Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 3,861 through 3,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #99433
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works” and “I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began”. – Proverbs 8 22-23

    “When there were no oceans, I was given birth”. – Proverbs 8:24

    “Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,”. – Proverbs 8:30

    People can argue that wisdom is an attribute and that is true. People can also argue that truth is an attribute and that is true. But Jesus is also the Truth and he is in fact wisdom too.

    Wisdom was the craftsman at God's side and was the first of God's works and was given birth. The Logos was also with God in the beginning and we know that Jesus is with God now at his right hands side.

    1 Corinthians 1:24
    but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

    Therefore Jesus is the wisdom of God, just as he is the truth and the light and we know that truth comes from God and that God is light.

    I actually think there is a strong case to make regarding attributes of God. God creates us based on his attributes. If we are created in his image it is God's attributes that we personify. Makes me wonder if the name that we receive that no one knows except God and the person who is given the name, is the attribute that we were created to reflect. Something that only God would know because he created us for a purpose and he perhaps knew of us before we were crafted into the womb.

    #99434
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 01 2008,17:18)
    Hello again, Kathi.

    I'm sure you are aware of the great many versions of the bible and how they interpret scriptures differently?  Below is just one example of how this scripture can be interpreted differently –
    Titus 2:13 (King James Version)
    King James Version (KJV)
    Public Domain

    13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

    The Glorious appearing of our great God AND our Saviour Jesus Christ.  Two.  One is God, the other is Jesus.  Just another interpretation from a very popular version of God's Word.  Other scriptures that you listed can also be found to follow this KJV interpretaion.

    So the muddy waters continue to be muddy.  It is not absolutely clear.  To say that I have a “different” faith than Paul and Peter because I do not see the scriptures as you do seems a bit self-righteous, imo, but I'll let it go because I've come to know your heart and I'm sure you didn't mean for it to sound quite like that.

    Take care,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    You said it right about the different translations of the N.T which have made N.T a mess. The scribes have manipulated the manuscripts and made our Lord Jesus as another God which has complicated understanding the True God of the Bible. I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    I think these verses clarify who Jesus came to be.
    Deut 18:

    15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a prophet of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear: 16 As thou desiredst of the Lord thy God in Horeb, when the assembly was gathered together, and saidst: Let me not hear any more the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see any more this exceeding great fire, lest I die. 17 And the Lord said to me: They have spoken all things well. 18 I will raise them up a prophet out of the midst of their brethren like to thee: and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. 19 And he that will not hear his words, which he shall speak in my name, I will be the revenger. 20 But the prophet, who being corrupted with pride, shall speak in my name things that I did not command him to say, or in the name of strange gods, shall be slain. 21 And if in silent thought thou answer: How shall I know the word that the Lord hath not spoken? 22 Thou shalt have this sign: Whatsoever that same prophet foretelleth in the name of the Lord, and it cometh not to pass: that thing the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath forged it by the pride of his mind: and therefore thou shalt not fear him.

    What does these verses say?
    Jesus came as a prophet like Moses from their brothers. He has to be a human being not any God. Jesus came to speak to Israelites on behalf of God. He is the open mouth of God declaring His word. That's why he is the incarnation of the 'word of God' not God Himself.

    If you don't understand God and Jesus from the view point of Jewish monotheism we make lot of blunder in making God poly and mystery.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam

    #99837
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 01 2008,08:29)
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    I think these verses clarify who Jesus came to be.
    Deut 18:

    15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a prophet of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear: 16 As thou desiredst of the Lord thy God in Horeb, when the assembly was gathered together, and saidst: Let me not hear any more the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see any more this exceeding great fire, lest I die. 17 And the Lord said to me: They have spoken all things well. 18 I will raise them up a prophet out of the midst of their brethren like to thee: and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. 19 And he that will not hear his words, which he shall speak in my name, I will be the revenger. 20 But the prophet, who being corrupted with pride, shall speak in my name things that I did not command him to say, or in the name of strange gods, shall be slain. 21 And if in silent thought thou answer: How shall I know the word that the Lord hath not spoken? 22 Thou shalt have this sign: Whatsoever that same prophet foretelleth in the name of the Lord, and it cometh not to pass: that thing the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath forged it by the pride of his mind: and therefore thou shalt not fear him.

