Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,801 through 7,820 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #200793
    JustAskin
    Participant

    What a waste of a bad talent – the “bad penny” jamming the coin slot of truth.

    I have been for a long time thinking that KJ and WJ were here just to keep a TTT going so that AntiTrinitarians would have a 'resistance' to work against (Not a bad idea…! Hey, Keep on keeping on – you doing a brilliantly bad job!)

    #200808
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 30 2010,06:31)
    What a waste of a bad talent – the “bad penny” jamming the coin slot of truth.

    I have been for a long time thinking that KJ and WJ were here just to keep a TTT going so that AntiTrinitarians would have a 'resistance' to work against (Not a bad idea…! Hey, Keep on keeping on – you doing a brilliantly bad job!)


    I think we are doing a pretty good job. You have virtually ceased from giving biblical explanations and have resorted to being a funny man. In other words, we have pretty much shut your mouth.

    Mikeboll is making more gaffe statements inwhich he admits that he has no scriptural proof for his beliefs on monogenes. He relies heavily on Eusebius and now it appears that he will introduce UNRELATED archaeological “evidence”. So Mike is losing the battle on the scripture front. t8 is asking me the same question over and over and over again. He has not answered my chief point about the petitioning of the Son of God in prayer (1 John 5:13-15).

    You: Funny man statements most of the time

    Mikeboll: Admits that he lacks scriptural proof; relies heavily on one church father-a trintiarian; now wants to introduce UNRELATED archaeological 'evidence' from Hebrew predacessors in a new debate.

    t8: Can't get commmentary out of him on 1 John 5:13-15 which talks about praying to Jesus and asking Him for things.

    Seems to me like WJ and I are doing a pretty good job and any objective person who passes through this board and reads the posts knows it.

    Either WJ and I are good or you guys are just bad apologists. At any rate, you're all getting your tushes kicked.

    It feels good to beat my chest once in a while. But I won't make a habit of it like Mikeboll.

    KJ

    #200810
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 30 2010,06:31)
    What a waste of a bad talent – the “bad penny” jamming the coin slot of truth.

    I have been for a long time thinking that KJ and WJ were here just to keep a TTT going so that AntiTrinitarians would have a 'resistance' to work against (Not a bad idea…! Hey, Keep on keeping on – you doing a brilliantly bad job!)


    JA……..Now that is something we do both completely agree on brother.

    peace and love……………………..gene

    #200811
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 30 2010,07:28)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 30 2010,06:31)
    What a waste of a bad talent – the “bad penny” jamming the coin slot of truth.

    I have been for a long time thinking that KJ and WJ were here just to keep a TTT going so that AntiTrinitarians would have a 'resistance' to work against (Not a bad idea…! Hey, Keep on keeping on – you doing a brilliantly bad job!)


    JA……..Now that is something we do both completely agree on brother.

    peace and love……………………..gene


    Gene,

    Read the facts in my post immediately above.

    KJ

    #200813
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KJ,
    You must have sore hands from patting yourself on the back so much.
    But truth is the aim not self satisfaction.

    #200826
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 30 2010,03:57)
    Martian said:

    Quote
    Christ as a God brings all he did, as an example, into question. There is no way of knowing if he did the things via his humanity or via his deity. With Christ as a God how can anyone know (without speculation) which of his natures overcame sin or rose from the dead or was one with God?


    This is the essence of our difference isn't it? You are a Rationalist and I am a Presuppositionalist.

    Rationalism: The theory that all religious knowledge must be deduced from logic alone

    Presuppositionalism: The theory that all religious knowledge must be deduced from scripture alone

    I know that Christ is God and I know that He was really tempted. And I know that He really overcame. I know these things because God said so.

    I fail to see how Christ as God brings His example into question. We discussed this last year and I told you that Christ as God become servant makes His example more meaningful. If His acts were performed as a mere servant, then He was just doing what He was supposed to do. But as God stooping down and becoming a servant His example has more command to it.

    For example, I used to be in middle management and I often stooped down and worked with my underlings. I had much more clout with them then anyone in upper management had. Why? Because I did that which I was not required to do.

