Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 3,881 through 3,900 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #99931
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,02:39)
    I believe He was actually born of God Himself!


    Ah……I believe this too!!

    :)

    #99933
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,00:05)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,03:03)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:44)
    Although there have been 200 years of attempts to dislodge Sharp’s rule, all attempts have been futile. Sharp’s rule stands vindicated after all the dust has settled.


    This is certainly one opinion, and one opinion that happens to enforce your belief system.  However there are other's out there that would claim the opposite and I have read many of them.  One such argument against the GSR is presented by the CES folks and if you'd like I could copy their findings here.  But something tells me that your mind is made up and that is OK, too.


    Mandy,
    Sure, go ahead.  It is good to look at all angles.
    Kathi


    Hi Kathi,
    I couldn't find the link so I have to type this by hand. I'll invest the time so that other's may see the flip side. This is merely one view out of many though, that discount the GSR. Other's should also be compared.

    From the book, One God & One Lord, by http://www.truthortradition.com

    There are problems the the Granville Sharp “Rule”. First, it is impossible to prove that it was a rule of grammar at the time of the apostle Paul. Nigel Turner, a Trinitarian, writes:

    Unfortunately, at this period of Greek we cannot be sure that such a rule is really decisive. Sometimes the definite article is not repeated even when there is a clear separation in idea.

    Buzzard writes about Titus 2:13, also supposedly an example of the Granville Sharp rule:

    a wide range of grammarians and Biblical scholars have recognized that the absence of the definite article before “our Savior Jesus Christ” is auite inadequate to establish the Trinitarian cliam that Jesus is here called “the great God”.

    The point is, that when scripture refers to “our Great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,” it can refer to two separate beings – 1) the Great God and 2) the Savior, Jesus Christ. Andrews Norton wrote a clear evaluation of the Granville Sharp Rule as it applies to the Trinity in Statement of Reasons for Not Believing the Doctrines of Trinitarians. Norton writes:

    The argument for the deity of Christ founded upon the omission of the Greek article was recxeived and brought into notice inthe last century by Granville Sharp, Esq. He applied it to eight texts, which will be hereafter mentioned. The last words of Ephesians 5:5 may afford an example of the construction on which th argument is founded: “in the Kingdom of Christ and God.” From the article being inserted before “Christ” and omitted before “God,” Mr. Sharp infers that both names relate to the same person, and renders “in the kingdom of Christ our God.” the proper translation I suppose to be of the common Version (the KJV), “in the kingdom of Christ and of God,” or, “in the kingdom of the Messiah and of God.”

    The argument of Sharp is defended by Bishop Middleton in his Doctrine of the Greek article. by attending to the rule laid down by him, with it's limitations and exceptions, we shall be able to judge of it's applicability to the passage in question. His rule is this:

    When two or more attributives, joined by a copulative or copulatives, are assumed of (related to) the same person or thing, before the first attributive the article is inserted, before the remaining ones it is omitted.”

    by attributives, he understands adjectives, participles and nouns, which are significant of character, relation, and dignity.

    The limitations and exceptions to the rule stated by him are as follows:

    1. There is no similar rule respecting “names of substances considered as substances.” Thus, we may say “the stone and gold,” without repeating the article before “gold,” though we speak of two different substances. The reason of this limitation of the rule is stated to be that “distinct real essences cannot be conceived to belong to the same thing;” or, in other words, that the same thing cannot be supposed to be two different substances.

    In this case, then, it appears that the article is not repeated, because its repetition is not necessary to prevent ambiguity. This is the true principle with accounts for all the limitations and exceptions to the rule that are stated by Bishop Middleton and others. It is mentioned thus early, that the principle may be kept in mind; and it's truth may be remarked in other cases of limitation or of exception to be quoted.

    KATHI, AT THIS POINT I REALIZE THERE ARE PAGES LEFT TO QUOTE AND I NEED TO GET ON WITH MY MORNING. Please refer to said book for more very important information on this GSR!

    I did not proof this so sorry for mistakes and typos.

    Have a great weekend,
    Mandy

    #99936
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hello again,

    Quote
    Mandy,
    Your answer:

    His Father. His Father made Him a Son and the Father reveals to those whom He chooses, that He is His Son.


    This is the answer to the question, “Who determines who the real Son is?”.
    I agree with your answer.

    Quote
    Matthew 16
    15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.


