Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,521 through 7,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #198007

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,18:00)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2010,09:14)

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,17:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2010,05:42)
    Jesus said…

    I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for “if ye believe not that I am he”, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24


    I believe that he is the Christ and the son of God. Do you really believe that? Or do you give lip service to that and say that he is also the God that he is suppose to be the son of. And how do you explain that confusion?


    t8

    Yes I believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the living God! :)

    So did John and Thomas!

    John said that he was the Word that was with God and was God, and that the Jews wanted to crucify him because he made himself “Equal to God” by claiming he was the Son of God!

    Would you crucify him like the Jews for claiming he was “Equal to God”?

    Thomas called him my Lord and God!

    Paul said he was his “Great God and Savour” the one that that purified a people to himself!

    Jude said he was his “Only Lord (Possesor) and Master the one that saved the children of Israel out of Egypt!

    Do you believe this? :)

    WJ


    Yes, WJ, I have heard your logic many times and once I myself was brainwashed by the Trinity Doctrine, so I knew about it then too. But it is deceptive. It ignores the vast majority of scripture and views a few scriptures using the Trinity Template.

    For us there is one God the Father and for you there are 3 who are God. That is it in a nutshell.

    There is us, and there are Trinitarians. If we take it that Paul wrote correctly.

    Also, if you believe that there is one God the Father, then no scripture is difficult. When you say that 3 are God, then you have great difficultly and confusion, and that is why you often hear the last line of Trinitarian defence that says, “God is beyond our understanding”. However, that statement ignores that we are revealing God using scripture and scripture is not beyond understanding.


    t8

    The scriptures are not difficult, it is only you and the unbelievers that find them difficult.

    Who hath bewitched you to accept another Jesus?

    WJ

    #198008
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,02:07)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 17 2010,22:31)

    Quote (t8 @ June 18 2010,13:44)
    From the beginning of this forum I have always held that Jesus existed in the FORM of God.
    That he was a divine being, but not the Divine himself.


    I wonder how you reconcile your statements with these three passages:

    “O Lord, there is none like You, nor is there any God besides You” 1 Chronicles 17:20

    “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isaiah 43:10

    “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me” Isaiah 46:9

    How do you?


    Hi Paul

    Exactly! They can't!

    t8 like others engage in the pick and choose method when looking at the scritpures!

    Or they make the scriptures of none effect when they say things like “We believe in only One True God, but we believe in other true gods!

    Its laughable! :)

    Blessings Keith


    Keith,

    Paul gave Isaiah 43:10 inwhich YHWH said that before and after Him there was no god “formed.” I give the LXX of Isaiah 43:10 below. Please note the word in bold which is “ginomai” and it means “to come into being.”

    43:10 γενεσθε μοι μαρτυρες καγω μαρτυς λεγει κυριος ο θεος και ο παις ον εξελεξαμην ινα γνωτε και πιστευσητε και συνητε οτι εγω ειμι εμπροσθεν μου ουκ εγενετο αλλος θεος και μετ' εμε ουκ εσται

    How many times have we heard many here say that Jesus is a god and that He came into being. Yet YHWH said that no god “came into being” before or after Him?

    Jack

    #198010

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,18:02)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 18 2010,09:58)
    Hi Is 1.18,
    Our Lord.
    But his God is our God.[Jn20]


    Yes, Is 1.18.

    Listen to the voice of reason and truth.

    God made Jesus Lord and Christ.

    Who is God if he made Jesus Lord.

    Did Jesus make himself Lord and Christ?

    It is a hard road fighting the truth Is.


    t8

    You are being disingenous.

    Was Jesus “Lord” before he “emptied himself”? (Phil 2:6-8)

    The context of the scriptures is speaking of his resurrection and the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecy when he was given back all that he had left to come in the flesh and be found in fashion as a man!

    You should use honest exegesis t8.

    WJ

    #198011

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 17 2010,18:18)
    WJ,

    Jesus did not claim to be God. The Jews SAID 'because you say you are the Son of God, you are 'implying' that you are therefore equal to God' But Jesus answered, 'WHAT OF IT if I say that I am the Son of God. Did 'He' (God himself) not call 'THEM' also, 'gods', them unto whom the Word of God came.'?

