Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 9,941 through 9,960 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #225573
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Nov. 19 2010,11:43)
    Hi Adam,
    I thought you might be interested in what Tertullian said about the light on day one:

    Then, therefore, does the Word also Himself assume His own form and glorious garb, His own sound and vocal utterance, when God says, “Let there be light.” This is the perfect nativity of the Word, when He proceeds forth from God—formed by Him first to devise and think out all things under the name of Wisdom—“The Lord created or formed me as the beginning of His ways;” then afterward begotten, to carry all into effect—“When He prepared the heaven, I was present with Him.” Thus does He make Him equal to Him: for by proceeding from Himself He became His first-begotten Son, because begotten before all things; and His only-begotten also, because alone begotten of God, in a way peculiar to Himself, from the womb of His own heart—even as the Father Himself testifies: “My heart,” says He, “hath emitted my most excellent Word.” The Father took pleasure evermore in Him, who equally rejoiced with a reciprocal gladness in the Father’s presence:  “Thou art my Son, to-day have I begotten Thee;” even before the morning star did I
    beget Thee. The Son likewise acknowledges the Father, speaking in His own person, under the name of Wisdom: “The Lord formed Me as the beginning of His ways, with a view to His own works; before all the hills did He beget Me.”

    http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.vii.html

    Are you familiar with Tertullian?


    Hi Sis Kathy,
    Wonderful post it is to support your revelations on light. I wonder this sort of imaginations on birth of son of God is not a new thing but very old even Tertullian could frame it. But the problem here is Gen 1 talks about our world only not about creation of angels or heavenly bodies. If N.T talks about only this creation your assumption may be correct but it can not prove that the son of God as first creation/procreation as you support. There were other sons of God already existing as per Job when God created this world.

    And also Tertullian quoted Prov 8 to support God forming son of God. I don't agree with that logic since Hebrew Bible talks about female wisdom “Sofia” instead of male son. It is only a poetical expression of wisdom and other attribute of God.

    Please see the argument of Sis Shimmer light is also one of the attributes of God as N.T quotes “God is light” but it can not be other way round as “light is God”. Gen 1 talks about  impersonal light rather natural light. Please also see the argument of brother Pierre; he says if God is already light why at all he should create one like that. So it is different from what we call God. I believe it is natural light but not any formation of a being as Tertullian and others assume here as God created every other earthly things in Gen 1.

    These are my thoughts and arguments. I leave it to you.

    Peace and love to you
    Adam

    #225574
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Nov. 19 2010,20:18)
    t8 and Pierre and Shimmer,
    I think that God certainly is/was always Light (spiritual not physical).  Think of the sun lit up but its rays not turned on yet.  “Let there be light” turned on the rays (the Son) from the sun (the Father) who was always lit up just had nothing to emit rays to till something was created.  When it finally got time to create He said “let there be light” and He begot the rays (the Light of/from Light-the Son).


    Kathi

    speculation,speculation,and speculation, :cool: :cool: :cool:

    Pierre

    #225575
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (shimmer @ Nov. 19 2010,20:11)
    Your all wrong, I can prove it with scripture which I will later…… the light is love, the dark is hate. Men prefered to live in the dark (hate)

    Hatred brings everything else with it, envy, jealousy, lies, fighting, murder, war, destruction…………. etc

    God is love, The light which was in the beginning.  The dark has never overcome it.


    shimmer

    no you cannot, because God created light, but in stead people chose to go into darkness (so hiding from God because of there wickedness)

    God never created wickedness of any kind.

    Pierre

    #225577
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 18 2010,23:02)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Nov. 19 2010,11:43)
    Hi Adam,
    I thought you might be interested in what Tertullian said about the light on day one:

    Then, therefore, does the Word also Himself assume His own form and glorious garb, His own sound and vocal utterance, when God says, “Let there be light.” This is the perfect nativity of the Word, when He proceeds forth from God—formed by Him first to devise and think out all things under the name of Wisdom—“The Lord created or formed me as the beginning of His ways;” then afterward begotten, to carry all into effect—“When He prepared the heaven, I was present with Him.” Thus does He make Him equal to Him: for by proceeding from Himself He became His first-begotten Son, because begotten before all things; and His only-begotten also, because alone begotten of God, in a way peculiar to Himself, from the womb of His own heart—even as the Father Himself testifies: “My heart,” says He, “hath emitted my most excellent Word.” The Father took pleasure evermore in Him, who equally rejoiced with a reciprocal gladness in the Father’s presence:  “Thou art my Son, to-day have I begotten Thee;” even before the morning star did I
    beget Thee. The Son likewise acknowledges the Father, speaking in His own person, under the name of Wisdom: “The Lord formed Me as the beginning of His ways, with a view to His own works; before all the hills did He beget Me.”

    http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.vii.html

    Are you familiar with Tertullian?


