesus be nothing more than “exactly like you”.

    Stand back from yourself for a minute and really answer this question:

    Kerwin, is it IMPOSSIBLE for God to have begotten a spirit Son unto Himself?

    When you consider the fact that NOTHING is IMPOSSIBLE for God, the only correct answer is “NO”.

    mike

    #257894
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 06 2011,22:55)
    Mike,

    The fact that Jesus was conceived in his mother's womb just as John the Baptist was conceived in his mother's womb according to Luke 1:36.


    That's right, Kerwin.  And nobody here has ever denied this scriptural fact.

    Hebrews 2:14
    Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil—

    What person who was never anything BUT human would have it said about him that he “SHARED IN HUMANITY”?  If this person was never anything BUT human, then this is a senseless and unnecessary thing for the writer of Hebrews to say.  Instead the writer of Hebrews is telling us the reason that Jesus emptied himself of the nature he was sharing with God and was made in the likeness of a human being, Kerwin.  He who was rich had to become poor in order to be able to DIE, thereby conquering death for the rest of us who were born “poor”.

    Nobody is denying that Jesus was born of Mary as a human being.  But many of you are denying that all things were created through him way before he became flesh.

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 06 2011,22:55)
    There were certainly angels before that time.  


    Yes, because the Spirit Being God created MANY spirit sons unto Himself.  Why you think it is impossible for Jesus to have been the FIRST of these sons is beyond me.

    Kerwin, it seems that you non-preexisters all have the same reason for ignoring or twisting clear scriptures like “I came down from heaven”.  Your reason is this:  If Jesus was nothing other than “exactly like me”, then I feel more confident that I can accomplish what he did.

    It is a selfish reason to re-write the scriptures.  And it seems that not one of you stop to think that Jesus had God Himself as his LITERAL Father – even as a human!  None of you can claim this.  So, no matter how hard you try, or how many scriptures you have to re-write, you will NEVER be able to make Jesus be “exactly like you”.

    Kerwin, look at where you guy's selfish ambition has led you.  You have admitted an “UNKNOWN” only begotten of God, since you refuse to let the Word be Jesus.

    Marty claims that John 17:5 is a case of Jesus asking for the glory the “THOUGHT OF HIM IN GOD'S HEAD” had before the creation of the world.

    Paladin claims that when Jesus refers to ascending to where he WAS BEFORE, right after clearly stating that he came DOWN from heaven, he was really speaking of ascending back to earth from the grave.

    Gene has to add his own words into the scriptures to make John 1:14 say “the Word CAME TO BE IN SOMEONE WHO WAS FLESH”; and to make Revelation 22:16 say Jesus is the “Offspring and Offspring of David”.

    Consider Colossians 1:15-16.  The actual words of the scripture say that Jesus is the firstborn of all creation because all invisible things in heaven and visible things on earth were created through him.

    On one hand, we have the “Jesus is God” people saying, “Well, it doesn't have to mean Jesus was the first creature ever created by God” because they don't want Jesus to have a beginning or to be a creation of his God.  So these people assert that it means Jesus, as GOD HIMSELF, is preeminent over creation.  (As if “firstBORN” would be a word that would ever apply to the God who has no beginning or end.  ??? )

    On the other hand, we have the non-preexisters saying, “Well, it doesn't have to mean Jesus was the first creature ever created by God” because they want Jesus to have been “exactly like them”, and to have begun his existence as a human being.  So these people assert that the words “ALL creation” in verse 15 really mean “NEW creation.  And the words “ALL things” in verse 16 really mean “NEW things”.  But only a man with a PERSONAL agenda would confuse the word “ALL” for the word “NEW”.

    Now, right smack dab in the middle of these two voices stands me……….wondering why it can't just mean what it clearly says.  And on both sides, I get all kinds of alternate things Paul could have been saying with those words.  And all of these alternate scenarios are clearly driven, not by the words of Col 1:15-16 themselves, but by PERSONAL agendas.  And through it all, I've yet to get any scriptural reason why it can't just be saying “Jesus was the first creation of his God, and then all other things were subsequently created through him”.  This is the most LOGICAL meaning of those words.  And there are many other scriptures that SUPPORT this meaning.  And most importantly, there are NO other scriptures that CONFLICT with this meaning.