    How on earth is this making claim that anyone is saying Jesus is God, when thd very one who is the unlying, fully truthfull, always righteous, God fearing, perfect Servant, he, himself says, 'No, i am the son of God by virtue of having the Word of God given to me, just as 'they (Moses, the prophets, Abraham, Noah, Isaac, Jacob, David, Solomon, others…) were, i am the Son of God and yet you rightly don't make claim that 'they' are also 'equal to God', do you?


    JA

    Thomas said he was “His God” and John said that he was making himself equal to God! John 20:28 – John 5:18.

    WJ

    #198014

    Quote (martian @ June 17 2010,19:05)

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 18 2010,09:19)
    WJ,

    Thomas asked Jesus to prove himself. Jesus' response does not credit Thomas for his exultation but, in fact, condemns him: 'For you believe because you have seen [and touched]. BLESSED are those who have not seen and yet believe'. Thomas was NOT blessed for his realisation.


    Thomas looked at Christ and saw his human Lord and Master and saw dwelling in him YHWH. Lord And God. This is no uncommon act. Everyone who claims to be a Christian should manifest their God. God should be revealed through us. We are to be filled with all the fullness of God and to the stature of Jesus Christ. If He is God that commandment makes no sense at all.


    Thomas specifically calls Jesus his Lord and his God.

    And Thomas answered and SAID UNTO HIM, My Lord and my God. John 20:28

    Has anyone ever “said to you” my Lord and my God?  :D

    WJ

    #198015

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,20:47)
    Basic stuff, but I need to remind some of these truths.

    God is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
    Jesus is the son of God.
    Jesus is the messiah and was sent by God.
    God is a Spirit.
    Jesus has a spirit.
    Each of us have a spirit.

    We are one in spirit.

    Throw the Trinity away. It is a useless theory that needs many assumptions before it even looks like it is standing. Even then, you could take any one of hundreds of scriptures and it falls down.

    No point in trying to prop up something that has no true foundation.


    Hi everyone.

    No, believe the scritpures that says Jesus is the Mighty God!

    Do not listen to the voice of a stranger that diminishes the nature of Jesus to being some sort of demi god.

    For it will only lead down the path that you see Jesus as just a mere man and therefore create a false image of who the Father and Jesus and the Holy Spirit is.

    Jesus is the “image of the invisible God” or the visible image of God, and to see him as less than God is to create a false image of God!

    Jesus is the True God. Isa 9:6 – John 1:1-14 -Tit 2:13 2 Peter 1:1 – 1 John 5:20 – Rev 1:8 just to mention a few!

    Blessings WJ

    #198017

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,18:20)
    WJ, would prefer to take any stance that backs his view. And if truth is a casualty, then so be it. That is how it appears to me.


    No!

    WJ would rather stand on scriptures that says Jesus is my Lord and My God. Jesus is the Mighty God and he is my Mighty God. Jude 1:4,5 John 20:28, Isa 9:6.

    That is scritpure isn't it t8?

    WJ

    #198030
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,02:17)

    Quote (martian @ June 17 2010,19:33)
    I IN NO WAY IMPLIED TWO SAVIORS. GOD IS THE ONLY SAVIOR. He may except the sacrifice of Christ as payment for our redemption and save us for Christ sake.
    Jesus paid a price acceptable to God and God saves us even as he saved Christ from death when he raised him from the dead.


    Martian

    You are contradicting yourself! You say that YHWH is the only Savour, yet you say that Jesus paid the price for our salvation.

    In other words without Jesus paying the price for our salvation we would not be saved.

    You might have a point if the scriptures did not say that Jesus IS our personal Savour and that “HE SAVED US WITH HIS OWN BLOOD”!

    Live with your contradictions, for no mere man could pay the price to save us as the scritpures clearly teach!

    Therefore Jesus is God!

