Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,241 through 11,260 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #255830
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Yes Marty, that is correct.

    The firstborn of all angels = first angel ever created.

    The firstborn of all dinosaurs = first dinosaur ever created.

    The firstborn of all human beings = first human ever created.

    And the first born of all creation = first creature ever created.

    Do you think we can't see through your pretense Marty?  All of us can see that you understand the concept well enough, but because it doesn't align with your own doctrine, you are willing to pretend that you don't understand what we know you do.

    #255849
    Pastry
    Participant

    Marty!  Don't you see what you are doing???

    Quote

    In is through Jesus, the last Adam, that God had forseen the culmination and fulfillment of his plan for this world and for humanity and the world to come.

    This is not what that Scripture in Col. 1:15 says   You are adding, and that is npt good….

    Read it again

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    THE FIRSTBORN OF EVERY CREATURE….
    You have a firstborn?  We have… and all other Sons of ours were born after Him……

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    FOR BY HIM ALL THINGS WERE CREATED….
    Do you see that????? Open your eyes and mind…..

    Peace Irene

    #255889
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Aug. 14 2011,01:36)
    Is explained by the following scripture:

    Quote
    Colossians 1:18And He is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He might have the preeminence.

    He is not the “first creature created by God”.  He is the “Last Adam”.  God began in Genesis saying that he was making man in “his own image”.  The first Adam was made a living soul.   He was like God in that he had a mind, a will, and emotions, a living person.  The last Adam is like God in this respect but through obedience to God's Word his character is like God in that God is a “spirit of love”.  The scripture states that Jesus is “the express image of God's person”.  

    The last Adam is what God envisioned when he created the worlds.   He is the culminnation of God's plan for humanity.  He is the first of God's creatures to be perfected and raised from the dead with a spiritual body.  In this, he is the beginning of the creation of God.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty …………..You have posted it right Brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………..gene

    #255961
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 13 2011,21:22)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 11 2011,00:33)

    Neither one of these scriptures has context inferring what the title “root” means.


    Okay Kerwin.  If you must go as far as pretending that you don't know what “root” means, I have gone as far as I can go with you.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 11 2011,00:33)

    In conclusion Jesus is before Abraham because Abraham believes in him.


    The words are:  Before Abraham was born, I have existed.

    If you can get “because Abraham believes in him” out of that, then your imagination is teaching you much more about the scriptures than the scriptures are.

    I don't have time to chase your unscriptural imagination all over the place.  I'm sorry.

    peace,
    mike


    Mike,

    Are you implying that “all creation” means both the old and new creations?

    #255962
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 14 2011,01:50)
    Marty!  Don't you see what you are doing???

    Quote

    In is through Jesus, the last Adam, that God had forseen the culmination and fulfillment of his plan for this world and for humanity and the world to come.

    This is not what that Scripture in Col. 1:15 says   You are adding, and that is npt good….

    Read it again

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    THE FIRSTBORN OF EVERY CREATURE….
    You have a firstborn?  We have… and all other Sons of ours were born after Him……

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    FOR BY HIM ALL THINGS WERE CREATED….
    Do you see that????? Open your eyes and mind…..

    Peace Irene


    Irene,

    You are adding old to the scripture while Marty is taking other scriptures that state Jesus is the firstborn of the new creation and stating this Colossians 1:15 is a restatement of the same idea.

    #255989
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 14 2011,18:03)
    Mike,

    Are you implying that “all creation” means both the old and new creations?


    Hi Kerwin,

    Let's see:

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature. 16 For through him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created through him and for him.

    If it says that he is the firstborn of EVERY creature, and it says that ALL things were created through him, then why would I NOT understand it to mean he was the first creature created of ANY creation – past, present AND future? ???

    Is there a VALID SCRIPTURAL reason for me to NOT understand it the way I do?

    peace,
    mike

    #256030
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 15 2011,08:35)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 14 2011,18:03)
    Mike,

    Are you implying that “all creation” means both the old and new creations?


    Hi Kerwin,

    Let's see:

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature. 16 For through him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created through him and for him.

    If it says that he is the firstborn of EVERY creature, and it says that ALL things were created through him, then why would I NOT understand it to mean he was the first creature created of ANY creation – past, present AND future?  ???

    Is there a VALID SCRIPTURAL reason for me to NOT understand it the way I do?

    peace,
    mike


    Mike,

    Scripture differentiates between the old creation of which Adam is the first human and the new of which Jesus Anointed is the first man.

