Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,381 through 11,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #257297
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    God is a spirit being, and would therefore beget, not Himself, but another, different spirit being. What you imply is that people would bow down and pay taxes to the infant child of King David, just because that child's FATHER is the King. The King of Israel would not beget other Kings of Israel, causing Israel to have many kings at one time. Likewise, the Omniscient Creator of all things would not beget the Omniscient Creator of all things, causing us to have two of them. Instead, God would beget a DIFFERENT spirit being who was NOT the Omniscient Creator of all things, and therefore NOT worthy of the worship we give only to the Omniscient Creator of all things.

    You are mixing up kind and rank in what you wrote. Therefore it seems that you believe God himself is an angel with the rank of God and Jesus is an angel with the rank of Heir. You also seem to believe that, unlike flesh, all spirit is the same.

    I disagree! God is the Alpha and Omega of his kind and he is the First and the Last of his kind. He is God because of whom and what he is as his kind, of which he is the only one, cannot be tempted by evil. On the other hand angels are tempted by evil and some have even fallen to it.

    Quote
    Actually, scripture doesn't specify that only “NEW things” are created through Jesus.

    It is not explicitly written in that way but the idea is specifically expressed in scripture from the first fruits made in the image of Christ to the time God states “I make all things new” in Revelations 21:5.

    Quote
    Where exactly are you seeing “only the NEW things”?

    God uses the words “all things” in regards to only the new things in Revelations 1:5.

    Quote
    Revelation 21:5
    King James Version (KJV)

    5And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.

    #257305
    kerwin
    Participant

    Irene,

    Quote
    Does that make Jesus God to be worshiped???

    This line of conversation began with Mike stating he believed Jesus was created from a part of God.  I answered that God divided cannot stand.  He did not seem to understand my response and so I added that making Jesus from a part of God would make two Gods worthy of being worshipped; just like one human being is made from another.   That is where you came in.  I and Mike have each made at least one addition post in that conversation since then. Feel free to follow it.

    Quote
    Scriptures state that only Jehovah God should be worshiped…

    I agree.

    Quote
    When you understand that God and The Word of God are titles it becomes much easier to understand what Scriptures say..

    I agree that Jesus holds both those titles.

    Quote
    It also states that God by Jesus created all….

    I agree that God, by Jesus, has made; is making; and will make all things new for that is why Jesus sacrificed himself; was resurrected with power; and ascended to mediate the new covenant.

    #257340
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 29 2011,10:12)

    You are mixing up kind and rank in what you wrote.  Therefore it seems that you believe God himself is an angel with the rank of God and Jesus is an angel with the rank of Heir.  


    No Kerwin.  I believe that God is a spirit being.  Do YOU believe that?

    Wouldn't a spirit being beget a DIFFERENT spirit being who is not himself?

    And you have not addressed the fact that you apparently think it is impossible for God to have begotten a son unto Himself.  Do you think this is impossible for God, Kerwin?  ???

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 29 2011,10:12)

    It is not explicitly written in that way but the idea is specifically expressed in scripture from the first fruits made in the image of Christ to the time God states “I make all things new” in Revelations 21:5.


    Of course it's not explicitely written that way, Kerwin.  What IS explicitely written is that ALL things came through the Word, God's Son, AND our Lord Jesus Christ.

    I'm actually glad you brought up Rev 21:5.  Maybe through that scripture, you can see that just because God is making NEW things doesn't mean He didn't also make ALL things.

    Similarly, just because NEW things are created through Jesus doesn't mean that ALL things weren't also created through him.

    If we applied YOUR logic to Rev 21:5, we could claim that ONLY the NEW things came from God, not ALL things.  I hope this helps you to see what you're doing with Jesus.

    mike

    #257353
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    Of course it's not explicitly written that way, Kerwin.  What IS explicitely written is that ALL things came through the Word, God's Son, AND our Lord Jesus Christ.

    This remark sounds like you have no clue how language works.   Whether that is true or not I figure that it is wisest to go over it in case it is.

    Here is an essay challenge for students to teaching them that words can express messages that are both clearly stated and implied in meaning.  Learning this fact is said to help them to better practice critical thinking.  Scripture, like the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, has both implied and implicit ideas.  

    teachersdomain.org reads:

    Quote
    Overview

    Students watch two video segments about the Fourteenth Amendment and then write an essay addressing where the amendment is explicit or implicit in meaning.