    Your theory that Christ as God brings His example into question cannot be verified by human experience. A theory that cannot be verified by human experience must be discarded.

    But human experience has verified that when a superior stoops down and becomes a servant himself his example has more command with people.

    DEMONSTRATE YOUR THEORY OR DISCARD IT.

    the Roo


    You have shown no proof based on human experience.
    From scripture we know that we are to immolate Christ and use him as our example.
    In any process where you desire two identical end results you must begin with the same materials.
    You cannot make two identical pots of caramel by starting with sugar in one and salt in the other. If I were teaching a cooking class and I told my students to start with salt while I start with sugar. I can guarantee their result would not be identical to mine.
    The perfection and raising up of sons is a process just like cooking is a process. We are perfected by what we suffer and we are to grow in the favor of God and man.
    If you believe that Christ is our example, then to be an accurate and true example he must start from birth forward made of the same raw materials as us. How else can we duplicate the process if we start from two different material sources.
    WAIT — Before you run of with the tangent indicating that Christ was sin free and we are not, let me say this. —
    The second part of the Messiah's mission was to free us from sin and God's report of the success of that process is that our sins are as far as the East is from the West, never to be remembered against us. He who the son has set free is free indeed. We are free of all of our sins. He died once and for all. Even the sins we commit in the future are forgiven.

    So now because of the blood sacrifice we stand pure and undefiled before God. A new birth if you will. A new life. Now all we need is someone to show us a door that can be entered by a man and an example of a man actually doing it to give us hope and direction. We need an example of how a man walks with God on this Earth.

    All of human history proves my point.
    When you learned how to drive, did your instructor show you how to turn the wheel in a proper manner with your hands? What if he was crippled and drove with his feet. Could he exactly show you how to drive with your hands? What if he had some mental telekinetic power to move the wheel that you did not posses. Would that help you to learn how to drive with your hands? Of course not. He is going to instruct you in a way that you can duplicate. Just like Christ being normal humanity shows us how to walk with God in a way that we can duplicate.

    Your assumption that you are correct in Presuppositionalism: The theory that all religious knowledge must be deduced from scripture alone, is only as good as the accuracy of interpretation of said scriptures. The more your interpretation varies from the original intent the more your knowledge will be tainted. In 40 years of study, I have never met anyone who can 100% accurately interpret the meaning scripture. For this reason I choose another test for conclusions. They must fit to promote the general plan of God and they must bear good fruit. No accurate conclusion will leave large loopholes for the enemy to exploit. God is not the author of confusion.
    No accurate conclusion will diminish the example of Christ for the rest of humanity.

    In addition. I do not follow rationalism. I do follow reason which is the way in which God deals with us. “Come let us reason together”
    Secondly, I follow scripture based on the over all intent of God and not based on doctrine. The gospel message is all through scripture, interwoven through the history of man’s interaction with God. I do not form conclusions that are based on facts contrary to the overall plan of God.
    From almost the beginning God sent us examples from prophets to kings on how to live and walk with God in our Earthly life. None were perfect. Man was also instructed to do sacrifice for our sins through the Temple and the priests. With the coming of Christ both of these processes were made perfect. Christ dies once and for all as our blood sacrifice and was also the example of a human that actually accomplished walking as a perfected son.

    This statement is interesting. You say —
    “But human experience has verified that when a superior stoops down and becomes a servant himself his example has more command with people.”

    What have you compared? One human doing something as example to another human. Thank you for proving my point. It is not about one thing being more powerful then another it is about having something we can follow. It is not about proving the humility of the superior, it is about doing something the rest of us can do. In order for me to duplicate or immolate the actions of the superior, I must start as a superior.
    You and WJ follow a book about God and doctrines conjured up from that book and do not follow Christ. You cannot follow Christ because the doctrines you have conjured make humanity walk another path then Christ.
    I am not a rationalists. I am a follower. I follow a Christ that has previously walked this Earth being of the same material as I and overcame as my example.

    Either Christ starts from Birth a normal human with no superior knowledge or power not available to the rest of humanity or he cannot be an accurate example to us.
    Do not show me a Christ that knew he preexisted or I cannot follow him in like manner.
    Do not show me a Christ that is a hybrid creature part God and part man or God clothed in human or “god’s” flesh for that is nothing I can follow.

