Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 3,901 through 3,920 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #99995
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    I just posted a reply to you and lost the entire thing. So I will attempt again to reply to this post. I confess that it will be a bit more pithy and with less enthusiasm simply because now I'm frustrated from having lost 10 minutes worth of thoughtful posting!

    Quote
    Well, I am willing to admit that the Son of God in His role as “Jesus” was Mary's son, He was born of a woman,


    In what way is Jesus “Mary's son”? Was Jesus born to Mary the same way your children were born to you? If not why? And if not, then can you honestly say you believe Mary is his biological mother? If not biological, what other type of mother conceives children? You see where I'm going with this.

    Quote
    He was born of a woman, Mary, and born To God but not OF God (at that time), His father.


    If Jesus was conceived through the holy Spirit of God, in what way was he NOT “of” his Father at the time of conception?

    Quote
    I would say that the Son of God had a different body, a heavenly body, before He had an earthly body.


    Adam was the man from earth. Jesus was the MAN from heaven.

    1 Corinthians 15:47
    The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven.

    Was Jesus a MAN in heaven? Did he have a “heavenly body” as a MAN?

    Quote
    While in His heavenly body, he had no mother, He was born OF God alone.


    In my opinion we have yet to establish Jesus' “heavenly body” let alone that fact that *Jesus* was born of God alone.

    Quote
    After He came in His earthly body, He did have a mother.


    We have also yet to establish whether Jesus had a true “mother” or just a factory that produced skin and “body prepared for him”.

    #99996
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Sorry Kathi, I'm not having much luck with my posting today. I wasn't done before it published. I'll continue here….

    #99997
    Not3in1
    Participant

    OK, let me try one last time….

    Quote
    After He came in His earthly body, He did have a mother. So, in that way He was definitely different.


    Again, trying to establish what you mean by having a mother and having an earthly body. In what way was he different? If as you say, his spirit remained the same, what was different about him?

    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body? Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?

    If Mary didn't contribute her DNA what did she contribute to her son that made him different than he was before? Skin only? Would that really make Jesus “different” or just look different?

    Have a great day, Kathi. We are enjoying what is called, Seafair Sunday. It's a longtime WA tradition to have hydro-plane races in our Lake Washington. It's a huge boating opportunity and tons of fun. We had better head out and get going.

    Thanks for your thoughts/beliefs/challenges/comments on this very important subject. We may not agree, but it's certainly nice to keep this topic at the forefront of our thinking…….

    Mandy

    #100008
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Oh my,
    So many posts to respond to and so many parties this weekend. Holy cow! I have no time right now, maybe tomorrow. Thanks all for your inquiries.
    LU

    #100013
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 04 2008,06:29)
    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body?  Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?


    Example:

    The accountant from New York was not necessarily an accountant when he was in New York, but that the accountant was originally from New York.

    The man from Heaven could be read the same way. He could have been a man in Heaven and came to earth, the man could have previously been in Heaven (with no reference to being a man there), or could be a man who belongs in Heaven.

    “The man from Heaven” on it's own probably doesn't prove much regarding this topic, but needs to be looked at in context. Context seems to side with Jesus being the Word that was with God in the beginning and who became flesh.

    It is actually written that we should believe that he came in the flesh, not a plan coming in the flesh. Denying that HE came in the flesh is of the antichrist spirit.

    2 John 1:7
    Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist.

    Is saying that a plan came in the flesh a subtle way of denying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? What do others think?

    #100016
    Irene
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 04 2008,13:41)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 04 2008,06:29)
    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body?  Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?


    Example:

    The accountant from New York was not necessarily an accountant when he was in New York, but that the accountant was originally from New York.

    The man from Heaven could be read the same way. He could have been a man in Heaven and came to earth, the man could have previously been in Heaven (with no reference to being a man there), or could be a man who belongs in Heaven.

    “The man from Heaven” on it's own probably doesn't prove much regarding this topic, but needs to be looked at in context. Context seems to side with Jesus being the Word that was with God in the beginning and who became flesh.

    It is actually written that we should believe that he came in the flesh, not a plan coming in the flesh. Denying that HE came in the flesh is of the antichrist spirit.

    2 John 1:7
    Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist.

    Is saying that a plan came in the flesh a subtle way of denying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? What do others think?