    So tell me Kerwin:  What SCRIPTURE would prohibit Col 1:15-16 from meaning exactly what I understand it to mean?

    Kerwin, I know this was a long post.  I'm not looking for a response from you.  I was just airing some things out.

    peace,
    mike

    #257895
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 07 2011,17:43)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 08 2011,03:25)
    If the eternal Light begets more Light, that begotten Light was always there, just not brought forth until the right time.

    Think about it. :)


    Huge assumption and no scriptural backing.

    We know that Jesus came from God, but you are saying that he always was, which is different.

    John 8:42
    Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.

    I can see eventually you may well be a Trinitarian.

    Interesting to watch the transformation.

    We could learn much from observing this process sped up.
    It would probably mirror Church history in the context of the apostacy.

    Remember that the Binity preceded the Trinity.
    The Holy Spirit was added as the third person some 60 or so years after the Binity.
    Perhaps 60 days in your case?


    Hey t8,
    How about let's discuss what is Christian instead of worrying about trinitarian. OK.

    If Jesus came out of the Father, i.e. begotten, then He could have always been in the Father before He was begotten from the Father.

    The scriptures tell us that He is in the bosom of the Father and elsewhere scriptures tell us that He came out from Him. This is beyond our understanding but to say that He couldn't have always been within the Father before He was begotten, well, you have no scriptural proof to say that couldn't have been the case. If He was always within before He was begotten, then that would demonstrate how He was a Son and not a partner who always was with the Father as a second person. It would show an eternal aspect to the Son's existence and justify all the scriptures that speak of Him as deity. It would also make it clear that the Word of God who is the Wisdom of God always was within the Father and did not have a beginning.

    There is no scriptural proof to think this is not possible. Anyone that begets, as in gives birth, brings another out that was within for a while.

    The Light brought forth Light. It is like having a lamp under a bushel basket then removing the basket. The light was there under the basket but when the basket was taken off, the light was brought forth.

    Jesus is the radiance of His glory, the true Light of the world.

    Kathi

    #257899
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi Kathi,

    I noticed that you twice informed t8 there's nothing that says it couldn't have happened the way you imagine.  Did you forget that there's also nothing that says it DID happen that way?

    There's nothing in scripture to prevent Jesus from being a unicorn made out of popcorn either.  But I'm not about to start building a doctrine around this nonsense just because no scripture specifically prohibits it.

    Perhaps you should build your doctrine around what the scriptures DO say, as opposed to what they don't specifically prohibit.

    The words “begotten”, “born”, “brought forth”, and “created” refer to one who at one time DIDN'T exist, but then DID.  This is the DEFAULT meaning of those words.  And without any scriptural evidence to override the default, you are just wishing things into reality in your own mind.

    mike

    #257904
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mike,
    All fathers by default had a beginning and did not exist at one point, so therefore, by your default logic, the Heavenly Father did not exist at one point? Why compare the supernatural to the natural? Created was not used in reference to the Son, ever, except that all things were created through Him.

    Scripture tells us that Jesus was the Word that was in the beginning and was God with the God. No one can be a God with deity nature unless they have always existed. That is what I believe and no one has given me a shred of evidence, that can remain under scrutiny, to deny this.

    God the Father was never without His Word or His Spirit.

    Kathi

    #257915
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kathi,

    Jesus is called by the title “god”, just as Satan is.  Do you assert that Satan is also without beginning?

    Other than that, I know of Col 2:9, where it is said that the fullness of THE Deity dwells in bodily form in the person of Jesus.  But we already knew that from Col 1:15, right?

    What scriptures are you using to come to the conclusion that Jesus is exactly as much “God” as the One he himself calls “my God”? How do you conclude that Jesus IS the invisible Deity whose fullness dwells in him?

    #257916
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kathi

    Quote
    God the Father was never without His Word or His Spirit.

