Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 2,921 through 2,940 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #90843
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (dirtyknections @ June 03 2008,14:42)
    To deny the pre-existence of Christ is to seek to deny the capacity of the host to be brought down to the pit and to be resurrected. It seeks to place Christ on a separate level and effectively deny the position of humans to become co-heirs with Christ, and for God to become all in all.


    DK,
    It's interesting that you say “To deny the pre-existence of Christ is to seek to deny….” and then you go on to list some things. I quite feel the opposite. To believe the preexistence of Christ is to deny those very things that you listed.

    Funny how two people reading the same book and supposedly have the same Spirit – can see two different and opposing ideas.

    God bless ya,
    Mandy

    #90863
    Lightenup
    Participant

    DK,
    Thank you for your post. I am so glad you are here!
    God bless you,
    LU

    #90867
    dirtyknections
    Participant

    Hey lighten…

    Blessings….I believe there is truth in everything everyone has said in this thread…there are parts missing that keep us from agreement…whos version has some truth missing? you,me, and everyone else here…we should keep in mind that only God has absolute truth…and we should keep seeking that truth until he leads us to it…when will we attain it? Thats in Gods jurisdiction..

    Remember Christ said, “There are many things i would like to tell you but you are not ready”…

    So I wait patiently until God reveals to me all that he has for me to know…

    #90868
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ June 02 2008,06:38)
    Hi LightenUp,
    You are completely out of Bible in interpreting these scriptures like Jn 1:1 or Gen 1:1-3. By claiming the 'word' as separate being other than one God you are making yourself another trap of creating more than one God like JW. Please be careful in interpreting scriptures like this. Even a Trinitarian will laugh at your interpretation like you did above. Don't deviate from monotheism what Jesus taught us ” One God created us without any one's help”.
    I don't want to hurt you personally but your interpretations are going in wrong direction by creating another begotten God.
    Sorry to bother you
    Adam


    GM,
    Do you not know anything about the active voice or passive voice regarding Greek verbs? You ought to learn it because you would see that a “plan” can not “exist” on its own action.
    I have written several posts on this, go back and read them.

    Do you not know that monogenes can be and typically is translated as “only begotten”?

    Do you not know that Theos is translated “god/God”.

    Do you not know that “monogenes Theos” is in the first chapter on John, specifically John 1:18?
    John 1:17-18
    18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father,
    NASU

    Did you not know that John says that Jesus is the True Light?
    This is also in the first chapter of John, specifically John 1:9. Also see John 8:12-13

    Then Jesus again spoke to them, saying, ” I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.”
    NASU

    Did you not know that Paul refers to the Heavenly Father's beloved Son as the Firstborn of all creation which means the first to be born and be alive?

    Did you not realize that the Light on day one of creation was the first-born of all creation in otherwords, the first to be alive of all creation?
    Col 1:15

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
    NASU

    Did you not realize that “let there be light” was the WORD in the beginning and actually the first word said by the Most High God in the beginning of Genesis? Also see in John 1 that the word in the beginning was with God and was God and was the true light that became flesh.

    Do you realize that a true begotten God could never be a true unbegotten and always existing God and never be His equal and that the unbegotten God would ALWAYS be the only ONE TRUE Most High God?

    Do you not realize these things? You must not have by what you say in your post. No wonder you do not understand my interpretation.

    No, you do not hurt me personally but you hurt yourself and I am sorry for that, I tried to help you and so did John and Paul (the John and Paul of the book of John and Colossians).

    Quote
    I don't want to hurt you personally but your interpretations are going in wrong direction by creating another begotten God.

    I am not creating “another” begotten God, you overestimate my ability. ???
    There is only one begotten God and that is the Son of the Most High God who became the Messiah. I do not believe that He was created but instead He was born. God begat God, hence, the begotten God. God didn't begat trees, He created trees. He didn't beget man, He created Him. Man begets man. My children were born of me, I did not create them. The Son of God was born of God, God did not create Him. God had everything He needed to reproduce one of His own kind always within Himself. That “reproduction” could never be the original or always existent like the original.