    #200833
    martian
    Participant

    Roo –
    Allow me to make comment on this subject —
    t8: Can't get commmentary out of him on 1 John 5:13-15 which talks about praying to Jesus and asking Him for things.

    13These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.
    14This is the confidence which we have before Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.
    15And if we know that He hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests which we have asked from Him.

    Let me ask a few questions to start –
    Who is the mediator between God and Man?
    Who was given all authority over heaven and Earth?
    Who was appointed judge of all the Earth?

    Answers?
    1.The MAN Christ Jesus. Whom else would we pray to? This requires no deity on the part of Christ.
    2.Christ. That authority had to be given to him from an outside source, He did not have it resident in himself.
    3.Christ. That appointment was not something derived from heritage but something earned. Plus that appointment was made by another source outside of Christ.

    Christ did not have the authority within himself to grant our requests. It was given him by God. Because he is human he is capable of sympathy with our plight and the perfect choice as our advocate before the father.

    #200840
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Martian said:

    Quote
    You have shown no proof based on human experience.


    And you have shown proof? You cannot verify from human experience that Christ as God calls His example in question. It is just theory sir! I have seen first hand the principle that when a superior stoops down and serves others that his example speaks loudly.

    Jesus' example has more command if He was God become servant then it would if He was just a mere servant. It has more command because He did not have to serve in the first place. Not only is this principle verified in human experience but it is also common sense. Your theory lacks both. Therefore, your theory is no good!

    When I left the company inwhich I was in middle management one of my underlings thanked me for pushing him to become better by my example. I managed by getting down there with them when I was not required. The other middle managers in the company could not get things done like I did and they had a whole lot of quality control problems. They managed by being above their underlings.

    Philippians 2 says that Jesus existed in the form of God but made Himself nobody and took upon Himself the form of a servant and BECAME obedient unto death. Jesus was not a servant. He BECAME a servant. He did not have to do it. He said that the Father would have given Him twelve legions of angels if He wanted. This proves that He did not have to do it.

    I wouldn't give you two cents much less my life for your isolated and uninvolved god. And don't you tell me I cannot verify my theory by human experience.

    My theory is verified by human experience. Yours is not. Therefore, yours must go.

    the Roo

    #200844
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KJ,
    So you reject the God of Martian and Jesus?

    #200845
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Martian said:

    Quote
    Let me ask a few questions to start –
    Who is the mediator between God and Man?
    Who was given all authority over heaven and Earth?
    Who was appointed judge of all the Earth?


    Martian,

    You claim to be the expert on Hebrew culture. In the Hebrew culture mediation had to occur by the kin of both parties.

    Hebrews 8:6-10 says that Christ is both the Mediator and God Himself:

    Quote
    6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.

     
    7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He (Jesus) says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah— 9 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the LORD. 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.


    Note that it is the Mediator who is saying, “I will make a new covenant” and “I will be their God.”

    How can Jesus be both the Mediator and God at the same time? Answer: In Hebrew culture mediation occurred by representation from both parties. Jacob and Laban had a dispute and it was mediated by the kin of both men (Gen. 31). So Jesus had to be God to represent God and also be man to represent us. Again, it is Christ the Mediator who is speaking in Hebrews 8 saying, “I will be their God.”

    So in Hebrew culture mediation occurred by the kin of both parties. Jesus was God's “kin” which means that He was God. He is also our “kin” which means that He is man like us. Jesus could not have been our mediator with God unless He was both God and Man in one person.

    It is as the “KIN” of both parties that Jesus Christ is the Mediator between both parties.

    Your points about His being “appointed” do not prove your antithesis. And your assertion that He cannot grant us anything of Himself is totally false. John said that if we ask anyting according to HIS WILL He hears us and grants our petitions.

    Prayer and petition is a form of worship is it not?

    the Roo

    #200846
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KJ,
    Cobblers.
    God is quoted in Heb 6 8-10

    #200848
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KJ,
    The prophets all represented God.
    None were God.

    #200853
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 30 2010,09:42)
    Martian said:

    Quote
    You have shown no proof based on human experience.


