Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 3,021 through 3,040 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #91083
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    DK……..the great (apostasy) is the trinitarian theology , it was prophesied to come and came full blown at the council of Necia in 325 AD. Or due you think it's going to come 2000 years after it was prophesied. It's been here for the last 1700 years, Just look at the trinitarian past would tell you that they murdered over 20 million people in the name of their trinitarian religion, come on wake up. Read up on it, look at all the history that proves it.

    Peace to you…………..gene

    #91084
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Also this pre-existence mythology my brother Gene for which many non-trinitarians bowingdown.

    #91094

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:01)
    WJ,
    So you say there is no eternal “Son”, then it stands to reason that there is also no eternal “Father”.  You then have your own idea of a trinity.  I may be wrong but I was taught that the first person of the trinity was the Father, the second person of the trinity was the Son, and the third person of the trinity was the Holy Spirit and they are co-eternal.


    LU

    And when were these things revealed to us?

    When did the Father become the Father of Yeshua?

    When did the Hebrews in the the Tanakh or Torah refer to YHWH as Father?

    Your logic also betrays you here.

    For if you say that Yeshua was born or had a beginning way back then.

    Then was the Father a Father before he spoke Yeshua into being, which I believe is your view?

    ???

    #91096
    gollamudi
    Participant

    There is thinking in that question my brother WJ

    #91097
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,12:30)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:01)
    WJ,
    So you say there is no eternal “Son”, then it stands to reason that there is also no eternal “Father”.  You then have your own idea of a trinity.  I may be wrong but I was taught that the first person of the trinity was the Father, the second person of the trinity was the Son, and the third person of the trinity was the Holy Spirit and they are co-eternal.


    LU

    And when were these things revealed to us?

    When did the Father become the Father of Yeshua?

    When did the Hebrews in the the Tanakh or Torah refer to YHWH as Father?

    Your logic also betrays you here.

    For if you say that Yeshua was born or had a beginning way back then.

    Then was the Father a Father before he spoke Yeshua into being, which I believe is your view?

    ???


    I am not the trinitarian here. I never said that the Son was eternal or that the Father was eternal. I have stated that it was the Most High God that was eternal. It is the trinity doctrine that claims the Father and Son and Holy Spirit as co-eternal. Yet you claim that the Son is not eternal and thus the Father can't be either.

    You claim to be the trinitarian here yet you deny the eternal nature of the Son and therefore the eternal nature of the Father. I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence and then announcing Him.

    With all due respect,
    It is not my logic that is betraying me but yours dear one and thank you for admitting that.
    LU

    #91102
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    Can you explain how God birth a son and anounced it if it is other than through Mary.

    #91103

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:44)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,12:30)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:01)
    WJ,
    So you say there is no eternal “Son”, then it stands to reason that there is also no eternal “Father”.  You then have your own idea of a trinity.  I may be wrong but I was taught that the first person of the trinity was the Father, the second person of the trinity was the Son, and the third person of the trinity was the Holy Spirit and they are co-eternal.


    LU

    And when were these things revealed to us?

    When did the Father become the Father of Yeshua?

    When did the Hebrews in the the Tanakh or Torah refer to YHWH as Father?

    Your logic also betrays you here.

    For if you say that Yeshua was born or had a beginning way back then.

    Then was the Father a Father before he spoke Yeshua into being, which I believe is your view?

    ???


    I am not the trinitarian here.  I never said that the Son was eternal or that the Father was eternal.  I have stated that it was the Most High God that was eternal.  It is the trinity doctrine that claims the Father and Son and Holy Spirit as co-eternal. Yet you claim that the Son is not eternal and thus the Father can't be either.

    You claim to be the trinitarian here yet you deny the eternal nature of the Son and therefore the eternal nature of the Father.  I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence and then announcing Him.

    With all due respect,
    It is not my logic that is betraying me but yours dear one and thank you for admitting that.
    LU


    LU

    There you go.

    Misrepresent me as all the rest.

    If I claim that Yeshua is One God with the Father as John 1:1 and other scriptures claim.

    Then how can I be saying that Yeshua before his incarnation is not eternal.

    You are simply putting words in my mouth.

    Yeshua was not declared a Son until  he came in the flesh and was found in fashion as a man. Phil 2.

    He was in the form of God before his incarnation just as the Father was and is in the form of God now.

    The words you speak are a missrepresentation of my view and is false witness to what I have said.

    Respectfully!

    You say…

    Quote

    I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence and then announcing Him.

    Yet you have said that when the Father said “Let there be light” that Yeshua became that light.

