Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,421 through 5,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #155856
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Monogenes?

    #155865

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 10 2009,00:57)
    Hi CON,
    Monogenes?


    Only Begotten!

    John 8:12 I am the Light of the world.

    Hebrews 11:17

    #155909
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    So begotten as a Spiritual Son from above at the Jordan when God proclaimed his sonship?
    It is the only sonship we can follow him into.

    #155926

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 10 2009,03:11)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 09 2009,23:24)
    Con, here is the post! Have at it!

    Hi All

    John 6:38-40
    For “I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will“, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that every one who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

    It is obvious what Jesus meant, but men who know nothing of the construction of the Greek have set out to make themselves greater than the truth by misinterpreting the clear meaning of the text in which the authors intended and which the translators translated.

    The Greek construction of the text concerning the preexistence of Jesus does not allow for a  “Unitarian” interpretation.

    The Greek for “I have come” is Strong's G2597 – katabainō which is defined…

    1) to go down, come down, descend
    a) the place from which one has come down from
    b) to come down

    In every place the word is used it is referring to a literal action by a person and not an abstract “thought or plan”“.

    katabainō  is in the “perfect” tense, and the “active voice” and the “indicative” mood!

    The perfect tense” in Greek corresponds to the perfect tense in English, and describes “an action” which is viewed as having been completed in the past, once and for all, not needing to be repeated.

    Jesus' last cry from the cross, TETELESTAI (“It is finished!”) is a good example of the perfect tense used in this sense, namely “It [the atonement] has been accomplished, completely, once and for all time.”

    Certain antiquated verb forms in Greek, such as those related to seeing (eidw) or knowing (oida) will use the perfect tense in a manner equivalent to the normal past tense. These few cases are exception to the normal rule and do not alter the normal connotation of the perfect tense stated above.

    The active voice” represents the subject as the doer or performer of the action. e.g., in the sentence, “The boy hit the ball,” the boy performs the action.

    The indicative mood” is a simple statement of fact. If an action really occurs or has occurred or will occur, it will be rendered in the indicative mood.

    For I came down (katabainō) from heaven”, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. John 6:38

    The same word is used here…

    And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God “descending (katabainō,)” like a dove, and lighting upon him: Matt 3:16

    And here…

    And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord “(descended (katabainō )” from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. Matt 28:2

    Was the Holy Spirit and the Angel a “thought or plan” come down from heaven? Or did they really descend from  heaven?

    Jesus said plainly that he came “From God” and “went to God”.

    Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that “he was come from God, and went to God“; John 13:3

    Again the Greek word come is in the “active voice” meaning Jesus did the action, and it is the indicative mood which means “the action really occurred”.

    When Jesus ascended to heaven., it was Jesus that did the ascending! The scriptures do not tell us the Father took him to heaven!

    Jesus words were clear, for he never said or even in the slightest way implied that he was or came from a plan or thought of the Father!

    Jesus puts the nail in the coffin for those who questioned what he was saying by the following words…

    What and if ye shall see the Son of man “ascend up where he was before”? John 6:62

    Again the word “Ascend” is in the present tense and active voice which means that Jesus is doing the action.

    Jesus is going to “WHERE HE WAS BEFORE”!

    Was he returning to a “plan or thought” or was he returning to the Father in heaven from where he came from and to the Glory that he had with the Father before the foundation of the world.

    John 17:5
    And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with “the glory which I had with thee before the world was“.

    The Greek word for “I had” is Strong's G2192 – echō which is defined as…

    1) to have, i.e. to hold

    a) to have (hold) in the hand, in the sense of wearing, to have (hold) possession of the mind (refers to alarm, agitating emotions, etc.), to hold fast keep, to have or comprise or involve, to regard or consider or hold as 2) to have i.e. own, possess

    Again “I had” is in the “imperfect tense”, the “active voice”, and the “indicative mood”, so there is no way Jesus was saying “I shared his glory because I was in his thought and plan”!