    Absolutely true!!!!
    God send His Son not into the world to condemn the world, but that through Him we might be saved.
    So were did God send His Son from???
    Where is God our Father????
    That is were Jesus as the Word was.
    When we put all together, we do come up with the truth.
    He was the firstborn of all creation. First to be born and first to be resurrected from the dead. That in all He will have preeminence.
    Rev. 22:12
    I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,
    the First and the Last.
    John 17:5 ” And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”
    Peace and Love Irene

    #100024
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Yes Irene. That is what is written and we should hold onto it.

    #100026
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Quote
    The accountant from New York was not necessarily an accountant when he was in New York, but that the accountant was originally from New York.


    Say what? This reminds me of the Abbott and Castello act of, “Who's on First?”.

    Quote
    The man from Heaven could be read the same way. He could have been a man in Heaven and came to earth, the man could have previously been in Heaven (with no reference to being a man there), or could be a man who belongs in Heaven.


    All of these examples “could be” true, but are they written?

    Quote
    Context seems to side with Jesus being the Word that was with God in the beginning and who became flesh.


    With all due respect, “seems to” goes a long way to “proving” anything regarding J e s u s preexisting his birth.

    Quote
    It is actually written that we should believe that he came in the flesh, not a plan coming in the flesh. Denying that HE came in the flesh is of the antichrist spirit.


    Wow, this was a stretch t8. Going from not being able to prove preexistence to saying that if you don't believe it, the disbelief may be the work of the antichrist. Good grief.

    Question: did your children come in the flesh? Were they by chance “planned”? I know that for the majority of parents nowadays, their families are planned. They plan to have two or three. We planned to adopt two children. They were planned, yet the actually “came in the flesh”. A plan did not come in the flesh, our children came in the flesh. I think that sometimes those that believe preexistence are so quick to shoot down the “plan” theory that they don't think it all the way through.

    Quote
    Is saying that a plan came in the flesh a subtle way of denying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh? What do others think?


    See above.

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #100027
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2008,10:21)
    Oh my,
    So many posts to respond to and so many parties this weekend.  Holy cow!  I have no time right now, maybe tomorrow.  Thanks all for your inquiries.
    LU


    Hey Kathi,
    Don't feel rushed in getting back to me, okay? We are actually going to be out of town for a few days and I won't be able to respond anyway.

    Take care (isn't this summer moving too quickly?),
    Mandy
    :)

    #100031
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 03 2008,03:05)
    Hi Kathi,

    Quote
    “I am” is in the active voice showing pre-existense.


    “I am” may be considered “active” but that certainly does not show or prove preexistence in the way that you seem to imagine.

    The argument is made that because Jesus was “before” Abe, Jesus must have preexisted in some form physically/spiritually.  There is no question that Jesus figuratively “existed” in Abe's time.  However, he did not actually physically exist as a person; rather he “existed” in the mind of God as God's plan for the redemption of man.

    A careful reading of the context of the verse shows that Jesus was speaking of “existing” in God's foreknowledge.  Verse 56 is translated in the KJV, which says, “Your Father Abraham rejoiced to see my day:  and he saw it, and was glad.”  This verse says that Abe “saw” the Day of Christ, which is normally considered by theologians to be the day when Christ conquerors the earth and sets up his kingdom.  That would fit with what Hebrews says about Abe:  “For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God” (11:20).  Abe looked for a city that is still future, yet the bible says Abe “saw” it.

    In what sense could Abe have seen something that was future?  Although Abe saw the Day of Christ by faith, that day existed in the mind of God long before Abe.  The context of God's plan existing from the beginning, Christ certainly was “before” Abraham.

    Final thought on this passage is that to say Jesus is “before” him is not to lift him out of the ranks of humanity but to assert his unconditional precedence.


    Hi Mandy,
    Yes, I believe it is quite possible that Abraham saw His day and it was in a looking forward to His day kinda way. It was not that part of the passage that was my main argument for pre-existense however that is what you focused your response on.

    However, I do believe that He really saw the Son of God when He appeared as a man with two others that were angels that appeared as men right before the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. There He passed on God's words to Him about the promise of a son for Abraham and Sarah. The three of them were referred as three “men” but we know that two of them were angels.

    Read about this in Gen 18:2
    When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth…

    You will see that the two men are angels if you keep reading and the other man is called Yahweh. I believe that is the Son of God who came in His Father's name.

    Now read John 8
    38 “I speak the things which I have seen with My Father; therefore you also do the things which you heard from your father.” 39 They answered and said to Him, “Abraham is our father.” Jesus *said to them, “If you are Abraham's children, do the deeds of Abraham. 40 “But as it is, you are seeking to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God; this Abraham did not do.