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 15
    King James Version (KJV)

    22For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

    23But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.

    24Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.

    25For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.

    26The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

    27For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.

    It is clear that God has not yet subjected all things to Jesus Anointed as even your five senses should tell you.

    It is therefore also clear that all things do not consist (hold together) in him, see Colossians 1:17.

    Instead we are told that in Adam all die while in Anointed all are made alive, 1 Corinthians 15:22.

    Are all already alive because in Jesus the Anointed they consist?  Obviously not yet, though the time will come when all the new creation will be made alive.

    #256089
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    Okay Kerwin.  If you must go as far as pretending that you don't know what “root” means, I have gone as far as I can go with you.

    You just made a personal attack without trying to use reason to explain why you believe other than what I wrote.   Did you do that because you are unable to counter what I wrote?

    I am sure you are well aware that David’s faith is rooted in Jesus because scripture testifies that David believed God when God promised him that he would have a son to sit on his throne forever.  So why do you persist in disagreeing even though you should also know those Revelations is addressed to would also know Jesus is the root of David’s faith and the offspring of his body?

    Quote
    The words are:  Before Abraham was born, I have existed.

    I admit I suffered a memory failure since I forgot the word “was” in the King James Version.  My understanding is correct for John 8:56 even though those who think in unspiritual ways though he was stating he preexisted his miraculous conception as verse 57 testifies.  Because of my memory failure I wrongly concluded Jesus was speaking of faith and erroneously understood verse 58 according to that error.  Still as I mediated on the matter it troubled me and I asked God to grant me his understanding.

    This is what I have found:

    Quote
    John 8
    King James Version (KJV)

    58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

    Or

    Quote
    John 8
    Young's Literal Translation (YLT)

    58Jesus said to them, `Verily, verily, I say to you, Before Abraham's coming — I am;'

    To Paraphrase his words Jesus is stating:

    Truly, Truly I say to you, I currently am before Abraham was.

    Jesus is obvious not speaking of his preexistent stated “I am” which is current tense instead of the past tense “I existed” that you inadvertently replaced it with.

    So it sounds as before Abraham was “what” and Jesus is currently the same?  So what comparison was Jesus using with the Jews earlier in the conversation would with the idea expressed in John 8:58.

    Here is a hint:

    Quote
    John 8
    King James Version (KJV)

    53Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?
    54Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
    55Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.
    56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

    Quote
    I don't have time to chase your unscriptural imagination all over the place.  I'm sorry.

    Please!  What I have written is of the spirit of Scripture. If you understood it then would understand what I wrote. As it is, you but repeat the misunderstandings expressed by those Jews who did not believe who spoke in verse 57 of John 8.

    #256096
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 15 2011,11:07)

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 14 2011,01:50)
    Marty!  Don't you see what you are doing???

    Quote

    In is through Jesus, the last Adam, that God had forseen the culmination and fulfillment of his plan for this world and for humanity and the world to come.

    This is not what that Scripture in Col. 1:15 says   You are adding, and that is npt good….

    Read it again

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    THE FIRSTBORN OF EVERY CREATURE….
    You have a firstborn?  We have… and all other Sons of ours were born after Him……

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    FOR BY HIM ALL THINGS WERE CREATED….
    Do you see that????? Open your eyes and mind…..

    Peace Irene


    Irene,

    You are adding old to the scripture while Marty is taking other scriptures that state Jesus is the firstborn of the new creation and stating this Colossians 1:15 is a restatement of the same idea.


    Kerwin! No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19 who that description of that verse is? You or Marty have not answered it….
    Irene

    #256118
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 15 2011,09:42)
    Mike,

    Scripture differentiates between the old creation of which Adam is the first human and the new of which Jesus Anointed is the first man.


    And what part of the phrase “ALL creation” leads you to believe that Paul speaks ONLY of the “NEW creation”?

    Also, how could ALL THINGS in heaven and on earth have been created through someone who wasn't even around until most of those things had already been created?

    See Kerwin?  You scoff at me for not wanting to chase your fantasies.  But you are unable to SENSIBLY address even these most simple scriptural words.

    A wise person once noted that, by starting with any old belief you wanted, anyone could with time make the scriptures actually TEACH that belief in their own mind.  This is what you are doing.  Your personal agenda has caused you to come up with an only begotten from the Father that you can't even identify.  Does that convince you that you are somehow on the right track?  ???