    WJ


    You spend so much time defending your doctrine that you have missed very important aspects of the relationship that God desires to have with man.
    You do not seem to get it that paramount in God’s plan is to work with man to accomplish God’s goals in His creation. In fact the Word “faith” in the Hebrew means working with God.
    You do not want to see that all the men in the OT that I posted previously that were called savior or called to do saving work cooperated with God to accomplish their mutual goals. This is primary in the Father – son relationship They work together for the benefit of the entire household. It is unfortunate that you do not understand these types of relationships.
    Jesus, like those mentioned in the OT, worked with his father to do the work of salvation. The fact that Christ forgave sins and even raised Lazarus from the dead does not deter from his humanity in that he said many times that he only did what his father instructed him to do. He always gave credit to his father for the power that was in him to do the works. He said his father is working and so is he. They both had a part to share in the mission of the Messiah. In most cases the work of deity was done through Christ but by God himself. The work of humanity was done by Christ for God.
    There are not two saviors. There is one, YHWH. Christ is called savior because the work was done through him.
    When the high priest made sacrifice for the sins of Israel. The people paid the price with the spotless lamb but it was God that accepted it and gave forgiveness. Christ paid the price with his own blood, God accepted it as a pure sacrifice and gave forgiveness.

    NOW ENOUGH OF ANSWERING YOUR SIDETRACK.
    From my original post. What is the context of psalms 49? Is the context about men trying to buy their salvation with wealth or not? And in the middle of this context God tells them that no man can pay for salvation for themselves or others. Attempt to pay with what? Worldly wealth. It has nothing to do with what the man Christ paid.

    #198031

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2010,10:50)

    Quote (t8 @ June 17 2010,18:20)
    WJ, would prefer to take any stance that backs his view. And if truth is a casualty, then so be it. That is how it appears to me.


    No!

    WJ would rather stand on scriptures that says Jesus is my Lord and My God. Jesus is the Mighty God and he is my Mighty God. Jude 1:4,5 John 20:28, Isa 9:6.

    That is scritpure isn't it t8?

    WJ


    t8

    Is Jesus the “Mighty God”?

    Is he your “Mighty God”?

    If you say no, then you are the one that denys the scriptures!

    WJ

    #198034

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,11:55)
    NOW ENOUGH OF ANSWERING YOUR SIDETRACK.
    From my original post. What is the context of psalms 49? Is the context about men trying to buy their salvation with wealth or not?  And in the middle of this context God tells them that no man can pay for salvation for themselves or others. Attempt to pay with what? Worldly wealth. It has nothing to do with what the man Christ paid.


    Martian

    You are creating a smoke screen and a strawman.

    It doesn't matter if men were trying to buy their salvation with wealth or riches or with their own life and blood!

    No mortal man could pay the price for sin even with his own blood.

    For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God.

    Jesus is not a Savour by proxy as you have tried to portray him.

    He is “The Savour” who saved us with his own life and blood!

    Scripture clearly teaches there is only “One Savour”.

    But you are side stepping this fact!

    WJ

    #198036
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,02:17)

    Quote (martian @ June 17 2010,19:33)
    I IN NO WAY IMPLIED TWO SAVIORS. GOD IS THE ONLY SAVIOR. He may except the sacrifice of Christ as payment for our redemption and save us for Christ sake.
    Jesus paid a price acceptable to God and God saves us even as he saved Christ from death when he raised him from the dead.


    Martian

    You are contradicting yourself! You say that YHWH is the only Savour, yet you say that Jesus paid the price for our salvation.

    In other words without Jesus paying the price for our salvation we would not be saved.

    You might have a point if the scriptures did not say that Jesus IS our personal Savour and that “HE SAVED US WITH HIS OWN BLOOD”!

    Live with your contradictions, for no mere man could pay the price to save us as the scritpures clearly teach!

    Therefore Jesus is God!

    WJ


    In the temple spotless lambs were sacrificed for the forgiveness of sins on the day of atonement. The lambs did not do the actual forgiving work. The were a fitting sacrifice to God who then did the forgiving.

    It is the same with Christ. He was a fitting sacrifice for no man deserved to live forever more then him. No mad deserved less the cruel death inflicted upon him. Even Pilot proclaimed him innocent and said he had done nothing to deserve death.
    No man can pay silver and Gold for salvation but one perfect spotless lamb can pay the price with his own blood. Christ is that lamb.

    17Since you call on a Father who judges each man's work impartially, live your lives as strangers here in reverent fear. 18For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your forefathers, 19but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect. 20He was chosen before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake. 21Through him you believe in God, who raised him from the dead and glorified him, and so your faith and hope are in God.