    To deny the preexistence of Jesus is to deny the simple truths of the scriptures that tell us that Jesus was with the Father in the beginning of all of creation!

    The Jews mumured among themselves because Jesus said he was the Bread of Life that came down from heaven and many turned back because it was a hard pill they could not swallow!

    John 6:61, 62
    When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? What and if ye shall see the Son of man “ascend up where he was before“?

    WJ


    “This is a hard saying, who can understand it?” asked the disciples (v.60).

    It was followed by one even more difficult: “What and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?”

    So ridiculous did this sound to some of Yeshua' disciples that they left him (v.66).

    And that conclusively proves that they knew nothing of the theory of a pre-existent messiah.

    Moreover, consider the title the Lord used.

    He described himself as “Son of Man.”

    Was the pre-existent one a Son of Man?

    Evidently he was if this reference is relied upon as proof of his supposed pre-existence.

    What did the Lord mean by these difficult sayings?

    They appear at the end of a long conversation with the Jews, based upon the giving of manna in the wilderness, and the circumstances provide the key to their meaning.

    The manna is described as “bread from heaven” (John 6:32), and the Lord likened himself to anti-typical manna or “bread from heaven” (vv. 32-33).

    Does this description mean that the manna was manufactured in heaven, at the dwelling place of 'elohim, and wafted down in a thick cloud every night through the illimitable spaces above to the wilderness below?

    Or did 'elohim send His spirit to earth, and there manufacture it?

    Undoubtedly the latter, as any reasonable person will concede.

    That is the sense, therefore, in which we must understand the Lord's allusions to himself.

    Co
    nsider the circumstances of his birth.

    The angel told his mother:

    “The holy spirit shall come upon thee, the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee, therefore that holy thing that shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of 'elohim” (Luke 1:35).

    Yeshua was “the only begotten Son of 'elohimd” and therefore from above.

    Paul taught that “'elohim was in the Messiah, reconciling the world unto Himself” (2 Cor. 5:19).

    That which was in the Messiah (the Spirit) had come down from heaven, and tabernacling in the flesh of Yeshua, ascended into heaven after his resurrection.

    That this is the true meaning, is shown by the explanatory words of the Lord himself.

    To the confused disciples he declared:

    “What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

    It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing” (John 6:62-63).

    'Elohim, by His spirit, descended to earth to provide one of the human race capable of conquering sin (see Ps. 80:17), and having done so, He withdrew this one to heaven, having changed his nature from a body of flesh to one of spirit, for it should be clearly understood that a spirit being is corporeal (1 Cor. 15:44-45).

    Thus the Spirit ascended where it was before, though in a different form.

    It descended as the power of 'elohim; it ascended as a Son of Man made immortal.


    Con

    Just as I thought. You ignore the clear meaning of the Greek text and explain it all away.

    They left him because they did not believe him. They did not believe him because they could not accept his clear teaching with the carnal mind. Unlike the 12 who stayed with him because he had the words of eternal life!

    Nice try.

    WJ

    #155927

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 10 2009,03:11)
    That which was in the Messiah (the Spirit) had come down from heaven, and tabernacling in the flesh of Yeshua, ascended into heaven after his resurrection.


    So the Fathers Spirit came in the flesh? John 1:14

    LOL, the Spirit was made flesh and dwelt (tabernacled) among us!

    WJ

    #155929
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Of course the conception of Jesus in the womb of Mary did not make him any different from you and I and it was the anointing at the Jordan that made him the light of the world, by the light of God's Spirit in him.

    #155930
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 11 2009,03:51)
    Hi CON,
    Of course the conception of Jesus in the womb of Mary did not make him any different from you and I and it was the anointing at the Jordan that made him the light of the world, by the light of God's Spirit in him.


    This is why scripture states the spirit descended and rested on Jesus at the Jordon.

    John 1:33(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

    It sounds different from what you state.