    What does these verses say?
    Jesus came as a prophet like Moses from their brothers. He has to be a human being not any God. Jesus came to speak to Israelites on behalf of God. He is the open mouth of God declaring His word. That's why he is the incarnation of the 'word of God' not God Himself.

    If you don't understand God and Jesus from the view point of Jewish monotheism we make lot of blunder in making God poly and mystery.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Adam,

    Quote
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    The “One God” did not have a beginning. The begotten God did. You still don't have my words straight dear one.

    I have showed you that the scriptures speak of “one LORD” and yet there is another “one Lord” and you seem to accept that. In a similar way, the scriptures speak of “one GOD” and yet there is another, a begotten God. One always existed and one had a beginning. I am comparing an apple to an orange. I am not thinking of them as two apples so to speak. An apple can't be an orange and an orange can't be an apple but both can be fruit. Do you get this Adam??

    God bless,
    LU

    #99844
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 01 2008,01:18)
    Hello again, Kathi.

    I'm sure you are aware of the great many versions of the bible and how they interpret scriptures differently?  Below is just one example of how this scripture can be interpreted differently –
    Titus 2:13 (King James Version)
    King James Version (KJV)
    Public Domain

    13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

    The Glorious appearing of our great God AND our Saviour Jesus Christ.  Two.  One is God, the other is Jesus.  Just another interpretation from a very popular version of God's Word.  Other scriptures that you listed can also be found to follow this KJV interpretaion.

    So the muddy waters continue to be muddy.  It is not absolutely clear.  To say that I have a “different” faith than Paul and Peter because I do not see the scriptures as you do seems a bit self-righteous, imo, but I'll let it go because I've come to know your heart and I'm sure you didn't mean for it to sound quite like that.

    Take care,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    Context clues as well as grammar structure tells us that there is one being spoke of here, keep reading verse 14:

    13 looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus, 14 who gave Himself for us to redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.

    This is what the NET Bible says about the translation:

    20 tn The terms “God and Savior” both refer to the same person, Jesus Christ. This is one of the clearest statements in the NT concerning the deity of Christ. The construction in Greek is known as the Granville Sharp rule, named after the English philanthropist-linguist who first clearly articulated the rule in 1798. Sharp pointed out that in the construction article-noun-καί-noun (where καί [kai] = “and”), when two nouns are singular, personal, and common (i.e., not proper names), they always had the same referent. Illustrations such as “the friend and brother,” “the God and Father,” etc. abound in the NT to prove Sharp’s point. The only issue is whether terms such as “God” and “Savior” could be considered common nouns as opposed to proper names. Sharp and others who followed (such as T. F. Middleton in his masterful The Doctrine of the Greek Article) demonstrated that a proper name in Greek was one that could not be pluralized. Since both “God” (θεός, qeos) and “savior” (σωτήρ, swthr) were occasionally found in the plural, they did not constitute proper names, and hence, do fit Sharp’s rule. Although there have been 200 years of attempts to dislodge Sharp’s rule, all attempts have been futile. Sharp’s rule stands vindicated after all the dust has settled. For more information on Sharp’s rule see ExSyn 270-78, esp. 276. See also 2 Pet 1:1 and Jude 4.

    http://net.bible.org/bible.php?book=Tit&chapter=2#v20

    When you see these apparent differences there is a need to dig deeper than just choosing another translation because it suits your faith.

    We do have two different faiths, you and I. That is not meant to be a self-righteous statement, simply a fact. I do not believe the son of God to be just a man and you do. That is extremely different.