    Notice that when Peter announces who Jesus is he attaches his identity (the Christ) with who his father is (the living God). Likewise, when Jesus answers Peter he also calls his name and recognizes who his father is (Jona). Just as Peter is the son of his Father, Peter is confirming that Jesus is the son of his Father, God. There is no discussion of preexisting forms and lives on either side. God did not reveal this part of the story to Peter. Should he have? That is, if indeed he was revealing who Jesus really was?

    It is assumption to say that “Jesus” was the son living with God prior to his “reveal” as the earthly, flesh-born Son of God. If there were clear scriptures regarding that truth this thread would not exist!

    But having recognized that, I also recognize that you have quilted some scriptures together that seem to tell a nice story (though it could easily be told a different way). This fact tells me that it is not necessarily THE truth, but one way it could pan out. I'm not being negative, just objective.

    Quote
    Jesus as Mary's first child had a beginning of days and end of life on the cross and He had a written geneology.


    Are you willing to admit that “Jesus” and the preexistent Son are two different Sons? One is begotten of God alone, while the other was born of God AND a women? Or are you of the camp that Mary was just a flesh-doning factory, contributing nothing to Jesus but the “body prepared for him”?

    Thanks for the chat,
    Mandy

    #99937
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,14:06)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,02:39)
    I believe He was actually born of God Himself!


    Ah……I believe this too!!

    :)


    Hi Mandy,
    Thanks for taking all that time copying from that book. I will have to look at that more closely.

    You say that you believe that the Son of God was born of God Himself. Was He born of God many hundreds of years before He was born of Mary? That is what I believe. Forgive me if I am wrong here but I'm quite sure that you don't believe that He was born of God many hundreds of years before He was born of Mary.

    I hope you are doing well,
    Kathi

    #99939
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,07:28)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,14:06)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,02:39)
    I believe He was actually born of God Himself!


    Ah……I believe this too!!

    :)


    Hi Mandy,
    Thanks for taking all that time copying from that book.  I will have to look at that more closely.

    You say that you believe that the Son of God was born of God Himself.  Was He born of God many hundreds of years before He was born of Mary?  That is what I believe.  Forgive me if I am wrong here but I'm quite sure that you don't believe that He was born of God many hundreds of years before He was born of Mary.

    I hope you are doing well,
    Kathi


    Oh, hi Kathi, I was just signing off when I saw your reply.

    You would be correct, I do not believe that J e s u s was born of God hundreds of years ago.  The reason I do not believe this is because it is not written in the scriptures.  Nor is it written that the “word” (as Jesus) or the “logos” (as Jesus) was born of God hundreds of years ago.

    If I am mistaken, please show me where.  I will gladly take a look at a few scriptures (not pages, please).  With a truth like this, only a few clear scriptures are needed.

    I look forward to your response.
    Love,
    Mandy

    #99945
    Irene
    Participant

    Mandy! I have read all of the posts that you have made. I thank your for them. However. I must say that Humans want to be always right. So, what do we have to do in order to get to the truth.
    First of all I am going to take my Husbands advice and ask God for His wisdom to show me the truth. Believe me when a J.W. first come and told me about the preexisting of Jesus, I said to Georg that Guy is nuts.
    God did not leave me in that believe, however.
    When we can take several Scriptures and see that they agree with each other, then I believe we have the truth. Could it be wrong, of course.
    But we only have this Bible. Can we see if that this Bible is the true word of God. Yes. By cross references Georg has taking this Bible and has come up with Historical events that have come true.
    I am going to stop this post and ask Georg to come and help. So I need to put this up. More will come later. Irene
    Irene

    #99949
    Irene
    Participant

    Read 2 Corinth. 4:3-4
    verse 3 But if our gospel be hid it is hid to them that are lost.
    verse 4 In whom the God of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not…
    This shows that if you don't believe the word of God, God can not teach you, because you reject His Holy Spirit. If you think that Scholars, from any age, have the understanding, of the Bible, then why can't they agree on the same doctrine. Theologians that teach about God, teach the doctrine of men.
    That is why Georg does not waste his time reading their writings. They are like the Scribes and Pharisees of Jesus time.
    If you are wondering when Jesus was born, then look at this verse
    John 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
    Before the world was it says, or the entire universe for that matter. The question is how long before Jesus created all things, Col. 1:16, was He created by God Col 1:15.
    Jesus said that He is the first and the last, God Himself created. Rev. 22:13.
    Everything else was created by Jesus.
    Mandy I hope that this helps. I do truly believe this.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #99953
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Thanks so much Irene and Georg. I appreciate your posts and your prayer.

    Question: does Jesus explain John 17:5? Are we given any lessons on his previous so-called glory?

