Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 1,101 through 1,120 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #61714
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,16:06)
    Hi Gene,
    By emptying himself and coming and partaking of flesh do you think he was altered?
    Satan is the god of this world in scripture but should we worship him too?


    Nick…. by emptying himself of what (being a GOD) or an angle or what. and How would it behove him to be made like his brothern.. what would a supernatual being have to gain being a human being.

    the only i can see Jesus is a forordained person in the plan of God someone who GOD created and brought forth at the right time,just like it say's.

    this gives God The Father all the Glory including the glory that Jesus now has .It all was from and by GOD The Father alone and no one else, it's his work from start to finish that God may be all and in all period. thanks gene.

    #61715
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,12:39)
    Hi not3,
    Christ was not just a son of man born of woman.
    He was the monogenes son first.
    Phil 2 shows he came by his consent.


    Where did Jesus consent?
    ….being found in the image of a man, he humbled himself…”

    That is not a consent.
    Nick, you once told me that there was a meeting in heaven where Jesus agreed to come down…..find those scriptures yet? Actually, any OT scriptures showing JESUS preexisted will be fine :)

    #61716
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 27 2007,16:22)
    Nick ….John saw Jesus as  uniquely begotten (he was born from a women who did have sex to beget him) this was unique no one else had been born that way. Why wouldn't he think that was unique, i certianly do. this is how Jesus was born into the world and how he begain life. You have no proof of any activity of Jesus before His birth as a human, if you do produce it. what was he doing pryer to his human existence . John said if you do not confess Jesus as comming in the flesh you are not of God.
    John had a problem with gnostics who believed Jesus (WAS a GOD) whom the Almighty God sent out from the palura to save the world. He also had the antiadoptinest who change many scriptures to try to defy Jesus.by changeing things like (only begotten from uniquely begotten) in three places inthe scriptures. So John enforced the idea that Jesus came into existence through the flesh, by making the statement, that whoever did not confess Jesus as comming in flesh was not of GOD. why do you think he mentioned this three times.
    thanks ….gene


    Hi Gene
    You say
    “Why wouldn't he think that was unique, i certianly do.”

    There are lots of ways he could be unique.
    We need to find which way scripture means.

    “So John enforced the idea that Jesus came into existence through the flesh, by making the statement, that whoever did not confess Jesus as comming in flesh was not of GOD. why do you think he mentioned this three times.”

    What he said twice was

    1Jn4
    ” 1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

    2Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

    3And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. “

    2Jn
    “7For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

    8Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.

    9Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

    10If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:

    11For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

    Many tell us instead it was God came in the flesh.

    To come in the flesh or partake of flesh one must surely already exist.

    God prepared a body for the “man from heaven.”

    #61717
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,14:06)
    Hi Gene
    Psalm 2:7
    I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

    God said it
    The Son heard him
    No mother is mentioned


    Nick,
    You're smarter than I am, Psalm 2 speaks of quite a few things that HAVEN'T HAPPENED YET! In fact, the begotten Son spoken of appears to rule with an iron scepter, and the nations are his inheritance…….did the preexistent son have all those things prior to his birth? Even more, prior to his return to earth?

    #61718
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi not3,
    Yes.
    But part of the paslm is prophetic we know but we also know that the begettal of the Son is not.

    #61720
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 27 2007,16:32)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,16:06)
    Hi Gene,
    By emptying himself and coming and partaking of flesh do you think he was altered?
    Satan is the god of this world in scripture but should we worship him too?


    Nick…. by emptying himself of what (being a GOD) or an angle or what. and How would it behove him to be made like his brothern.. what would a supernatual being have to gain being a human being.

    the only i can see Jesus is a forordained person in the plan of God someone who GOD created and brought forth at the right time,just like it say's.

    this gives God The Father all the Glory including the glory that Jesus now has .It all was from and by GOD The Father alone and no one else, it's his work from start to finish that God may be all and in all period.  thanks gene.