    Hi Sis Kathy,
    Wonderful post it is to support your revelations on light. I wonder this sort of imaginations on birth of son of God is not a new thing but very old even Tertullian could frame it. But the problem here is Gen 1 talks about the our world only not about creation of angels or heavenly bodies. If N.T talks about only this creation your assumption may be correct but it can not prove that the son of God as first creation/procreation as you support. There were other sons of God already existing as per Job when God created this world.

    And also Tertullian quoted Prov 8 to support God forming son of God. I don't agree with that logic since Hebrew Bible talks about female wisdom “Sofia” instead of male son. It is only a poetical expression of wisdom and other attribute of God.

    Please see the argument of Sis Shimmer light is also one of the attributes of God as N.T quotes “God is light” but it can not be other way round as “light is God”. Gen 1 talks about  impersonal light rather natural light. Please also see the argument of brother Pierre; he says if God is already light why at all he should create one like that. So it is different from what we call God. I believe it is natural light but not any formation of a being as Tertullian and others assume here as God created every other earthly things in Gen 1.

    These are my thoughts and arguments. I leave it to you.

    Peace and love to you
    Adam


    Hi Adam,
    I wouldn't decide that wisdom is not the Son based on the gender of a noun.  Did you know God is love?  Well love is feminine…did you realize that?  Is God female…He is always spoken about with male pronouns.  You are getting thrown off by genders of nouns in Hebrew.  Have you researched that at all?  The Hebrew word's gender for the nouns isn't determining the gender of who they refer to.

    Also, if light on day one is physical as well as light on day four, then why did it have to be separated again from darkness?  I think light on day one is spiritual and light on day four is physical and on day four is when the planets and stars are created.

    Also, you said the angels were already there by day one but I suppose you get that because of the verse in Job when the sons of God rejoiced over the laying of the foundation of the earth.  Well, the foundation wasn't laid, imo, until day three when the seas were separated from the dry land and not allowed to go any further.  You can see that in Prov. 8 when the foundations were being measured. see here:

    Prov 8:28-30
    28 When He made firm the skies above, When the springs of the deep became fixed,
    29 When He set for the sea its boundary So that the water would not transgress His command, When He marked out the foundations of the earth;
    30 Then I was beside Him, as a master workman; And I was daily His delight, Rejoicing always before Him,
    NASU

    So you see, the angels didn't need to be there before day one.  They probably were created during day one though.

    Bless you!

    #225581
    shimmer
    Participant

    Terrarica etc,

    No, you see, you have to see things differently, no ammout of bookwork will show you this.

    The dark is the hate and the “coldness” –by the way see how theres two different meanings for the word coldness ? ..see that ? — darkness is what men became or what men prefered…….. so the light came into the world but the world knew it not, because the world preferred darkness, the world preffered the ways of men which is to hate — the word hate has alot of different meanings to it. Both hate and love are either deep or shallow or somewhere in between, all things come from emotions, lack of or too many, either good or bad.

    I will find the verses later.

    #225584
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (shimmer @ Nov. 19 2010,22:52)
    Terrarica etc,

    No, you see, you have to see things differently, no ammout of bookwork will show you this.

    The dark is the hate and the “coldness” –by the way see how theres two different meanings for the word coldness ? ..see that ? — darkness is what men became or what men prefered…….. so the light came into the world but the world knew it not, because the world preferred darkness, the world preffered the ways of men which is to hate — the word hate has alot of different meanings to it. Both hate and love are either deep or shallow or somewhere in between, all things come from emotions, lack of or too many, either good or bad.

    I will find the verses later.


    shimmer

    did read what i say???

    shimmer

    no you cannot, because God created light, but in stead people chose to go into darkness (so hiding from God because of there wickedness)

    God never created wickedness of any kind.

    Pierre
    :D :D :D

    #225588
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi Sis Kathy and brother Pierre here is how God created light and darkness;
    Isa 45:
    7 I form the light and create darkness,
    I bring prosperity and create disaster;
    I, the LORD, do all these things.

    I don't agree with your idea of God created/procreated son of God when He said let there be light. In fact He created darkness before that as for Gen 1:1. It is only a speculation to claim like that.

    #225589
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 18 2010,17:43)

    Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 18 2010,17:13)
    Hi T8,

    Let me ask you this…

    Do you think we preexisted as well?

    God bless
    Ed J


    It is possible, but I see no teaching in scripture to support it.