    Why is this an important concept?

    Understanding that language can present messages that are both clearly stated and implied in meaning is an important part of critical reading and reading comprehension strategies. When students are able to understand that language includes nuance and “gray” areas in meaning, they are better able to practice and apply critical thinking, ask “big concept” questions and in turn become more open to the possibilities of multiple interpretations in various issues and subject matters.

    Quote
    I see, Kerwin.  So when Col 1:16 says that all things in heaven and earth were made through him, it means something different then when those same words are said in John 1?  

    From what you write here it seems best to go over context as well.

    heinemann.com reads:

    Quote
    What is context?

    Sometimes context has been conceptualized rather narrowly, as the words surrounding a particular word in question, within a sentence or phrase. In the last three decades, though, it has become increasingly evident that context means many things—even the context relevant to reading just an individual word. Context includes the grammar of sentences and the meanings of words; a paragraph; a whole story or other text. Context is also taken to include the reader's expectations and purposes for reading; various aspects of the location and situation in which the person is reading; and even the person's culture and times—in short, the reader's entire background of knowledge and experience (e.g. Brown, 1997). These various factors operate simultaneously for proficient readers; they usually operate quite unconsciously; and they can affect the identification of single words as well as the reader's understanding of an entire text. The automatic use of context—of multiple contexts—is a crucial part of the reading process, though most people don't realize it.

    I hope these help.  If not then perhaps we can both look into these matters some more.

    Note 1: here is the source to my quote on implied and explicit ideas behind words.

    Note 2:here is the source to my quote on the context of words.

    #257398
    kerwin
    Participant

    Pierre,

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 28 2011,21:32)
    you are speculating in your own mind, if you have inside show it do not say foolish thing based on your own feelings,

    if scriptures says what it says and we have it wrong you would clearly be able to show your point in the way of truth ,of scriptures ,

    so do it or do not say you know when you do not ,what you believe is also your personal acceptance of whatever you feel is true to you, this does not make it the TRUTH of God,…

    You wrote that in response to these words.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 29 2011,00:13)
    Mike,

    You are attempting to interpret “the word “Word” in John 1:1-18 symbolically when a literal interpretation of it is true.

    To test if a literal understanding works for John 1:3, I tested if the statement made in it about the Word is true.  Anyone that reads the story of creation in Genesis should know that it is true about the literal Word that:

    Quote
    John 1
    King James Version (KJV)

    3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    Did you read all of what I wrote before responding?   I ask because I pointed out that Scripture explicitly states that all things were made by the literal Word of God in the creation account recorded in Genesis and you words imply you disagree with that.  If really believe that is speculating then you do not believe God created the universe by his word.

    Is this scripture also calling your speculative spirit being “the Word of God” or it calling the literal Word of God the “Word of God”?

    Quote
    Hebrews 11
    King James Version (KJV)

    3Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

    It is not I who is basing my understanding on the desires of the flesh; which is why I tested if my understanding is true based on faith in God.  I am convinced that if our understandings have any common ground that common ground must include believing that all things were created by the literal Word of God and without the literal Word of God nothing was created.

    You also wrote the same words in response to this point.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 29 2011,00:13)
    Mike,

    It is flawed reasoning to believe that John 1:3, Hebrews1:2, and Colossians 1:13-16 are all speaking of the same thing just because the words are the same.  For example I can say “I made all of this” and at another time I can say “I made all of this” and yet be speaking of two different things.  Therefore context is important.

    So putting John 1:3 in the context of John 1:1-18 I will assure you that it speaks only of the old creation and not the new because it speaks of a time before the new creation began to exist.  Both Hebrews 1:2 and Colossians 1:13-16 speak of a time after the new creation began to exist.

    Though I do not see how you can disagree with the idea that the context of John 1:3 speaking of a time previous to the new creation beginning;  I do believe that such a debate, unlike discussions over whether or not the universe was created by God’s literal Word, is useful to correctly understand the good news.

    If there are other conversations you believe that relates to the preexistence topic and are useful to understanding the good news then I believe they are good to be addressed in this thread.  If you disagree with me on such an idea in my post that you just responded to and I failed to address it in this post then please let me know what it is. Thank you!