    Heb 1:3
    3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature…
    NASU

    The exact representation of the nature of something is a reproduction, and not the original, IMO.

    By golly, Golla, I want to be your friend that helps you and not one that does you harm, please believe me.

    God bless,
    LU

    #90869
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (dirtyknections @ June 03 2008,11:40)
    Hey lighten…

    Blessings….I believe there is truth in everything everyone has said in this thread…there are parts missing that keep us from agreement…whos version has some truth missing? you,me, and everyone else here…we should keep in mind that only God has absolute truth…and we should keep seeking that truth until he leads us to it…when will we attain it? Thats in Gods jurisdiction..

    Remember Christ said, “There are many things i would like to tell you but you are not ready”…

    So I wait patiently until God reveals to me all that he has for me to know…


    Well said DK and I agree. When He lead us to truth then we can lead others.
    God bless,
    LU

    #90871
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,03:48)
    Do you not know anything about the active voice or passive voice regarding Greek verbs? You ought to learn it because you would see that a “plan” can not “exist” on its own action.


    There are many of us in the camp that believe Jesus existed as a “plan” with God before the worlds were. However, I can only speak for myself when I say that I have never believed that the “plan existed on it's own action.” I have never believed that.

    John 1 tells us that the word was with God and was God. And so therefore the plan/word could not have existed on it's own. I realize this is just the tip of the iceberg here, but it's been a long night for me and I'm pretty pooped today. :)

    #90872
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (dirtyknections @ June 04 2008,03:40)
    Hey lighten…

    Blessings….I believe there is truth in everything everyone has said in this thread…there are parts missing that keep us from agreement…whos version has some truth missing? you,me, and everyone else here…we should keep in mind that only God has absolute truth…and we should keep seeking that truth until he leads us to it…when will we attain it? Thats in Gods jurisdiction..

    Remember Christ said, “There are many things i would like to tell you but you are not ready”…

    So I wait patiently until God reveals to me all that he has for me to know…


    Well, hallelujah brother!
    :)
    Preach it!
    Mandy

    #90875
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,03:48)

    Quote (gollamudi @ June 02 2008,06:38)
    Hi LightenUp,
    You are completely out of Bible in interpreting these scriptures like Jn 1:1 or Gen 1:1-3. By claiming the 'word' as separate being other than one God you are making yourself another trap of creating more than one God like JW. Please be careful in interpreting scriptures like this. Even a Trinitarian will laugh at your interpretation like you did above. Don't deviate from monotheism what Jesus taught us ” One God created us without any one's help”.
    I don't want to hurt you personally but your interpretations are going in wrong direction by creating another begotten God.
    Sorry to bother you
    Adam


    GM,
    Do you not know anything about the active voice or passive voice regarding Greek verbs? You ought to learn it because you would see that a “plan” can not “exist” on its own action.
    I have written several posts on this, go back and read them.

    Do you not know that monogenes can be and typically is translated as “only begotten”?

    Do you not know that Theos is translated “god/God”.

    Do you not know that “monogenes Theos” is in the first chapter on John, specifically John 1:18?
    John 1:17-18
    18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father,
    NASU

    Did you not know that John says that Jesus is the True Light?
    This is also in the first chapter of John, specifically John 1:9. Also see John 8:12-13

    Then Jesus again spoke to them, saying, ” I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.”
    NASU

    Did you not know that Paul refers to the Heavenly Father's beloved Son as the Firstborn of all creation which means the first to be born and be alive?

    Did you not realize that the Light on day one of creation was the first-born of all creation in otherwords, the first to be alive of all creation?
    Col 1:15

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
    NASU

    Did you not realize that “let there be light” was the WORD in the beginning and actually the first word said by the Most High God in the beginning of Genesis? Also see in John 1 that the word in the beginning was with God and was God and was the true light that became flesh.