    #155931
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KW,
    Jesus and John were related and would have known each other well but it was not till the Spirit of God came on his cousin that he knew he was the Christ.

    #155933
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 11 2009,04:27)
    Hi KW,
    Jesus and John were related and would have known each other well but it was not till the Spirit of God came on his cousin that he knew he was the Christ.


    I was pointing out that it seems John is stating the reason the Spirit descends on Jesus and remains with him is so that John will know Jesus is the Anointed One.

    There is evidence John later had doubts.

    #155958

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 10 2009,13:00)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 10 2009,03:11)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 09 2009,23:24)
    Con, here is the post! Have at it!

    Hi All

    John 6:38-40
    For “I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will“, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that every one who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

    It is obvious what Jesus meant, but men who know nothing of the construction of the Greek have set out to make themselves greater than the truth by misinterpreting the clear meaning of the text in which the authors intended and which the translators translated.

    The Greek construction of the text concerning the preexistence of Jesus does not allow for a  “Unitarian” interpretation.

    The Greek for “I have come” is Strong's G2597 – katabainō which is defined…

    1) to go down, come down, descend
    a) the place from which one has come down from
    b) to come down

    In every place the word is used it is referring to a literal action by a person and not an abstract “thought or plan”“.

    katabainō  is in the “perfect” tense, and the “active voice” and the “indicative” mood!

    The perfect tense” in Greek corresponds to the perfect tense in English, and describes “an action” which is viewed as having been completed in the past, once and for all, not needing to be repeated.

    Jesus' last cry from the cross, TETELESTAI (“It is finished!”) is a good example of the perfect tense used in this sense, namely “It [the atonement] has been accomplished, completely, once and for all time.”

    Certain antiquated verb forms in Greek, such as those related to seeing (eidw) or knowing (oida) will use the perfect tense in a manner equivalent to the normal past tense. These few cases are exception to the normal rule and do not alter the normal connotation of the perfect tense stated above.

    The active voice” represents the subject as the doer or performer of the action. e.g., in the sentence, “The boy hit the ball,” the boy performs the action.

    The indicative mood” is a simple statement of fact. If an action really occurs or has occurred or will occur, it will be rendered in the indicative mood.

    For I came down (katabainō) from heaven”, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. John 6:38

    The same word is used here…

    And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God “descending (katabainō,)” like a dove, and lighting upon him: Matt 3:16

    And here…

    And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord “(descended (katabainō )” from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. Matt 28:2

    Was the Holy Spirit and the Angel a “thought or plan” come down from heaven? Or did they really descend from  heaven?

    Jesus said plainly that he came “From God” and “went to God”.

    Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that “he was come from God, and went to God“; John 13:3

    Again the Greek word come is in the “active voice” meaning Jesus did the action, and it is the indicative mood which means “the action really occurred”.

    When Jesus ascended to heaven., it was Jesus that did the ascending! The scriptures do not tell us the Father took him to heaven!

    Jesus words were clear, for he never said or even in the slightest way implied that he was or came from a plan or thought of the Father!

    Jesus puts the nail in the coffin for those who questioned what he was saying by the following words…

    What and if ye shall see the Son of man “ascend up where he was before”? John 6:62

    Again the word “Ascend” is in the present tense and active voice which means that Jesus is doing the action.

    Jesus is going to “WHERE HE WAS BEFORE”!

    Was he returning to a “plan or thought” or was he returning to the Father in heaven from where he came from and to the Glory that he had with the Father before the foundation of the world.

    John 17:5
    And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with “the glory which I had with thee before the world was“.

    The Greek word for “I had” is Strong's G2192 – echō which is defined as…

    1) to have, i.e. to hold

    a) to have (hold) in the hand, in the sense of wearing, to have (hold) possession of the mind (refers to alarm, agitating emotions, etc.), to hold fast keep, to have or comprise or involve, to regard or consider or hold as 2) to have i.e. own, possess

    Again “I had” is in the “imperfect tense”, the “active voice”, and the “indicative mood”, so there is no way Jesus was saying “I shared his glory because I was in his thought and plan”!