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 28 2011,21:32)
    tell us Kerwin what are those scriptures are saying

    I believe that what you accidentally implied earlier was the result of your haste to bring up your point based on Col 1;15 to 20, Heb 1:2, Jn 1:3, and Pr 8:22-24.  That is why we are taught to be “quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry”, James 1:19.

    The scriptures you name are scriptures whose true meaning is subject to debate between us and therefore do not make for sound proofs between us.   The scriptures that make for sound proofs are those in which we have a common understanding.  I believe Hebrews 11:2 and the creation story are such in regards to understanding John 1:3.  If I am mistaken then that should be addressed before moving on to other things.

    #257403
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 30 2011,00:16)
    This remark sounds like you have no clue how language works.


    Says the man who thinks the EXPLICITE word “ALL” actually means “NEW”. :)

    Kerwin, address my point about Rev 21:5 please.  Does the word “NEW” in that verse mean that God DIDN'T make ALL things?

    Address whether or not you believe God is incapable of begetting a child unto Himself.

    Answer the question about whether or not you believe God is spirit.  And then address the point about whether or not a spirit being would beget a DIFFERENT spirit being who was NOT the one that begot him.

    Your info about implications and context seem to be a red flag signalling the fact that you are unable to actually address the POINTS I'm making in my posts.

    When Paul says that ALL things in heaven, on earth, visible or invisible were created through Jesus, where is the “context” or the “implication” that tells us only NEW things were created through him?  ??? Tell me what words IN THAT PARTICULAR PASSAGE let you know that “ALL” really means “NEW”. Perhaps I have missed something in Colossians 1.

    mike

    #257410
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    Did you read all of what I wrote before responding?

    I have the habit of taken in account all related scriptures so that the truth can be seen,

    you only cut out what you see fit for the view that is acceptable to you,this is not how we end up with the truth of God,

    Quote
    Did you read all of what I wrote before responding? I ask because I pointed out that Scripture explicitly states that all things were made by the literal Word of God in the creation account recorded in Genesis and you words imply you disagree with that. If really believe that is speculating then you do not believe God created the universe by his word.

    Is this scripture also calling your speculative spirit being “the Word of God” or it calling the literal Word of God the “Word of God”?

    Jn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    Jn 1:2 He was with God in the beginning.
    Jn 1:3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.
    Jn 1:4 In him was life, and that life was the light of men.
    Jn 1:5 The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.
    Jn 1:6 There came a man who was sent from God; his name was John.
    Jn 1:7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all men might believe.
    Jn 1:8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.
    Jn 1:9 The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.
    Jn 1:10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him.
    Jn 1:11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him.
    Jn 1:12 Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God—
    Jn 1:13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.
    Jn 1:14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
    Jn 1:15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ ”
    Jn 1:16 From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another.
    Jn 1:17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.
    Jn 1:18 No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.

    in those scriptures there are many “him” who is the HIM ?

    Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
    Col 1:16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.
    Col 1:17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
    Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.
    Col 1:19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him,

    here are more “HIM” who is HIM ?

    Rev 19:13 He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.who is “HE”??

    is this also the the “WORD OF GOD” ? or ??

    you may study a elephant with a magnifying glass and go trough all his body and know all its little ,skin features and what not ,BUT YOU WILL NEVER KNOW HOW THE ELEPHANT LOOKS

    Quote
    The scriptures you name are scriptures whose true meaning is subject to debate between us and therefore do not make for sound proofs between us. The scriptures that make for sound proofs are those in which we have a common understanding.

    THIS COMMENT IS RIDICULES ,YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURES BUT NOW WE MAN HAVE TO DEBATE THE MEANING OF GODS WORDS ?? THE TRUTH IS WITHIN THE SCRIPTURES THE DEBATE IS DO WE ACCEPT SCRIPTURES OR NOT , HOW COULD SOME ONE HAVE SOUND PROOF IF HE REJECT WHAT SCRIPTURES SAYS,???

    Pierre

    #257424
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    Kerwin, address my point about Rev 21:5 please.

    Why should I bother since you appear to deny how language works?  

