Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 3,261 through 3,280 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #92354
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    So you agree the Spirit of God is God's own spirit.
    Then why do you teach the Spirit is another person from the Father?

    Just because of inferences?

    #92355

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 12 2008,08:52)
    Hi WJ,
    So you agree the Spirit of God is God's own spirit.
    Then why do you teach the Spirit is another person from the Father?

    Just because of inferences?


    NH

    The Spirit of God is God, just like the Father and the Son.

    It is written, yet you will ignore certain scriptures because of what you say is inferrence.

    Scriptures should interpret our theology and not visa versa.

    :)

    #92356
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 11 2008,03:58)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 11 2008,17:38)
    “But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come.

    Regarding this verse:
    The personal spirit of God is directed by the mind of God, it  acts as the spirit of God, not the mind of God. It is not a person in and of itself nor does it have its own will.  It responds to the will of God.  The mind of God is where the things of God originate and then God, with His thoughts, directs His spirit within Him to act accordingly, and the spirit within Him responds to His will.

    The spirit within God certainly would not act on its own initiative.  It does what the mind of God directs it to do.  It doesn't have a choice, it depends on the mind to initiate what it does.  The Spirit of God does not have its own mind or will, it responds to God's mind and will.  Also, the spirit of God is without measure, it never runs out.  It remains in God but also flows into others.

    Our spirit does not act on its own as if we had a spirit that acted independently of our will.  Apparently God does not have a spirit that acts independently of His will either.  The Holy Spirit gives us that which it has been shown or told by the thoughts of God's mind.

    This is my understanding.

    Gratefully His,
    LU


    Hi LU.
    I think I understand your position correctly, you affirm that the Holy Spirit is a non personal, spiritual extension of the Father, true? If so I believe there are some verse that challenge the theory that the Holy Spirit does not have His own mind or will:

    “and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.” (Romans 8:27)

    “THE mind OF the Spirit” It couldn't be more explicit. The text also bears out that the Spirit “intercedes” (to intercede in behalf of: – make intercession for. [Strongs]) on the saints' behalf, which denotes intelligence, right? But notwithstanding that Who does He intercede to? Wouldn't it be the Father? Seems to me He would be, a lot of scripture points to that. So in holding that that The Holy Spirit is a non-personal extension of the Father Himself is also to acknowledge that The Father (Who is Himself “Spirit”) uses an extension of Him to make intercession TO HIMSELF. Which is the very essence of confusion.

    “But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually just as He wills.” (1 Corinthians 12:11)

    The Spirit right here in this verse is said to have a will. It's plain.

    Here is, what I think is, an excellent exegetical study of the Bible's Holy Spirit data. It was written by Glenn Miller. Have a read and tell me what you think.

    http://www.christian-thinktank.com/trin04a.html

    Blessings
    Is


    Hello Is 1:18 and WJ,

    Quote
    “But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually just as He wills.” (1 Corinthians 12:11)

    If you read the context of the passage from 1 Cor 12:1+ you will see that the “He” from “He wills” in v. 11 refers to God. This passage establishes in the context that the spirit spoken of is the spirit of God. It is God who wills, not the spirit who wills.

    Quote
    “and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.” (Romans 8:27)

    If we understand that the mind of God directs the spirit, then we can read this verse with that understanding. The mind of the Spirit (thoughts/purposes in the mind of God) is God's own mind so of course God knows what the mind of the Spirit is and the Spirit is doing what He is directing it to do within the saints. God sends His spirit to interceed (plead) with us to draw us close to Him. In other words, that which is directing the Spirit is the mind of God. The Spirit does not have a seperate mind from the mind of God the Father.

    Peace,
    LU

    I use the pronoun “it” for the Holy Spirit because “spirit” is a neuter noun and not a masculine noun. The pronoun for a neuter noun is “it” and not “he”.

    #92358
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 12 2008,08:58)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 12 2008,08:52)
    Hi WJ,
    So you agree the Spirit of God is God's own spirit.
    Then why do you teach the Spirit is another person from the Father?

    Just because of inferences?


    NH

    The Spirit of God is God, just like the Father and the Son.

    It is written, yet you will ignore certain scriptures because of what you say is inferrence.

    Scriptures should interpret our theology and not visa versa.

    :)


    Hi WJ,
    The Son of God
    is not our God.

    Scripture is clear that the Father is our God and his.

    #92359

    Hi LU

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 12 2008,09:07)
    I use the pronoun “it” for the Holy Spirit because “spirit” is a neuter noun and not a masculine noun.  The pronoun for a neuter noun is “it” and not “he”.

    Will touch on the rest later, but thought for now I would say that your interpretation of the Holy Spirit and the pronouns is a total violation to all of the major translations.