    To deny the preexistence of Jesus is to deny the simple truths of the scriptures that tell us that Jesus was with the Father in the beginning of all of creation!

    The Jews mumured among themselves because Jesus said he was the Bread of Life that came down from heaven and many turned back because it was a hard pill they could not swallow!

    John 6:61, 62
    When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? What and if ye shall see the Son of man “ascend up where he was before“?

    WJ


    “This is a hard saying, who can understand it?” asked the disciples (v.60).

    It was followed by one even more difficult: “What and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?”

    So ridiculous did this sound to some of Yeshua' disciples that they left him (v.66).

    And that conclusively proves that they knew nothing of the theory of a pre-existent messiah.

    Moreover, consider the title the Lord used.

    He described himself as “Son of Man.”

    Was the pre-existent one a Son of Man?

    Evidently he was if this reference is relied upon as proof of his supposed pre-existence.

    What did the Lord mean by these difficult sayings?

    They appear at the end of a long conversation with the Jews, based upon the giving of manna in the wilderness, and the circumstances provide the key to their meaning.

    The manna is described as “bread from heaven” (John 6:32), and the Lord likened himself to anti-typical manna or “bread from heaven” (vv. 32-33).

    Does this description mean that the manna was manufactured in heaven, at the dwelling place of 'elohim, and wafted down in a thick cloud every night through the illimitable spaces above to the wilderness below?

    Or did 'elohi
    m send His spirit to earth, and there manufacture it?

    Undoubtedly the latter, as any reasonable person will concede.

    That is the sense, therefore, in which we must understand the Lord's allusions to himself.

    Consider the circumstances of his birth.

    The angel told his mother:

    “The holy spirit shall come upon thee, the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee, therefore that holy thing that shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of 'elohim” (Luke 1:35).

    Yeshua was “the only begotten Son of 'elohimd” and therefore from above.

    Paul taught that “'elohim was in the Messiah, reconciling the world unto Himself” (2 Cor. 5:19).

    That which was in the Messiah (the Spirit) had come down from heaven, and tabernacling in the flesh of Yeshua, ascended into heaven after his resurrection.

    That this is the true meaning, is shown by the explanatory words of the Lord himself.

    To the confused disciples he declared:

    “What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

    It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing” (John 6:62-63).

    'Elohim, by His spirit, descended to earth to provide one of the human race capable of conquering sin (see Ps. 80:17), and having done so, He withdrew this one to heaven, having changed his nature from a body of flesh to one of spirit, for it should be clearly understood that a spirit being is corporeal (1 Cor. 15:44-45).

    Thus the Spirit ascended where it was before, though in a different form.

    It descended as the power of 'elohim; it ascended as a Son of Man made immortal.


    Con

    Just as I thought. You ignore the clear meaning of the Greek text and explain it all away.

    They left him because they did not believe him. They did not believe him because they could not accept his clear teaching with the carnal mind. Unlike the 12 who stayed with him because he had the words of eternal life!

    Nice try.

    WJ


    So you say.

    #155971
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Amen WJ!!

    #155973
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CON- Colossians 1;16 by Jesus all things were created in heaven. Visiable and invisiable, by him and for Him.(17) He is before all things and by Him all things consist.(Hmmm) Must pre-existed!

    #155980
    georg
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 30 2007,05:38)
    The belief that Jesus was alive before his conception raises a number of questions about his nature.  Is it possible to be a human being in any meaningful sense if one does not originate in the womb of one's mother?

    John Knox said this, “We can have the humanity of Christ without the preexistence and we can have the preexistence without the humanity.  There is absolutely no way of having both.”

    The Messiah, according to scripture was to be a descendant of David, of Abraham (Gal. 3:16), and the seed of the women (Gen. 3:15).  Paul constantly thinks of Christ as the last Adam (man).  If he existed as a person before his conception, in what sense is he – the real person – a human being and a descendant of David and Abraham?