    Quote
    Says the man who thinks the EXPLICITE word “ALL” actually means “NEW”.

    This is an example in point as what “all” means depends on the context of what you are speaking about.  So the question is not about what the word “all” means but rather about what it is referring to.    It is referring to the word creation which is also an explicit word but one that does not either state if it is teaching about the new, old, or both creations.   The answer to that mystery is implied by the context of the particular teaching and of Scripture as a whole.  You appear to choose to deny that context and arbitrarily chose an answer at you own risk.

    If you actually wish to determine what the answer to the mystery is then you examine what the context of that scripture is in order to seek what that context infers.

    Quote
    Address whether or not you believe God is incapable of begetting a child unto Himself.

    I have addressed it but you seem to choose to disregard that the spirit that God is composed of will not do evil and cannot be tempted by evil and thus Jesus, who was tempted,  is not made from that type of spirit.   Further communications on the issue is meaningless until we agree who God is.

    Quote
    Your info about implications and context seem to be a red flag signaling the fact that you are unable to actually address the POINTS I'm making in my posts.

    Or it could indicate that you appear to be dodging the issues and I am calling you on it because I am getting tired of our communications being in a rut.  

    Quote
    When Paul says that ALL things in heaven, on earth, visible or invisible were created through Jesus, where is the “context” or the “implication” that tells us only NEW things were created through him?

    That is actually a good question and so what I am continuously looking for.

    Here in verse 13, where the subject of the teaching is mentioned, is some evidence to consider.  The question that reveals this evidence is “was it those of the old, new, or both creations that were ‘delivered from the power of darkness and translated into the kingdom Jesus Christ’?”

    Quote
    Colossians 1

    King James Version (KJV)

    13Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:

    #257426
    kerwin
    Participant

    Pierre,

    Quote
    I have the habit of taken in account all related scriptures so that the truth can be seen,

    You claim that but I doubt your claim is true or you would have acknowledged that the old creation was in fact created by the literal Word of God.   You have yet to acknowledge that the old creation was created by the literal word of God.  Why is that?

    Quote
    you only cut out what you see fit for the view that is acceptable to you, this is not how we end up with the truth of God,

    You choose to thus accuse me when I choose to dig down to bedrock and built my house on scriptures that are easily understand; as we agree on their meaning; while you choose to build your house on your own dubious understanding of scriptures that are open to debate; and thus by definition hard to understand by at least some.    “Wisdom is known by her children.”

    Quote
    THIS COMMENT IS RIDICULES ,YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURES BUT NOW WE MAN HAVE TO DEBATE THE MEANING OF GODS WORDS ?? THE TRUTH IS WITHIN THE SCRIPTURES THE DEBATE IS DO WE ACCEPT SCRIPTURES OR NOT , HOW COULD SOME ONE HAVE SOUND PROOF IF HE REJECT WHAT SCRIPTURES SAYS,???

    As it is written “some scriptures is hard to understand”.  Is it really more ridicules to use such clearly hard to understand scriptures as proof of your beliefs or easier ones such as those stating that the universe was created by the literal Word of God. “Wisdom is known by her children.

    Quote
    in those scriptures there are many “him” who is the HIM ?

    If you are speaking of John 1:1- 18 then you have asked a good question.  To answer that question you have to determine what the context of the location the pronoun “him” is used.

    If you are instead attempting to argue that the gender of the pronoun “him” indicated the individual being spoken of is a male then I must inform you that the personalization of non-persons such as in the case when a ship is call “she” and when I quoted the proverb that called Wisdom “her”.

    Quote
    is this also the the “WORD OF GOD” ? or ??

    I believe I informed you elsewhere that Jesus is the manifestation of the Word of God and therefore deserves to be called “The Word of God”.  That does not make him the literal Word of God and more than calling Wisdom a woman makes her one.

    #257455
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 30 2011,23:11)

    I have addressed it but you seem to choose to disregard that the spirit that God is composed of will not do evil and cannot be tempted by evil and thus Jesus, who was tempted,  is not made from that type of spirit.   Further communications on the issue is meaningless until we agree who God is.


    God is Jehovah, the Most High God and the Creator of the heavens, the earth, and everything in them.  God is a Spirit Being.  And that Spirit Being brought forth other spirit beings known as angels, who CAN be tempted with evil even though they were spirit beings brought forth by God.