    Listen, if it said “the firstborn of all dinosaurs”, anyone in their right mind would assume they were talking of the first dinosaur even brought into existence.

    But what it says is that Jesus is the “firstborn of ALL CREATION/ EVERY CREATURE”, Kerwin.  To me, that means that of EVERY CREATURE, Jesus was the one brought forth FIRST.

    You too agree that “firstborn” means “the one born first”.  It's just that you have nonsensically and unscripturally changed the word in your own head to say “NEW creation” instead of “ALL creation”.  Why?  What would drive a sensible man to do such a thing?  ???  What would drive a sensible man to rearrange John 1:14 in such a way that we now have an unknown only begotten from the Father?  ???  What would drive a sensible man to ignore the fact that ALL THINGS IN HEAVEN AND ON EARTH, including the AGES (with an “S”), were created through Jesus?  ???

    It is for these reasons that I posted what I did to you.  Don't take offense, sir.  I'm only being honest.

    peace,
    mike

    #256120
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 15 2011,19:28)

    So why do you persist in disagreeing even though you should also know those Revelations is addressed to would also know Jesus is the root of David’s faith and the offspring of his body?


    Does the scripture say “Root of David's faith”?  Or “Root of David”?

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 15 2011,19:28)

    Jesus is obvious not speaking of his preexistent stated “I am” which is current tense instead of the past tense “I existed” that you inadvertently replaced it with.


    John 8:58 NWT
    Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”

    From Greek expert and Professor Jason BeDuhn:
    I AM
    “The majority of translations recognize these idiomatic uses of ‘I am’, and properly integrate the words into the context of the passages where they appear.  Yet when it comes to 8:58, they suddenly forget how to translate.  All the translations except the LB and NWT also ignore the true relation between the verbs of the sentence and produce a sentence that makes no sense in English.  Theses changes in the meaning of the Greek and in the normal procedure for translation point to a bias that has interfered with the work of the translators.  No one listening to Jesus, and no one reading John in his own time would have picked up on a divine self-identification in the mere expression ‘I am’, which, if you think about it, is just about the most common pronoun-verb combination in any language.  The NWT understands the relation between the two verbs correctly.  The average Bible reader might never guess that there was something wrong with the other translations, and might even assume that the error was to be found in the NWT.”

    Kerwin, this is from his book, “Truth in Translation”, where this non-biased professor dissected 9 different English translations of the Bible, and ranked them.  The NWT, whose translation he gloats about, is the translation I quoted for you above.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 15 2011,19:28)

    What I have written is of the spirit of Scripture. If you understood it then would understand what I wrote.


    The “YOU DON'T HAVE THE SPIRIT TO UNDERSTAND” accusation doesn't work on me, Kerwin.  I find it to be weak, flawed, and usually the last resort of a person who is losing a debate.

    peace,
    mike

    #256121
    terraricca
    Participant

    kerwin

    Quote
    I am sure you are well aware that David’s faith is rooted in Jesus because scripture testifies that David believed God when God promised him that he would have a son to sit on his throne forever. So why do you persist in disagreeing even though you should also know those Revelations is addressed to would also know Jesus is the root of David’s faith and the offspring of his body?

    please show scriptures

    Pierre

    #256230
    kerwin
    Participant

    Irene,

    Quote
    Kerwin!  No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19  who that description of that verse is?  You or Marty have not answered it….

    I have stated that Jesus is called the word of God in Revelations 19- while scripture states the Spirit is the Word of God.  The Spirit being the Word of God therefore has a better claim to being the Word in John 1- than Jesus who is merely called the Word of God.    You have yet to answer why you disregard the Spirit being the Word in John 1- even though you should know that the Spirit is God and is with God and was so from the beginning because it is God’s Spirit.  You also should know that is comes from above and that no one but it knows God and thus can reveal God to man.  

    Colossians does not say old creation and the purpose of the New Testament is to teach of the new creation and not the old one as the old one is passing away and the new is being revealed.  Jesus is the first born of the new creations and those that believe are the first fruits and they and all else will be created through him and by him and for him.    This is clear from reading the New Testament.  So to interpret Colossians 1- as speaking of the new covenant is in line with what the whole New Testament teaches about the relationship between Jesus and the new creation.

    #256262
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,15:21)
    Irene,

    Quote
    Kerwin!  No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19  who that description of that verse is?  You or Marty have not answered it….