    Did you notice that last line “this Abraham did not do”. What didn't he do? He didn't seek to kill Him when He appeared as a man in the name of Yahweh and told Abraham the truth which He heard from God. IMO

    And now regarding John 8:57-59 the pre-existence part:
    57 So the Jews said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.” 59 Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple.

    Just before this passage Jesus makes it quite clear that He doesn't glorify Himself yet He makes very BIG statements like before Abraham was born, I existed or “I am”. He did that as a follow-up of their comment “you are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?” Now wouldn't that be a perfect time to explain if He was speaking of a vision or such of Himself? But no, He didn't did He, in fact He one upped them with a loftier statement.

    I find it impossible to believe that Jesus would lead them to that lofty opinion of Himself if it weren't so. He knew that they were thinking of His age and not a plan of Himself. His response was that He was there (in an active way, doing the action himself) before Abraham was born.

    What I find humorous is that Adam thinks you are proving non-pre-existense with your post. (It's obvious he is easily convinced when he wants to be). No use of the word “plan” or “foreknowledge” clearly listed here at all. You mention that nothing is clearly speaking pre-existence here without really addressing verse 58. That was my main point that showed pre-existense. Did you mean to miss that main point? By the way, that verse is to use your own words, “is normally considered by theologians” to show Christ's deity. So you pick and choose when you throw that “is normally considered by theologians” stuff when it is convenient to your beliefs and not when it disagrees with you. IMO

    And please explain “unconditional precedence.”

    Sorry if I ruffled any feathers I'm just a little frustrated. I can imagine how Christ must have felt.
    Kathi

    #100032
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    Does scripture identify Jesus with Abraham or is this a guess?

    Genesis 18:2
    And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,

    #100033
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    If it was Jesus was he a man before becoming a man?
    Was Jesus the Lord of Abraham before he had been appointed Lord?

    #100034
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 03 2008,10:11)
    Hi Sis Kathi,
    Do you think we who born are of our parents are not created beings?

    Do think Jesus birth different from ours in what way?

    Do think Jesus who was born to a human mother, a begotten God?

    How can a God be born to his creation?

    You question to me regarding manipulation of scriptures 'yes' I say three times that scribes and translators changed the texts as per their wish and will not according to God's will. If you want you can read the book “Misquoting Jesus” by  Bart Ehrman. It gives full picture on “Who changed the bible?”

    Please answer the queries of Irene/Georg on Col 1:12-17 what is meant by “Jesus was the first born all created things of this universe”?

    Your belief of Jesus being born and not created first before the foundations of the world from God is baseless on scriptures. Either you have to agree with the trinitarians by saying that the Son coexisting with Father from eternity uncreated or you have to believe Arianism/JW which says that son had beginning by first created before all thing by the Father God. Your way of telling begotten not created is like the slogan of the Trinitarians but the origins like the Arians by saying that the  son is having a begining. I can clearly get what you believe which is not so difficult to grasp my sis.
    Please understand God from the view point of a Jewish origin not from our pagan origin.
    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Hi Adam,

    Quote
    Do you think we who born are of our parents are not created beings?

    Mankind was created, yes. Adam and Eve were formed from dirt and a rib. The rest of humanity is a reproduction of that creation and born of women. Definitly the part of us that lies in a coffin after our death was created initially on the sixth day of creation, the other part, our inner man goes on to live in a heavenly body and is not part of our DNA from what I can tell. No chromosones linked to the “inner” man from my limited understanding.

    Quote
    Do think Jesus birth different from ours in what way?

    The actual birth from Mary, not different. Out popped the weasel as WJ might put it.

    Quote
    Do think Jesus who was born to a human mother, a begotten God?

    Yes, even from before the world was, He was the only begotten God. Mary didn't give birth to God, she gave birth to a man that the already existing begotten God came to dwell within.

    Quote
    How can a God be born to his creation?

    He was not born “to” his creation, He was the firstborn “of” creation.

    I think that I have that book “Misquoting Jesus”, I will have to dig it up from a pile of resources.

    Do you think it to be impossible for God to reproduce one of His own kind? That is what begotten implies “of its own kind”. I believe that result is the begotten God, a Son for God Himself. The Son was the first to receive life of all the living. That is what I believe “firstborn of all creation” means.

    Hope that answers all your questions.
    Kathi

    #100035
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,
    I should wait and let you catch-up here before I post again, but I have limited time tonight before I will be gone for a few days.