    Now, how can you say that God couldn't have created a FIRST spirit being named Jesus, who was also able to be tempted by evil?  ???

    Kerwin, even in your understanding, where Jesus was first brought forth as a man on earth, was he not still fathered by God through His Holy Spirit?  So whether he pre-existed or not, he is still the LITERAL offspring of God Almighty, right?  And as the LITERAL offspring of God Almighty, Jesus WAS able to be temped with evil.  Your point seems moot to me.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 30 2011,23:11)

    Or it could indicate that you appear to be dodging the issues and I am calling you on it because I am getting tired of our communications being in a rut.  


    As am I.  You talk in mazes, Kerwin.  You never come right out and state a point.  Your points are always shrouded in mystery, and I have to GUESS what point you are even making with this scripture or that scripture.  What have I dodged?  Ask me a DIRECT and UNDERSTANDABLE question, and I will give you a DIRECT and UNDERSTANDABLE answer to it.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 30 2011,23:11)

    That is actually a good question and so what I am continuously looking for.


    As were the other questions you chose not to answer.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 30 2011,23:11)

    Here in verse 13, where the subject of the teaching is mentioned, is some evidence to consider.  The question that reveals this evidence is “was it those of the old, new, or both creations that were ‘delivered from the power of darkness and translated into the kingdom Jesus Christ’?”


    And what is the answer, in your opinion?

    Kerwin, consider this fake scripture:

    We have been delivered from the power of darkness of the NEW CREATION by the Son of God, who was the firstborn of all creation because all other things, in heaven, on earth, visible things and invisible things were created through him.

    Your claim seems to be that if the scripture clearly spelled out “NEW CREATION” in one part of the passage, then all of a sudden, the words “ALL CREATION” really mean “NEW CREATION” from there on out.  But that is not the case at all.  One mention of a new creation would not mysteriously change the meaning of “all creation” from that point forward.  And IMO, it's just plain silly to think it would.

    I contend that even in my fake scripture above, the “all creation” STILL means “all creation”, even though there was a previous mention of a “new creation”.

    mike

    #257463
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 31 2011,23:48)
    Pierre,

    Quote
    I have the habit of taken in account all related scriptures so that the truth can be seen,

    You claim that but I doubt your claim is true or you would have acknowledged that the old creation was in fact created by the literal Word of God.   You have yet to acknowledge that the old creation was created by the literal word of God.  Why is that?

    Quote
    you only cut out what you see fit for the view that is acceptable to you, this is not how we end up with the truth of God,

    You choose to thus accuse me when I choose to dig down to bedrock and built my house on scriptures that are easily understand; as we agree on their meaning; while you choose to build your house on your own dubious understanding of scriptures that are open to debate; and thus by definition hard to understand by at least some.    “Wisdom is known by her children.”

    Quote
    THIS COMMENT IS RIDICULES ,YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURES BUT NOW WE MAN HAVE TO DEBATE THE MEANING OF GODS WORDS ?? THE TRUTH IS WITHIN THE SCRIPTURES THE DEBATE IS DO WE ACCEPT SCRIPTURES OR NOT , HOW COULD SOME ONE HAVE SOUND PROOF IF HE REJECT WHAT SCRIPTURES SAYS,???

    As it is written “some scriptures is hard to understand”.  Is it really more ridicules to use such clearly hard to understand scriptures as proof of your beliefs or easier ones such as those stating that the universe was created by the literal Word of God. “Wisdom is known by her children.

    Quote
    in those scriptures there are many “him” who is the HIM ?

    If you are speaking of John 1:1- 18 then you have asked a good question.  To answer that question you have to determine what the context of the location the pronoun “him” is used.

    If you are instead attempting to argue that the gender of the pronoun “him” indicated the individual being spoken of is a male then I must inform you that the personalization of non-persons such as in the case when a ship is call “she” and when I quoted the proverb that called Wisdom “her”.

    Quote
    is this also the the “WORD OF GOD” ? or ??

    I believe I informed you elsewhere that Jesus is the manifestation of the Word of God and therefore deserves to be called “The Word of God”.  That does not make him the literal Word of God and more than calling Wisdom a woman makes her one.