    How do you propose to know more about Greek than the 100s of translators? ???

    So lets see what your translation looks like…

    “But when it, the Spirit of truth, comes, it will guide you into all the truth; for it will not speak on its own initiative, but whatever it hears, it will speak; and it will disclose to you what is to come.”

    Sounds like the twilight zone. Here is why the translators disagree with your interpretation.

    The verse says the Spirit of truth will…

    ”Come”… erchomai, which means…
    1) to come
    a) of persons
    1) to come from one place to another, and used both of persons arriving and of those returning
    2) to appear, make one's appearance, come before the public

    This word is used AV — come 616, go 13, misc 13, vr come 1

    It is used almost invariably in association with a person in the NT.

    The verse says the Spirit of truth will…

    “Guide”… hodēgeō, which means… 1) to be a guide, lead on one's way, to guide
    2) to be a guide or a teacher
    a) to give guidance to

    This word is used AV — lead 3, guide 2

    100 percent used in association with a person.

    The verse says the Spirit of truth will…

    “Speak”… laleo,  which means…

    1) to utter a voice or emit a sound
    2) to speak
    a) to use the tongue or the faculty of speech
    b) to utter articulate sounds
    3) to talk
    4) to utter, tell
    5) to use words in order to declare one's mind and disclose one's thoughts
    a) to speak

    AV — speak 244, say 15, tell 12, talk 11, preach 6, utter 4, misc 3, vr speak 1

    Almost invariably it involves a person with a tongue.

    The verse says the Spirit of truth will…

    “Hear”… akouō, which means…

    1) to be endowed with the faculty of hearing, not deaf
    2) to hear
    b) to attend to, consider what is or has been said
    c) to understand, perceive the sense of what is said
    3) to hear something
    a) to perceive by the ear what is announced in one's presence
    b) to get by hearing learn
    c) a thing comes to one's ears, to find out, learn
    d) to give ear to a teaching or a teacher
    e) to comprehend, to understand

    AV — hear 418, hearken 6, give audience 3, hearer 2, misc 8

    Again, almost invariably associated with a person who has ears.

    The verse says the Spirit of truth will…

    “Shew” anaggello,

    1) to announce, make known
    2) to report, bring back tidings, rehearse

    AV — tell 6, show 6, declare 3, rehearse 1, speak 1, report 1

    100% associated with a person who has a tongue.

    While we are at it lets look at the 14th verse.

    He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew [it] unto you.

    The Spirit of truth will…

    “Glorify” doxazo,
    1) to think, suppose, be of opinion
    2) to praise, extol, magnify, celebrate
    3) to honour, do honour to, hold in honour
    4) to make glorious, adorn with lustre, clothe with splendour
    a) to impart glory to something, render it excellent
    b) to make renowned, render illustrious
    1) to cause the dignity and worth of some person or thing to become manifest and acknowledged

    AV — glorify 54, honour 3, have glory 2, magnify 1, make glorious 1, full of glory 1

    100% associated with a person.

    The Spirit of truth will…
    “Receive” lambano,

    1) to take
    a) to take with the hand, lay hold of, any person or thing in order to use it
    1) to take up a thing to be carried
    2) to take upon one's self
    b) to take in order to carry away
    1) without the notion of violence, i,e to remove, take away
    c) to take what is one's own, to take to one's self, to make one's own
    1) to claim, procure, for one's self
    a) to associate with one's self as companion, attendant
    2) of that which when taken is not let go, to seize, to lay hold of, apprehend
    3) to take by craft (our catch, used of hunters, fisherman, etc.), to circumvent one by fraud
    4) to take to one's self, lay hold upon, take possession of, i.e. to appropriate to one's self
    5) catch at, reach after, strive to obtain
    6) to take a thing due, to collect, gather (tribute)
    d) to take
    1) to admit, receive
    2) to receive what is offered
    3) not to refuse or reject
    4) to receive a person, give him access to one's self,
    a) to regard any one's power, rank, external circumstances, and on that account to do some injustice or neglect something
    e) to take, to choose, select
    f) to take beginning, to prove anything, to make a trial of, to experience
    2) to receive (what is given), to gain, get, obtain, to get back

    AV — receive 133, take 106, have 3, catch 3, not tr 1, misc 17

    Almost invariably associated with a person.

    This is only two verses spoken by Jesus and not to mention the Apostles describing the Holy Spirit with personal attributes using personal pronouns.

    Should we ignore them?

    Finally Jesus said…

    But the Comforter, (parakletos) which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. John 14:26

    Jesus uses this greek word “parakletos” 4 times in the Gospel of John in referring to the Holy Spirit.

