Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,261 through 11,280 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #256324
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 18 2011,00:40)

    Your understanding is not explicit according to the Strong’s which defines root (rhiza) as:

    Quote
    1.a root
    2.that which like a root springs from a root, a sprout, shoot
    3.metaph. offspring, progeny

    So the first and therefore most popular definition is “root”, just like it is always translated, huh?  :)

    Also, see my last post to Gene in the incarnation thread.  For your understanding to be true, Jesus claims to be the Offspring AND the Offspring of David in Rev 22:16. ???

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 18 2011,00:40)

    ………and so the sentence becomes:

    Before Abraham was made great/anointed, I am (either historical present or present continuous) great/anointed.


    I see.  So the words are “I AM”, the question becomes, “I AM WHAT?”, and we are just allowed to fill in any answer to that question?  Your version could be, “Before Abraham was made, I am”.  But there is no Greek word from which to get “great/anointed”, either referring to Abraham or Jesus.

    In other words, you are just adding in whatever scripturally unsupported words you want to add.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 18 2011,00:40)

    For example using the present continuous tense Jesus was telling Philip that he has been, is, and will be with him in seeable future.


    Okay then.  But you need to compare apples to apples, right?  So if in the case of Philip it means “has been, is, and will be”, then that is the same in the case of Abraham.  So it would mean that before Abraham was ginomai, Jesus “had been, is, and will be”.

    #256330
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 19 2011,14:40)

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 18 2011,23:27)
    gene

    so do you believe Jesus when he says that he came from heaven ???

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    You are inadvertently asking a loaded question and so I will answer it with two questions that avoid the loaded characteristic.

    Do you believe God who teaches us every good and perfect things comes from above?

    If so then was Jesus' mortal human body good and perfect?

    I believe that which is good and perfect in Jesus came from above while that which is not, did not.


    Kerwin

    it is not a loaded question it is so simple it could be answered by yes or no,

    it become loaded if you do not believe the words of Christ as he said,or you looking to make your own interpretation to those words,

    all the verses and many are there would be not true without your interpretation ??

    Quote
    Do you believe God who teaches us every good and perfect things comes from above?

    yes i do,the strange thing is you do not,you see it is the same person Jesus that has given us the truth and the understanding of Gods word ,and it is you who refuse to believe his words,

    you say you believe the scriptures but not the way it is written ,right ? Jesus is the channel that God as used to give us his grace straight from heaven in the person of Christ

    Quote
    If so then was Jesus' mortal human body good and perfect?

    tell me Kerwin ;how can a mortal human body be mortal and perfect  at the same time ??

    an perfect human  does not die or as a dead curse of sin in it ,

    just as Adam did not have to die ,it was the sentence of his sin that killed him,

    so your theory of not accepting the words of Christ are only for personal opinion or believes ,

    Pierre

    #256334
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi Kerwin,

    I almost forgot:  What do you make of all those scholars who translated “I AM” as “I HAVE BEEN” in John 14:9?  And do you suppose that if the Trinity was out of the picture, those same scholars would have also translated it as “I HAVE BEEN” in 8:58 – like the NWT does? I know they would have.  :)

    Here's another example for you:

    Last week I drove my car all the way to L.A.  Here I am, driving and driving………..not even noticing that my blinker was on the whole way.

    Do you see how I used the words “I AM” when I really meant “I WAS”?  I even said “NOTICING” when I really meant “NOTICED”.

    The more I thought about this, the more I remembered that even English speaking people do this a lot.  If you'd like, I'll find you some examples from the internet.

    #256339
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi Kerwin,

    I was reading a post t8 made a minute ago, and found this from him:

    “The directors then face criminal charges because they take in investors who are under the impression that all is good and this is a good company to invest in.”

    See?  He did it too.  The words “THEN face criminal charges” let's us know that t8 really meant to say “because they TOOK in investors who WERE under the impression that all WAS good and this WAS a good company to HAVE INVESTED in”.

    It is what Professor BeDuhn calls an “idiom”.  Some people talk this way sometimes.  But because Jesus said, “BEFORE Abraham”, he could ONLY have meant “I WAS”………even if he said “I AM”, like he did in 14:9.