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #99957
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 02 2008,18:13)
    Read 2 Corinth. 4:3-4
    verse 3 But if our gospel be hid it is hid to them that are lost.
    verse 4 In whom the God of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not…
    This shows that if you don't believe the word of God, God can not teach you, because you reject His Holy Spirit. If you think that Scholars, from any age, have the understanding, of the Bible, then why can't they agree on the same doctrine. Theologians that teach about God, teach the doctrine of men.
    That is why Georg does not waste his time reading their writings. They are like the Scribes and Pharisees of Jesus time.
    If you are wondering when Jesus was born, then look at this verse
    John 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
    Before the world was it says, or the entire universe for that matter. The question is how long before Jesus created all things, Col. 1:16, was He created by God Col 1:15.
    Jesus said that He is the first and the last, God Himself created. Rev. 22:13.
    Everything else was created by Jesus.
    Mandy I hope that this helps. I do truly believe this.
    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene and Georg,
    I hope you are doing ok.

    I was wondering why you insist that the Son of God was created and not born. I think that there is a big difference. The scriptures do not say “first created” but they do say “firstborn”.

    It speaks of Him being the beginning of all creation but as the firstborn of all creation, not as the first created of all creation. When it says that He is the first and the last it doesn't say He is the first created and the last created it simply says He is the first and the last. It could mean that He is the firstborn son and the last son since He is the only begotten. I do not think that a begotten son is the same as a created son.

    I believe that the only begotten Son was born, then there are the created sons that are angels and man. To create is not the same as to begat.

    God created the fish and birds, He didn't begat the fish or birds. He begat one of His own kind, a Son, an exact representation of His very nature. We beget one of our own kind (or even 4 or 5 as in our case). We didn't create our children.

    Just wondering,
    Love,
    Kathi

    #99962
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,15:24)
    Hello again,

    Quote
    Mandy,
    Your answer:

    His Father.  His Father made Him a Son and the Father reveals to those whom He chooses, that He is His Son.


    This is the answer to the question, “Who determines who the real Son is?”.
    I agree with your answer.

    Quote
    Matthew 16
    15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the  living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon  Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.


    Notice that when Peter announces who Jesus is he attaches his identity (the Christ) with who his father is (the living God).  Likewise, when Jesus answers Peter he also calls his name and recognizes who his father is (Jona).  Just as Peter is the son of his Father, Peter is confirming that Jesus is the son of his Father, God.  There is no discussion of preexisting forms and lives on either side.  God did not reveal this part of the story to Peter.  Should he have?  That is, if indeed he was revealing who Jesus really was?

    It is assumption to say that “Jesus” was the son living with God prior to his “reveal” as the earthly, flesh-born Son of God. If there were clear scriptures regarding that truth this thread would not exist!

    But having recognized that, I also recognize that you have quilted some scriptures together that seem to tell a nice story (though it could easily be told a different way).  This fact tells me that it is not necessarily THE truth, but one way it could pan out.  I'm not being negative, just objective.

    Quote
    Jesus as Mary's first child had a beginning of days and end of life on the cross and He had a written geneology.


    Are you willing to admit that “Jesus” and the preexistent Son are two different Sons?  One is begotten of God alone, while the other was born of God AND a women?  Or are you of the camp that Mary was just a flesh-doning factory, contributing nothing to Jesus but the “body prepared for him”?

    Thanks for the chat,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,

    Quote

    Quote
    Jesus as Mary's first child had a beginning of days and end of life on the cross and He had a written geneology.


    Are you willing to admit that “Jesus” and the preexistent Son are two different Sons? One is begotten of God alone, while the other was born of God AND a women? Or are you of the camp that Mary was just a flesh-doning factory, contributing nothing to Jesus but the “body prepared for him”?

    Well, I am willing to admit that the Son of God in His role as “Jesus” was Mary's son, He was born of a woman, Mary, and born To God but not OF God (at that time), His father. I would say that the Son of God had a different body, a heavenly body, before He had an earthly body. While in His heavenly body, he had no mother, He was born OF God alone. After He came in His earthly body, He did have a mother. So, in that way He was definitely different. I believe that His spirit was the same though.

    Just as our spirit when we die is going to be the same spirit to exist in our heavenly bodies, His was the same spirit in His heavenly body as it was in His earthly body. I believe that we are identified by our spirit more so than our body.

    Love
    Kathi

    #99963
    Irene
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 03 2008,13:00)
    Thanks so much Irene and Georg.  I appreciate your posts and your prayer.

    Question:  does Jesus explain John 17:5?  Are we given any lessons on his previous so-called glory?