    I have stated that Jesus is called the word of God in Revelations 19- while scripture states the Spirit is the Word of God.Spirit being the Word of God therefore has a better claim to being the Wo  The rd in John 1- than Jesus who is merely called the Word of God.    You have yet to answer why you disregard the Spirit being the Word in John 1- even though you should know that the Spirit is God and is with God and was so from the beginning because it is God’s Spirit.  You also should know that is comes from above and that no one but it knows God and thus can reveal God to man.  

    Colossians does not say old creation and the purpose of the New Testament is to teach of the new creation and not the old one as the old one is passing away and the new is being revealed.  Jesus is the first born of the new creations and those that believe are the first fruits and they and all else will be created through him and by him and for him.    This is clear from reading the New Testament.  So to interpret Colossians 1- as speaking of the new covenant is in line with what the whole New Testament teaches about the relationship between Jesus and the new creation.


    Kerwin!  

    How can the Holy Spirit become flesh????

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER; FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH…

    I only know one that was begotten of the Father and that is who became Jesus…..

    Not only that God through The Word of God, created all, just like it says in.  I am giving you all these Scriptures to show you that it is who became Jesus..

    Col 1:12   Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:  

    Col 1:13   Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into the kingdom of his dear Son:  

    Col 1:14   In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:  

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    If God created all through Jesus< He had to be there….and He was….

    Now to the New creation.  

    Col 1:18   And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.  

    After this happened it became the New Creation…. which we are part of , by God Holy Spirit.
    Before that there was no new creation….

    You claim that John 1:1 is the Holy Spirit?  And that Spirit became flesh???? Mm now you are talking trinity…. The Holy Spirit of God is not made flesh, and if you say through Jesus who was born of Maria and then the Holy Spirit  is the Word of God??
    makes no sense at all.  The Holy Spirit is not first of all, the only begotten of the Father John 1:14 and cannot become flesh….. it lives in all born again Christians, the Church Col 1:18 where Jesus is the Head of….. No Church in this society is the true Church…. It has to come yet….Right now it is Spiritual by nature….

    I find it so ironic that in Rev. 19 you agree it is Jesus, but when it says the same in John 1:1 then it is the Holy Spirit, which is not the only begotten of the Father, or can it ever become flesh…..

    Peace Irene

    #256269
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    Does the scripture say “Root of David's faith”?  Or “Root of David”?

    I see that as a useless question as I can with equal validity ask you ‘Does scripture sat “Root of David’s flesh or Root of David?” as the answer to either is inferred and not explicit.

    Quote
    Kerwin, this is from his book, “Truth in Translation”, where this non-biased professor dissected 9 different English translations of the Bible, and ranked them.  The NWT, whose translation he gloats about, is the translation I quoted for you above.

    “Unbiased”?  He is a human being and so if a slave to sin he is biased towards sin but if a servant to righteousness he is biased towards God.

    But as for his argument, it is weak at best.

    The words would be better written as:

    Ere Abraham made (ginomai), I am +(eimi)

    I admit that the King James Version translated “eimi” to the past tense “was” 1 time out of 146 occurrences.  It translates it to the present tense 138 times and I am uncertain of the last 7.  Of course what is Jesus debating with the unspiritual Jews when he spoke these words.

    Jesus speaks to the Samaritan woman at the well to make the same point and the word “eimi” is translated to “am he”.

    Quote
    John 4
    King James Version (KJV)

    25The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
    26Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.

    Quote
    The “YOU DON'T HAVE THE SPIRIT TO UNDERSTAND” accusation doesn't work on me, Kerwin.  I find it to be weak, flawed, and usually the last resort of a person who is losing a debate.

    “Do you who say do not steal, steal?” Paul of Tarsus.

    I quote those paraphrased words as I was responding to your own accusation by pointing out that you are in agreement with those Jews Jesus accused of being unspiritual.  I on the other hand am in agreement with Jesus’ words that he is the Anointed and so is greater than Abraham and yet you accused me of having an unscriptural imagination.   Test your beliefs and actions to make sure they are in tune with God’s spirit.  I assure you that I test my own.

    #256270
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,16:46)

    Mike,

    Quote
    Does the scripture say “Root of David's faith”?  Or “Root of David”?

    I see that as a useless question as I can with equal validity ask you ‘Does scripture sat “Root of David’s flesh or Root of David?” as the answer to either is inferred and not explicit.


