Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,961 through 5,980 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #164401

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 15 2009,01:18)
    yes i can;

    paul was telling the truth ;Paul never forget to mention the thank to his God the father who is the one who as the will and power to make it all come trough and thanks to the Son for willingly having given is live in ransom for us Jesus christ.


    Yes of course we are to give the Son the same honour as we do the Father. John 5:23

    In fact look who it is sitting in the throne with the Father being praised and worshipped!

    And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, AND UNTO THE LAMB FOR EVER AND EVER. Rev 5:13

    WJ

    #164403

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 15 2009,01:26)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,12:09)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 15 2009,00:45)
    Worshipping Jesus wrote:

    Quote

    “No other DIVINE BEING except the Father and Jesus (who are “One”) is called “Theos” by the Father or the Apostles or any followers of Jesus in the NT.”, unless you believe Jesus is not Divine?

    There are others but Jesus and God that are called “theos” in the New Testament.  It does not mean they are divine.  The writers were attempting to translate Hebrew ideas into the Greek language so “theos” is used equivalently to “elohim” and not necessary how the Greeks themselves would use it.

    It is used over 1000 times in the New Testament.


    Kerwin

    That still does not explain why the Apostles called Jesus “Their theos”, and never once ever mentioned any other as such but the Father and the Holy Spirit!

    Neither does any of the early church Fathers call any other their God BTW.

    WJ


    That is a little more information than I had before to go on.  I have not looked into the subject.  Thank for clarifying your point of view.


    Kerwin

    You are welcome!  :;):

    WJ

    #164405
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi WJ
    oh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
    Joh 14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

    Joh 10:29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
    Joh 10:30 I and my Father are one.

    went the diciples say” who my God” to Jesus they must understand what they instruction they recieved from the Son of the Father.
    and see in the spirit of truth.

    #164408

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 15 2009,01:41)
    hi WJ
    oh 14:9  Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
    Joh 14:10  Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

    Joh 10:29  My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
    Joh 10:30  I and my Father are one.

    went the diciples say” who my God” to Jesus they must understand what they instruction they recieved from the Son of the Father.
    and see in the spirit of truth.


    T

    How about if the Father calls him God?

    Isa 9:6, Heb 1:8.

    If the Father calls him God and commands the Angels to worship him then so should you and I!

    WJ

    #164411
    chosenone
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,17:21)

    Quote (chosenone @ Dec. 14 2009,19:04)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,08:36)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 14 2009,16:26)

    hi wj
    God is not a trinity,you make Christ a liar look John 14;28
    Joh 14:28  Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.


    terraricca

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 14 2009,16:26)
    hi wj
    God is not a trinity,


    Presto, terraricca knows everything about the nature of God.

    terraricca also denys scripture that say Jesus is God.

    Presto the Trintarian debate is finished because terraricca says so.

    :p  :p  :p

    But, terraricca cannot explain why Paul and the Apostles say things like…

    while we wait for the blessed hope–the glorious appearing of “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, Titus 2:13

    WJ


    JW.

      You quote Titus2:13, as an argument for the trinity, that if read in context, and correctly translated thusly:

    Titus2:9-13…  9 Slaves are to be subject to their own owners, to be well-pleasing in all things, not contradicting;
    10 not embezzling, but displaying all good faithfulness, that they may be adorning the teaching that is of God, our Saviour, in all things.
    11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
    12 training us that, disowning irreverence and worldly desires, we should be living sanely and justly and devoutly in the current eon,
    13 anticipating that happy expectation, even the advent of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ,

      I believe this is identifying our “great God” and our “Saviour Jesus Christ” (both).  Not our “great God and Saviour” (one)

      The same as 1Tim4:9-11… 9 Faithful is the saying and worthy of all welcome
    10 (for for this are we toiling and being reproached), that we rely on the living God, Who is the Saviour of all mankind, especially of believers.
    11 These things be charging and teaching.
      Notice… God, who is the saviour of all mankind…

    Blessings.


    CO

    Nowhere does the scriptures claim we are looking for the Father to come again or to appear! The word “Appear” in the verse in every case it is used in the NT is speaking of Jesus!

    The Grandville Sharp rule is at play in the verse which means since there is only one article for the words “God and Saviour” they are the same referent.