    And you have shown proof? You cannot verify from human experience that Christ as God calls His example in question. It is just theory sir! I have seen first hand the principle that when a superior stoops down and serves others that his example speaks loudly.

    Jesus' example has more command if He was God become servant then it would if He was just a mere servant. It has more command because He did not have to serve in the first place. Not only is this principle verified in human experience but it is also common sense. Your theory lacks both. Therefore, your theory is no good!

    When I left the company inwhich I was in middle management one of my underlings thanked me for pushing him to become better by my example. I managed by getting down there with them when I was not required. The other middle managers in the company could not get things done like I did and they had a whole lot of quality control problems. They managed by being above their underlings.

    Philippians 2 says that Jesus existed in the form of God but made Himself nobody and took upon Himself the form of a servant and BECAME obedient unto death. Jesus was not a servant. He BECAME a servant. He did not have to do it. He said that the Father would have given Him twelve legions of angels if He wanted. This proves that He did not have to do it.

    I wouldn't give you two cents much less my life for your isolated and uninvolved god. And don't you tell me I cannot verify my theory by human experience.

    My theory is verified by human experience. Yours is not. Therefore, yours must go.

    the Roo


    You say-
    And you have shown proof? You cannot verify from human experience that Christ as God calls His example in question. It is just theory sir! I have seen first hand the principle that when a superior stoops down and serves others that his example speaks loudly.

    Reply –
    And what example does that teach? Is it an example that others can follow? Not unless they can become superiors like yourself and then stoop down. In the sense of the plan of God does that even relate? Can we be Gods and stoop down to become servants?
    You produce an example that we cannot follow. You produce no fruit other then empty philosophy with no actual gain involved.

    You say-
    When I left the company in which I was in middle management one of my underlings thanked me for pushing him to become better by my example.

    Reply-
    Please explain how he could follow your example. Was he eventually elevated to middle management wherein he could follow your example?

    The humility you show as an example is just as applicable with Christ as a man. Christ was without sin and never gave up his position of dominion over the Earth. He had the right to Lord over the other humans that had failed through sin. He was righteous and knew it. Yet he did not use his righteous standing before God nor his authority given by God because of that righteous to overlord men. Neither did he use his authority to meet his own desires as the first Adam did. Instead he became a servant and obedient to the death. Christ did not want to die. He was asked by God to do so.
    Secondly you ignore even the most basic of principles of interpretation, that of context. What is the context of the scriptures in Phil. What does it say we should emulate? “Have this attitude in you that was in Christ.” That is the context. We are to have the same attitude as Christ. Can we do that if his attitude was derived from deity?
    The word “Attitude” in the context means “thinking”. In other words Christ gave up his own way of thinking what was right and wrong and obeyed God.
    Secondly – Your conclusion is based on the questionable assertion that God can give up being God. A theory that flies in the face of everything Christianity and Jewish faith has believed for 6000 years.
    You ask any Christian (outside of this discussion) if God can stop being God and they will tell you absolutely not.

    You say-
    My theory is verified by human experience. Yours is not. Therefore, yours must go.

    Reply-
    I have laid hands on the sick and they have recovered.
    How did I know that it was possible for me to yield to God’s power and to do that? Not because I saw a God do it, but because I saw my brother and fellow human do it.

    I have been used in prophecy (that has actually come true)
    How did I know that it was possible to yield to God’s power to do that? Not because I read a book and made an interpretation that a God did it, but because my brother and fellow human did it before me as an example of what I could do.
    I have overcome much sin and temptation in my life.
    How did I know that it was possible to yield to God’s power to do that? Not because I read about a God doing it, but because my brother and fellow human did it before me as an example of what I could do.