    Do you realize that a true begotten God could never be a true unbegotten and always existing God and never be His equal and that the unbegotten God would ALWAYS be the only ONE TRUE Most High God?

    Do you not realize these things? You must not have by what you say in your post. No wonder you do not understand my interpretation.

    No, you do not hurt me personally but you hurt yourself and I am sorry for that, I tried to help you and so did John and Paul (the John and Paul of the book of John and Colossians).

    Quote
    I don't want to hurt you personally but your interpretations are going in wrong direction by creating another begotten God.

    I am not creating “another” begotten God, you overestimate my ability. ???
    There is only one begotten God and that is the Son of the Most High God who became the Messiah. I do not believe that He was created but instead He was born. God begat God, hence, the begotten God. God didn't begat trees, He created trees. He didn't beget man, He created Him. Man begets man. My children were born of me, I did not create them. The Son of God was born of God, God did not create Him. God had everything He needed to reproduce one of His own kind always within Himself. That “reproduction” could never be the original or always existent like the original.

    Heb 1:3
    3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature…
    NASU

    The exact representation of the nature of something is a reproduction, and not the original, IMO.

    By golly, Golla, I want to be your friend that helps you and not one that does you harm, please believe me.

    God bless,
    LU


    lightenup………And do you not realize you have added words and thought and textual inferences to meet your own trinitarian view points. So what you have is the trinity thats obivious given to you by the lying trinitarians.

    Gollamudi ……has the simple Truth. Given Him by GOD simple and clear and doesn't have to contort scriptures to see things that are not specifically there like you and the rest of the trinitarians do. When God's Spirit is guiding you it's easily understood things.

    IMO……………gene

    #90877
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Bro Gene,

    I might be mistaken, but I don't think Kathi calls herself a trinitarian? However I have always agreed that the preexistent theory is closely related to trinity doctrine.

    Anyway, if we can keep discussing the truth with love I believe there will be some unity amongst all of us. Even if we agree to disagree and keep encouraging one another we will have fulfilled one of the greatest commandments to love one another.

    Grace extended is such a beautiful thing amongst the brethren. I believe it's how we recognize who is his – by our love.

    Press on bro. And remember the most excellent way…….love.
    Mandy

    #90880
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 03 2008,12:24)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,03:48)
    Do you not know anything about the active voice or passive voice regarding Greek verbs?  You ought to learn it because you would see that a “plan” can not “exist” on its own action.


    There are many of us in the camp that believe Jesus existed as a “plan” with God before the worlds were.  However, I can only speak for myself when I say that I have never believed that the “plan existed on it's own action.”  I have never believed that.

    John 1 tells us that the word was with God and was God.  And so therefore the plan/word could not have existed on it's own.  I realize this is just the tip of the iceberg here, but it's been a long night for me and I'm pretty pooped today.  :)


    That is good Mandy that you do not believe that the “plan existed on it's own action.” That is why I say that the “word” in John 1:1 could not be a “plan” spoken about. The “word” is the subject of each of the three clauses in John 1:1:

    In the beginning, WAS (the past tense verb in the ACTIVE voice in Greek) the WORD (the subject of the clause),

    and the WORD WAS with God, (the subject does the action when the verb is written in the ACTIVE voice) (the subject receives the action when written in the PASSIVE voice) “was” in this verse, in each clause, is written in the active voice.
    Mandy, if it were a plan, the verb would be in the PASSIVE voice. The subject would be causing the plan to exist. I do not think that you understand this from your post. So you follow this now?

    and the WORD WAS God. If the “word” was a plan of God's then why isn't it written the “word was God's”??? With an apostrophe s and with Theos in the Genitive case (the case that show's possession).

    The “word” is the subject and is doing the action which in these three clauses the action is “was” which is a past tense state of being. A plan does not do its own existing.

    If the “word” is the “light”, well the “light” can do the action of existing with God.