    Have I missrepresented you here? ???

    #91104
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,11:46)
    WJ,

    So that would be no verses that actually use the word “unique”.  

    You seem to like this translation so I will ask you a question using it also.

    ESV
    No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.
    Footnote:
    a Greek in the bosom of the Father
    b Or the only One, who is God; some manuscripts the only Son
    The Holy Bible, English Standard Version © 2001 Crossway Bibles

    If Jesus is “the only God, who is at the Father's side,” then the Holy Spirit is not also God at the Father's side.

    This post and my last post to you are pointing out problems with your understanding if there truly is a triune God.  You are contradicting your own doctrine.

    LU[/quote]
    LU

    I see no contradiction.

    There is no disparity in the Godhead. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One God.

    With your logic you are simply confused.

    Is Yeshua in the Father? Is the Father in Yeshua? Then how can they be in each other at the same time.

    How can they be in each other and be beside each other?

    Tell me LU, how many spirits did you drink or was baptised into?

    Does the Father live in you, or the Son or the Holy Spirit?

    If you answer these questions then you will know the nature of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, for they are ONE, not the same in person, but One God.

    The Henotheistic view has many flaws, for they claim Yeshua preexisted as “a god” much like the Jws. But scriptures are clear only YHWH created all thinngs “By himself”, with none other.

    :)


    WJ,

    Quote
    Is Yeshua in the Father? Is the Father in Yeshua? Then how can they be in each other at the same time.

    How can they be in each other and be beside each other?

    Yeshua can be in the Father and so can we and the Father can also be in us as well as Yeshua. How can we all be in each other at the same time? We are not collectivey one God are we. Yet you say that they are one God. But we are also in Him and He is in us but your logic is inconsistent because the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and the believers are not considered one God.

    If you want to know how the Father can be in the Son and also beside the Son at the same time without them being the one God then it would be similar to how we can be in them and they in us at the same time and we are not one God.

    I think that the Father's love and purpose and words can be in us and in His Son. Also the Father's spirit can be in us and in His Son. The spirit of the Son can also be in us crying “Abba Father”.

    How can we be in the Father? He is our God, our protector, our shield, our covering. The Son is also those things. The Son is in His Father by being in subjection to His Father.

    1 Cor 15:27-28
    27 ForHE HAS PUT ALL THINGS IN SUBJECTION UNDER HIS FEET. But when He says, ” All things are put in subjection,” it is evident that He is excepted who put all things in subjection to Him. 28 When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.
    NASU

    LU

    #91107

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:56)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,11:46)
    WJ,

    So that would be no verses that actually use the word “unique”.  

    You seem to like this translation so I will ask you a question using it also.

    ESV
    No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.
    Footnote:
    a Greek in the bosom of the Father
    b Or the only One, who is God; some manuscripts the only Son
    The Holy Bible, English Standard Version © 2001 Crossway Bibles

    If Jesus is “the only God, who is at the Father's side,” then the Holy Spirit is not also God at the Father's side.

    This post and my last post to you are pointing out problems with your understanding if there truly is a triune God.  You are contradicting your own doctrine.

    LU


    LU

    I see no contradiction.

    There is no disparity in the Godhead. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One God.

    With your logic you are simply confused.

    Is Yeshua in the Father? Is the Father in Yeshua? Then how can they be in each other at the same time.

    How can they be in each other and be beside each other?

    Tell me LU, how many spirits did you drink or was baptised into?

    Does the Father live in you, or the Son or the Holy Spirit?

    If you answer these questions then you will know the nature of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, for they are ONE, not the same in person, but One God.

    The Henotheistic view has many flaws, for they claim Yeshua preexisted as “a god” much like the Jws. But scriptures are clear only YHWH created all thinngs “By himself”, with none other.

    :)[/quote]
    WJ,

    Quote
    Is Yeshua in the Father? Is the Father in Yeshua? Then how can they be in each other at the same time.

    How can they be in each other and be beside each other?

    Yeshua can be in the Father and so can we and the Father can also be in us as well as Yeshua.  How can we all be in each other at the same time?  We are not collectivey one God are we.  Yet you say that they are one God.  But we are also in Him and He is in us but your logic is inconsistent because the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and the believers are not considered one God.

    If you want to know how the Father can be in the Son and also beside the Son at the same time without them being the one God then it would be similar to how we can be in them and they in us at the same time and we are not one God.

    I think that the Father's love and purpose and words can be in us and in His Son. Also the Father's spirit can be in us and in His Son.  The spirit of the Son can also be in us crying “Abba Father”.