    What kind of answer is that?  ???  Actually is it quite explicit and says “The Root of David”, not “The Root of David's faith”.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,16:46)

    I admit that the King James Version translated “eimi” to the past tense “was” 1 time out of 146 occurrences.


    That's right Kerwin.  I assume you speak of John 14:9.  And look at how all of these translators render the PRESENT tense of “eimi”.  

     
    New International Version (©1984)
    Jesus answered: “Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?

    New Living Translation (©2007)
    Jesus replied, “Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and yet you still don't know who I am? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father! So why are you asking me to show him to you?

    English Standard Version (©2001)
    Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    Jesus said to him, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, 'Show us the Father '?

    International Standard Version (©2008)
    Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me? The person who has seen me has seen the Father. So how can you say, 'Show us the Father'?

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    Jesus replied, “I have been with all of you for a long time. Don't you know me yet, Philip? The person who has seen me has seen the Father. So how can you say, 'Show us the Father'?

    King James Bible
    Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

    American King James Version
    Jesus said to him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet have you not known me, Philip? he that has seen me has seen the Father; and how say you then, Show us the Father?

    American Standard Version
    Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and dost thou not know me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; how sayest thou, Show us the Father?

    Bible in Basic English
    Jesus said to him, Philip, have I been with you all this time, and still you have no knowledge of me? He who has seen me has seen the Father. Why do you say, Let us see the Father?

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    Jesus saith to him: Have I been so long a time with you; and have you not known me? Philip, he that seeth me seeth the Father also. How sayest thou, Shew us the Father?

    English Revised Version
    Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and dost thou not know me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; how sayest thou, Shew us the Father?

    Webster's Bible Translation
    Jesus saith to him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me Philip? he that hath seen me, hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

    Weymouth New Testament
    Have I been so long among you,” Jesus answered, “and yet you, Philip, do not know me? He who has seen me has seen the Father. How can *you* ask me, 'Cause us to see the Father'?

    World English Bible
    Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you such a long time, and do you not know me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father. How do you say, 'Show us the Father?'

    This is one of the Greek “idioms” that Professor BeDuhn was talking about.  Because in John 14:9, almost every translator understands that Jesus was saying he HAD BEEN with Philip for a long time – and so they translate it that way into English.  But like the Professor said, when it comes to 8:58, all of a sudden they forget how to translate, and end up with a sentence that makes absolutely no sense in English.

    58 “I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham came into existence, I am!”

    Now think about the sentence as a whole, Kerwin.  BEFORE ABRAHAM CAME INTO EXISTENCE, I…………………(what?)  

    The English present tense “AM” doesn't work in 8:58 any better than it works in 14:9.  But because the Trinitarian scholars want this to be some “secret message” that Jesus was slipping in, they don't adjust the present tense for English like they do in 14:9.

    Think about it.  If the “I AM” part was supposed to be Jesus calling himself by God's Name, then the sentence is STILL lacking.  For then it would say, “Before Abraham came into existence, Jehovah”.  What?  ???  Jehovah did WHAT?  Jehovah was WHAT?  Get it?  And do you notice that because of the words “BEFORE ABRAHAM”, the rest of the sentence has no choice but to be PAST TENSE.  Just like when I asked Jehovah DID (past tense) what?  Or Jehovah WAS (past tense) what?

    So even for the Trinitarian botch-job to work, Jesus would have had to say, “Before Abraham existed, I WAS I am.”  Or “I HAVE BEEN I am”.

    It is simply a Greek idiom, where to the Greek speaking people, it made perfect sense to say, “Before I met my wife, I AM single for 20 years.”  Now in English, that present tense would not make sense.  We would say the same sentence using the words “I WAS single” instead of “I AM single”.  The translators know this stuff and translate accordingly in 14:9.  But because of their lame attempt to make Jesus be claiming that he is God Himself, they don't translate accordingly in 8:58.

    Kerwin, do you understand all that I've just shown you?  Does it make sense to you?  Can you show me that I'm wrong about it?

    mike

    #256293
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    What kind of answer is that?

    I voiced my opinion that your questioning of what I believed was inferred in the two passages of Revelations calling Jesus the root of David was in itself based on your own beliefs and so was a loaded question.

    Quote
    Actually is it quite explicit and says “The Root of David”, not “The Root of David's faith”.