    You have consistently ignored or missed the point of my posts Your conclusions may make nice philosophies but they leave us with nothing that we can follow.
    I posted a few pages ago the meaning of follower. It means to travel along the same path as led by an example.
    To be a Christian means to follow Christ. To travel along the same path as led by example of His walk. Your conclusions from scripture make that impossible. No one can walk in the same path and manner as a God. Your conclusions are simply dogma for debate. I am much more interested in learning to walk with God using Christ as my example.
    I am talking about real Christianity. Not the silliness so often thrown about on head knowledge forums. I am talking about Christianity that actually has the potential of making us like Christ. That has the potential of teaching us by example how to walk with God as he did.
    Do you remember the sweetness of real Christianity? When Christ said follow me and we walked the same path in the same manner as he did? Do you remember that before you got all wrapped up in the intellectual pursuit of a book about God.
    Do you remember his hand reaching out to guide you in the same footsteps as he. Do you remember the sweetness and the honesty of that touch? Does it seem honest and just of that Christ, that lover of your soul, to ask you to follow if the path he walks can only be walked by a God?

    #200855
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 30 2010,10:08)
    Martian said:

    Quote
    Let me ask a few questions to start –
    Who is the mediator between God and Man?
    Who was given all authority over heaven and Earth?
    Who was appointed judge of all the Earth?


    Martian,

    You claim to be the expert on Hebrew culture. In the Hebrew culture mediation had to occur by the kin of both parties.

    Hebrews 8:6-10 says that Christ is both the Mediator and God Himself:

    Quote
    6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.

     
    7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He (Jesus) says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah— 9 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the LORD. 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.


    Note that it is the Mediator who is saying, “I will make a new covenant” and “I will be their God.”

    How can Jesus be both the Mediator and God at the same time? Answer: In Hebrew culture mediation occurred by representation from both parties. Jacob and Laban had a dispute and it was mediated by the kin of both men (Gen. 31). So Jesus had to be God to represent God and also be man to represent us. Again, it is Christ the Mediator who is speaking in Hebrews 8 saying, “I will be their God.”

    So in Hebrew culture mediation occurred by the kin of both parties. Jesus was God's “kin” which means that He was God. He is also our “kin” which means that He is man like us. Jesus could not have been our mediator with God unless He was both God and Man in one person.

    It is as the “KIN” of both parties that Jesus Christ is the Mediator between both parties.

    Your points about His being “appointed” do not prove your antithesis. And your assertion that He cannot grant us anything of Himself is totally false. John said that if we ask anyting according to HIS WILL He hears us and grants our petitions.

    Prayer and petition is a form of worship is it not?

    the Roo


    Your interpretation of what that scripture means is nothing of proof if it contradicts Christ as our example. Every verse you interpret must fit within the perameters of Christ as our example.
    You and I have contention on the meaning of several scriptures. You have your personal interpretation of scripture as your proof. All scriptural interpretation is subject to error. Your interpretation produces no fruit. It denies Christ as our example by making at least part of what christ did a result of his deity. The question is what part? It is open to guesswork and speculation. You cannot even say if Christ preexistence carried any advantage after his birth to Mary. Nor can you tell me what happened to that Christ that existed prior to his birth to Mary. More speculation and guesswork.

    I have the test of interpretation producing fruit within the plan of God as proof. My interpretations show how Christ is the perfect and accurate example for the rest of humanity. I am sure that I can do what Christ did because I believe him to be human like me. If he can do it so can I because he had no advantage or power not available to me. There is no question as to what God did and what man did. there is no speculation or guesswork. this gives me absolute hope that cannot be shaken by the enemy because of loopholes or questions that can be exploited.

    I do not know about you, but I would rather follow beliefs that actually produce fruit and further my journey along the path that Christ traveled.
    I could give a wit about speculative phylosophies based on personal interpretations that produce no fruit.

    Your doctrine echoes the serpent saying “Hath God said?”
    The serpent continues to question — “Hath God said you can really follow Christ as an example? How can you do that if he is a God. You are not a God so you cannot go on the same path as he. You cannot use him as your example for you because he is not like you.”

    Christ as God = Hath God said.

    #200887
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    martian……….Right on brother> If we do not see Jesus as a Man just like the rest of Us , we simply do not see Jesus. We look to Jesus because He is our (exact) representation to the Father of a human being Just as we are. He calls us alongside Him in fellowship with the FATHER, and himself. Good post brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene

    #200980
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 29 2010,10:05)
    Hog wash! It CLEARLY says that Christ is counted worthy of the glory of the builder because He IS the builder. The builder is God. Therefore, Christ is God.