    The GSR has never been refuted!

    WJ


    JW.
    Where did I say “That we are looking for the Father to come again and appear”? You didn't read my post correctly, the word used in scripture, correctly translated, is not 'appear', but …”verse 13, anticipating that happy expectation, even the “advent” of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”.
    Correct translation is manditory for correct understanding.

    Blessings.

    #164416
    david
    Participant

    Is saying “he will be called” the same as calling him “God” himself? In Is 9:6, the Father does not call Jesus God.
    And of course, in Heb 1:8, there is an alternate translation.
    http://www.carm.org/religio….-throne

    Quote
    In this particularly interesting verse, God is addressing the Son. The Greek construction of Hebrews 1:8 allows the text to be translated in two legitimate ways:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….
    and
    “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”

    But because of the Watchtower presupposition that Jesus is not God, they choose the first version,

    …..and conversely, because most every other translator is trinitarian, they choose the “Jesus is God” translation.

    So, in Is 9:6, we certainly don't have Jehovah 'calling' Jesus his God, or even God. We have the text saying that he would be called “mighty god.”
    And of course, Heb 1:8 has two possible translations.

    But what we do know, and we know without question, is that very very clearly, and without dispute, about 4 or 5 times, Jesus referred to the Father as his “God.”

    It has never been the other way around.

    Quote
    If the Father calls him God and commands the Angels to worship him then so should you and I!


    Please don't let WJ deceive you with empty words. Please go to the “worship” thread and study the word “proskyneo.” It's basic meaning is not “worship” but rather “bow down, do obeisance” but can and often does mean worship…once again, depending on what mood the translator is in….a trinitarian mood, or a non-trinitarian one.

    david.

    #164417

    Quote (chosenone @ Dec. 15 2009,01:52)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,17:21)

    Quote (chosenone @ Dec. 14 2009,19:04)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,08:36)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 14 2009,16:26)

    hi wj
    God is not a trinity,you make Christ a liar look John 14;28
    Joh 14:28  Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.


    terraricca

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 14 2009,16:26)
    hi wj
    God is not a trinity,


    Presto, terraricca knows everything about the nature of God.

    terraricca also denys scripture that say Jesus is God.

    Presto the Trintarian debate is finished because terraricca says so.

    :p  :p  :p

    But, terraricca cannot explain why Paul and the Apostles say things like…

    while we wait for the blessed hope–the glorious appearing of “our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, Titus 2:13

    WJ


    JW.

      You quote Titus2:13, as an argument for the trinity, that if read in context, and correctly translated thusly:

    Titus2:9-13…  9 Slaves are to be subject to their own owners, to be well-pleasing in all things, not contradicting;
    10 not embezzling, but displaying all good faithfulness, that they may be adorning the teaching that is of God, our Saviour, in all things.
    11 For the saving grace of God made its advent to all humanity,
    12 training us that, disowning irreverence and worldly desires, we should be living sanely and justly and devoutly in the current eon,
    13 anticipating that happy expectation, even the advent of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ,

      I believe this is identifying our “great God” and our “Saviour Jesus Christ” (both).  Not our “great God and Saviour” (one)

      The same as 1Tim4:9-11… 9 Faithful is the saying and worthy of all welcome
    10 (for for this are we toiling and being reproached), that we rely on the living God, Who is the Saviour of all mankind, especially of believers.
    11 These things be charging and teaching.
      Notice… God, who is the saviour of all mankind…

    Blessings.


    CO

    Nowhere does the scriptures claim we are looking for the Father to come again or to appear! The word “Appear” in the verse in every case it is used in the NT is speaking of Jesus!

    The Grandville Sharp rule is at play in the verse which means since there is only one article for the words “God and Saviour” they are the same referent.

    The GSR has never been refuted!

    WJ


    JW.
      Where did I say “That we are looking for the Father to come again and appear”?  You didn't read my post correctly, the word used in scripture, correctly translated, is not 'appear', but …”verse 13,  anticipating that happy expectation, even the “advent” of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”.
      Correct translation is manditory for correct understanding.

    Blessings.


    CO

    Advent. Appearing, Event, is the same Greek word “Strong's G2015 – epiphaneia” and is found 6 times in the AV and in every case it refers to Jesus appearing (advent) and not the Fathers!