    God bless,
    Kathi

    #99850
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8….> i believe you have it backward, Jesus is not the wisdom of God , GOD'S wisdom is in him, big difference brother. Jesus (became to us) the wisdom of God, he was not always that way He became that way by God's Spirit in Him. Wisdom is one of God's attributes.

    peace to you and yours……….gene

    #99868
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:44)
    We do have two different faiths, you and I. That is not meant to be a self-righteous statement, simply a fact. I do not believe the son of God to be just a man and you do. That is extremely different.


    Hi Kathi,

    I'm running out the door to take the kids and dogs to the beach, but I quickly wanted to reply. I will reply more thoughtfully this evening.

    I do not believe that Jesus is just a man, so I think you are a bit confused as to what I believe. That is OK, it's difficult to keep track of everyone's theories here.

    The self-righteous statement was not directed at my personal faith alone but also seemed to encompass other's who do not embrace your theology. Claiming that you have the faith of Peter and Paul and that perhaps other's have not accepted “that” faith (if they do not interpret scripture as you do) is a bit self-righteous, imo.

    Who is to say who has THE faith of Peter and Paul? Can the JW's lay claim to that? Can the Lutheran's or Catholic's? Can the Trinitarians or Unitarians? Can you?

    More tonight,
    Mandy

    #99869
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 01 2008,12:18)
    I would like you to tell me why Jesus is not your great God and Savior.  He is to Paul and Titus and Simon Peter and those that have received a faith of the same kind as them.
    Have you not received that faith yet?  Do you have a different faith than them?


    Real quick – so there is no confusion.

    Above is your statement regarding my faith perhaps not being that of Paul and Peter and YOU, apparently…..

    You say that we have two different “faith's” but I believe in the One true God who is the Father of all, and Creator of all.  I echo Paul in 1 Cor. 8:6.  Do you believe in another God?  If not, we have the same faith.

    Looking at what we have in common brings more unity that finding things where we do not.  If you take time to read Acts (my favorite book) you will find mostly unity among the brethren.  Their belief systems were very simple and straight forward.  If you are for Christ then you are not against him – come one, come all!  Praise God!

    OK, kids are tugging at my sleeve now….have to run!

    #99870
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 02 2008,00:29)
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.


    Real quick (again). The kids are blowing bubbles…I have 5 minutes. :laugh:

    Adam,
    I agree with you, however I don't believe Kathi's theology is primitive. In fact, it is quite advanced. Most folks take a simple revelation they feel they have from God (I've done this too) and begin to build a theology from it's base. You can do this with pretty much anything you choose. Scriptures are there for the plucking and pasting together. Even Lexicons, grammer, Greek and dictionaries will aid you in developing your own, unique religion.

    But faith in God is simple. It is our hope and it saves our souls.

    NOW – off to the beach!
    :)

    #99876
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 01 2008,15:54)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:44)
    We do have two different faiths, you and I.  That is not meant to be a self-righteous statement, simply a fact.  I do not believe the son of God to be just a man and you do.  That is extremely different.


    Hi Kathi,

    I'm running out the door to take the kids and dogs to the beach, but I quickly wanted to reply.  I will reply more thoughtfully this evening.

    I do not believe that Jesus is just a man, so I think you are a bit confused as to what I believe.  That is OK, it's difficult to keep track of everyone's theories here.

    The self-righteous statement was not directed at my personal faith alone but also seemed to encompass other's who do not embrace your theology.  Claiming that you have the faith of Peter and Paul and that perhaps other's have not accepted “that” faith (if they do not interpret scripture as you do) is a bit self-righteous, imo.  

    Who is to say who has THE faith of Peter and Paul?  Can the JW's lay claim to that?  Can the Lutheran's or Catholic's?  Can the Trinitarians or Unitarians?  Can you?