    Kathi

    but the scriptures do not say that -THE WORD -IS HIS SPIRIT OR HIS SPOKEN WORD,

    you do not understand God words

    Pierre

    #257919
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 08 2011,10:57)
    If Jesus came out of the Father, i.e. begotten, then He could have always been in the Father before He was begotten from the Father.


    What about yourself.

    God is the father of all spirits right.
    Were you with the Father always because your spirit came from the Eternal God?

    Back to the drawing board.

    #257961
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    That's right, Kerwin.  And nobody here has ever denied this scriptural fact.

    Hebrews 2:14
    Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil—

    What person who was never anything BUT human would have it said about him that he “SHARED IN HUMANITY”?  If this person was never anything BUT human, then this is a senseless and unnecessary thing for the writer of Hebrews to say.  Instead the writer of Hebrews is telling us the reason that Jesus emptied himself of the nature he was sharing with God and was made in the likeness of a human being, Kerwin.  He who was rich had to become poor in order to be able to DIE, thereby conquering death for the rest of us who were born “poor”.

    Your words agree with mine but your definition of conceived is a new one that I have not read in any dictionary.  A being is conceived in their mother’s inner parts when they first begin to exist and from that point they develop to birth and are called a neonatal.  An angel that transformed into a human being, even if they do it within a human woman’s inner parts, is not conceived.

    Quote
    Nobody is denying that Jesus was born of Mary as a human being.  But many of you are denying that all things were created through him way before he became flesh.

    Scripture does not attest that all the old things were created through Jesus at a time before he came to exist as a human being.   What scripture does declare is that the old man was put death and the new man was created as a first fruit of the new creation.

    Quote
    Kerwin, it seems that you non-preexisters all have the same reason for ignoring or twisting clear scriptures like “I came down from heaven”.  Your reason is this:  If Jesus was nothing other than “exactly like me”, then I feel more confident that I can accomplish what he did.

    I cannot speak for all those that believe Jesus was conceived as a human being in his mother’s womb instead of being transformed from an angel, but as for myself, I find that belief beneficial for maintaining faith in the promise of God that he will make me righteous and holy as he is.  

    I have not confidence that “I can accomplish what he did” as such faith is faith in the flesh and not of the spirit of God.   My confidence is that God will do as he promised and make me righteous and holy as he is through, by, and for his Son.

    As for the scripture that states “I come down from heaven” and similar ones, it is you that misunderstand it, for Jesus came down from heaven in the same way the baptism of John the Baptist did since Jesus is a prophet and even more than a prophet.

    Quote
    It is a selfish reason to re-write the scriptures.

    So hungering and thirsting for righteousness is a selfish desire according to you.  Is that why Jesus blessed those that do it?

    Quote
    And it seems that not one of you stop to think that Jesus had God Himself as his LITERAL Father – even as a human!

    Why would I choose to believe in that polytheistic belief that depends on the principles of man and not of God?

    God desires children that are righteous as he is righteous for they are the children of his spirit as he is the Spirit of love just as is written in 1 John 4:16.   Jesus Anointed is the chief of those children.

    Quote
    Kerwin, look at where you guy's selfish ambition has led you.  You have admitted an “UNKNOWN” only begotten of God, since you refuse to let the Word be Jesus.

    I merely admitted I do not know all things.  I have looked into the situation more and the Word made human has a glory as the glory of the Wisdom of God.  The Wisdom of God has long been acknowledged to be the begotten of God by both Christians and Jews.

    Quote
    Marty claims that John 17:5 is a case of Jesus asking for the glory the “THOUGHT OF HIM IN GOD'S HEAD” had before the creation of the world.

    Jesus stated in the great commission that he was made King of all things in heaven and on earth.  Since that is the glory God gave him after he sacrificed himself in compassion for all mankind and was resurrected by the power of the Spirit of God and we know that God planned it out before hand it is reasonable that that is also the glory Jesus spoke of earlier.  Marty is correct about the traditional definition of Godhead that existed before the Trinitarians took it to use for their own purposes.

    Quote
    Paladin claims that when Jesus refers to ascending to where he WAS BEFORE, right after clearly stating that he came DOWN from heaven, he was really speaking of ascending back to earth from the grave.