    LU

    #90881
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Gene,
    For you to think that I am a trinitarian, well, that tells me that you are not reading my posts with open eyes or you do not fully know what a trinitarian believes. They do not believe that the Son of God had a beginning, I do.
    LU

    #90882
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2008,13:45)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 01 2008,18:19)
    Hey Mandy,
    It couldn't be just any body that the Son of God took.  Just any old body would have had the sin passed into it from the earthly father.  Jesus could not have had a body with the inherited sin.  

    Just my opinion.
    And about the cookies, why don't you come to the bbq for my son's graduation and help yourself:) I'd love to have you.
    Kathi


    Great explaination, thank you.

    However Nick's theory about Jesus surrounds the idea of him being re-born or inhabited by God's spirit at the Jordan.  Meaning, Jesus was a mere “vessel” which God took over, so to speak, or worked through?  It's unclear, exactly.  The dogma takes a while to work.

    With his idea, any body would have done.  Any body could have been reborn at the Jordan and filled with God's spirit.  There was no need for special conceptions and a virgin.  His theory is actually a lot less work for God, if you think about it.

    But your saying that in fact, it was important for Jesus to be conceived by God and Mary.  Your reason is that he would not have sin passed on to him in this way.  But are you forgetting that he was born of a women (mankind).  And not just any women – a women who was under the Law.

    This is where it gets muddy for those who do not believe God conceived a literal son with Mary.  In order to hold to your belief, you must deny that Jesus was actually conceived as the gospels teach.  You MUST apply a different definition to conception.

    Conception is the fusing of two sources.  DNA is mixed and divided.  A new individual (never before on any scene) is the product of both parents.  Any other definition won't due and isn't one that anyone on earth recognizes.  We know God by his creation.  This is how we know him.  He wouldn't mess with that, imo.

    Thanks for listening,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    It is my impression that it is the fathers that pass on the curse of sin to their sons and daughters. I do not think that the mothers pass it on eventho they also sin.

    Ex 34:5-7
    6 Then the LORD passed by in front of him and proclaimed, “The LORD, the LORD God, compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness and truth; 7 who keeps lovingkindness for thousands, who forgives iniquity, transgression and sin; yet He will by no means leave the guilty unpunished, visiting the INIQUITY OF FATHERS on the children and on the grandchildren to the third and fourth generations.”
    NASU

    Why does it not say anything about the iniquity of mothers being passed on to the next generation even though the mothers also receive the curse of sin and also sin themselves?

    Also read this keeping in mind that Eve was the first to eat of the forbidden tree.
    Rom 5:12-21

    12 Therefore, just as through one MAN sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned– 13 for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of ADAM (not Eve written here), who is a type of Him who was to come.

    15 But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the ONE (not two) the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many. 16 The gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment arose from ONE transgression resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification. 17 For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.

    18 So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men. 19 For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous. 20 The Law came in so that the transgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, 21 so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
    NASU

    We are told that Eve fell into transgression but did so because she was deceived. Adam fell into transgression out of disobedience. Adam's action spread death to all men not Eve's action apparently eventho she was involved. The above passage speaks of ONE transgression-Adam's.

    1 Tim 2:13-15
    14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
    NASU

    Therefore, I think that it is the male's contribution to the fertilized egg that continues the curse to the next generation. That is why I think that Jesus had to be conceived by the Holy Spirit so He did not automatically have the curse of sin but that He willingly took on the curse of our sin. Hallelujah! He didn't have to die, he willingly died for us.

    I hope you can see this also, Mandy. I think that it explains the reason for Jesus to not come from a normal earthy man but instead to come from the heavenly Father.

    Also, regarding Jesus being filled with God's spirit, I think Jesus was always filled with His Father's spirit. At His baptism at Jordan is when the Holy Spirit descended ON Him (not IN Him). That is when He started His ministry. It's like us when we receive “our calling”.

    God bless,
    LU

    #90890
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi lU,
    Are you saying that no sin was passed from Mary's father or grandfather etc?