    “parakletos” is “Masculine noun” that means;

    1) summoned, called to one's side, esp. called to one's aid

    a) one who pleads another's cause before a judge, a pleader, counsel for defense, legal assistant, an advocate

    b) one who pleads another's cause with one, an intercessor

    1) of Christ in his exaltation at God's right hand, pleading with God the Father for the pardon of our sins

    c) in the widest sense, a helper, succourer, aider, assistant

    1) of the Holy Spirit destined to take the place of Christ with the apostles (after his ascension to the Father), to lead them to a deeper knowledge of the gospel truth, and give them divine strength needed to enable them to undergo trials and persecutions on behalf of the divine kingdom

    In fact John even uses the word in describing Yeshua here…

    My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate (parakletos) with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: 1 John 2:1

    I think the translators have it right.

    Blessings!

    #92363
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Moved to the thread.

    #92379
    dirtyknections
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 11 2008,10:30)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 11 2008,10:12)
    To all …….who believe in preexistence , tell me who is this talking about here.

    Psa 139:13…> “for you formed my inward parts; You covered me in my mothers womb.14.> I will praise you because i am fearfully and wonderfully made: Marvelous are Your works, and that, my soul knows very well.15..> My frame was not hidden from You, When i was made in secret, and skillfully wrought in the lowest parts of the earth,16..> Your saw my substance, being yet unformed. and in your book they all were written, the days fashioned for me, when as yet there were none of them.

    question in what book was it not the bible and was it not the prophesies about Jesus that is being referred to here. And if that be the case then no where is there does he mention a prior existence and don't you think it would have been mentioned it, if he preexisted. If its a prophesy about Jesus, which i believe it is.

    peace….gene


    GB

    That is simply a Psalm of David.

    David says…

    For you created my inmost being;
    you knit me together in my mother's womb. NIV Ps 139:13

    This is not prophetic of Yeshua even though you would like for it to be. IMO.  WJ

    :)


    AMEN!!

    #92400
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    DK……what do you do with …”in your (BOOK) they were all written , the days (fashioned) when as (YET) there were NONE of them.
    Please show me where any of that fits King David. If you really study what it says you will conclude it's refereeing to Jesus Himself. Remember where is says ” in the volume of the books it is written of me, I come “O” GOD to do (YOUR) WILL. These books mentioned here are the Book of GOD the Bible. And Jesus was written in them before He was Born as you well Know, where King David was Not written in any prophesies at all.

    IMO……….>gene

    #92401
    dirtyknections
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 12 2008,13:37)
    DK……what do you do with …”in your (BOOK) they were all written , the days (fashioned) when as (YET) there were NONE of them.
    Please show me where any of that fits King David. If you really study what it says you will conclude it's refereeing to Jesus Himself. Remember where is says ” in the volume of the books it is written of me, I come “O” GOD to do (YOUR) WILL. These books mentioned here are the Book of GOD the Bible. And Jesus was written in them before He was Born as you well Know, where King David was Not written in any prophesies at all.

    IMO……….>gene


    David was GOD's annointed king and he took pride in doing his will…he was also “favorable in his eyes”

    Remember…there are many “books” and “scrolls” according to the bible…GOD designed humans and David was simply lauding GOD for his wonderful creation

    #92402
    dirtyknections
    Participant

    Remember these other books and scrolls mentioned in the bible…and their contents..are in GOD's jurisdiction not ours…it is pointless to speculate what may be in them until GOD tells us

    #92409
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    DK……no where was David's existence prophesied to come in any book and the only book being mentioned here is God's book, the bible.The days (fashioned) when as yet there was none, that means before He was born it was all laid out what He was to do. It's a prophecy about Jesus. And that's plain and we don”t have to speculate on others books and scrolls there were none concerning King David. It's plain it's talking about Jesus who was prophesied to come in the bible and that was what the Psalm was talking about, No other.

    IMO………….gene

    #92412
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    I am thankful that the Holy Spirit is capable of many things. The spirit of man is capable of different personified things as well. Note these verses below:

    Job 21:4
    As for me, is my complaint to man? and if it were so, why should not my spirit be troubled?

    Ps 77:3
    I remembered God, and was troubled: I complained, and my spirit was overwhelmed. Selah.

    Ps 77:6
    I call to remembrance my song in the night: I commune with mine own heart: and my spirit made diligent search.

    Ps 142:3
    When my spirit was overwhelmed within me, then thou knewest my path. In the way wherein I walked have they privily laid a snare for me.

    Co 14:14
    For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

    Lu 1:47
    And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.