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    Mandy! Thank you for replying.  
    His glory that He gave up to become one of us, was His Spirit Nature.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #99965
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,15:34)
    You would be correct, I do not believe that J e s u s was born of God hundreds of years ago.  The reason I do not believe this is because it is not written in the scriptures.  Nor is it written that the “word” (as Jesus) or the “logos” (as Jesus) was born of God hundreds of years ago.

    If I am mistaken, please show me where.  I will gladly take a look at a few scriptures (not pages, please).  With a truth like this, only a few clear scriptures are needed.

    I look forward to your response.
    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    If He said that before Abraham was born, He existed in a living and active way would you believe that He was alive before Abraham was born? “I am” is in the active voice showing pre-existense.

    56 “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” 57 So the Jews said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.” 59 Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple.

    There is one passage for you to at least show pre-existense. If you can't believe that, then anymore verses are useless.

    God bless,
    Kathi

    #99967
    Irene
    Participant

    Kathi!
    Col. 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.
    verse 16 For by Him were all things created, that are in Heaven, and that are in earth,….

    In other words all the angels were created, the same way Jesus was created, except He was
    created by the Father.
    Born simple means brought into existence, spirit beings or angels don't have to wait 9 months for
    that to happen. Adam and Eve were not born either, Adam was created out of clay, and Eve was
    formed out of one of Adams rib. Every other human being would have to be developed in the
    Mothers womb for 9 months, before he or she is born.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #99968
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 02 2008,23:19)
    Kathi!  
    Col. 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.
    verse 16 For by Him were all things created, that are in Heaven, and that are in earth,….
               
         In other words all the angels were created, the same way Jesus was created, except He was
         created by the Father.
         Born simple means brought into existence, spirit beings or angels don't have to wait 9 months for
         that to happen.  Adam and Eve were not born either, Adam was created out of clay, and Eve was
         formed out of one of Adams rib. Every other human being would have to be developed in the  
         Mothers womb for 9 months, before he or she is born.
         Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene,
    I'm sorry but I do not agree that the Son of God was created by the Father. He was the firstBORN of the Father, the only “begotten” not the only “created”. I would agree that how this happened was very different than the firstborn of man, Cain.

    Don't you see that begotten and created are two different words with two different meanings?

    John 3:16 says:
    For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten son.

    It does not say that He gave His only created son.

    Take care,
    Kathi

    #99975
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    Quote
    “I am” is in the active voice showing pre-existense.


    “I am” may be considered “active” but that certainly does not show or prove preexistence in the way that you seem to imagine.

    The argument is made that because Jesus was “before” Abe, Jesus must have preexisted in some form physically/spiritually.  There is no question that Jesus figuratively “existed” in Abe's time.  However, he did not actually physically exist as a person; rather he “existed” in the mind of God as God's plan for the redemption of man.

    A careful reading of the context of the verse shows that Jesus was speaking of “existing” in God's foreknowledge.  Verse 56 is translated in the KJV, which says, “Your Father Abraham rejoiced to see my day:  and he saw it, and was glad.”  This verse says that Abe “saw” the Day of Christ, which is normally considered by theologians to be the day when Christ conquerors the earth and sets up his kingdom.  That would fit with what Hebrews says about Abe:  “For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God” (11:20).  Abe looked for a city that is still future, yet the bible says Abe “saw” it.

    In what sense could Abe have seen something that was future?  Although Abe saw the Day of Christ by faith, that day existed in the mind of God long before Abe.  The context of God's plan existing from the beginning, Christ certainly was “before” Abraham.

    Final thought on this passage is that to say Jesus is “before” him is not to lift him out of the ranks of humanity but to assert his unconditional precedence.

    #99976
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2008,15:01)
    There is one passage for you to at least show pre-existense. If you can't believe that, then anymore verses are useless.


    Kathi,

    Indeed it is useless because there are no clear passages of scripture that prove Jesus' preexistence. The “I am” passage also falls short of “proving” any preexistence at all. However if you want to see it there – you may indeed see it – but it is not clear.

    Off to bed,
    Mandy

    #99979
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 03 2008,19:05)
    Hi Kathi,

    Quote
    “I am” is in the active voice showing pre-existense.


    “I am” may be considered “active” but that certainly does not show or prove preexistence in the way that you seem to imagine.

    The argument is made that because Jesus was “before” Abe, Jesus must have preexisted in some form physically/spiritually.  There is no question that Jesus figuratively “existed” in Abe's time.  However, he did not actually physically exist as a person; rather he “existed” in the mind of God as God's plan for the redemption of man.