    #90892
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Nick,
    No I am not saying that NO sin was passed from Mary's father or grandfather. What I understand is that the “curse of sin” was passed to Mary by her father but she did not pass the curse on to any of her children (nor does any other mother), the earthly father of her children passed that on except the Father of her first child which was not an earthly father. The Heavenly Father did not pass the curse of sin to His child that was conceived in Mary.

    I hope that I am saying this clear enough.

    #90893
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,05:54)
    Therefore, I think that it is the male's contribution to the fertilized egg that continues the curse to the next generation. That is why I think that Jesus had to be conceived by the Holy Spirit so He did not automatically have the curse of sin but that He willingly took on the curse of our sin. Hallelujah! He didn't have to die, he willingly died for us.

    I hope you can see this also, Mandy. I think that it explains the reason for Jesus to not come from a normal earthy man but instead to come from the heavenly Father.


    I absolutely agree, Kathi. Thank you.
    Mandy

    #90894
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,08:26)
    The Heavenly Father did not pass the curse of sin to His child that was conceived in Mary.

    I hope that I am saying this clear enough.


    Loud and clear, Kathi! :)

    This is why I believe that Jesus is literally conceived by God and Mary. And this is why I don't believe Jesus preexisted OR that he was just a sperm that God provided (and not the contribution or DNA of God himself).

    Jesus was truly conceived and given the attributes and DNA from his Father. This is how he indeed avoided the curse.

    Good work, sis!
    Mandy

    #90895

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,08:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,08:26)
    The Heavenly Father did not pass the curse of sin to His child that was conceived in Mary.

    I hope that I am saying this clear enough.


    Loud and clear, Kathi!  :)

    This is why I believe that Jesus is literally conceived by God and Mary.  And this is why I don't believe Jesus preexisted OR that he was just a sperm that God provided (and not the contribution or DNA of God himself).  

    Jesus was truly conceived and given the attributes and DNA from his Father.  This is how he indeed avoided the curse.

    Good work, sis!
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy!

    So do you think the Father has DNA?

    DNA is a created thing, Isnt it?

    What do you think?

    :)

    #90897
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,08:39)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,08:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,08:26)
    The Heavenly Father did not pass the curse of sin to His child that was conceived in Mary.

    I hope that I am saying this clear enough.


    Loud and clear, Kathi!  :)

    This is why I believe that Jesus is literally conceived by God and Mary.  And this is why I don't believe Jesus preexisted OR that he was just a sperm that God provided (and not the contribution or DNA of God himself).  

    Jesus was truly conceived and given the attributes and DNA from his Father.  This is how he indeed avoided the curse.

    Good work, sis!
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy!

    So do you think the Father has DNA?

    DNA is a created thing, Isnt it?

    What do you think?

    :)


    We are made in his image?
    :)

    #90898
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Also it said he walked in the garden, so he must have had feet?
    :)

    I know scripture teaches us that God is not a man, but I'm positive that he has a “make-up” even if it is totally divine. He provided what was needed – and this case it was a divine sperm. Wow, think of that. :laugh:

    #90899

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,08:41)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 04 2008,08:39)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 04 2008,08:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 04 2008,08:26)
    The Heavenly Father did not pass the curse of sin to His child that was conceived in Mary.

    I hope that I am saying this clear enough.


    Loud and clear, Kathi!  :)

    This is why I believe that Jesus is literally conceived by God and Mary.  And this is why I don't believe Jesus preexisted OR that he was just a sperm that God provided (and not the contribution or DNA of God himself).  

    Jesus was truly conceived and given the attributes and DNA from his Father.  This is how he indeed avoided the curse.

    Good work, sis!
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy!

    So do you think the Father has DNA?

    DNA is a created thing, Isnt it?

    What do you think?

    :)


    We are made in his image?
    :)


    Mandy

    Being made in his image and likeness does not mean the Father is flesh and blood, does it?

    ???

Viewing 20 posts - 2,921 through 2,940 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account