    Our faith and hope is in God who raised christ from the dead and glorified him. WHY? Because a human being fully like us was raised from the dead and glorified. For this reason we can have hope. If a God was raised from the dead (assuming a God can die) we can take no solace or have any hope of our own ressurection and glorification.
    .

    #198037
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,04:19)

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,11:55)
    NOW ENOUGH OF ANSWERING YOUR SIDETRACK.
    From my original post. What is the context of psalms 49? Is the context about men trying to buy their salvation with wealth or not?  And in the middle of this context God tells them that no man can pay for salvation for themselves or others. Attempt to pay with what? Worldly wealth. It has nothing to do with what the man Christ paid.


    Martian

    You are creating a smoke screen and a strawman.

    It doesn't matter if men were trying to buy their salvation with wealth or riches or with their own life and blood!

    No mortal man could pay the price for sin even with his own blood.

    For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God.

    Jesus is not a Savour by proxy as you have tried to portray him.

    He is “The Savour” who saved us with his own life and blood!

    Scripture clearly teaches there is only “One Savour”.

    But you are side stepping this fact!

    WJ


    It is not a strawman to actually quote scriptures within their context. You have still thrown up a sidetrack. You refuse to admit that the context of psalm 49 is about attempting to but salvation with wealth. Is it about that or not!!! NO MORE DANCING AROUND THE SUBJECT. Will you admit that you took the verse out of context?

    #198045
    martian
    Participant

    Perhaps some cannot see what I am attempting to do. Let me explain.
    On several occasions I have posted reasonable principles for interpreting and understanding scripture. First and foremost among them is to not make a conclusion about a scripture that goes against the context of the verse in question. When I have posted these principle WJ has agreed with them. YET — Here is a clear example of WJ and others pulling a scripture out of psalms 49 that is clearly talking about attempting to buy salvation with worldly wealth and applying it to the situation of Christ blood price. He will not admit that he pulled this verse out of context or even admit the context of the verse. He is talking out of both sides of his mouth. His interpretation principles are in great question. With that being the case how can one trust his conclusions?

    After three years on this board I realize that he will not change. He is unwilling to change no matter how wrong he is proven. I know I am casting my pearls before the swine. I know it is useless BUT sometimes entertaining to watch them wallow in the muck and mire.

    #198046
    martian
    Participant

    Now WJ. You can pontificate all you want. I have other things to do right now.

    #198049
    martian
    Participant

    Salvation requires a blood sacrifice.
    Hebrews 9:22
In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

    But whose blood? Some would have you believe that it has to be the blood of God himself. It is pretty presumptuous for anyone to say they require God to bleed to forgive them. Secondly it is not up to us what sacrifice God requires.
    Romans 3:25
God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished
    Did God present himself as a sacrifice of attonement?
    Hebrews 9:14
How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!
    Did Christ “the God” offer himself to himself?

    #198056

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,12:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,04:19)

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,11:55)
    NOW ENOUGH OF ANSWERING YOUR SIDETRACK.
    From my original post. What is the context of psalms 49? Is the context about men trying to buy their salvation with wealth or not?  And in the middle of this context God tells them that no man can pay for salvation for themselves or others. Attempt to pay with what? Worldly wealth. It has nothing to do with what the man Christ paid.


    Martian

    You are creating a smoke screen and a strawman.

    It doesn't matter if men were trying to buy their salvation with wealth or riches or with their own life and blood!

    No mortal man could pay the price for sin even with his own blood.

    For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God.

    Jesus is not a Savour by proxy as you have tried to portray him.

    He is “The Savour” who saved us with his own life and blood!

    Scripture clearly teaches there is only “One Savour”.

    But you are side stepping this fact!

    WJ


    It is not a strawman to actually quote scriptures within their context. You have still thrown up a sidetrack. You refuse to admit that the context of psalm 49 is about attempting to but salvation with wealth. Is it about that or not!!! NO MORE DANCING AROUND THE SUBJECT. Will you admit that you took the verse out of context?


    NO!

    It is still the same thing! No man can save another man by wealth or riches or his own life.

    Will you admit that Jesus is your “Personal” Savour and that only God can be your Savour?