    #256359
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 18 2011,09:16)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,15:21)
    Irene,

    Quote
    Kerwin!  No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19  who that description of that verse is?  You or Marty have not answered it….

    I have stated that Jesus is called the word of God in Revelations 19- while scripture states the Spirit is the Word of God.Spirit being the Word of God therefore has a better claim to being the Wo  The rd in John 1- than Jesus who is merely called the Word of God.    You have yet to answer why you disregard the Spirit being the Word in John 1- even though you should know that the Spirit is God and is with God and was so from the beginning because it is God’s Spirit.  You also should know that is comes from above and that no one but it knows God and thus can reveal God to man.  

    Colossians does not say old creation and the purpose of the New Testament is to teach of the new creation and not the old one as the old one is passing away and the new is being revealed.  Jesus is the first born of the new creations and those that believe are the first fruits and they and all else will be created through him and by him and for him.    This is clear from reading the New Testament.  So to interpret Colossians 1- as speaking of the new covenant is in line with what the whole New Testament teaches about the relationship between Jesus and the new creation.


    Kerwin!  

    How can the Holy Spirit become flesh????

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER; FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH…

    I only know one that was begotten of the Father and that is who became Jesus…..

    Not only that God through The Word of God, created all, just like it says in.  I am giving you all these Scriptures to show you that it is who became Jesus..

    Col 1:12   Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:  

    Col 1:13   Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into the kingdom of his dear Son:  

    Col 1:14   In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:  

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    If God created all through Jesus< He had to be there….and He was….

    Now to the New creation.  

    Col 1:18   And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.  

    After this happened it became the New Creation…. which we are part of , by God Holy Spirit.
    Before that there was no new creation….

    You claim that John 1:1 is the Holy Spirit?  And that Spirit became flesh???? Mm now you are talking trinity…. The Holy Spirit of God is not made flesh, and if you say through Jesus who was born of Maria and then the Holy Spirit  is the Word of God??
    makes no sense at all.  The Holy Spirit is not first of all, the only begotten of the Father John 1:14 and cannot become flesh….. it lives in all born again Christians, the Church Col 1:18 where Jesus is the Head of….. No Church in this society is the true Church…. It has to come yet….Right now it is Spiritual by nature….

    I find it so ironic that in Rev. 19 you agree it is Jesus, but when it says the same in John 1:1 then it is the Holy Spirit, which is not the only begotten of the Father, or can it ever become flesh…..

    Peace Irene


    Kerwin! Again you did not answer this….Irene

    #256365
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    “I am” is a translation from Greek words “ego eimi”. Is the mere utterance of “ego eimi” a blasphemy? Does the use of “ego eimi” automatically identify the speaker as Yahweh?

  • Gabriel said, “Ego eimi Gabriel.”
  • In John 9:9, the blind man whose sight was restored by Jesus said, “Ego eimi.”
  • In Acts 10:21, Peter said, “Behold, ego eimi (I am) he whom ye seek.”

    Obviously, the mere use of “ego eimi” does not equate one to the “I Am” of Exodus 3:14.

    No Trinity here. Back to the drawing board.

#256367
kerwin
Participant

Mike,

Quote
I see.  So the words are “I AM”, the question becomes, “I AM WHAT?”, and we are just allowed to fill in any answer to that question?  Your version could be, “Before Abraham was made, I am”.  But there is no Greek word from which to get “great/anointed”, either referring to Abraham or Jesus.

In other words, you are just adding in whatever scripturally unsupported words you want to add.

Translators commonly add implied words to passages because such unwritten words occur in the Greek language.  They are also known to occur in the English language so you should know about them.  Calling the use of implied words unscriptural is therefore unsound.    To use one of T8’s examples when the translators translate ego eimi in Acts 10 to I am and then add a “he” they believe is implied.  The KJV translators did the same with John 14:9 by adding “Have I” to  “been”(eimi) as they believed those words were implied.   So instead of denying that implied words happen why don’t you discuss why you believe they did not happen in this case.