    What do other's think?  If you believe Jesus existed prior to his birth, please give your scriptural understanding.  As most of you know, I contend for the Son of God beginning his life – for the first time – at conception.

    If Jesus is the Son, and words mean anything, a “son” is derived and dependent.


    Mandy

    Did not God, through his son (Jesus), create the universe from nothing? Do you think it would be a greater task to place his son as a sperm into the womb of Mary?
    He had to be all human because he came to die, take the place in the grave for a human;

    Hbr 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

    he was the exchange that took on all of our sins, and the penalty for sin is death.

    Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

    If you think it is no big deal for God to give you a spirit body after your resurrection, why should it be any harder for God to do it the other way around?
    The seed of David means, from the same blood line, not necessarily a direct descendant from David. Abraham of course is the father of the nation Israel.
    If Jesus began his life when he was born of Mary, God could not have send him, how can you send your son who is not yet born?
    Father: he who gives live to the son.
    Son: he who receives live from the father.
    That is why Jesus calls God his Father, and himself the son.

    Georg

    #155998
    Jodi Lee
    Participant

    Quote (georg @ Nov. 11 2009,15:28)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 30 2007,05:38)
    The belief that Jesus was alive before his conception raises a number of questions about his nature.  Is it possible to be a human being in any meaningful sense if one does not originate in the womb of one's mother?

    John Knox said this, “We can have the humanity of Christ without the preexistence and we can have the preexistence without the humanity.  There is absolutely no way of having both.”

    The Messiah, according to scripture was to be a descendant of David, of Abraham (Gal. 3:16), and the seed of the women (Gen. 3:15).  Paul constantly thinks of Christ as the last Adam (man).  If he existed as a person before his conception, in what sense is he – the real person – a human being and a descendant of David and Abraham?

    What do other's think?  If you believe Jesus existed prior to his birth, please give your scriptural understanding.  As most of you know, I contend for the Son of God beginning his life – for the first time – at conception.

    If Jesus is the Son, and words mean anything, a “son” is derived and dependent.


    Mandy

    Did not God, through his son (Jesus), create the universe from nothing? Do you think it would be a greater task to place his son as a sperm into the womb of Mary?
    He had to be all human because he came to die, take the place in the grave for a human;

    Hbr 2:16   For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

    he was the exchange that took on all of our sins, and the penalty for sin is death.

    Rom 6:23   For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.  

    If you think it is no big deal for God to give you a spirit body after your resurrection, why should it be any harder for God to do it the other way around?
    The seed of David means, from the same blood line, not necessarily a direct descendant from David. Abraham of course is the father of the nation Israel.
    If Jesus began his life when he was born of Mary, God could not have send him, how can you send your son who is not yet born?
    Father: he who gives live to the son.
    Son: he who receives live from the father.
    That is why Jesus calls God his Father, and himself the son.

    Georg


    Hi Georg,

    The Father was sending His PROMISE!! What part of the pre-existent son was the infant that sucked on his mother's boobie and crapped in his diaper? …….or whatever they had in those days=)  …seriously, come on, think about it! YHWH didn't send a pre-existent being to become an embryo, then a fetus, then an infant, then a boy, then a man. He sent into the world that which He had Promised, a human Messiah that would be to Him a Son because of his obedience as a MAN!

    Hbr 2:16   For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

    The “he” is not speaking of the pre-existing Jesus but the after- existing Jesus, the ….RESURRECTED Jesus, the human being raised flesh and bones… IMO!!

    #156007

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 10 2009,13:06)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 10 2009,03:11)
    That which was in the Messiah (the Spirit) had come down from heaven, and tabernacling in the flesh of Yeshua, ascended into heaven after his resurrection.


    So the Fathers Spirit came in the flesh? John 1:14

    LOL, the Spirit was made flesh and dwelt (tabernacled) among us!