    Hi gene,
    All he needed was a flesh body
    And God provided it for him.[Heb 10]
    God deserves and gets all the glory from the Son.

    #61721
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,16:43)
    Hi not3,
    Yes.
    But part of the paslm is prophetic we know but we also know that the begettal of the Son is not.


    Oh, my brother, you are taking what you want to believe and quilting your own theology.  Why is it OK to believe part of the Psalm and not the other part?  There is something to be said for context.  If the majority of the Psalm is speaking prophetically……..why only believe that the begettal is present-day-history?

    #61722
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick ….if God begot him that day, why don't you believe that is was that day and not some other day in a prexistant time, because it say that the sons of God shouted for joy at the creation of the world.
    Was Jeus their among them then, and if he was then why did God say this day I have begotten you then. He could not say today he begot Jesus if he already preixisted He would have to say today I rebegot you then, wouldn't He.Especially seening God Created all things in Heaven and Earth by His self.

    #61723
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi not3,
    Do you realise the first verses and the last verses are about the end of the millenial reign?
    If so then do you think that the verses about the begettal apply to that time?

    #61728
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,17:00)
    Hi not3,
    Do you realise the first verses and the last verses are about the end of the millenial reign?
    If so then do you think that the verses about the begettal apply to that time?


    Maybe.

    However, in Hebrews 5:4-9 (the parallel of Psalm 2), we are shown that this Psalm refers to Jesus becoming a high priest. also, it places the timeframe with “Jesus' life on earth” in verse 7.

    #61730
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi not3,
    So must the whole psalm be fulfilled at one time?
    How can you align the other verses then?
    Many other psalms are similar in containing prophecies for different times as God sprinkles His truth for his sons to search out?

    #61731
    Not3in1
    Participant

    If you are able to nail down when the majority of the Psalm will be fulfilled (the milleniel reign), thus in the future's-future……why place the begettal in the previous-past?  Why not use scripture to tell you that the reign has not happened yet because prophecies need to be fulfilled, and the begettal happened when the Messiah was born (a fulfillment of prophecy in it's own right)?  All the OT points towards the BIRTH of the Messiah…….why is that?

    #61735
    Laurel
    Participant

    Quote (IM4Truth @ July 27 2007,03:40)
    Laurel  I said that I was not going to respond to anything written here, but I must say something when you say Set-apart spirit. There is only one Holy Spirit read Ephesians 4:4-6 All other spirits are not from God. And believe me they are all around us. Satan and his demons is God of this world. Hopefully that will end soon. But you are right that this post has gone on to long. Going around in circles is not profitable.
    Peace Mrs.IM4Truth
    Mrs.IM4Truth


    4truth,
    Set-apart Spirit IS the correct usage of the Spirit of Elohim. It is “set apart” just like His people are set apart. Special and different from everything else. The word Holy Spirit is derived from Greek. If you tranlsated “Holy” to Greek you would get Set-apart. Hebrew IS the language of Elohim and Y'shua Messiah is the Savior's Name. Ya'weh is YHWH in Hebrew and is translated by the “Pharisees” and then to us as adoni which is LORD in English. Lord by the way is NOT His Name. Lord is a title, the same title used for every man who is a land owner.

    Now, we can keep wasting eachothers time by disputing His Name, but Scripture in Hebrew is the original and I prefer it because it is correct.

    In the original language, (Qodesh Rauch) in Hebrew, in which Holy Spirit was translated from means Set-apart Spirit of Elohim.

    It's funny how so many people here speak and do not know what they are speaking about.

    #61747
    Bibliophile
    Participant

    Hi Laurel,

    Is it possible that you mean to say instead of “In the original language, (Qodesh Ruach) in Hebrew, in which Holy Spirit was translated from means Set-apart Spirit of Elohim” should be 'Ruach in Hebrew, in which holy spirit was translated from is transliterated into English as set-apart spirit of Elohim?'