    Kerwin

    you have not answered the questions ,I ask you

    so please answer them

    Pierre

    #257470
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 01 2011,09:58)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 31 2011,23:48)
    Pierre,

    Quote
    I have the habit of taken in account all related scriptures so that the truth can be seen,

    You claim that but I doubt your claim is true or you would have acknowledged that the old creation was in fact created by the literal Word of God.   You have yet to acknowledge that the old creation was created by the literal word of God.  Why is that?

    Quote
    you only cut out what you see fit for the view that is acceptable to you, this is not how we end up with the truth of God,

    You choose to thus accuse me when I choose to dig down to bedrock and built my house on scriptures that are easily understand; as we agree on their meaning; while you choose to build your house on your own dubious understanding of scriptures that are open to debate; and thus by definition hard to understand by at least some.    “Wisdom is known by her children.”

    Quote
    THIS COMMENT IS RIDICULES ,YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURES BUT NOW WE MAN HAVE TO DEBATE THE MEANING OF GODS WORDS ?? THE TRUTH IS WITHIN THE SCRIPTURES THE DEBATE IS DO WE ACCEPT SCRIPTURES OR NOT , HOW COULD SOME ONE HAVE SOUND PROOF IF HE REJECT WHAT SCRIPTURES SAYS,???

    As it is written “some scriptures is hard to understand”.  Is it really more ridicules to use such clearly hard to understand scriptures as proof of your beliefs or easier ones such as those stating that the universe was created by the literal Word of God. “Wisdom is known by her children.

    Quote
    in those scriptures there are many “him” who is the HIM ?

    If you are speaking of John 1:1- 18 then you have asked a good question.  To answer that question you have to determine what the context of the location the pronoun “him” is used.

    If you are instead attempting to argue that the gender of the pronoun “him” indicated the individual being spoken of is a male then I must inform you that the personalization of non-persons such as in the case when a ship is call “she” and when I quoted the proverb that called Wisdom “her”.

    Quote
    is this also the the “WORD OF GOD” ? or ??

    I believe I informed you elsewhere that Jesus is the manifestation of the Word of God and therefore deserves to be called “The Word of God”.  That does not make him the literal Word of God and more than calling Wisdom a woman makes her one.


    Kerwin

    you have not answered the questions ,I ask you

    so please answer them

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    Why should I bother as you do not seem interested in unstanding the Word of God as we are actually seeking to correctly understand John 1:3.

    Do you agree that the universe was created by the litteral word of God?

    #257472
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    God is Jehovah, the Most High God and the Creator of the heavens, the earth, and everything in them.  God is a Spirit Being.  And that Spirit Being brought forth other spirit beings known as angels, who CAN be tempted with evil even though they were spirit beings brought forth by God.

    Angels may well be created from nothing as scripture does not speak on the matter and so to speak of such is to speculate.

    Quote
    And you have not addressed the fact that you apparently think it is impossible for God to have begotten a son unto Himself.  Do you think this is impossible for God, Kerwin?

    Scripture states God is love. Can you divide love?  If you take love and make it into something else then what do you make it into and what happens to the love you removed it from?

    Quote
    Kerwin, even in your understanding, where Jesus was first brought forth as a man on earth, was he not still fathered by God through His Holy Spirit?

    The Spirit of God is his creative force and every human being is always created by God.  Jesus creation was a wonder as it was done in an exceptional way.  As God is the sire Adam’s body so is he the sire of Jesus’ body.  The Holy Spirit also teaches and trains in righteousness and so God also sired the saintly seat of character within Jesus and thus Jesus became a spiritual son of God.

    Quote
    As were the other questions you chose not to answer.

    That is not what I discerned as many of them are not and others I simply do not choose to wade through the rest in order to answer.    I therefore felt a reset of communications was necessary.

    Quote
    And what is the answer, in your opinion?

    My answer is a riddle that goes “it is the slaves to sin that require deliverance and not the servants of righteousness.”  See Romans 6 to figure out what my answer means.

    Quote
    Kerwin, consider this fake scripture:

    It does not match the theme of my question.  This is the correct phrasing of what I understand as Colossians would have known they were the first fruits of the new creation and that all new things were created through Jesus Anointed.