    WJ

    #164418
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    JW.
    Where did I say “That we

    WJ, you have to get yourself a new name. At least a few times, you have mistakenly been called a “JW.”

    #164419
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi WJ
    Isaiah annonces the comming of Christ,
    Heb;1 -8,9 read it totaly please
    Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
    Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

    also you have to understand ;
    Exo 4:16 And he shall be thy spokesman unto the people: and he shall be, even he shall be to thee instead of a mouth, and thou shalt be to him instead of God.

    this as to be seen whit the spirit of Christ

    #164423
    david
    Participant

    Remember, this verse could go either way:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….
    and
    “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”

    “When we look at the Hebrew, we see that there is no grammatical requirement for this translation, though it is considered to be the best translation by most translators.” ….because they are trinitarian, that is.
    http://www.carm.org/religio….-throne

    “Throne” figuratively signifies a seat of ruling authority (1Ki 2:12; 16:11) or the kingly authority and sovereignty itself (Ge 41:40; 1Ch 17:14; Ps 89:44); a reigning government or royal administration (2Sa 14:9); sovereign control over a territory (2Sa 3:10); and a position of honor (1Sa 2:7, 8; 2Ki 25:28).

    God is Jesus' seat of authority. It was God that gave all power over heaven and earth to Jesus. When we consider for a moment how “throne” is used in the Bible and what it represents, it becomes easier to see how this verse could be translated:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….

    ….meaning, God is the authority behind Jesus.

    Here's an example for those that didn't look up the scriptures above:
    And I will cause him to stand in my house and in my kingship to time indefinite, and his throne will itself become one lasting to time indefinite.”’” (1 chron 17:14)

    It's talking not about his actual physical throne, but about his rulership.

    #164426

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)
    Remember, this verse could go either way:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  
      and
      “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”

    “When we look at the Hebrew, we see that there is no grammatical requirement for this translation, though it is considered to be the best translation by most translators.”  ….because they are trinitarian, that is.
    http://www.carm.org/religio….-throne

    “Throne” figuratively signifies a seat of ruling authority (1Ki 2:12; 16:11) or the kingly authority and sovereignty itself (Ge 41:40; 1Ch 17:14; Ps 89:44); a reigning government or royal administration (2Sa 14:9); sovereign control over a territory (2Sa 3:10); and a position of honor (1Sa 2:7, 8; 2Ki 25:28).

    God is Jesus' seat of authority.  It was God that gave all power over heaven and earth to Jesus.  When we consider for a moment how “throne” is used in the Bible and what it represents, it becomes easier to see how this verse could be translated:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  

    ….meaning, God is the authority behind Jesus.

    Here's an example for those that didn't look up the scriptures above:
    And I will cause him to stand in my house and in my kingship to time indefinite, and his throne will itself become one lasting to time indefinite.”’” (1 chron 17:14)

    It's talking not about his actual physical throne, but about his rulership.


    Hey David

    Were you getting bored somewhere else or did you get kicked off somewhere for promoting your JW propaganda?

    Tell me David, why do you work so hard at saying the scriptures do not call Jesus “God” theos, when your own translation says that he is “a theos”?

    Shall we discuss your polytheism again? I can just paste the previous post and we can go around in circles if you like?

    WJ

    #164428
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Hey David

    Were you getting bored somewhere else or did you get kicked off somewhere for promoting your JW propaganda?

    No, WJ, after a while, I missed watching your brainwashing and evasion tactics, so I thought I'd come back and enjoy the show. I love how you can't stay on subject, or how you attack people almost racially whenever in a jam. Ahhh. Good times.

    Quote
    Tell me David, why do you work so hard at saying the scriptures do not call Jesus “God” theos, when your own translation says that he is “a theos”?

    I do not say, nor have I ever said (as you of course know) that Jesus is never referred to by the word “god.”

    But, given that Jehovah is referred to as God about 7000 times, don't you think it odd that Jesus is only clearly and without question referred to by that word a few times–literally, I can count them on one hand.

    I just want to keep things in perspective.

    Hey, I almost didn't notice that you made no attempt to actually comment on anything I said. You are good!

    david.

