Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 2,501 through 2,520 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #88661
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ May 02 2008,22:45)
    He didn't have any advantage in the flesh other than he was fathered by the only True God


    Hi Adam,

    You say, “…..other than he was fathered by the only true God.”

    And that is not an advantage? I think it is. Why? Because I was not fathered by the only true God. And if I wasn't fathered by God, but Jesus was, wouldnt' it be logical to think there is a difference between Jesus and us?

    That difference is what's up for debate, in my opinion.

    Good to hear from you,
    Mandy

    #88665

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ May 03 2008,03:46)
    seek and you will find……if you translate the above verses ptr 745 gave from the original Hebrew translation according to Jeff Benner mechanical translation of Genesis they would read like this.

    Gen 2:4…> these are the generations of the heavens and earth when they were created, in the day (HE exists with Powers) made the earth heavens,

    Gen 2:7…> And (He exists with powers) molded man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the wind of life, and man became a living soul.

    Gen 2:9…> And out of the ground  made (He Exists with powers) to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of Knowledge of good (AND) Evil.

    Gen 2:19 .> And out of the ground (He Exists with powers) formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air: and brought Them into Adam to see what he would call them; and what so ever Adam called every living creature, that was the mane thereof.

    Gen 2:22.> And the rib, which the (He Exist with Powers) had taken from, man He made a woman, and brought her unto the man.

    The word LORD < is (He Exists) The word GOD < (is Powers) another words (HE Exist with Powers), that's the way the original Hebrews would have perceived it.

    This is not even mentioning  all the scriptures in Isaiah that clearly show that the Lord God did all the creating by His self, he plainly said that and that there is none other God except Him . So Jesus was right he said (THOU) art the (ONLY) true GOD.

    The whole concept of the trinity and preexistence is false teachings created by false Christanity.

    IMO……..gene


    Yes of course,

    lets believe the apologetic words of an apologist like Mr Benner who disagree with 100s of Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic scholars of the many english translations today.

    Can somebody please show me where his credentials are? Does he have any degrees in the Hebrew and Greek languages?

    I cant seem to find anything on this guy escept that he has compiled info based on his own studies.

    “To believe Jesus has not come in the flesh, meaning preexistence, is false doctine and false Christianity”.

    See, any body can make this statement when someone doesn't agree with them.

    The bible has many scriptures that show Jesus came down from heaven.

    KJV
    For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
    King James Version 1611, 1769

    NKJV – Jhn 6:38 – “For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.
    New King James Version © 1982 Thomas Nelson

    NLT – Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven to do the will of God who sent me, not to do what I want.
    New Living Translation © 1996 Tyndale Charitable Trust

    NIV – Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.
    New International Version © 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society

    ESV – Jhn 6:38 – “For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me.
    The Holy Bible, English Standard Version © 2001 Crossway Bibles

    NASB – Jhn 6:38 – “For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.
    New American Standard Bible © 1995 Lockman Foundation

    RSV – Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me;
    Revised Standard Version © 1947, 1952.

    ASV – Jhn 6:38 – For I am come down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
    American Standard Version 1901 Info

    Young – Jhn 6:38 – because I have come down out of the heaven, not that I may do my will, but the will of Him who sent me.
    Robert Young Literal Translation 1862, 1887, 1898 Info
     
    Darby – Jhn 6:38 – For I am come down from heaven, not that I should do *my* will, but the will of him that has sent me.
    J.N.Darby Translation 1890 Info

    Webster – Jhn 6:38 – For I came down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him that sent me.
    Noah Webster Version 1833 Info

    HNV – Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me.
    Hebrew Names Version 2000 Info

    This is only one of many.

    It doesn't get any plainer than this.

    :)

    #88667

    W.j. Thank you and I agree. It does not get any plainer. But then I thought Col. 1:15-18 was clear too and all turned it around. Lets just see.
    :D :D :D

    Peace and Love Mrs.

    #88668

    Quote (seek and you will find @ May 03 2008,05:37)
    W.j. Thank you and I agree. It does not get any plainer. But then I thought Col. 1:15-18 was clear too and all turned it around. Lets just see.
    :D :D :D

    Peace and Love Mrs.


    Mrs

    Watch out there.

    You are agreeing with a Trinitarian. You can't do that of course because Trinitarians are always wrong.

    Be careful, you may be labeled for this.

    :D

    Its funny because Unitarians, Arians and antitrinitarians believe in Catholic doctrines also.

    RCC believes Jesus died, was buried and rose again and ascended.

    I guess that means that anybody who believes those things are part of the “Whore”?

    Come out of her.

    :D

    #88671
    Jodi
    Participant

    Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me.

    So WJ and Mrs., what part of the preexisting Son of God, came down to earth?

    The Holy Spirit came unto Mary and she conceived a human baby. Are you saying that Yeshua is the Holy Spirit?

    You want to take verse 38 literally, then tell me what literal part of the preexisting Son came down to become Yeshua of Nazareth?

    What WE KNOW came down from heaven was the fullfillment of Yah's plan. What we know that came down from heaven was Yah's Spirit living and working in Yeshua.

    What we do know is the details to the conception and birth of Yeshua, none of which state anything about a preexisting Son coming down to transform into a human baby.

    #88673
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ…… it seems your dandref is up again. But to clearify a point, there is no (Mechanical) translations, Mr Benner is the First person to do it as far as i know . Let see if there is creditablity to what He says even by your so called 200 scholars.