    Quote
    Yes, I believe it is quite possible that Abraham saw His day and it was in a looking forward to His day kinda way. It was not that part of the passage that was my main argument for pre-existense however that is what you focused your response on.


    Jesus' age coupled with the fact that Abe saw “his day” are related subjects. In my opinion, one goes with the other instead of one standing on it's own.

    Quote
    However, I do believe that He really saw the Son of God when He appeared as a man with two others that were angels that appeared as men right before the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. There He passed on God's words to Him about the promise of a son for Abraham and Sarah. The three of them were referred as three “men” but we know that two of them were angels.


    You may see Jesus in this passage but it certainly is not written here. When it is not written what do you have? We are left with popular opinions, speculations, assumptions and so on. This is not enough to prove anything.

    Quote
    Just before this passage Jesus makes it quite clear that He doesn't glorify Himself yet He makes very BIG statements like before Abraham was born, I existed or “I am”.


    I don't believe Jesus was seeking glory by making the “I am” statement. In this context, “I am” certainly isn't translated, “I was born,” or “I existed.”. That would really be a dream come true for those who believe in Jesus' preexistence. It cannot be proven because it is not written.

    As for the stoning, what can I say? It seems to be a popular belief that they only stoned or threatened to stone Jesus because he *made himself equal to God* but in reality, they stoned people for all sorts of reasons. They had it out for Jesus and probably tried to stone him every chance they got! But certainly a good reason to stone him might have been that he believed he was predestined to be their messiah (the coming Son of God and Man). He didn't exactly match what they were looking for, and who did he think he was anyway!!

    Quote
    What I find humorous is that Adam thinks you are proving non-pre-existense with your post. (It's obvious he is easily convinced when he wants to be).


    I don't find it humorous when a brother or sister is confused. This is not a popularity contest, Kathi. We are batting around ideas and belief's. We won't always agree or sometimes not even come close. But the love of God should be in all his children. I am not a child of God because you or anyone else says I have THE correct truth. I am a child of God because God says so.

    Quote
    You mention that nothing is clearly speaking pre-existence here without really addressing verse 58. That was my main point that showed pre-existense. Did you mean to miss that main point?


    I didn't mean to miss that point, I answered it the way I thought best. I'm sorry it wasn't what you were looking for.

    Quote
    By the way, that verse is to use your own words, “is normally considered by theologians” to show Christ's deity. So you pick and choose when you throw that “is normally considered by theologians” stuff when it is convenient to your beliefs and not when it disagrees with you. IMO


    Forgive me for chuckling a little bit here, but of course I am going to point out things that skew to my viewpoint. This is how I represent my viewpoint for you, and for other's reading. You in turn, may also give information that points towards your understanding (i.e., the GSR copy and paste). 😉

    Quote
    And please explain “unconditional precedence.”


    What would you like to know specifically? Jesus was always meant to be over all beings (even before he was born).

    Quote
    Sorry if I ruffled any feathers I'm just a little frustrated. I can imagine how Christ must have felt.


    What has got you so frustrated? As I said, we may not agree but the topic we are debating is a great one (an ancient one). We cannot expect to have all the answers. We know only in part…… What we share here are ideas and what we are convicted of. That doesn't necessarily make us 100% right.

    Mandy

    #100036
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 03 2008,23:38)
    Hi LU,
    If it was Jesus was he a man before becoming a man?
    Was Jesus the Lord of Abraham before he had been appointed Lord?


    Hi Nick,
    I think that the Son of God could “appear” as a man without actually being a man before Mary' conception. I think that angels could also appear as men without being a men in actuality.

    Ge 18:2
    When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth…

    Read on to find out that these that appeared as men were two angels and one that represented Yahweh.

    I believe that Jesus was the Lord of Abraham. I do not think that He was “appointed” as Lord. That is not scriptural as far as I can see. Why would someone that was God from the beginning need to be appointed lord anyway? John 1:1

    LU

    #100037
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 03 2008,23:33)
    Hi LU,
    Does scripture identify Jesus with Abraham or is this a guess?

    Genesis 18:2
    And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,


    Hi Nick,
    Many others believe that it is Christ, not just me. We have clues that can lead to this conclusion.
    LU

    #100038
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Kathi,
    God MADE Jesus both “Lord” and “Christ”. If Jesus were already these things from eternity, what point would there be in God making Jesus anything? Scripture would have clearly taught us that Jesus was already these things.

    Also, Abraham never speaks of Jesus being his Lord. Was he aware of this?