    WJ

    #198058

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,13:15)
    Salvation requires a blood sacrifice.
    Hebrews 9:22
In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

    But whose blood? Some would have you believe that it has to be the blood of God himself. It is pretty presumptuous for anyone to say they require God to bleed to forgive them. Secondly it is not up to us what sacrifice God requires.
    Romans 3:25
God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished
    Did God present himself as a sacrifice of attonement?
    Hebrews 9:14
How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!
    Did Christ “the God” offer himself to himself?


    Martian

    Make up your mind, is it the Blood of God or not. Is Jesus the sacrifice that the Father sent or not.

    Now explain how Jesus is our own personal Savour and redeemed us with “His own Blood”.

    WJ

    #198069

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,12:53)

    YET — Here is a clear example of WJ and others pulling a scripture out of psalms 49 that is clearly talking about attempting to buy salvation with worldly wealth and applying it to  the situation of Christ blood price.


    Hi All

    Notice everyone that it is Martian who is pulling scripture out of its context. This is usually the way ATs approach the written scriptures.

    The passages that Martian quotes are…

    Why should I fear in days of adversity,
           When the iniquity of my foes surrounds me,
      6Even those who trust in their wealth
           And boast in the abundance of their riches?
      7″NO MAN CAN BY ANY MEANS REDEEM HIS BROTHER
           Or give to God a ransom (Money or wealth) for him–
      8For the redemption of his soul is costly,
           And he should cease trying forever–

    The Psalmist is making the point that a man cannot be saved by “any means” of man because the price of his soul is too high.

    Jesus said what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and lose his own soul. Yet Jesus said a man can save his soul by taking up his cross and following him even to the death.

    This kind of devotion to a mere man that is demanded of Jesus would be considered blasphemous to Monotheistic Jews. For a man to require the soul of  another man to follow him even to the death would be of the Highest form of blasphemy!

    Jesus is our personal “Savour” who bought us with a price, the price of his “Own Blood” which is the Blood of God! Acts 20:28 – Titus 2:13, 14. Not only that, he redeemed us to be his very own!

    All things were made by him and for him! He is our Great God and Savour!

    WJ

    #198071
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,07:14)

    Quote (martian @ June 18 2010,12:53)

    YET — Here is a clear example of WJ and others pulling a scripture out of psalms 49 that is clearly talking about attempting to buy salvation with worldly wealth and applying it to  the situation of Christ blood price.


    Hi All

    Notice everyone that it is Martian who is pulling scripture out of its context. This is usually the way ATs approach the written scriptures.

    The passages that Martian quotes are…

    Why should I fear in days of adversity,
           When the iniquity of my foes surrounds me,
      6Even those who trust in their wealth
           And boast in the abundance of their riches?
      7″NO MAN CAN BY ANY MEANS REDEEM HIS BROTHER
           Or give to God a ransom (Money or wealth) for him–
      8For the redemption of his soul is costly,
           And he should cease trying forever–

    The Psalmist is making the point that a man cannot be saved by “any means” of man because the price of his soul is too high.

    Jesus said what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and lose his own soul. Yet Jesus said a man can save his soul by taking up his cross and following him even to the death.

    This kind of devotion to a mere man that is demanded of Jesus would be considered blasphemous to Monotheistic Jews. For a man to require the soul of  another man to follow him even to the death would be of the Highest form of blasphemy!

    Jesus is our personal “Savour” who bought us with a price, the price of his “Own Blood” which is the Blood of God! Acts 20:28 – Titus 2:13, 14. Not only that, he redeemed us to be his very own!

    All things were made by him and for him! He is our Great God and Savour!

    WJ


    Excellent post WJ!

    #198072
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Martian, WJ,

    “Life is in the Blood”

    God required a 'Pure Blood Sacrifice' to atone for the Sin of Adam but none of man was found.

    So a pure, spotless animal was used instead, but as Scripture says, 'If animal sacrifice was 'acceptable' to God then 'we' would not have remained in sin to this day'…

    'Only the 'pure unblemished blood' of a Son of God was acceptable.

    Sin and death by the unrighteous act of the first Son of God.
    Salvation and Life by the righteousness and Death of the Second Son of God.

Viewing 20 posts - 7,521 through 7,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account