I have concluded Jesus is using implied words because I do not see any words in the sentence that tie it in with the point he was previously making with his listeners. That point was teaching them that he is continuously the Messiah and therefore greater than Abraham.  He did not mention anything about existing before Abraham in the whole conversation before v 58 and so why should one read it in that on verse.

Quote
Okay then.  But you need to compare apples to apples, right?  So if in the case of Philip it means “has been, is, and will be”, then that is the same in the case of Abraham.  So it would mean that before Abraham was ginomai, Jesus “had been, is, and will be”.

I have looked more into the matter and concluded that like in John 14:9, Jesus is using a present progressive to state I continuously am before Abraham was made.  

Quote
I almost forgot:  What do you make of all those scholars who translated “I AM” as “I HAVE BEEN” in John 14:9?  And do you suppose that if the Trinity was out of the picture, those same scholars would have also translated it as “I HAVE BEEN” in 8:58 – like the NWT does?  I know they would have\

The Scholars are aware of present progressives and therefore should have easily figured out that Jesus told Philip I continuously am so long with you…”  John 8:58 is more difficult whether it is being employed as a historic present or a present progressive.    I find the Trinitarian argument to be mystical in nature but not that which is from God.

Quote
Here's another example for you:

Last week I drove my car all the way to L.A.  Here I am, driving and driving………..not even noticing that my blinker was on the whole way.

Do you see how I used the words “I AM” when I really meant “I WAS”?  I even said “NOTICING” when I really meant “NOTICED”.

The more I thought about this, the more I remembered that even English speaking people do this a lot.  If you'd like, I'll find you some examples from the internet.

You are using an historic present in that example as well is in your example of T8 using one in your next post.   That is different from the present progressive which also occurs in English.

#256368
kerwin
Participant

Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 19 2011,08:53)

Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 18 2011,09:16)

Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 17 2011,15:21)
Irene,

Quote
Kerwin!  No Sir, I only compared those two Scriptures in Rev. 13 to show who Jesus is in John 1:1…. It plainly show that… I also asked you and Marty who that could be in Rev. 19  who that description of that verse is?  You or Marty have not answered it….

I have stated that Jesus is called the word of God in Revelations 19- while scripture states the Spirit is the Word of God.Spirit being the Word of God therefore has a better claim to being the Wo  The rd in John 1- than Jesus who is merely called the Word of God.    You have yet to answer why you disregard the Spirit being the Word in John 1- even though you should know that the Spirit is God and is with God and was so from the beginning because it is God’s Spirit.  You also should know that is comes from above and that no one but it knows God and thus can reveal God to man.  

Colossians does not say old creation and the purpose of the New Testament is to teach of the new creation and not the old one as the old one is passing away and the new is being revealed.  Jesus is the first born of the new creations and those that believe are the first fruits and they and all else will be created through him and by him and for him.    This is clear from reading the New Testament.  So to interpret Colossians 1- as speaking of the new covenant is in line with what the whole New Testament teaches about the relationship between Jesus and the new creation.


Kerwin!  

How can the Holy Spirit become flesh????

Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory of THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER; FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH…

I only know one that was begotten of the Father and that is who became Jesus…..

Not only that God through The Word of God, created all, just like it says in.  I am giving you all these Scriptures to show you that it is who became Jesus..

Col 1:12   Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:  

Col 1:13   Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into the kingdom of his dear Son:  

Col 1:14   In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:  

Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

If God created all through Jesus< He had to be there….and He was….

Now to the New creation.  

Col 1:18   And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.  

After this happened it became the New Creation…. which we are part of , by God Holy Spirit.
Before that there was no new creation….

You claim that John 1:1 is the Holy Spirit?  And that Spirit became flesh???? Mm now you are talking trinity…. The Holy Spirit of God is not made flesh, and if you say through Jesus who was born of Maria and then the Holy Spirit  is the Word of God??
makes no sense at all.  The Holy Spirit is not first of all, the only begotten of the Father John 1:14 and cannot become flesh….. it lives in all born again Christians, the Church Col 1:18 where Jesus is the Head of….. No Church in this society is the true Church…. It has to come yet….Right now it is Spiritual by nature….