    The reason I mention this is because of your use of 'meaning.' The definition of holy spirit (ruach) in Hebrew is:

    wind, breath, mind, spirit
    breath
    wind
    of heaven
    quarter (of wind), side
    breath of air
    air, gas
    vain, empty thing
    spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
    spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
    courage
    temper, anger
    impatience, patience
    spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
    disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
    (All taken from Theological Wordbook of the OT)

    The Greek holy spirit (pnuema) means:

    a movement of air (a gentle blast
    of the wind, hence the wind itself
    breath of nostrils or mouth
    the spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated
    the rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks, decides
    (all taken from the Theological Dictionary of the NT)

    If I have misunderstood what you are saying please accept my apologies.

    :D :D :D

    #61748
    Artizan007
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,17:00)
    Hi not3,
    Do you realise the first verses and the last verses are about the end of the millenial reign?
    If so then do you think that the verses about the begettal apply to that time?


    Hey Nick,

    Do I realise the above statement – mmm nope I don't; you can only presume this is about the end of the millennial reign… it is not even mentioned by Christ but like the Trinity doctrine the writer of Revelation develops this over time. If not I find it strange that such a significant event is not even mentioned by Jesus.

    The millennial reign is not mentioned in the OT unless you look at Isaiah 65:17 onwards and stretch it to come up with what you are saying… but even these verses do not sound like the millennial reign mentioned in Revelation because according to it, the new heaven and earth happens after the millennial reign… the only place the 1000 year reign is mentioned is here in Revelation 20… It is kind of like Paul's statement of “baptism for the dead” in 1 Corinthians. A one off mentioned no where else and boy do the Mormons love this verse.

    Where does the 1000 year reign teaching come from… not even Jesus taught it – I find this strange as we state that He is the author and perfecter of our faith – was this a theologian's attempt to cover over something that had not happened the way the early church read and thought what the OT prophets and Jesus himself had stated would happen?

    Where in this psalm does it say Jesus would come, come again, and then reign 1000 years… it does not but simply states a one-off arrival of the one who would reign as King in Zion.

    So you can only presume that you know the Psalmist is writing about the millennial reign and cannot not make concrete statements that what you say is correct.

    It only says His Anointed One would reign – it does not say which one – so we must read into the text…

    Nick, not even the different versions can agree with upon the wording of this Psalm so how can we make doctrine out of it…

    Vulgate says: Embrace discipline, lest He be angry
    Targum says: Receive instruction, lest he be angry
    Septuagint says: Embrace discipline, lest the LORD be angry

    Lastly, verse 7 says…

    I will declare the decree: The Lord has said unto me… who is me, not the Messiah, but the person writing the Psalm – it makes no sense to have the M of me in capitals… because he is declaring what God had said unto him… then the Psalmist said what the Lord had said unto him; God speaking “You are My son, today I have begotten you”.

    #61806
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    Laurel Just saying set-apart spirit that I am afraid to use any Translation, because there is so much misunderstanding, that I want to make sure that I am not listening to Demons. Since I came out of the Cath. Church 26 years ago, I always start my Prayers with Heavenly Father God of the Universe maker of Heaven and Earth, I come before your Throne through Jesus Christ our Mediator. The Holy Spirit lives in me and because of it it is possible to do so. It is a personal thing. You have to convince in your mind what you think is right, do you have a scripture that proves that what you are saying is correct. or just a mans interpretation of the use. No disrespect intended, Laurel.

    #61816
    Laurel
    Participant

    Here is what Holy Spirit means again. The OT was written in Hebrew originally and through out the years has remained in it's pure form. I know this because of the equidistant letter sequence found in the Torah in Hebrew.

    In Hebrew the first two books of the Torah which are Genesis and Exodus are written so that every 50th letter consecutively spells “T-O-R-A-H” over and over again throughout the entire two books.

    In Hebrew the last two books of the Torah which are Deuteronomy and Numbers, every 50th letter consecutively spells “H-A-R-O-T. Torah backwards.