    Your understanding is not explicit according to the Strong’s which defines root (rhiza) as:

    Quote
    1.a root
    2.that which like a root springs from a root, a sprout, shoot
    3.metaph. offspring, progeny

    Note: metaph.= metaphysical

    Quote
    That's right Kerwin.  I assume you speak of John 14:9.  And look at how all of these translators render the PRESENT tense of “eimi”.  

    I did not know but thank you for telling me.  I have not looked into the matter much and so at first I was of the opinion Jesus used as a historic present similarly to how a historical chronicler uses such for a series of events.    After more research I have come to believe it is more likely a present continuous use to show an incomplete action in progress at a specific time.

    Quote
    Now think about the sentence as a whole, Kerwin.  BEFORE ABRAHAM CAME INTO EXISTENCE, I…………………(what?)  

    The English present tense “AM” doesn't work in 8:58 any better than it works in 14:9.  But because the Trinitarian scholars want this to be some “secret message” that Jesus was slipping in, they don't adjust the present tense for English like they do in 14:9.

    I translated “ginomai” to made as it is translated that way in John 1:14 and can fit both our understanding for John 8:58 while “came into existence” is a loaded translation.  In John 1:14 you can see that the word “ginomai” flesh while in John 8:58 what Abraham “ginomai” is not explicitly written.  You believe it infers “existent” while I believe it infers “great/anointed” and so the sentence becomes:

    Before Abraham was made great/anointed, I am (either historical present or present continuous) great/anointed.

    Quote
    It is simply a Greek idiom, where to the Greek speaking people, it made perfect sense to say, “Before I met my wife, I AM single for 20 years.”  Now in English, that present tense would not make sense.  We would say the same sentence using the words “I WAS single” instead of “I AM single”.  The translators know this stuff and translate accordingly in 14:9.  But because of their lame attempt to make Jesus be claiming that he is God Himself, they don't translate accordingly in 8:58.

    I see that by your example you are speaking of incorrect translations.  I can certainly see the possibility that John 8:58 and John 14:9 are poor translations of either the historic present or the present continuous.  In either case translating it to the past tense does not convey the actual meaning of the words.  For example using the present continuous tense Jesus was telling Philip that he has been, is, and will be with him in seeable future.  I believe that the use of the historic past tense is more straight forward as it speaks of the past as if it were presently occurring.

    I am still looking into the matter.

    #256315
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,15:21)
    Irene,

    Quote
    Kerwin!  No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19  who that description of that verse is?  You or Marty have not answered it….

    I have stated that Jesus is called the word of God in Revelations 19- while scripture states the Spirit is the Word of God.  The Spirit being the Word of God therefore has a better claim to being the Word in John 1- than Jesus who is merely called the Word of God.    You have yet to answer why you disregard the Spirit being the Word in John 1- even though you should know that the Spirit is God and is with God and was so from the beginning because it is God’s Spirit.  You also should know that is comes from above and that no one but it knows God and thus can reveal God to man.  

    Colossians does not say old creation and the purpose of the New Testament is to teach of the new creation and not the old one as the old one is passing away and the new is being revealed.  Jesus is the first born of the new creations and those that believe are the first fruits and they and all else will be created through him and by him and for him.    This is clear from reading the New Testament.  So to interpret Colossians 1- as speaking of the new covenant is in line with what the whole New Testament teaches about the relationship between Jesus and the new creation.


    Kerwin ………Your have it right, the SPIRIT (INTELLECT) is EXPRESSED through WORDS, the LOGOS is the SPIRIT WORD OF GOD EXPRESSED through JESUS to US, GOD and HIS WORD are one and the SAME and GOD, the SPIRIT LOGOS was (IN) JESUS and Spoke to us through Him first person. Jesus was not lying when He said the “FATHER WAS IN ME”. He (the FATHER) can also be (IN) us also through that same SPIRIT LOGOS that was in Jesus, just as Paladin brought out. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………………………gene

    #256318
    terraricca
    Participant

    gene

    so do you believe Jesus when he says that he came from heaven ???

    Pierre

    #256323
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 18 2011,23:27)
    gene

    so do you believe Jesus when he says that he came from heaven ???

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    You are inadvertently asking a loaded question and so I will answer it with two questions that avoid the loaded characteristic.

    Do you believe God who teaches us every good and perfect things comes from above?

    If so then was Jesus' mortal human body good and perfect?

    I believe that which is good and perfect in Jesus came from above while that which is not, did not.

Viewing 20 posts - 11,241 through 11,260 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account