I find it so ironic that in Rev. 19 you agree it is Jesus, but when it says the same in John 1:1 then it is the Holy Spirit, which is not the only begotten of the Father, or can it ever become flesh…..

Peace Irene


Kerwin!  Again you did not answer this….Irene


Irene,

I thought I was keeping up with the posts. I am sorry for the error but do not have sufficent time to make ammends at the moment. I will mention that the Spirit of God is made flesh when it incarnated into a human being. If you look up the definitions of incarnate the should tell you that.

As for the rest if the Lord is willing I will get back to you on it.

#256377
kerwin
Participant

Irene,

Quote
Now to the New creation.

Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.

After this happened it became the New Creation…. which we are part of , by God Holy Spirit.
Before that there was no new creation….

We agree that Colossians 1:18 is speaking of the new creation.

But I wish to direct your attention to verse 17 and ask you if you believe that all the old creation holds together in Christ Jesus especially since the purpose of the new covenant, according to verse 18, is that in all things Jesus the Son of God might have supremacy.

Quote
You claim that John 1:1 is the Holy Spirit?  And that Spirit became flesh? Mm now you are talking trinity.

I am speaking of God dwelling in the human being Jesus through the holy spirit of God.   That trinity is not the trinity taught by Trinitarians as only God is God.    

Any son of God is a son because God dwells in him through the Spirit of God.  It is Jesus union with the Spirit that allows all others to also be united with God through the spirit and thus he is the way, the truth, and the light.

Quote
The Holy Spirit of God is not made flesh, and if you say through Jesus who was born of Maria and then the Holy Spirit is the Word of God??

Scripture declares that as of the flesh Jesus is the seed of David and to be the seed of David he must be created from a part of a descendent of David. Therefore the human being known as Jesus is indeed created from a part of Maria.  The spirit of God is directly incarnated into the human being Jesus making him the Son of God.

Quote
makes no sense at all.  The Holy Spirit is not first of all, the only begotten of the Father John 1:14 and cannot become flesh…..

It is true that the Spirit of God does not transform into a human being but it instead unites with a human to become one with him just as a man marries a woman and the two become one.  

What came from God before his own spirit?

Quote
….. it lives in all born again Christians, the Church Col 1:18 where Jesus is the Head of

I agree but I also will add that it first lives in Jesus and so he is the head of the church.

#256379
kerwin
Participant

Pierre,

Quote
it is not a loaded question it is so simple it could be answered by yes or no,

I am sure you do not see it as a loaded question and that I do and so I see no sense in debating it.

Quote
you say you believe the scriptures but not the way it is written ,right ?

Scripture is as it is written but words are malleable and so can be understood in different ways depending on different factors.  What I am saying therefore is I do not believe your understanding of scripture.

Quote
Jesus is the channel that God as used to give us his grace straight from heaven in the person of Christ

That sounds like an accurate description.

Quote
yes i do,

So we agree that all good and perfect things come from God.

Quote
tell me Kerwin ;how can a mortal human body be mortal and perfect  at the same time ??

God did not create human beings to be mortal.  It is through sin human beings were reduced from that state of perfection.

Scripture also instructs us that the body will be made perfect with these words.

Quote
1 Corinthians 15
King James Version (KJV)

54So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

and

Quote
2 Corinthians 5:4
King James Version (KJV)

 4For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life.

A mortal body therefore does not come from heaven.

Dou you believe Jesus had a mortal body?

#256380
Ed J
Participant

Quote (t8 @ Aug. 19 2011,16:18)
“I am” is a translation from Greek words “ego eimi”. Is the mere utterance of “ego eimi” a blasphemy? Does the use of “ego eimi” automatically identify the speaker as Yahweh?

  • Gabriel said, “Ego eimi Gabriel.”
  • In John 9:9, the blind man whose sight was restored by Jesus said, “Ego eimi.”
  • In Acts 10:21, Peter said, “Behold, ego eimi (I am) he whom ye seek.”

    Obviously, the mere use of “ego eimi” does not equate one to the “I Am” of Exodus 3:14.