    #164434
    banana
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 30 2007,05:38)
    The belief that Jesus was alive before his conception raises a number of questions about his nature.  Is it possible to be a human being in any meaningful sense if one does not originate in the womb of one's mother?

    John Knox said this, “We can have the humanity of Christ without the preexistence and we can have the preexistence without the humanity.  There is absolutely no way of having both.”

    The Messiah, according to scripture was to be a descendant of David, of Abraham (Gal. 3:16), and the seed of the women (Gen. 3:15).  Paul constantly thinks of Christ as the last Adam (man).  If he existed as a person before his conception, in what sense is he – the real person – a human being and a descendant of David and Abraham?

    What do other's think?  If you believe Jesus existed prior to his birth, please give your scriptural understanding.  As most of you know, I contend for the Son of God beginning his life – for the first time – at conception.

    If Jesus is the Son, and words mean anything, a “son” is derived and dependent.


    Mandy

    I feel kind of silly to post in a thread, that has been going on for so long.
    If you believe Jesus had his beginning at his human birth, than how would you explain these scriptures?

    Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
    Col 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

    How could God have created all things through him, if he had not existed?

    Jhn 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
    Jhn 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

    How could God have send his son, how could God have given us his son, had he not existed?

    Jesus was a spirit being before he became human, when he became human, he was all human, not both.

    Hbr 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

    He was a descendant of David, but only on the mothers side.
    He is called a Son, because he is the only one God created himself; that is what the definition is in my dictionary, Father- he who gives life to the son. Son- he who receives life from the Father. He was not called Jesus before his human birth. John refers to him as the “Word”, the reason, the son, or an angel did all the talking. The son was the spokesman for God, because “no man” has ever heard the voice of the Father.

    Jhn 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.

    Notice, “at any time”, is any one doubting the word of Jesus?
    And yes, as a created being, spirit or human, Jesus “WAS” dependent on the Father. I said was, because now he is divine and immortal as his Father.

    Jhn 5:26 For as the Father hath life in himself (immortality); so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself (immortality);

    That was after he had finished his work here on earth; had he been immortal, which means, death is impossible, how could he have died for us? but that still does not make him equal to the Father; nothing and no one, will ever be equal to the Father.

    Georg

    #164457
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    CO  said to WJ:

    Quote
    Where did I say “That we are looking for the Father to come again and appear”?  You didn't read my post correctly, the word used in scripture, correctly translated, is not 'appear', but …”verse 13,  anticipating that happy expectation, even the “advent” of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”.
     Correct translation is manditory for correct understanding.

    CO,
    See Strong's3 2015. The word “epiphaneia” may be translated either way. What is your point?

    thinker

    #164458
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    CO said:

    Quote
    I believe this is identifying our “great God” and our “Saviour Jesus Christ” (both).  Not our “great God and Saviour” (one)

    CO,
    You are quite mistaken. “God AND Savior” mean one and the same.

    Heaven Net friends,
    Titus 2:13 is a direct assertion that Jesus Christ is God,

    Quote
    Looking for that blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ

    Note this grammatical rule right from the textbook,

    Quote
    If two substantives are connected by kai and both have the article, they refer to two different persons or things; if the first has the article and the second does not, the second refers to the same person (Syntax of the New Testament Greek, University Press of America, p.76).

    The textbook gives Titus 2:13 as an example of this rule,

    προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ

    I put the article which comes before “great God” in bold for you. And I also put the Greek “kai” in bold. There is no article before “Savior”. This means that the substantatives “great God” and “Savior” (Jesus Christ) are ONE AND THE SAME.

    This is right from the textbook!

    Yet the New World translation inserts a second definite article before the word “Savior” to make a distinction between God and Savior.

    Quote
    While we wait for the happy hope and glorious manifestation of the great God and of [the] Savior of us, Christ Jesus

    There is no second definite article before “Savior”. The NWT translators inserted the second article in brackets thus exposing their true agenda.

    thinker

    #164463
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    David said:

    Quote
    Remember, this verse could go either way:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  
     and
     “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”


    No David! The verse cannot go either way. The whole context is about the Father's spoken witness about the Son. Are you saying that the Father is speaking TO the Son GLORIFYING Him and then suddenly interjects a word about Himself which does not fit the progression of thought?