    More tonight,
    Mandy


    Mandy,

    So are Peter and Paul self-righteous too? Do you think that you have the same faith as Peter and Paul, then are you self-righteous? No, I think you have the wrong idea of what self-righteous is, Mandy. You want to judge me? Look at the posts around here. Most everyone has a belief. Just because they have a belief and they disagree with you, doesn't make them self-righteous. We all want to think that we have the faith of Peter and Paul don't we. However if that faith includes whether Jesus always existed, per-existed but not always, or began in Mary's womb, those are faiths in three different son's of God. Therefore, if Peter and Paul believed in one of those three and I believe in another, I do not have the same faith and visa versa. Do you understand that we do not have the same faith. I believe that we have some things in common but when it comes to Christ, we don't. Therefore, not the same faith.

    1 John 5 11-13
    And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. 12 He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life. 13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.

    He who has the Son has the life. Which son? The real son or another son? I believe that you need to have the real son to have “the life”.

    Read 2 Cor 11 and see that different Christs can be preached and then read that there are false apostles that teach those different Christs. It is not a small matter. Just because anyone says they believe in Jesus doesn't mean anything.

    Later,
    Kathi

    #99879
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,10:23)
    I believe that you need to have the real son to have “the life”.


    And who determines who the “real” Son is?

    #99889
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    If you were living in the time of Jesus what would you need to know about the coming Christ?

    #99903
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:44)
    Although there have been 200 years of attempts to dislodge Sharp’s rule, all attempts have been futile. Sharp’s rule stands vindicated after all the dust has settled.


    This is certainly one opinion, and one opinion that happens to enforce your belief system. However there are other's out there that would claim the opposite and I have read many of them. One such argument against the GSR is presented by the CES folks and if you'd like I could copy their findings here. But something tells me that your mind is made up and that is OK, too.

    #99911
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 01 2008,19:29)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,10:23)
    I believe that you need to have the real son to have “the life”.


    And who determines who the “real” Son is?


    Mandy,
    Your answer:

    His Father. His Father made Him a Son and the Father reveals to those whom He chooses, that He is His Son.

    Matthew 16
    15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

    I believe that the “Son” that the Father reveals is not the one with a geneology and an earthly mother but the one without a human geneology. That Son, without geneology became a man with geneology (see Matt 1 for His earthly geneology) so that He could be given for us as a blood sacrifice.

    Hebrews 7
    3 Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.

    Jesus as Mary's first child had a beginning of days and end of life on the cross and He had a written geneology.

    God bless,
    Kathi

    #99912
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 02 2008,03:03)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:44)
    Although there have been 200 years of attempts to dislodge Sharp’s rule, all attempts have been futile. Sharp’s rule stands vindicated after all the dust has settled.


    This is certainly one opinion, and one opinion that happens to enforce your belief system.  However there are other's out there that would claim the opposite and I have read many of them.  One such argument against the GSR is presented by the CES folks and if you'd like I could copy their findings here.  But something tells me that your mind is made up and that is OK, too.


    Mandy,
    Sure, go ahead. It is good to look at all angles.
    Kathi

    #99916
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 01 2008,20:15)
    Hi LU,
    If you were living in the time of Jesus what would you need to know about the coming Christ?


    Hi Nick,
    There has been progressive revealation about the Christ over time. Back then in the time of Jesus they knew that the Messiah was coming and would declare all things to them however this was true, it wasn't knowledge that gave them salvation. To know Him and to know about Him are not the same thing.

    Some passages from John 4
    25 The woman said to Him, “I know that Messiah is coming (He who is called Christ); when that One comes, He will declare all things to us.”

    This woman knew this but still did not KNOW in a way to have eternal life.

    10 Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, `Give Me a drink,' you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.”

    22 “You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    39 From that city many of the Samaritans believed in Him because of the word of the woman who testified, “He told me all the things that I have done.” 40 So when the Samaritans came to Jesus, they were asking Him to stay with them; and He stayed there two days. 41 Many more believed because of His word; 42 and they were saying to the woman, “It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves and know that this One is indeed the Savior of the world.”