    How can we be in the Father?  He is our God, our protector, our shield, our covering.  The Son is also those things. The Son is in His Father by being in subjection to His Father.

    1 Cor 15:27-28
    27 ForHE HAS PUT ALL THINGS IN SUBJECTION UNDER HIS FEET. But when He says, ” All things are put in subjection,” it is evident that He is excepted who put all things in subjection to Him. 28 When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.
    NASU

    LU


    LU

    Quote

    Yeshua can be in the Father and so can we and the Father can also be in us as well as Yeshua. How can we all be in each other at the same time? We are not collectivey one God are we. Yet you say that they are one God. But we are also in Him and He is in us but your logic is inconsistent because the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and the believers are not considered one God.

    You didnt answer the questions?

    How many Spirits live in you? Yeshua is omnipresent, living in the heart of every believer by his Spirit.

    Dont you see the difference? ???

    #91109
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,12:55)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:44)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,12:30)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:01)
    WJ,
    So you say there is no eternal “Son”, then it stands to reason that there is also no eternal “Father”.  You then have your own idea of a trinity.  I may be wrong but I was taught that the first person of the trinity was the Father, the second person of the trinity was the Son, and the third person of the trinity was the Holy Spirit and they are co-eternal.


    LU

    And when were these things revealed to us?

    When did the Father become the Father of Yeshua?

    When did the Hebrews in the the Tanakh or Torah refer to YHWH as Father?

    Your logic also betrays you here.

    For if you say that Yeshua was born or had a beginning way back then.

    Then was the Father a Father before he spoke Yeshua into being, which I believe is your view?

    ???


    I am not the trinitarian here.  I never said that the Son was eternal or that the Father was eternal.  I have stated that it was the Most High God that was eternal.  It is the trinity doctrine that claims the Father and Son and Holy Spirit as co-eternal. Yet you claim that the Son is not eternal and thus the Father can't be either.

    You claim to be the trinitarian here yet you deny the eternal nature of the Son and therefore the eternal nature of the Father.  I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence and then announcing Him.

    With all due respect,
    It is not my logic that is betraying me but yours dear one and thank you for admitting that.
    LU


    LU

    There you go.

    Misrepresent me as all the rest.

    If I claim that Yeshua is One God with the Father as John 1:1 and other scriptures claim.

    Then how can I be saying that Yeshua before his incarnation is not eternal.

    You are simply putting words in my mouth.

    Yeshua was not declared a Son until  he came in the flesh and was found in fashion as a man. Phil 2.

    He was in the form of God before his incarnation just as the Father was and is in the form of God now.

    The words you speak are a missrepresentation of my view and is false witness to what I have said.

    Respectfully!

    You say…

    Quote

    I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence and then announcing Him.

    Yet you have said that when the Father said “Let there be light” that Yeshua became that light.

    Have I missrepresented you here? ???


    WJ,
    Sorry if I misrepresented you but you do not believe that the Son was eternal as a Son but the trinity doctrine teaches an eternal Son. So I do not think that you accept the trinity doctrine. Are you saying that the first person of the trinity was the Father-to-be, the second person of the trinity was the Son-to-be and the third person of the trinity was the Holy Spirit and they are co-eternal? That is not what the trinity doctrine says.

    About you misrepresenting me,

    I do not believe that the Son of God was merely spoken into existence. I think that He came from the Most High God in an asexual reproduction birth and that He was born on day one and announced as the Light.

    LU

    #91110
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ June 05 2008,02:53)
    Hi DK
    Yes I can quote many verses like these
    1) 1 Pet 1:20 “Jesus was predestained before the foundations of the world”
    2) Gal 4:4 “when fullness of time came …Jesus was born through a woman”
    3) Rom 1:3-4 “born of a descendant of David…declared the son of God ..by the resurrection from the dead”
    4) Heb 1:1-2 ” …in these last days He spoke to us in His son”
    5) Eph 1:4-5 “… He chose us in him(christ) before the foundations of the world”
    6) Jn 17:5 “..glorify me ..with the glory which I had before the foundations of the world”
    7) Jn 17:24 ” ..for thou didst love me before the foundations of the world”
    8) 2 Sam 7:12-16 ” …I will be a father to him and he will be son to me”
    9) Ps 2:7 ” Today I have begotten thee..”
    10) Isa 11:1-5 ” a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse”
    Like this I can quote many scriptures that prove that there is no pre-existence of Jesus whatsoever except he was foreordained in the plan of God to take birth through a woman when the fullness of time comes according to Paul in Gal 4:4. I know you may interpret some of these scripture towards your pre-existence, then I leave to your dogma. The glory Jesus was mentioning in Jn 17:5 was pre-ordained glory for Jesus on his successful completion of God's will in his life not the pre-existing glory as you believe. Jesus was raisen to the level of this glory only after he rose from the dead not that he was already sitting with the father before his birth. Where do you find such verses to support that dogma?
    Hope you will study these scripture in details and submit your anology.
    Adam


    Adam,
    Good work and I agree.
    Love, Mandy

    #91111
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Thanks Sis,
    Now you concentrate on LU's dogma.