    WJ


    Why you trying to make it magical with your hocus pocus ideas? 'Elohim with a word Yeshua was born in the flesh, and dwelt among them! Or, By the word of 'Elohim, Yeshua came into being! He was born! Or even, The word became life!

    Greek Study Bible (Apostolic / Interlinear)

    Καὶ ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο καὶ ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν, καὶ ἐθεασάμεθα τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ, δόξαν ὡς μονογενοῦς παρὰ πατρός, πλήρης χάριτος καὶ ἀληθείας.

    KJV John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory the glory as of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth.

    3056. logos

    “A word (as embodying an idea), a statement, a speech.”

    Original Word: λόγος
    Transliteration: logos
    Phonetic Spelling: (log'-os)
    Short Definition: word

    NAS Exhaustive Concordance:

    Word Origin, from legó

    Definition: a word (as embodying an idea), a statement, a speech.

    NASB Word Usage:

    account (7), account* (1), accounting (2), accounts (2), answer (1), appearance (1), complaint (1), exhortation* (1), have to do (1), instruction (1), length* (1), matter (4), matters (1), message (10), news (3), preaching (1), question (2), reason (2), reasonable (1), remark (1), report (1), said (1), say (1), saying (4), sayings (1), speaker (1), speech (10), statement (18), story (1), talk (1), teaching (2), thing (2), things (1), utterance (2), what he says (1), what* (1), word (179), words (61).

    Strongs Exhaustive Concordance:

    a word, the Word

    From lego; something said (including the thought); by implication, a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension, a computation; specially, (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (i.e. Christ) — account, cause, communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say(-ing), shew, X speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.

    Romans 1:3 concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh,

    1 John 1:1 What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the Word of Life!

    #156028

    Quote (katjo @ Nov. 10 2009,19:52)
    CON- Colossians 1;16 by Jesus all things were created in heaven. Visiable and invisiable, by him and for Him.(17) He is before all things and by Him all things consist.(Hmmm) Must pre-existed!


    Did Yeshua create the Earth?

    Colossians 1:15-18: By Yeshua Were All Things Created
    “The firstborn of every creature: for by (Yeshua) were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers; all things were created by him, and for him: and he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead…” (Col. 1:15-18).

    This is typical of those passages which can give the impression that Yeshua actually created the earth.

    1. If this were true, then so many other passages are contradicted which teach that Yeshua did not exist before his birth.

    The record in Genesis clearly teaches that 'elohim was the creator.

    Either Yeshua or 'elohim were the creator; if we say that Yeshua was the creator while Genesis says that 'elohim was, we are saying that Yeshua was directly equal to 'elohim.

    In this case it is impossible to explain the many verses which show the differences between 'elohim and Yeshua.

    2. Yeshua was the “firstborn”, which implies a beginning.

    There is no proof that Yeshua was 'elohim’s “firstborn” before the creation of the literal earth.

    Passages like 2 Sam.7:14 and Ps. 89:27 predicted that a literal descendant of David would become 'elohim’s firstborn.

    He was clearly not in existence at the time those passages were written, and therefore not at the time of the Genesis creation either.

    Yeshua became “the Son of 'elohim with power” by his resurrection from the dead (Rom. 1:4).

    'Elohim “has raised up Yeshua again; as it is also written in the second psalm, You are My Son, this day have I begotten you” (Acts 13:32,33).

    Thus Yeshua became 'elohim’s firstborn by his resurrection.

    Note too that a son standing at his father’s right hand is associated with being the firstborn (Gen. 48:13-16), and the Messiah was exalted to 'elohim’s right hand after his resurrection (Acts 2:32 R.V.mg.; Heb. 1:3).

    3. It is in this sense that Yeshua is described as the firstborn from the dead (Col. 1:18), a phrase which is parallel to “the firstborn of every creature” or creation (Col. 1:15 R.V.).

    He therefore speaks of himself as “the first begotten of the dead…the beginning of the creation of 'elohim” (Rev. 1:5; 3:14).