    There four books point to the book of Leviticus which is the heart of the Torah. In Hebrew, every 7th letter consecutively spells “Y-H-W-H” or Ya'weh, through the entire book.

    This phenomonon could only have been made possible by Elohim Himself.

    When I look for the proper meaning of words in Scripture I refer back to the Hebrew language of the Old Testament.

    Romans 3:1 asks: What advantage hath the Jew?
    Romans 3:2 answers: Much in every way because unto them were committed the oracles of Elohim.

    These verses say that the living Word of Elohim was entrusted to the Jew. I trust that it is correct.

    Now the Hebrew word Qodesh (Qof-Dalet-Shin) was translated to English as the word Holy. It means Set-apart, sanctified, consecrated, most holy. It is an adjective which discribes.

    The Hebrew word Rauch (Resh-Waw-Chet) was translated to English as Spirit. It means breath (including it's expressions and functions). It is a noun and a verb which means a thing and an action.

    Set-apart Spirit is just that Set-apart. Capitalized out of respect.

    My Bible writes it as such and I've even heard pastors on the radio discribe it as such. My Bible also uses the proper Names written in Hebrew. Y-H-W-H for LORD and Y-H-W-Sh-Uh for Jesus. Even the Names of the prophets are written in their proper form. Yeshiyahu is Isaiah.( יהוה is YHWH and יהושׁע is Y'shua) Hebrew words are read from right to left.

    It is good that you are cautious, just don't be foolish. Let the Set-apart Spirit guide you to understanding.

    #61817
    Laurel
    Participant

    Y'shua says in John 5:43
    I have come in my Father's Name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him you will recieve.

    If you look at their names you will see the first three letters are the same. BTW Jesus is not a Hebrew name and dosen't even translate the same. Y'shua translates to English “Joshua” not Jesus.

    Be careful what you believe.

    #61818
    Laurel
    Participant

    If you believe Y'shua died on a Friday and was ressurected on a Sunday, you believe a lie.

    #61824
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    Jodi No I am not that rude to say what you are saying is limiting God. No and I would not say that it is a Mystery, because God has revealed the Mystery of God to the saints.
    Ephesians 1:9 “and 3:3-9and 6:19and col.1:26
    Neither do I believe in the trinity doctrine. No not just in pure faith either, it says in
    1 Thes.5:21 Prove all things

    The name Jesus was given to Son/Word when He became flesh;
    John 1:14 ” And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, …”
    The Apostle John is the only one that referrers to the Son as the Word of the Old Testament. The reason, the Son/Word did all the speaking for God, and He only spoke the Word that God gave Him to speak,
    John 12:49
    Jesus told us that no man at anytime, old or new Testament, has heard Gods Voice,
    John 5:37
    Since the Son is the one that all things were created by, John 1″3 and Col.1:16, it has to be one and the same.
    This also shows that the Son existed from the beginning of creation. He, the Son, is the image of the invisible God, Col.1:15.
    An image can not be a thought or an idea in Gods mind.
    God is the creator of spirit being and Human beings. We believe that some of us will become spirit beings, which is a change of nature, why then should we doubt that God can change a spirit being, His Son, into a human being. It is a change of nature too.
    Christ experience this change twice
    John 17:5 ” AND NOW, O FATHER, GLORIFY THOU ME WITH THENE OWN SELF WITH THE GLORY WHICH I HAD WITH THEE BEFORE THE WORLD WAS.”
    What is Christ asking His Father? Answer: to give Him back His Glory, spirit nature that He had before He became flesh.
    Hebrew 2:7 ” Thou madest Him a little lower then the angels; (the Son became flesh) thou crownedst Him with glory and honor ( Christ ascended into heaven and God gave Him a divine nature, immortality),
    and didst set Him over the works of thy hands.
    Peace and Love to you Mrs.IM4Truth

Viewing 20 posts - 1,101 through 1,120 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account