    HI T8,

    Hoe about this one…

    Jer.1:5  Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and
    before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee,
    and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

    Or this one…

    2Tm.1:9 Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling,
    not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace,
    which was given [[[us]]] in Christ Jesus before the world began,

    Or this one…

    Jude:1:12 …clouds they are without water, carried about of winds;
    trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #225590
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Why is this scripture not good enough?

    Philippians 2:5-11
    5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
    6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
    7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
    8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
    9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
    10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
    11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

    It talks about his attitude and how we should be humble too.
    How humble was Christ? I would say much more than us.
    He was divine, but never raised himself up in pride.
    He made himself nothing by being a servant and as a human.
    As a man, he died for us.
    God exalted him up.

    And we know that he is in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began.

    So how do the deniers pull Philippians 2:5-11 apart?
    Let me guess. He wasn't divine, but was a memory in the Divine or something?

    #225594
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi brother T8 sorry to bother you. If Jesus was with the same glory before the foundations of the world is it not ridiculous to say “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” achieved through obedience and humility?

    #225597
    gollamudi
    Participant

    For brother Mike on john 6 which supports full blown preexistence of Jesus. Here is another quote from Tertullian:

    Tertullian says, “According to the gospel of Marcion, in the fifteenth year of Tiberius,
    Christ Jesus deigned to emanate from heaven, a salutary spirit.” But, he also says,
    according to this “Great Anti-Christian,” the Christ was a phantom, who appeared
    suddenly at the synagogue of Capernaum in the likeness of a full-grown man for the
    purpose of protesting against the law and the prophets! But it is certain that the Lord
    or Christ of Marcion is entirely non-historical. He has no genealogy or Jewish line of
    descent; no earthly mother, no father no mundane birthplace or human birth.

    I think this Marcion's Jesus is more powerful than John's because there is no incarnation required here. Jesus directly comes down from heaven as John 6 claims as full grown up man.

    Most of the Christian scriptures are based on such redaction on Gnosticism. They wanted to prove that Jesus was not Phantom but real human being with material body. I wonder how this differs with that of Gnostic Jesus as their Jesus was also not real human but God/god in disguise of human.

    Please think over
    Adam

    #225599
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 19 2010,19:06)
    Hi brother T8 sorry to bother you. If Jesus was with the same glory before the foundations of the world is it not ridiculous to say “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” achieved through obedience and humility?


    Why can't he be in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began and in addition to being humbled in the flesh and obedient, which taught him obedience which gains extra reward? After all do we not have salvation and receive on top of that reward for our obedience and good works?

    The only time you see contradiction is when you have already made up your mind to the contrary. But if you read it all as it is, then it all fits. I don't see what the problem is, unless you have been swayed by someone's teachings to see problems.

    #225602
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    Considering your argument using Paul’s words that the head of woman is man and the head of man is Christ is based on a scripture written to those under the new covenant and thus part of the new creation. I am not in disagreement with you as I am certain the new creation was created through, by, and for Jesus.

    One simple truth is there is only one divine being and that is God. The angels are not divine beings though they have the divine nature of righteousness. Jesus also has the divine nature of righteousness. The Holy Spirit can be considered to be divine as from what I have learned it is part of God.

    Since Jesus had the Spirit with in him you can say that was his divine nature while his human nature was his own. I do not believe that is what you meant but if so feel free to correct me.

    Scripture does not say he returned to the glory he had God or even express that idea. It does say “glorify me”, John 17:5, as in “bestow the honor on me” which certainly does not mean “return”.

    Your explanation does not remove the contradiction of a child being born or existing before its parent.

    Please Note that if you are just speaking of the soul as being preexistent then it can remove the contradiction. You cannot explain it with a spiritual being wearing human flesh as a disguise or a spiritual being transformed into a human being, and thus in either case not actually related to his (?) parents.

    #225613
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 19 2010,20:41)
    Scripture does not say he returned to the glory he had God or even express that idea. It does say “glorify me”, John 17:5, as in “bestow the honor on me” which certainly does not mean “return”.


    Before the world began.

    #225614
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 19 2010,20:41)
    Your explanation does not remove the contradiction of a child being born or existing before its parent.


    It does.

    Because Jesus existed in the form of God/divine nature.
    He then emptied himself and existed in human nature.

    The divine nature was before human nature.

    He is a child in human nature and he had a history in divine nature.

    The only contradiction is in your own doctrine. Because you do not believe that he existed in the form of God/with divine nature, it is a contradiction because you only see flesh nature.

    But it is not a contradiction to a person who believes that Jesus existed in the form of God as it is written.