    So what can the spirit of man do?
    It can rejoice in God
    It can pray
    It can be overwhelmed
    It can make a diligent search
    It can be troubled

    The spirit of man can do things that a man can also do; pray, search, etc. but it is not another man which is inside us or with us but it is a “thing” a very unique and special thing, not a person. The spirit of man is a neuter noun also just like the spirit of God is a neuter noun and the pronouns for a neuter noun would be it, its, and itself.

    Let's try these verses again but add he/it. Which one fits better? First say the verse with “he” as the pronoun and then say the verse with “it” as the pronoun. Do you notice a difference? I do.

    Job 21:4
    As for me, is my complaint to man? and if it were so, why should not my spirit be troubled (why should he/it not be troubled?)

    Ps 77:3
    I remembered God, and was troubled: I complained, and my spirit, he/it was overwhelmed. Selah.

    Ps 77:6
    I call to remembrance my song in the night: I commune with mine own heart: and my spirit, he/it made diligent search.

    Ps 142:3
    When my spirit (When he/it) was overwhelmed within me, then thou knewest my path. In the way wherein I walked have they privily laid a snare for me.

    Co 14:14
    For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit, he/it prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

    Lu 1:47
    And my spirit, he/it hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.

    I would think that “it” would be a better choice as the pronoun for man's spirit because the word “he” makes it sound like the spirit is another person in or with us.

    So, I think that “it” instead of “he” should be the pronoun for the Holy Spirit. Using “he” when the spirit is a neuter noun really changes the meaning as we can see in the above and no wonder for all the confusion thinking that the Holy Spirit is another person. Masculine nouns get “he/his/himself”, feminine nouns get “she/her/herself” and neuter nouns get it/its/itself as their pronouns.

    God bless,
    LU

    #92424
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I honestly cannot see how preexisting in the form of God, then emptying yourself to become lower than the angels as a man, gave Jesus an advantage. He chose to become a man like us. Yes he was without sin and that was the difference between him and us, but he paid the price that the first Adam clocked up.

    In every other way he was like us and was tempted like us, but probably in a more extreme way too. I believe that he could have chosen to sin, just as Adam chose.

    Jesus lived as a perfect man and is able to redeem all men.

    He is now in the glory that he had with the Father before the world was created.

    #92425
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    A being with divine nature who emptied himself and took on human nature still equals a human being. i.e., a being with a human body.

    He is now in the glory that he had with the Father before the world began. He is at the right hand of the majesty on high.

    #92433
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hello T8,
    Was there any proof that Jesus was having glory before his resurrection? Why was it not visible in heaven earlier? See the present glory which Jesus is having promised by his Father before the foundations of the world but was not given untill he fulfilled his Father's will on the cross of calvary. “He is sitting on the right hand of Father” is present my friend not past before his birth. There is lot of assumption in your understanding for which there is no proof in O.T.
    take care
    Adam

    #92451

    HI LU

    In respnse to your post, I have moved the discussion to the Holy Spirit thread.

    Holy Spirit thread.

    #92455
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8………gollamudi is right there is a LOT of assumptions in what you said, and is not scripturally backed up, where does it say he (WAS) before he was born in divine nature your making it come out that way to fit your theology of preexistence, But if you examine it closely it says “who (EXISTING) in the Nature of God , question when was he (EXISTING) in the Nature of GOD, before He was born?, or after He was Born,?,

    It was after He was born because He was given the divine nature at berth and He did not
    try to rob GOD, by taking away His Glory as if He were a GOD. T8 its simple to understand God the Father made another Adam the all And perfected Him through out His life on earth. Just like He will do with us when we receive the fullness of the Spirit of God at the resurrection of the justified, When we will see Him Just as He is, so will we be. Thats are hope.

    peace ……….gene

    #92490
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    If you would undestand scripture you should study the order in which it is written.
    Looking at Heb 1 and Phil 2 shows what God is revealing. Scrambling the order to justify disbelief is not the way we should follow.

    #92494
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick…….It's you who are scrambling the order Show me where it says He preexisted in the nature of GOD. The scripture read (Who (existing) in the nature of God) not preexisted, It doesn't say that right but you and trinitarians are trying to make it say that when if fact it doesn't say that. If it does please show me it.

    Peace ……….gene

    #92495
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick………When Jesus was here on earth He existed in the Nature of GOD, that simply means He has the fullness of the Spirit of God in Him and despite that He did not consider to make himself equal to God by robbing God of Gods Glory, that what trinitarians do they take God's glory and give it all to Jesus, But interestingly Jesus never did that< He gave God the Father all the Glory. Saying if I glorify myself my glory is nothing. And again I have glorified (YOU) God the Father on the earth.

    With all your bible quoting you should by now know these things………..gene

Viewing 20 posts - 3,261 through 3,280 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account