    Verse 10 blows your theory to hades because the author quoted the Septuagint version of the old testament which says “you Kurios in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth.” The Hebrew word is “YHWH”, the Septuagint uses “Kurios” and the author to the Hebrews applies “Kurios” to the Son. Therefore, the Son is YHWH!

    The NWT's rendering is totally without grammatical and contextual basis. Back to the drawing board for you David.

    thinker

    #164465

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)

    Remember, this verse could go either way:


    So you say and you’re lonely NWT that has been proven to be disingenuous in its Translation, maybe because there were no Hebrew and Greek scholars on the translating team.  :p

    Yep, I choose the legitimate translations on Biblegateway.com and Blueletterbible.org that were translated by real scholars over the NWT.

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  
      and
      “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”

    “When we look at the Hebrew, we see that there is no grammatical requirement for this translation, though it is considered to be the best translation by most translators.”  ….because they are trinitarian, that is.
    http://www.carm.org/religio….-throne


    Ah but you just said that it “could go either way”, yet now you seek to discredit real Hebrew and Greek scholars. BTW, we are not talking about the Hebrew in Heb 1:8 but about the Greek. The writer of Heb 1:8 under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit wrote it and in context would know more about the meaning of the Psalmist than you or the NWT translators.

    The Net, which is put together by more than 25 scholars – experts in the original biblical languages – who worked directly from the best currently available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts commented on the verse…

    24tn Or possibly, “Your throne is God forever and ever.” This translation is quite doubtful, however, since (1) in the context the Son is being contrasted to the angels and is presented as far better than they. The imagery of God being the Son’s throne would seem to be of God being his authority. If so, in what sense could this not be said of the angels? In what sense is the Son thus contrasted with the angels? (2) The μέν…δέ (men…de) construction that connects v. 7 with v. 8 clearly lays out this contrast: “On the one hand, he says of the angels…on the other hand, he says of the Son.” “Thus, although it is grammatically possible that θεός (qeos) in v. 8 should be taken as a predicate nominative, the context and the correlative conjunctions are decidedly against it. Hebrews 1:8 is thus a strong affirmation of the deity of Christ.

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)

    “Throne” figuratively signifies a seat of ruling authority (1Ki 2:12; 16:11) or the kingly authority and sovereignty itself (Ge 41:40; 1Ch 17:14; Ps 89:44); a reigning government or royal administration (2Sa 14:9); sovereign control over a territory (2Sa 3:10); and a position of honor (1Sa 2:7, 8; 2Ki 25:28).


    This point should be of some concern for the Arians because God does not share his sovereign Glory with another. Yet we see that Jesus post incarnation is seated at the right hand of the Father as our “Only Lord and Master” (Jude 1:4).  He returned to the Glory that he shared with the Father before the foundations of the world (John 17:3). And now at this time is not subject to the Father until all things are subjected to him, Jesus.

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)

    God is Jesus' seat of authority.  It was God that gave all power over heaven and earth to Jesus.  When we consider for a moment how “throne” is used in the Bible and what it represents, it becomes easier to see how this verse could be translated:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  

    ….meaning, God is the authority behind Jesus.

    Here's an example for those that didn't look up the scriptures above:
    And I will cause him to stand in my house and in my kingship to time indefinite, and his throne will itself become one lasting to time indefinite.”’” (1 chron 17:14)

    It's talking not about his actual physical throne, but about his rulership.


    Why do you Arians always refer to Jesus post incarnation when you speak of the Father giving him all authority and power. Remember it was Jesus who “emptied himself” and left his glory and power to be subject to the Father for a season in the flesh. Phil 2:6-8

    He had shared all authority and power with the Father before all things since he was the agent by and through whom all things were made!

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:12)

    Remember, this verse could go either way:


    But the evidence leans our way David, little wonder why all the other major translations render the verse the same.

    “On the one hand, he says of the angels…on the other hand, he says of the Son.” “Thus, although it is grammatically possible that θεός (qeos) in v. 8 should be taken as a predicate nominative, the context and the correlative conjunctions are decidedly against it. Hebrews 1:8 is thus a strong affirmation of the deity of Christ.