    #225615
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 19 2010,20:41)
    Considering your argument using Paul’s words that the head of woman is man and the head of man is Christ is based on a scripture written to those under the new covenant and thus part of the new creation. I am not in disagreement with you as I am certain the new creation was created through, by, and for Jesus.


    The man is the head of the woman under the old creation (now). In the new creation, there is no male or female. We will become like the angels. There is also no male or female in Christ.

    #225616
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 19 2010,20:41)
    Please Note that if you are just speaking of the soul as being preexistent then it can remove the contradiction. You cannot explain it with a spiritual being wearing human flesh as a disguise or a spiritual being transformed into a human being, and thus in either case not actually related to his (?) parents.


    Jesus Father was God (the Spirit). His mother was from Earth.
    Hence he has a human lineage and a divine lineage.

    He was before and he was after.

    He was with God in the beginning and God made all things through him and for him. That is all things.

    #225630
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 19 2010,20:08)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 19 2010,19:06)
    Hi brother T8 sorry to bother you. If Jesus was with the same glory before the foundations of the world is it not ridiculous to say “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” achieved through obedience and humility?


    Why can't he be in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began and in addition to being humbled in the flesh and obedient, which taught him obedience which gains extra reward? After all do we not have salvation and receive on top of that reward for our obedience and good works?

    The only time you see contradiction is when you have already made up your mind to the contrary. But if you read it all as it is, then it all fits. I don't see what the problem is, unless you have been swayed by someone's teachings to see problems.


    So brother T8 you think that is the correct answer for my query and you blame me for not willing to take it?
    God knows who is correct. Let us leave it Him. Instead of conflicting each other.

    thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #225649
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 20 2010,05:50)

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 19 2010,20:08)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 19 2010,19:06)
    Hi brother T8 sorry to bother you. If Jesus was with the same glory before the foundations of the world is it not ridiculous to say “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” achieved through obedience and humility?


    Why can't he be in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began and in addition to being humbled in the flesh and obedient, which taught him obedience which gains extra reward? After all do we not have salvation and receive on top of that reward for our obedience and good works?

    The only time you see contradiction is when you have already made up your mind to the contrary. But if you read it all as it is, then it all fits. I don't see what the problem is, unless you have been swayed by someone's teachings to see problems.


    So brother T8 you think that is the correct answer for my query and you blame me for not willing to take it?
    God knows who is correct. Let us leave it Him. Instead of conflicting each other.

    thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    Adam

    you see this can not be done,the word of God is a living word,and it keep someone to go always forward and never still
    or backward,you have to make the truth come out while the spirit is feeding you the knowledge,because one truth builds upon the other and so on,until the light in your hearth is so bright that you can see Christ in his glory,

    it is our decision to go forward or to stop and so go backwards.

    Pierre

    #225668
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 19 2010,22:50)

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 19 2010,20:08)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 19 2010,19:06)
    Hi brother T8 sorry to bother you. If Jesus was with the same glory before the foundations of the world is it not ridiculous to say “Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” achieved through obedience and humility?


    Why can't he be in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began and in addition to being humbled in the flesh and obedient, which taught him obedience which gains extra reward? After all do we not have salvation and receive on top of that reward for our obedience and good works?

    The only time you see contradiction is when you have already made up your mind to the contrary. But if you read it all as it is, then it all fits. I don't see what the problem is, unless you have been swayed by someone's teachings to see problems.


    So brother T8 you think that is the correct answer for my query and you blame me for not willing to take it?
    God knows who is correct. Let us leave it Him. Instead of conflicting each other.

    thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    I don't blame anyone for anything.

    Scripture clearly says that he EXISTED in the FORM of God which some translations say he EXISTED with divine nature. This is before he EXISTED in human nature. And we know that God made all things through him and that it was the Logos that God made all things through and that the Logos was with God and that Jesus is the Logos of God. And in case you thought the Logos was a plan, there are other scriptures that say that God made all things through Christ which also witnesses to him being the unique one of God.

    And it is not as if this is an isolated case. There are many references to Jesus being with God before the world began and that his origins are from ancient times. Please note that God has no origin, but Jesus origin is not 2000 years ago in a human body. There are too many scriptures that testify to this and to change all of them would be ruthless.

    Scripture says this and men can decide for themselves whether they accept it or not. It is easy to twist any scripture to say what you want it to say by injecting other things that are not mentioned. It the same with getting vinegar from a sponge. A sponge first needs to be soaked in vinegar in order to squeeze vinegar from a sponge.

    Jesus said before Abraham I am. He said a lot of things that indicated who he was and where he came from and when.

Viewing 20 posts - 9,941 through 9,960 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account