    Back in the time of Jesus as a man, people knew Him as a man, some thought He was just a prophet, many knew He claimed to be the Son of God but not everyone knew that He was indeed the Son of God. Those who did know that He was indeed the Son of God began a spiritual journey into the fullness of truth. I believe to really know the Son of God from the Father's revelation, you will receive fuller true knowledge of Him and His Son and not reject it. That is maturing in Christ. Some remain infants in their knowledge and require to be fed milk. Others grow and because by practice their senses are trained to discern good and evil.

    Hebrews 5:11-14

    11 Concerning him we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food. 13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is not accustomed to the word of righteousness, for he is an infant. 14 But solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil.

    So Nick,
    To answer your question:
    “If you were living in the time of Jesus what would you need to know about the coming Christ?”
    You wouldn't need to know about Him, you would need to know Him. It is then that you start the maturing process, not before. I think that our maturing process will not reach full maturity during our mortal stage of life. We can become more and more mature though. In order to know Christ, the Father must first draw us to Him and give us the faith to believe.

    LU

    #99918
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:17)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 01 2008,08:29)
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    I think these verses clarify who Jesus came to be.
    Deut 18:

    15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a prophet of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear: 16 As thou desiredst of the Lord thy God in Horeb, when the assembly was gathered together, and saidst: Let me not hear any more the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see any more this exceeding great fire, lest I die. 17 And the Lord said to me: They have spoken all things well. 18 I will raise them up a prophet out of the midst of their brethren like to thee: and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. 19 And he that will not hear his words, which he shall speak in my name, I will be the revenger. 20 But the prophet, who being corrupted with pride, shall speak in my name things that I did not command him to say, or in the name of strange gods, shall be slain. 21 And if in silent thought thou answer: How shall I know the word that the Lord hath not spoken? 22 Thou shalt have this sign: Whatsoever that same prophet foretelleth in the name of the Lord, and it cometh not to pass: that thing the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath forged it by the pride of his mind: and therefore thou shalt not fear him.

    What does these verses say?
    Jesus came as a prophet like Moses from their brothers. He has to be a human being not any God. Jesus came to speak to Israelites on behalf of God. He is the open mouth of God declaring His word. That's why he is the incarnation of the 'word of God' not God Himself.

    If you don't understand God and Jesus from the view point of Jewish monotheism we make lot of blunder in making God poly and mystery.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Adam,

    Quote
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    The “One God” did not have a beginning.  The begotten God did.  You still don't have my words straight dear one.

    I have showed you that the scriptures speak of “one LORD” and yet there is another “one Lord” and you seem to accept that.  In a similar way, the scriptures speak of “one GOD” and yet there is another, a begotten God.  One always existed and one had a beginning.  I am comparing an apple to an orange.  I am not thinking of them as two apples so to speak.  An apple can't be an orange and an orange can't be an apple but both can be fruit. Do you get this Adam??

    God bless,
    LU


    Hi Sis Kathi,
    No scriptural proof for your begotten God unless the scribes have changed the texts in N.T. Jesus is the begotten Son of the only God the Father. You can not make many Gods who created this universe. Please see the scriptures that say Only one God that created us not two or three. All this drama started by historical Arians who claimed Jesus as begotten (God) and had a beginning. Your theory is not some thing new here. Even a JW believes that. But please understand God from the view point of Judaism not from Paganism. Jesus is the vessel for that One God not that he himself is another God. Please see Col 2:9-10

    9 “For in him dwells the whole fullness of the deity bodily,
    10 and you share in this fullness in him, who is the head of every principality and power”

    We are also going to share in that fullness of Godliness with Jesus in our resurrection. So do we also be called Gods like you say about Jesus as begotten God apart from one God. I am not confused with your theory of saying Father is one Lord also jesus is one Lord. Pl. come out from that primitive belief of believing two Gods which make chrstianity a poly and mystery.
    Sorry for the strong words.
    Peace and love to you
    Adam

    #99919
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 02 2008,09:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2008,01:17)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 01 2008,08:29)
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    I think these verses clarify who Jesus came to be.
    Deut 18:

    15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a prophet of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear: 16 As thou desiredst of the Lord thy God in Horeb, when the assembly was gathered together, and saidst: Let me not hear any more the voice of the Lord my God, neither let me see any more this exceeding great fire, lest I die. 17 And the Lord said to me: They have spoken all things well. 18 I will raise them up a prophet out of the midst of their brethren like to thee: and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. 19 And he that will not hear his words, which he shall speak in my name, I will be the revenger. 20 But the prophet, who being corrupted with pride, shall speak in my name things that I did not command him to say, or in the name of strange gods, shall be slain. 21 And if in silent thought thou answer: How shall I know the word that the Lord hath not spoken? 22 Thou shalt have this sign: Whatsoever that same prophet foretelleth in the name of the Lord, and it cometh not to pass: that thing the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath forged it by the pride of his mind: and therefore thou shalt not fear him.

    What does these verses say?
    Jesus came as a prophet like Moses from their brothers. He has to be a human being not any God. Jesus came to speak to Israelites on behalf of God. He is the open mouth of God declaring His word. That's why he is the incarnation of the 'word of God' not God Himself.

    If you don't understand God and Jesus from the view point of Jewish monotheism we make lot of blunder in making God poly and mystery.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Adam,

    Quote
    I now can get what our Sis Kathi believes. But she is still in primitive stage of believing Jesus as another God besides the One God who also has beginning and preexisting.

    The “One God” did not have a beginning.  The begotten God did.  You still don't have my words straight dear one.

    I have showed you that the scriptures speak of “one LORD” and yet there is another “one Lord” and you seem to accept that.  In a similar way, the scriptures speak of “one GOD” and yet there is another, a begotten God.  One always existed and one had a beginning.  I am comparing an apple to an orange.  I am not thinking of them as two apples so to speak.  An apple can't be an orange and an orange can't be an apple but both can be fruit. Do you get this Adam??

    God bless,
    LU


    Hi Sis Kathi,
    No scriptural proof for your begotten God unless the scribes have changed the texts in N.T. Jesus is the begotten Son of the only God the Father. You can not make many Gods who created this universe. Please see the scriptures that say Only one God that created us not two or three. All this drama started by historical Arians who claimed Jesus as begotten (God) and had a beginning. Your theory is not some thing new here. Even a JW believes that. But please understand God from the view point of Judaism not from Paganism. Jesus is the vessel for that One God not that he himself is another God. Please see Col 2:9-10

    9 “For in him dwells the whole fullness of the deity bodily,
    10 and you share in this fullness in him, who is the head of every principality and power”

    We are also going to share in that fullness of Godliness with Jesus in our resurrection. So do we also be called Gods like you say about Jesus as begotten God apart from one God. I am not confused with your theory of saying Father is one Lord also jesus is one Lord. Pl. come out from that primitive belief of believing two Gods which make chrstianity a poly and mystery.
    Sorry for the strong words.
    Peace and love to you
    Adam


    Hi Adam
    Where is your proof that the scribes have changed the original text of John 1:18. Where is your proof that “monogenes theos” was not the original wording?

    Also, it is important to know the Son of God who does NOT have an earthly geneology but later became the Son of God with an earthly geneology.

    Kathi

    #99921
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Adam,
    Don't the JW's and Arians believe that the Son of God was created. I don't. I believe He was actually born of God Himself! Big difference. It is sad to see that you still don't understand what I believe. It is like I am continually having to take you back to the basics of my belief.

    Kathi

    #99925
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Adam……I think it was Athanius who taught the trinity not Airus who taught it, Ithink Arius believed Jesus did not exist as a God before his birth. Check it out in the book when Jesus became God i am pretty sure it there. But what you are saying is right in my opinion Jesus was not a preexisting God or being either, he did not come into existence until his berth through Mary, as Many and others believe.

    Peace to you and your brother……….gene

    #99926
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Adam…….I meant to say MANDY above. Sorry Mandy.

Viewing 20 posts - 3,861 through 3,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account