    Paladin is in error on that one as Jesus was merely paraphrasing the idea that those that obey all God’s commands come from heaven and are rewarded with eternal life for doing so.  

    It is true that Jesus did descend to Sheol and then ascended to earth and so Paladin’s understanding does not harm his understanding of the message of salvation unless it causes him to add or subtract from the message.

    Quote
    Gene has to add his own words into the scriptures to make John 1:14 say “the Word CAME TO BE IN SOMEONE WHO WAS FLESH”; and to make Revelation 22:16 say Jesus is the “Offspring and Offspring of David”.

    What you state Gene believes is confusing but his use of English is not always the same as mine and so I would have to communicate with him to find out what his idea actually is.

    Quote
    So tell me Kerwin:  What SCRIPTURE would prohibit Col 1:15-16 from meaning exactly what I understand it to mean?

    The use of English, Greek, and probably every other human language prohibit such., for instance first born has more than one application and thus can mean the first born in time, order, or importance.  That is why context is important.

    #257975
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike….> if you do not believe the word (LOGOS) of God came to be in Jesus, then answer this “THE WORDS I AM TELLING YOU ARE NOT MY WORDS BUT THE WORDS OF HIM WHO SENT ME”. And while you at it answer this , The Father who is (IN) Me (HE) doth the Works, so tell us O Wise one , how was the Father (IN) Jesus?< was it not by the Spirit (intellect) of GOD which produced the LOGOS or Word of GOD (IN) Him. So now if those words were not his, then how is it you call him the words he obviously said were not his.? I have never denied Jesus spoke GOD the Fathers WORDS to us, and as your words are your are yours, so is GOD Words His also. Mike no one does more "TWISTING of Scriptures then you Preexistences, and your brother the Trinitarians do. IMO

    peace and love……………………………………………gene

    #257979
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 08 2011,13:45)
    Kathi,

    Jesus is called by the title “god”, just as Satan is.  Do you assert that Satan is also without beginning?

    Other than that, I know of Col 2:9, where it is said that the fullness of THE Deity dwells in bodily form in the person of Jesus.  But we already knew that from Col 1:15, right?

    What scriptures are you using to come to the conclusion that Jesus is exactly as much “God” as the One he himself calls “my God”?  How do you conclude that Jesus IS the invisible Deity whose fullness dwells in him?


    Mike! I was just reading what you said about Col. 2:9….

    Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

    Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

    That however does not mean that Jesus had Deity, He has immortality now….
    if Jesus was Deity like His Father , He could not have died for us….
    Jehovah God is Deity….He is above All….Deity means being a God I grant you that…. But why did God not come to earth Himself, why did He send His Son? Because He could not die for us, but Jesus could, He was not Deity…. Then every being that is called God is Deity????? I don't think so…..

    One more thing..
    Before Jesus went back to Heaven He said this

    Jhn 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come [again] unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.

    Do you think that Jesus would have said this if He would have been exactly like His Father and Deity? I don't believe that…..

    He now has immortality…

    Jhn 5:24 ¶ Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

    Jhn 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.
    Jhn 5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;

    Jhn 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

    Jhn 4:24 God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.

    Those that believe that Jesus too is Deity will worship Jesus too
    like those that belong to the Catholic Church and others that believe in the trinity….because they all believe that Jesus always existed…
    Peace Irene

    #257996
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 08 2011,09:51)
    Kathi

    Quote
    God the Father was never without His Word or His Spirit.

    Kathi

    but the scriptures do not say that -THE WORD -IS HIS SPIRIT OR HIS SPOKEN WORD,

    you do not understand God  words

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    Are you claiming The Word of God is not the Word of God?

    #257997
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Pastry @ Sep. 09 2011,10:44)
    Mike! I was just reading what you said about Col. 2:9….

    Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

    That however does not mean that Jesus had Deity, He has immortality now….


    Hi Irene,

    That was my point. One of the scriptures that many Trinitarians use to pretend Jesus is God is Col 2:9. They say that Col 2:9 calls JESUS Deity. It does not, however. It say that the fullness OF THE Deity dwells in him. In other words, Col 2:9 also speaks of the fact that there is only ONE Deity. And the fullness of that ONE Deity (namely, Jehovah), dwells IN Jesus. It does NOT say that Jesus is Deity.