    But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. Heb 1:8

    So take your pick David, I have chosen mine!  :p

    WJ

    #164466

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 15 2009,12:26)
    David said:

    Quote
    Remember, this verse could go either way:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  
     and
     “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”


    No David! The verse cannot go either way. The whole context is about the Father's spoken witness about the Son. Are you saying that the Father is speaking TO the Son GLORIFYING Him and then suddenly interjects a word about Himself which does not fit the progression of thought?

    Verse 10 blows your theory to hades because the author quoted the Septuagint version of the old testament which says “you Kurios in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth.” The Hebrew word is “YHWH”, the Septuagint uses “Kurios” and the author to the Hebrews applies “Kurios” to the Son. Therefore, the Son is YHWH!

    The NWT's rendering is totally without grammatical and contextual basis. Back to the drawing board for you David.

    thinker


    Jack

    Excellent point about context and Heb 1:10.

    The obvious intent of the writer is to show the Deity of Christ.

    WJ

    #164473
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 16 2009,04:45)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 15 2009,12:26)
    David said:

    Quote
    Remember, this verse could go either way:

    “God is your throne forever and ever….  
     and
     “Thy Throne O God, is forever and ever…”


    No David! The verse cannot go either way. The whole context is about the Father's spoken witness about the Son. Are you saying that the Father is speaking TO the Son GLORIFYING Him and then suddenly interjects a word about Himself which does not fit the progression of thought?

    Verse 10 blows your theory to hades because the author quoted the Septuagint version of the old testament which says “you Kurios in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth.” The Hebrew word is “YHWH”, the Septuagint uses “Kurios” and the author to the Hebrews applies “Kurios” to the Son. Therefore, the Son is YHWH!

    The NWT's rendering is totally without grammatical and contextual basis. Back to the drawing board for you David.

    thinker


    Jack

    Excellent point about context and Heb 1:10.

    The obvious intent of the writer is to show the Deity of Christ.

    WJ


    Yeah Keith. Hebrews 1 is about the Father's testimony concerning His Son. David would have us to believe that in the middle of it God breaks the thought and says to the Son, “don't let My glorification of you here go to your head. Just remember who I am.”

    Then in verse 10 the Father confuses things even more by attributing the word “Kurios” to the Son from the Septuagint translation of “YHWH.”

    David needs for the Father to engage in double talk as his JW brethren.

    Jack

    #164487

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,02:17)
    Hey David

    Were you getting bored somewhere else or did you get kicked off somewhere for promoting your JW propaganda?


    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:28)

    No, WJ, after a while, I missed watching your brainwashing and evasion tactics, so I thought I'd come back and enjoy the show.


    You mean like the brainwashing the Watchtower has done on you and on the many other deceived JWs?

    The real show is to see you squirm when you are in a corner theologically and can’t get out so you just use a little magic and disappear for awhile to avoid the heat.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,02:17)
    I love how you can't stay on subject, or how you attack people almost racially whenever in a jam.  Ahhh.  Good times.


    This is laughable seeing how you attacked me from the start.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 15 2009,02:17)
    Tell me David, why do you work so hard at saying the scriptures do not call Jesus “God” theos, when your own translation says that he is “a theos”?


    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:28)

    I do not say, nor have I ever said (as you of course know) that Jesus is never referred to by the word “god.”


    And you call me evasive. Nice wording, why didn’t you just say…

    “”I do not say, nor have I ever said (as you of course know) that Jesus is never referred to as “a god”.

    That would be truer to the NWT wouldn't it?

    You Arians seem to have a problem with calling Jesus your “god” or “God”, could it be that you do not accept the scriptures that claim he is God!

    Oh I know you say that you can count them on one hand, but how many does it take David?

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:28)

    But, given that Jehovah is referred to as God about 7000 times, don't you think it odd that Jesus is only clearly and without question referred to by that word a few times–literally, I can count them on one hand.


    Yes of course that is if you presume that YHWH only means the Father and not Jesus who is the “Rock” that followed them in the wilderness (1 Cor 10:4), the Savior that delivered them (Jude 1:3, 4)

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:28)

    I just want to keep things in perspective.


    You mean the JW perspective!

    Quote (david @ Dec. 15 2009,02:28)

    Hey, I almost didn't notice that you made no attempt to actually comment on anything I said.  You are good!

    david.


    I was too tired last night to deal with your strawmen!

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 5,961 through 5,980 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account