    #91114
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,04:44)
    I pointed out that the Most High God became a Father and not by speaking the Son into existence either but by birthing the Son into existence


    The reason this theory causes confusion is because it is nonesense to humans.  You cannot give birth to something by yourself.  That is something we cannot understand.

    Gene says, “And the beat goes on.”

    And I would say, the spin continues to spin…..

    #91116
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,05:09)
    I think that He came from the Most High God in an asexual reproduction birth and that He was born on day one and announced as the Light.


    Unique theology.

    Brother Adam, I do not need to focus on Kathi's dogma. I think I get her. She feels she has had a revelation from God regarding some passages in Genesis and that when “light” was called out, this was the Son being born.

    OK. I can see that. Just as I see my theory and other's. It's different, I'll grant you that. But I can still see it. And hey, if God has shown her this who are we to tell her it's not so? :;):

    #91118
    Lightenup
    Participant

    WJ,
    I believe this is what you want me to address:

    You say:
    Tell me LU, how many spirits did you drink or was baptised into?

    Does the Father live in you, or the Son or the Holy Spirit?
    I do not know what you mean when you ask how many spirits did I drink?

    I was baptized in the baptism of water to acknowledge the forgiveness of sins and to follow Christ and the Holy Spirit resides in me which is the spirit of the Father. I have been given the spirit of the Son.
    Gal 4:6-7
    God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying, ” Abba! Father!”
    NASU

    I do not think that the Son is omnipresent although His spirit is put into the heart of all God's children. I do believe that the Holy Spirit is able to be present wherever He wants to be. If anything can actually be omnipresent the Holy Spirit would be it. Like, I would have trouble with the idea that the Holy Spirit is in my air conditioner or in my oven. If the Son is omnipresent then why would the Father have to put the spirit of the son in my heart. If He was omnipresent, His spirit would already be there.

    #91120
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hey Kathi,

    Ask t8 for editing rights. It will make your posting so much easier.
    :)

    #91121
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Kathi,

    Quote
    I do believe that the Holy Spirit is able to be present wherever He wants to be


    AND

    Quote
    I do not think that the Son is omnipresent although His spirit is put into the heart of all God's children.

    Question: do you believe that the “Holy Spirit” and the spirit of the Son are two different spirits?

    #91124
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,13:28)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,05:09)
    I think that He came from the Most High God in an asexual reproduction birth and that He was born on day one and announced as the Light.


    Unique theology.

    Brother Adam, I do not need to focus on Kathi's dogma.  I think I get her.  She feels she has had a revelation from God regarding some passages in Genesis and that when “light” was called out, this was the Son being born.

    OK.  I can see that.  Just as I see my theory and other's.  It's different, I'll grant you that.  But I can still see it.  And hey, if God has shown her this who are we to tell her it's not so?   :;):


    Thanks Mandy!

    The revelation that I received was that the term “firstborn of all creation” related to “let there be Light”.
    Have a great day,
    Love, LU

    #91125
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,13:40)
    Kathi,

    Quote
    I do believe that the Holy Spirit is able to be present wherever He wants to be


    AND

    Quote
    I do not think that the Son is omnipresent although His spirit is put into the heart of all God's children.

    Question:  do you believe that the “Holy Spirit” and the spirit of the Son are two different spirits?


    Hi Mandy,
    Wow instant messaging, cool.
    Yes, I believe that they are two distinct spirits.
    Kathi

    #91127
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 05 2008,05:49)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,13:40)
    Kathi,

    Quote
    I do believe that the Holy Spirit is able to be present wherever He wants to be


    AND

    Quote
    I do not think that the Son is omnipresent although His spirit is put into the heart of all God's children.

    Question:  do you believe that the “Holy Spirit” and the spirit of the Son are two different spirits?


    Hi Mandy,
    Wow instant messaging, cool.
    Yes, I believe that they are two distinct spirits.
    Kathi


    So as believer's which spirit are we given? The Holy Spirit or the spirit of Christ?
    Thanks

Viewing 20 posts - 3,021 through 3,040 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account