    Romans 14:9
    For this very reason, Christ died and returned to life so that he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.

    Romans makes it sound like Jesus *became* Lord after his death (because he is the Lord of BOTH the living and the dead). If he were the Lord of Abraham, he would only be the Lord of the living then?

    Not sure on this….

    #100039
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2008,16:33)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 03 2008,23:33)
    Hi LU,
    Does scripture identify Jesus with Abraham or is this a guess?

    Genesis 18:2
    And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,


    Hi Nick,
    Many others believe that it is Christ, not just me.  We have clues that can lead to this conclusion.
    LU


    Hi LU,
    It opens a can of worms.
    Reliance on inference is unwise IMO.

    Was Jesus a man who was sent to do the judgement and punishment of men for God? If so why should we trust him?Did he have a preview of life that gave him a headstart over those meant to be following him?

    #100041
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2008,16:26)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 03 2008,23:38)
    Hi LU,
    If it was Jesus was he a man before becoming a man?
    Was Jesus the Lord of Abraham before he had been appointed Lord?


    Hi Nick,
    I think that the Son of God could “appear” as a man without actually being a man before Mary' conception.  I think that angels could also appear as men without being a men in actuality.

    Ge 18:2
    When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth…

    Read on to find out that these that appeared as men were two angels and one that represented Yahweh.

    I believe that Jesus was the Lord of Abraham.  I do not think that He was “appointed” as Lord.  That is not scriptural as far as I can see.  Why would someone that was God from the beginning need to be appointed lord anyway?  John 1:1

    LU


    Hi LU,
    Was Jesus a spokeman for God before he walked the earth?

    Certainly many times angels spoke for God and appeared as men but why take this by inference to include Jesus? What COULD happen needs a lot more support before we say it DID.

    The baby in the manger was not any form of god in disguise. He emptied himslef to be just like us. It was only by his anointing that he became Lord and mouthpiece for God by God's Spirit. Acts 10.38

    #100042
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 03 2008,14:29)
    OK, let me try one last time….

    Quote
    After He came in His earthly body, He did have a mother.  So, in that way He was definitely different.


    Again, trying to establish what you mean by having a mother and having an earthly body.  In what way was he different?  If as you say, his spirit remained the same, what was different about him?

    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body?  Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?

    If Mary didn't contribute her DNA what did she contribute to her son that made him different than he was before?  Skin only?  Would that really make Jesus “different” or just look different?

    Have a great day, Kathi.  We are enjoying what is called, Seafair Sunday.  It's a longtime WA tradition to have hydro-plane races in our Lake Washington.  It's a huge boating opportunity and tons of fun.  We had better head out and get going.

    Thanks for your thoughts/beliefs/challenges/comments on this very important subject.  We may not agree, but it's certainly nice to keep this topic at the forefront of our thinking…….

    Mandy


    Mandy,

    Quote
    After He came in His earthly body, He did have a mother.  So, in that way He was definitely different.


    Quote
    Again, trying to establish what you mean by having a mother and having an earthly body.  In what way was he different?  If as you say, his spirit remained the same, what was different about him?

    What was different was that He no longer had a heavenly body but had the limits of an earthly, flesh and blood body, an infant earthly body at that.  Also, He became a son to a mother and not just His Father.

    Quote

    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body?  Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?

    Apparently heavenly beings can be referred to as men according to the story of Abraham.
    Ge 18:2
    When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth…

    Like I just posted to you minutes ago, two of these so-called men were definitely angels yet they appeared as men.  So I believe that angels have an ability to take on different appearances as the need arises.  Then humans call them as they see them.  They looked like men to Abraham but weren't.  

    Quote
    Did the “MAN from heaven” have a spiritual body?  Are heavenly beings referred to as men (mankind)?

    Where does it say the “Man from heaven?”  

    The Son had a heavenly body which He gave up to take on an earthly body which later died and He then received the glory of the heavenly body again.

    Quote
    If Mary didn't contribute her DNA what did she contribute to her son that made him different than he was before?  Skin only?  Would that really make Jesus “different” or just look different?

    I believe that Mary did contribute her DNA.  That is one reason He had skin.  Also, He had the limits of a flesh and blood body.  He was born without memory as a baby would be and, without special privileges that He had before.

    I hope you had a fun day at the lake.  I was at the lake yesterday for a pig roast.  Summer is indeed going too fast:)

    Take care,
    Kathi[QUOTE]

Viewing 20 posts - 3,901 through 3,920 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account