    We of the NEW CREATION have been delivered from the power of darkness by the Son of God, who is the firstborn of all creation because all new things, in heaven, on earth, visible and invisible were created through him.

    Quote
    I contend that even in my fake scripture above, the “all creation” STILL means “all creation”, even though there was a previous mention of a “new creation”

    .

    Actually “all both creations” works if you also hold that “first” means he exceeds all others “born” of either or both creations in authority.

    #257481
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 01 2011,17:11)
    The Spirit of God is his creative force and every human being is always created by God.  Jesus creation was a wonder as it was done in an exceptional way.  As God is the sire Adam’s body so is he the sire of Jesus’ body.  The Holy Spirit also teaches and trains in righteousness and so God also sired the saintly seat of character within Jesus and thus Jesus became a spiritual son of God.


    Kerwin……….Another Accurate statement IMO.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………..gene

    #257489
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 01 2011,22:52)

    Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 01 2011,09:58)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 31 2011,23:48)
    Pierre,

    Quote
    I have the habit of taken in account all related scriptures so that the truth can be seen,

    You claim that but I doubt your claim is true or you would have acknowledged that the old creation was in fact created by the literal Word of God.   You have yet to acknowledge that the old creation was created by the literal word of God.  Why is that?

    Quote
    you only cut out what you see fit for the view that is acceptable to you, this is not how we end up with the truth of God,

    You choose to thus accuse me when I choose to dig down to bedrock and built my house on scriptures that are easily understand; as we agree on their meaning; while you choose to build your house on your own dubious understanding of scriptures that are open to debate; and thus by definition hard to understand by at least some.    “Wisdom is known by her children.”

    Quote
    THIS COMMENT IS RIDICULES ,YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW THE SCRIPTURES BUT NOW WE MAN HAVE TO DEBATE THE MEANING OF GODS WORDS ?? THE TRUTH IS WITHIN THE SCRIPTURES THE DEBATE IS DO WE ACCEPT SCRIPTURES OR NOT , HOW COULD SOME ONE HAVE SOUND PROOF IF HE REJECT WHAT SCRIPTURES SAYS,???

    As it is written “some scriptures is hard to understand”.  Is it really more ridicules to use such clearly hard to understand scriptures as proof of your beliefs or easier ones such as those stating that the universe was created by the literal Word of God. “Wisdom is known by her children.

    Quote
    in those scriptures there are many “him” who is the HIM ?

    If you are speaking of John 1:1- 18 then you have asked a good question.  To answer that question you have to determine what the context of the location the pronoun “him” is used.

    If you are instead attempting to argue that the gender of the pronoun “him” indicated the individual being spoken of is a male then I must inform you that the personalization of non-persons such as in the case when a ship is call “she” and when I quoted the proverb that called Wisdom “her”.

    Quote
    is this also the the “WORD OF GOD” ? or ??

    I believe I informed you elsewhere that Jesus is the manifestation of the Word of God and therefore deserves to be called “The Word of God”.  That does not make him the literal Word of God and more than calling Wisdom a woman makes her one.


    Kerwin

    you have not answered the questions ,I ask you

    so please answer them

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    Why should I bother as you do not seem interested in unstanding the Word of God as we are actually seeking to correctly understand John 1:3.

    Do you agree that the universe was created by the litteral word of God?


    Kerwin

    Quote
    Do you agree that the universe was created by the litteral word of God?

    before I answer your question ,I ask you this ;is God a spirit being ? if yes did he has a body or form ? if yes ,then tell me who is the first thing that God created ?

    when you answer those question you will have your answer from me,

    Pierre

    #257504
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 01 2011,00:11)

    Quote (mikeboll @ 64)
    God is Jehovah, the Most High God and the Creator of the heavens, the earth, and everything in them.  God is a Spirit Being.  And that Spirit Being brought forth other spirit beings known as angels, who CAN be tempted with evil even though they were spirit beings brought forth by God.

    Now, how can you say that God couldn't have created a FIRST spirit being named Jesus, who was also able to be tempted by evil?

    Angels may well be created from nothing as scripture does not speak on the matter and so to speak of such is to speculate.