    That's what I was pointing out to Kathi.

    peace,
    mike

    #257998
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 09 2011,00:02)

    An angel that transformed into a human being, even if they do it within a human woman’s inner parts, is not conceived.


    I see.  After Jesus died, was he BORN again?  Isn't that how he got to be the FIRSTBORN from the dead?  But, according to you, that can't be.  Because if Jesus was already born once by Mary, then he couldn't possibly have been born again from the dead.  Do you see how weak your argument is?

    Take you, for instance.  You hope that someday you will be BEGOTTEN by God, and become a NEW creation.  But how can you?  Your philosophy prohibits you from being begotten after you've already been begotten.  Your philosophy prohibits you from becoming a NEW creation since you already WERE a creation.

    Kerwin, if God can take a human being who died, and raise that human being up as a brand new spirit being, then why can't he take a spirit being, place it in a woman's womb, and have that spirit be CONCEIVED as a human being?

    Your argument is as weak as they come, as it puts limits on what God can and can't do.  And you didn't address my point about Jesus SHARING IN humanity.  What did that mean if he was never anything BUT human?

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 09 2011,00:02)

    Scripture does not attest that all the old things were created through Jesus at a time before he came to exist as a human being.  


    You are looking at a scripture that says “WHITE” and claiming, not only that it DOESN'T say “WHITE”, but also that it DOES say “BLACK” when in fact, it doesn't.  You say scripture doesn't attest?  Read 1 Cor 8:6 Kerwin.  The same exact “ALL THINGS” that came from the Father also came through our Lord Jesus Christ.  So if you want to blindly change the INSPIRED SCRIPTURAL word “ALL” to “NEW”, then you have to do it with the Father also.  So………….do you believe that only NEW things came from the Father?

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 09 2011,00:02)

    As for the scripture that states “I come down from heaven” and similar ones, it is you that misunderstand it, for Jesus came down from heaven in the same way the baptism of John the Baptist did since Jesus is a prophet and even more than a prophet.


    Really?  So they BOTH came from God the same exact way, yet John said he wasn't even worthy to untie the sandals of Jesus.  ???  Kerwin, read this scripture:

    John 6:46
    No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

    Could John the Baptiser also say this, Kerwin?  How is it that Jesus had seen the Father, but John hadn't – considering that, according to you, they both came down from heaven the same way.  (That's just one of MANY Jesus/John contrasts that I can scripturally show you.)

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 09 2011,00:02)

    Quote (mikeboll @ 64)
    And it seems that not one of you stop to think that Jesus had God Himself as his LITERAL Father – even as a human!

    Why would I choose to believe in that polytheistic belief that depends on the principles of man and not of God?


    Kerwin, GOD impregnated Mary through His Holy Spirit.  This is what the scriptures teach, and why the one born of Mary was called the “Son of the Most High God”.   So even IF Jesus began his existence when he was born of Mary, he was STILL the LITERAL Son of God.  And calling me a polytheist will not change that SCRIPTURAL FACT.

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 09 2011,00:02)

    Quote (mikeboll @ 64)
    So tell me Kerwin:  What SCRIPTURE would prohibit Col 1:15-16 from meaning exactly what I understand it to mean?

    The use of English, Greek, and probably every other human language prohibit such., for instance first born has more than one application and thus can mean the first born in time, order, or importance.  That is why context is important.


    WHAT?!?  Please, by all means, show me how.  I realize that “firstborn” has more than one application.  What I asked for is a SCRIPTURE that PROHIBITS Col 1:15-16 from saying that Jesus was the first creature God ever created and all other creatures were subsequently created by God through Jesus.

    ALONG WITH this scripture, feel free to show me how “the use of English, Greek, and probably every other human language prohibit such”.  This should be interesting.  (Actually, I believe your mouth just wrote a check that your butt can't cover.  :)  But nevertheless, I am anxious to see how you'll attempt to cover this statement.)

    mike

Viewing 20 posts - 11,421 through 11,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account