    No Trinity here. Back to the drawing board.


  • Hi T8,

    “i am” is a mistranslation and it also does NOT equate to Ex.3:14, [אהיה] translates into English as “I WILL”.

    [אהיה אשר אהיה] translates into English as “I WILL BE what I WILL BE“. (Link)

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #256384
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote

    We agree that Colossians 1:18 is speaking of the new creation.

    But I wish to direct your attention to verse 17 and ask you if you believe that all the old creation holds together in Christ Jesus especially since the purpose of the new covenant, according to verse 18, is that in all things Jesus the Son of God might have supremacy.

    Kerwin!  Yes, is the answer, but that does not explain what soever John 1:14 where it says that The Word of God who was with God BTW is the only begotten of the Father

    Jhn 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  

    Jhn 1:2   The same was in the beginning with God.  

    THIS IS THE WORD OF GOD, WHO WAS WITH GOD

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.  

    THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER….. HE WAS THERE WITH GOD IN THE BEGINNING.   HE DID NOT BECOME A BEING WHEN HE BECAME A MAN…. HE WAS THERE BEFORE THE WORLD WAS AND THIOS SCRIPTURE ALSO PROOFS IT……

    Jhn 17:4   I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.  

    Jhn 17:5   And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with there before the world was.

    You see what you are doing your putting your own twist with those Scriptures, it has nothing to do with Gods Holy Spirit, and all with THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER WHO BECAME JESUS……..

    Lets go this far, and then we will go with the rest that You did not address, that is who is the firstborn of all creation….Col. 1:15, Rev. 3:14

    Peace Irene

    #256398
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    I am going to try your method of breaking up various topics into separate conversations.

    Quote
    So the first and therefore most popular definition is “root”, just like it is always translated, huh?  

    So Jesus is the plant root of David?

    Enough of reducing your argument to an absurdity as I believe you are trying to make the point that “Jesus is the root of David” cannot mean “Jesus is the root of David’s faith”.

    So do you believe that “Jesus is the way” can mean “faith in Jesus is the way” and that “Jesus saves” can mean “faith in Jesus saves”?

    I assume you do and so you should already know that stating Jesus is the faith root of David can be paraphrased as Jesus is the root of David for the same reasons.

    Quote
    For your understanding to be true, Jesus claims to be the Offspring AND the Offspring of David in Rev 22:16.

    I do not believe these words of yours are true but I acknowledge that according to one definition of Strong’s that would be the case.    I do not see that definition fitting the context of the passage in question.

    Instead I am convinced that Jesus is the faith root of David because Jesus believed that a time would come when the seed of his body would sit on his throne forever.  Having that knowledge from other scriptures I can see where it also fits the context of Revelations 22:16.

    Quote
    Also, see my last post to Gene in the incarnation thread.

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 18 2011,08:13)

    Mike my question to you is why would you even see it any different then that, is it because of a “PREDISPOSED” Position you have and therefore tend to force the text to Meet those positions?

    Gene is correct that you do have a predisposed position that you believe fits the context of Revelations 22:16 and other scriptures.  I believe you are convinced that position is based on ideas expressed in other scriptures.  The question is whether those ideas are from God or are they from mankind.

    As for me, it is the ideas expressed by God through scriptures that I seek to understand.  

    If you understand the works of lawyers then you know that the letter can support many ideas even though they are not those of the author.

    #256400
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 19 2011,22:14)

    Quote

    We agree that Colossians 1:18 is speaking of the new creation.

    But I wish to direct your attention to verse 17 and ask you if you believe that all the old creation holds together in Christ Jesus especially since the purpose of the new covenant, according to verse 18, is that in all things Jesus the Son of God might have supremacy.

    Kerwin!  Yes, is the answer, but that does not explain what soever John 1:14 where it says that The Word of God who was with God BTW is the only begotten of the Father

    Jhn 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  

    Jhn 1:2   The same was in the beginning with God.  

    THIS IS THE WORD OF GOD, WHO WAS WITH GOD

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.  

    THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER….. HE WAS THERE WITH GOD IN THE BEGINNING.   HE DID NOT BECOME A BEING WHEN HE BECAME A MAN…. HE WAS THERE BEFORE THE WORLD WAS AND THIS SCRIPTURE ALSO PROOFS IT……

    Jhn 17:4   I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.  

    Jhn 17:5   And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with there before the world was.

    You see what you are doing your putting your own twist with those Scriptures, it has nothing to do with Gods Holy Spirit, and all with THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER WHO BECAME JESUS……..

    Lets go this far, and then we will go with the rest that You did not address, that is who is the firstborn of all creation….Col. 1:15, Rev. 3:14

    Peace Irene


    Kerwin! I am patiently waiting for your answer…..Irene

    #256401
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    If you understand the works of lawyers then you know that the letter can support many ideas even though they are not those of the author.

    i do not believe this ;the letter and words are used to say ??????? but letters and words are limited to what the expression of them means ;but also what they do not mean,and what was the intend for those letter and words,there limit of understanding

    some people will stretch words be on there meaning or reduce the full meaning of the words and letters,some time people will not believe in simple words or letters expressed like ;

    Jn 3:12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
    Jn 3:13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.

    what do you think Nicodemus understood from those words Christ say to him ?

    would it not be that Christ came from heaven ?or was Jesus tried to deceit Nicodemus by making up a story ? or was Jesus talking in a allegory way ?you see what i mean ?

    some times you have to believe the words and letters the way they are ,because their are complete the way they are,

    Pierre

    #256431
    kerwin
    Participant

    Pierre,

    Quote
    I do not believe this;

    Never the less it is true because human languages need to be somewhat generic in order to fit many circumstances.  In addition, not all we mean is in what we write or say since we tend to assume our readers understand the basic concept we discuss.  

    Quote
    But letters and words are limited to what the expression of them means; but also what they do not mean

    You are correct that there are broad meanings of words and letters and those words eliminate some possibilities but even that is dependent on the circumstances.

    Quote
    some people will stretch words be on there meaning or reduce the full meaning of the words and letters,some time people will not believe in simple words or letters expressed like ;

    It is not the ideas that are complicated but the point of view necessary to understand them correctly.  Jesus even teaches Nichodemus that when he says “I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?”

    He then goes on to speak of heavenly things by saying “No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.”

    I ask you to judge for yourself if Jesus was speaking of his physical body or the Holy Spirit within him as a heavenly thing.

    Quote
    would it not be that Christ came from heaven ?or was Jesus tried to deceit Nicodemus by making up a story ? or was Jesus talking in a allegory way ?you see what i mean ?

    Jesus is speaking in spiritual words that the spiritual discerning can hear because they know “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing.”

    #256433
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 20 2011,02:28)

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 19 2011,22:14)

    Quote

    We agree that Colossians 1:18 is speaking of the new creation.

    But I wish to direct your attention to verse 17 and ask you if you believe that all the old creation holds together in Christ Jesus especially since the purpose of the new covenant, according to verse 18, is that in all things Jesus the Son of God might have supremacy.

    Kerwin!  Yes, is the answer, but that does not explain what soever John 1:14 where it says that The Word of God who was with God BTW is the only begotten of the Father

    Jhn 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  

    Jhn 1:2   The same was in the beginning with God.  

    THIS IS THE WORD OF GOD, WHO WAS WITH GOD

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.  

    THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER….. HE WAS THERE WITH GOD IN THE BEGINNING.   HE DID NOT BECOME A BEING WHEN HE BECAME A MAN…. HE WAS THERE BEFORE THE WORLD WAS AND THIS SCRIPTURE ALSO PROOFS IT……

    Jhn 17:4   I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.  

    Jhn 17:5   And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with there before the world was.

    You see what you are doing your putting your own twist with those Scriptures, it has nothing to do with Gods Holy Spirit, and all with THE ONLY BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER WHO BECAME JESUS……..