    A careful reading of the context of the verse shows that Jesus was speaking of “existing” in God's foreknowledge.  Verse 56 is translated in the KJV, which says, “Your Father Abraham rejoiced to see my day:  and he saw it, and was glad.”  This verse says that Abe “saw” the Day of Christ, which is normally considered by theologians to be the day when Christ conquerors the earth and sets up his kingdom.  That would fit with what Hebrews says about Abe:  “For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God” (11:20).  Abe looked for a city that is still future, yet the bible says Abe “saw” it.

    In what sense could Abe have seen something that was future?  Although Abe saw the Day of Christ by faith, that day existed in the mind of God long before Abe.  The context of God's plan existing from the beginning, Christ certainly was “before” Abraham.

    Final thought on this passage is that to say Jesus is “before” him is not to lift him out of the ranks of humanity but to assert his unconditional precedence.


    Hi Mandy,
    That's wonderful post on disproving Jesus's literal preexistence. I am happy you are with me in this battle of unending debate on preexistence. Hope our Sis Kathi appreciate this debate which I kindled by my posts here.

    Hi Sis Kathi,
    Do you think we who born are of our parents are not created beings?

    Do think Jesus birth different from ours in what way?

    Do think Jesus who was born to a human mother, a begotten God?

    How can a God be born to his creation?

    You question to me regarding manipulation of scriptures 'yes' I say three times that scribes and translators changed the texts as per their wish and will not according to God's will. If you want you can read the book “Misquoting Jesus” by Bart Ehrman. It gives full picture on “Who changed the bible?”

    Please answer the queries of Irene/Georg on Col 1:12-17 what is meant by “Jesus was the first born all created things of this universe”?

    Your belief of Jesus being born and not created first before the foundations of the world from God is baseless on scriptures. Either you have to agree with the trinitarians by saying that the Son coexisting with Father from eternity uncreated or you have to believe Arianism/JW which says that son had beginning by first created before all thing by the Father God. Your way of telling begotten not created is like the slogan of the Trinitarians but the origins like the Arians by saying that the son is having a begining. I can clearly get what you believe which is not so difficult to grasp my sis.
    Please understand God from the view point of a Jewish origin not from our pagan origin.
    Thanks and blessings
    Adam

    #99980
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 03 2008,04:57)
    Adam……I think it was Athanius who taught the trinity not Airus who taught it, Ithink Arius believed Jesus did not exist as a God before his birth. Check it out in the book when Jesus became God i am pretty sure it there. But what you are saying is right in my opinion Jesus was not a preexisting God or being either, he did not come into existence until his berth through Mary, as Many and others believe.

    Peace to you and your brother……….gene


    Hi brother Gene,
    Thanks for your post addressed to me. In fact I have read the book “When Jesus became God” fully. I agree that Athenasius is the one who fought for trinity but we should not forget that the Arians began this controversial belief of Jesus' preexistence by saying God created son before the foundations of the world from nothing and they also believed in son's divinity.

    Sorry to bother you.
    Peace and love to you
    Adam

    #99987
    Irene
    Participant

    Hi All

    Why is it that we stumble over words like, son, begotten, firstborn, only begotten, born, created.
    Here are the definition for these words.

    Son – he who receives life from the father.
    Begotten – to acquire; to become the father of; sire; to cause; produce.
    Firstborn – born first in a family; oldest; the first-borne child.
    Only begotten – only child of.
    Born – to give birth; brought into life or existence.
    Create (-ated) – to cause to come into existence; make; produce; bring about.

    By tradition only, are we taught to ignore these true meaning of these words, if they don't apply, why are they in the bible?
    It should be very simple to understand, if we only allow ourselves to think logically and sensibly, unhindered by tradition.
    Jehovah God, whom we address as Father, is the only one that has always existed. Everything else, and every ONE else, has a beginning; including his Son Jesus.

    Georg

    #99990
    Not3in1
    Participant

    birth   Audio Help   /bɜrθ/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[burth] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
    –noun 1. an act or instance of being born: the day of his birth.  
    2. the act or process of bearing or bringing forth offspring; childbirth; parturition: a difficult birth.  
    3. lineage; extraction; descent: of Grecian birth.  
    4. high or noble lineage: to be foolishly vain about one's birth.  
    5. natural heritage: a musician by birth.  
    6. any coming into existence; origin; beginning: the birth of Protestantism; the birth of an idea.  

    Hi Georg,
    One more little word with big meaning!  😉  Thank you for adding this list, it's very important to see the simple, straightforward meanings of words.

    Love,
    Mandy

Viewing 20 posts - 3,881 through 3,900 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account