    Yeshua was the first of a new creation of immortal men and women, whose resurrection and full birth as the immortal sons of 'elohim has been made possible by the death and resurrection of Yeshua (Eph. 2:10; 4:23,24; 2 Cor. 5:17).

    “In the Messiah shall all (true believers) be made alive. But every man in his own order: The Messiah the firstfruits, afterward they that are the Messiah’s at his coming” (1 Cor. 15:22,23).

    This is just the same idea as in Col. 1.

    Yeshua was the first person to rise from the dead and be given immortality, he was the first of the new creation, and the true believers will follow his pattern at his return.

    4. The creation spoken about in Col. 1 therefore refers to the new creation, rather than that of Genesis.

    Through the work of Yeshua “were all things created. . . thrones. . . dominions” etc.

    Paul does not say that Yeshua created all things and then give examples of rivers, mountains, birds etc.

    The elements of this new creation refer to those rewards which we will have in 'elohim’s Kingdom.

    “Thrones…dominions” etc. refer to how the raised believers will be “kings and priests, and we shall reign on the earth” (Rev. 5:10).

    These things were made possible by the work of Yeshua.

    “In him were all things created in the heavens” (Col. 1:16 R.V.).

    In Eph. 2:6 we read of the believers who are in the Messiah as sitting in “heavenly places”.

    If any man is in the Messiah by baptism, he is a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17).

    By being in the Messiah we are saved by His death (Col. 1:22).

    The literal planet could not be created by being in the Messiah.

    Thus these verses are teaching that the exalted spiritual position which we can now have, as well as what we will experience in the future, has all been made possible by the Messiah.

    The “heavens and earth” contain “all things that needed reconciliation by the blood of (the Messiah’s) cross” (Col. 1:16,20), showing that the “all things…in heaven” refer to the believers who now sit in “heavenly places…in the Messiah Yeshua”, rather than to all physical things around us.

    5. If Yeshua were the creator, it is strange how He should say: “…from the beginning of the creation 'elohim made them…” (Mk. 10:6).

    This surely sounds as if He understood 'elohim to be the creator, not He Himself.

    And if He literally created everything in Heaven, this would include 'elohim.

    6. That “by him” is a poor translation is readily testified by reliable scholars. Take J.H. Moulton: “for because of him [Yeshua]…”; or the Expositor's Greek Commentary: “en auto: This does not mean “by Him””.

    It should be noted, as a general point, that 'elohim the Father alone, exclusively, is described as the creator in many passages (e.g. Is. 44:24; Is. 45:12; Is. 48:13; Is. 66:2).

    These passages simply leave no room for the Son to have also created the literal planet.

    James Dunn comments on Col. 1:20: “The Messiah is being identified here not with a pre-existent being but with the creative power and action of 'elohim. There is no indication that Yeshua thought or spoke of himself as having pre-existed with 'elohim prior to his birth”. Christology In The Making p.254.

    J.H. Moulton, Grammar Of New Testament Greek (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1963) Vol. 3 p. 253.

    W.R. Nicoll, ed., Expositor's Greek Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1967) p. 504.

    #156029
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    The Son was declared as His Son by God Himself at his anointing so his sonship in power began then and not at his resurrection.
    He was also proven to be the son of God [ps2] promised in 2 Sam 7 and Ps 89 and his resurrection proved those prophecies to be about him[Acts 2, Acts 13, Rom1]

    He is also the firstborn from the dead being first to receive the reward of eternal life, the firstfruits of God's promise..

    #156054
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    See how many scriptures contradict each other when you dont believe in the trinity!! God became flesh!

    #156056
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Kat,
    Jesus Christ came in the flesh.
    God, his Father came to dwell in him.
    God can also be dwelling in you [eph 3.19]

    Does that make you God too? Come out of her.

    #156067
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The word was God- became flesh! Old testament even shows us he would be coming.

Viewing 20 posts - 5,421 through 5,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account