    Lets go this far, and then we will go with the rest that You did not address, that is who is the firstborn of all creation….Col. 1:15, Rev. 3:14

    Peace Irene


    Kerwin!  I am patiently waiting for your answer…..Irene


    Irene,

    Thank you for your answer. It concerns me that according to what you appear to be saying in regards to Colossians 1,, there was no reason for Jesus to appear in these last ages, to sacrifice himself, be resurrected, ascend, and mediate as he was already mediating in heaven. Of course that concern is not directly connected to John 1:1-

    John 1:14 does not say “that The Word of God who was with God BTW is the only begotten of the Father”. If you reread the more accurate translations then you will find it instead says The Word made flesh has a glory like that of the only begotten of God. Please note that for their own reasons some translations drop the comparison word; even though it is clearly in the Greek manuscripts.

    John 1:1+ does not state that the Word was a being prior to when it states the Word became flesh.

    John 1:1 states that the Word of God is both with God and is God in the beginning. The Spirit of God fits those criteria as does the Wisdom of God and the literal Word of God.

    Where does scripture state the only begotten of God became Jesus?

    You accuse me of putting my own ideas in scripture and yet my conscious is clear on this matter as I know that I speak the truth when I state the Spirit of God was God and was with God in the beginning and was made flesh by being united with the human being Jesus. The same is true of both the Word and Wisdom of God as the Spirit of God carries out is Word and reveals it as it also does with his Wisdom. These things are clear in scripture and you have not disagreed.

    #256436
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    It is not the ideas that are complicated but the point of view necessary to understand them correctly. Jesus even teaches Nichodemus that when he says “I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?”

    He then goes on to speak of heavenly things by saying “No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.”

    I ask you to judge for yourself if Jesus was speaking of his physical body or the Holy Spirit within him as a heavenly thing.

    Quote
    would it not be that Christ came from heaven ?or was Jesus tried to deceit Nicodemus by making up a story ? or was Jesus talking in a allegory way ?you see what i mean ?

    Jesus is speaking in spiritual words that the spiritual discerning can hear because they know “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing.”

    the question is not the flesh but the soul what is spirit ;this was the real Christ that came down from heaven. the flesh is the box

    Pierre

    #256439
    Pastry
    Participant

    Kerwin, no the is not what I am saying.  
    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    These verses have nothing to do with the scarifies of Jesus.  But with what Jesus was before the world was created…. And then through Jesus God created all… That is what it says… Just like it says in John 1:3 He was not a mediator then.  He came to die for us and that now makes Him a mediator between man and God…. Before they had to scarify an animal to have their sins forgiven,now w have Jesus who is the perfect Scarifies….we now go through Jesus….
    That was not possible before He came down from Heaven to die for us….so that theory does not make sense….
    John !:14 says that The Word of God became flesh and dwelt among us, as the only begotten of the Father…. Who is that Kerwin… I believe that is who became Jesus and not the Holy Spirit of God….

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

    Irene

    #256448
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 19 2011,02:04)

    I have concluded Jesus is using implied words because I do not see any words in the sentence that tie it in with the point he was previously making with his listeners.


    The Jews:  What are you talking about, dude?  ???  You are not even 50 years old!  How in the world could YOU have seen Abraham?  ???

    Jesus:  Before Abraham ever existed, I have existed.  Therefore, because of this, I HAVE seen Abraham.

    THAT is the point Jesus was making to his listeners, Kerwin.  And adding an implied “him” or “they” is one thing.  Adding an implied “great” or “anointed”, when there is nothing in the context from which to get those implied words, is something else altogether.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 19 2011,02:04)

    I have looked more into the matter and concluded that like in John 14:9, Jesus is using a present progressive to state I continuously am before Abraham was made.  


    Well then that seals the deal, Kerwin.  Because Jesus DID contiunously exist before Abraham was made.

    So it seems that all your searching into the matter has landed you at the truth after all.  :)  Now, hurry up and just ACCEPT what your searching has caused you to discover.  Accept it as it is, without trying to bend over backwards to find some non-sensical way to make this truth NOT mean that Jesus pre-existed.

    mike

    Viewing 20 posts - 11,261 through 11,280 (of 19,165 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

    © 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

    Log in with your credentials

    or    

    Forgot your details?

    Create Account