    WHAT?!?  Created from nothing?  What does that have to do with my point?  ???  My point was that angels ARE spirit beings who were created by God.  And those spirit beings CAN BE tempted with evil.  And my question, which remains unanswered, was:

    How can you say that God couldn't have created a FIRST spirit being named Jesus, who was also able to be tempted by evil?

    Will you answer the question this time, please?

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 01 2011,00:11)

    Quote (mikeboll @ 64)
    And you have not addressed the fact that you apparently think it is impossible for God to have begotten a son unto Himself.  Do you think this is impossible for God, Kerwin?

    Scripture states God is love. Can you divide love?  If you take love and make it into something else then what do you make it into and what happens to the love you removed it from?


    WHAT?!?  When I begot my son, I didn't “divide” myself, Kerwin.  I'm still the same exact being I was before I begot my son.  It seems to me that you are trying to avoid giving clear, sensible and direct answers to my questions.  That in itself is answer, Kerwin.  It shows you to be lacking when it comes to logically defending your doctrine.

    Kerwin, I feel I have been sidetracked many times and in many ways during this discussion.  I will now make a DIRECT point, and I really want you to DIRECTLY address it:

    Kerwin, are you saying that it is IMPOSSIBLE for God to have brought forth a spirit Son unto Himself?  YES or NO?

    Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 01 2011,00:11)

    My answer is a riddle……


    I am not interested in your “riddles” anymore.  I want you to make DIRECT claims, and show me CLEARLY how the scriptures you quote support those claims.  And when I make DIRECT claims or ask DIRECT questions, I expect them to be addressed DIRECTLY from now on.

    Can you do this for me?

    peace,
    mike

    #257506
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    We of the NEW CREATION have been delivered from the power of darkness by the Son of God, who is the firstborn of all creation because all new things, in heaven, on earth, visible and invisible were created through him.

    who is the WE of the new creation ?

    Pierre

    #257511
    kerwin
    Participant

    Pierre,

    Quote
    Before I answer your question

    How long would you like to wander in the wilderness before answering whether or not you believe that God created the universe by his literal word?

    Quote
    Is God a spirit being

    These are the only scriptures I know that touch on that issue and therefore going beyond them would be speculation.  If you know others then perhaps you will share them for a later conversation as I would like to continue looking into John 1:3 first.

    Quote
    John 4:24
    King James Version (KJV)

    24God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

    Jesus appears to be teaching us that God is the same kind of spirit that his worshippers must worship him in.

    Quote
    1 John 4:16
    King James Version (KJV)

     16And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.

    John appears to be paraphrasing what Jesus teaches in John 4:24.

    Quote
    If yes did he has a body or form ?

    He does not consist of the same thing as angels since God is not created and therefore we should not think of him as a created being.  

    From what those two scriptures say the answer to your question, beyond what I just wrote, is in the answer to the question “Does the spirit of love have a body?”

    Quote
    If yes, then tell me who is the first thing that God created?

    What does possessing a body have to do with the act of creation?

    While ignoring that irrelevant part of your question, the female personification of Wisdom claims it is her in Proverbs 8.

    Quote
    Who is the WE of the new creation ?

    Anyone that Jesus Anointed has set truly free from slavery to sin.

    #257515
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    Do you agree that the universe was created by the litteral word of God?

    I do not know what is the litteral word of Godbecause God his a spirit ,

    so could you change your wording ?or tell me what is your understanding of THE WORD OF GOD ?

    Pierre

    #257522
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Terricca………..A word proceeds forth from the MIND, and the SPIRIT (intellect) that is (IN) the MIND produces thoughts and they are expressed through WORDS, can you at lest understand that?. It work the SAME with GOD the Father his SPIRITS produce intellects in His Mind also and He utters them through us if his Spirit is (IN) a Person, the same way he did Jesus. let this mind be (IN) you that was in Christ Jesus our Lord. If that Mind be in you then that Spirit producing that mind is also that is the LOGOS of GOD, it is GOD'S LOGOS (IN) a PERSON, Just as Paladin Brought out. now if the spirit of him (the logos) that raised Christ from the dead dwell in you (IT) shall also quicken (bring to life) your Mortal (dead) Bodies (ALSO). Just like (IT) did Jesus'. IMO

    peace and love…………………………………………gene

Viewing 20 posts - 11,381 through 11,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account