    For this One has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as He who built the house has more honor than the house. 4 For every house is built by someone, but He who built all things is God.

    This is a clear cut assertion that Christ is God.


    You are abviously not aware that God made all things through Christ. Look up the word 'through'. Honestly roo, this shows how your logic works or should I say, doesn't work.

    But you are convinced in your own mind and not even scripture will change that I suppose.

    2 Corinthians 5:18
    All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation:

    Colossians 1:16
    For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities–all things have been created through Him and for Him.:

    So if Jesus is God because God made all things through Christ, then please explain why we are not Christ using your logic and applying it to the following:

    “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” …. Why do we doubt the promises made by God

    #200981
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 30 2010,15:38)
    martian……….Right on brother> If we do not see Jesus as a Man just like the rest of Us , we simply do not see Jesus. We look to Jesus because He is our (exact)  representation to the Father of a human being Just as we are. He calls us alongside Him in fellowship with the FATHER, and himself. Good post brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene


    If Jesus is really the same as us as opposed to existing in the form of God, emptying himself and coming in the flesh, then why do you even need to mention Jesus. What about Bob, Jack, or Bruce. If he is the same as us, them we are the same as him. So why talk about Jesus. There are like 6 or 7 billion other humans you could talk about.

    #200985
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 01 2010,00:58)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 30 2010,15:38)
    martian……….Right on brother> If we do not see Jesus as a Man just like the rest of Us , we simply do not see Jesus. We look to Jesus because He is our (exact)  representation to the Father of a human being Just as we are. He calls us alongside Him in fellowship with the FATHER, and himself. Good post brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene


    If Jesus is really the same as us as opposed to existing in the form of God, emptying himself and coming in the flesh, then why do you even need to mention Jesus. What about Bob, Jack, or Bruce. If he is the same as us, them we are the same as him. So why talk about Jesus. There are like 6 or 7 billion other humans you could talk about.


    Because Jesus is special in the fact that he was the first to complete God's plan for all of mankind. Paul says follow me as I follow Christ. Christ is the example, but others as examples are possible if they are following Christ.
    christ is the perfect and complete example even unto his death. Others can be examples in the areas wherein they are following Christ example.

    Secondly – christ is special for the other part of his two fold mandate. His mission as the Blood sacrifice. No other human has that calling.

    #200987
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8…….Jesus was GOD (FIRSTBORN) FROM the Human race to attain eternal life and immortality, How can you say we should not look to him then? He is our (exact) representation in every Way. Bother i do not follow you reasoning here, If you were lost in the mountains and a Man came and showed you the way out, because he had been there and understood it ,does that mean all men could have shown you the way out, NO so How can you say we should not listen to him. You argument makes no sense at all brother. Jesus (IS) our exact example of what we need to be and become, until we all come unto the (full) measure of Christ. You are really out on a limb on that one brother. IMO

    peace and love to you and your……………….gene

    #200989
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ July 01 2010,01:12)
    If Jesus is really the same as us as opposed to existing in the form of God, emptying himself and coming in the flesh, then why do you even need to mention Jesus. What about Bob, Jack, or Bruce. If he is the same as us, them we are the same as him. So why talk about Jesus. There are like 6 or 7 billion other humans you could talk about.[/quote]
    Because Jesus is special in the fact that he was the first to complete God's plan for all of mankind. Paul says follow me as I follow Christ. Christ is the example, but others as examples are possible if they are following Christ.
    christ is the perfect and complete example even unto his death. Others can be examples in the areas wherein they are following Christ example.

    Secondly – christ is special for the other part of his two fold mandate. His mission as the Blood sacrifice. No other human has that calling.


    Got ya.

    So those scriptures that say that God made all things through him and for him is hogwash then? And where it says that he existed in the form of God, emptied himself, and came in the flesh, and returned to the glory that he had with the Father before the world begun is hogwash too.

    And “He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” is just more of the same hogwash. As is Jesus saying that before Abraham was, I am.

    Tell me martian, why should I put your word above scripture?

    Your doctrine is alien which is appropriate given your chosen name.

Viewing 20 posts - 7,801 through 7,820 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account