    When Moses ask who should i say sent me, God said tell them (I AM ,THAT I AM ) sent you. Now let's amalize the word I am , doesn't it mean the same as (I exist )….. also notice God bid not say (I exist and another I exists also with me also,) as trinitarians want us to believe. You know as well as I the Hebrews, only believed in ONE GOD and no other, in fact doesn't say (Hear O Israel the Lord our God is ONE Lord), not two or three trinune beings or essences as trinitarians espouse.

    Now ss God told Moses to use the Phrase I exist or I am, they are one in the same word right. I exist therefore i am is a phrase still used.
    So with that being said Mr. Benner and the Scholars seem to agree on this, it's you who is not agreeing with them. even your oun 200 scholars.

    As far as your pun about even others believing in some RCC doctrines you are forgetting something> “even Satan apperas as a angle of light”, right. As one person i heard say, 99% 0f what a person say's could be right, but it's that 1% that kill you. So it is with religions.

    #88679
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,05:58)

    Quote (seek and you will find @ May 03 2008,05:37)
    W.j. Thank you and I agree. It does not get any plainer. But then I thought Col. 1:15-18 was clear too and all turned it around. Lets just see.
    :D :D :D

    Peace and Love Mrs.


    Mrs

    Watch out there.

    You are agreeing with a Trinitarian. You can't do that of course because Trinitarians are always wrong.

    Be careful, you may be labeled for this.

    :D

    Its funny because Unitarians, Arians and antitrinitarians believe in Catholic doctrines also.

    RCC believes Jesus died, was buried and rose again and ascended.

    I guess that means that anybody who believes those things are part of the “Whore”?

    Come out of her.

    :D


    Hey Keith and Irene,

    In my opinion, believing in preexistence does go hand-in-hand with the Trinity doctrine.

    Take care

    #88680
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)
    What we do know is the details to the conception and birth of Yeshua, none of which state anything about a preexisting Son coming down to transform into a human baby.


    Absolutely.

    And we do also know that Jesus “came down from heaven”, we also know that he “came from God”.

    God is in heaven.

    Jesus came from God. It stands to reason that most son's “come from” their Dads, does it not?

    #88681

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 03 2008,09:51)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,05:58)

    Quote (seek and you will find @ May 03 2008,05:37)
    W.j. Thank you and I agree. It does not get any plainer. But then I thought Col. 1:15-18 was clear too and all turned it around. Lets just see.
    :D :D :D

    Peace and Love Mrs.


    Mrs

    Watch out there.

    You are agreeing with a Trinitarian. You can't do that of course because Trinitarians are always wrong.

    Be careful, you may be labeled for this.

    :D

    Its funny because Unitarians, Arians and antitrinitarians believe in Catholic doctrines also.

    RCC believes Jesus died, was buried and rose again and ascended.

    I guess that means that anybody who believes those things are part of the “Whore”?

    Come out of her.

    :D


    Hey Keith and Irene,

    In my opinion, believing in preexistence does go hand-in-hand with the Trinity doctrine.

    Take care


    Mandy

    Then you will need to speak to lightenup, NH, t8, Mrs, David, and many others who are not Trinitarians!

    It is only the Unitarians who reject preexistence.

    Blessings!

    #88682
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,09:55)
    Then you will need to speak to lightenup, NH, t8, Mrs, David, and many others who are not Trinitarians!

    It is only the Unitarians who reject preexistence.


    It's interesting that you would point this out.

    All that you mentioned believe some form of “Jesus was someone different before his birth.”

    It's really a form of incarnation versus true birth, in my opinion (speaking from a non-trinitarian view).

    David believes Jesus was Micheal, Nick and t8 believe Jesus was a spirit son, I'm not sure what LU believes yet, and Irene believes along the same lines as Nick but slightly different.

    All of these forms, when combined with Mary at conception, CHANGE by her contribution. In other words, Michael was fused together with Mary's DNA, as was the spirit son that God beget alone, and so on.

    Preexistence puts mud in the waters. Unless of course, you are a trinitarian. To me, that is the only preexistent story that makes sense (and I use that term lightly). :;):

    #88688
    Ptr745
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,05:58)

    Its funny because Unitarians, Arians and antitrinitarians believe in Catholic doctrines also.

    RCC believes Jesus died, was buried and rose again and ascended.

    I guess that means that anybody who believes those things are part of the “Whore”?

    Come out of her.

    :D

    Yeah but they even screwed that up too. How many days and nights did Jesus say he would be dead and in the heart of the earth?

    Matt 12:38 Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee.
    39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah:
    40 For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

    How long does the RCC and all the churches that came out of her teach? Friday -> Sunday morning, not quite three days and three nights is it, and they base their celebrations around these days. They, along with these celebrations of Easter, are denying the very sign that Jesus said would prove he was the messiah. But it doesn't, we're still celebrating Jesus, right? Wrong, they're celebrating a false Jesus, just as many celebrate false gods, is that okay too?

    And that brings up another question: How can somebody who is immortal lay down their body as a sacrifice for your sins, be dead for three days and three nights, and need to be raised from the dead? How can somebody who is immortal die? They can't, Jesus at this point was not yet immortal, not until his resurrection, so how can somebody who is not immortal have pre-existed the creation of the universe? Can somebody who is immortal temporarily give up immortality? Not quite immortality then is it?

    People who believe in the pre-existence of Jesus have to rely on obscure verse such as “he cam down from heaven” or “he was first born of creation”, verse which are speaking spirutal concepts, yet reject the plain and abvious verses that stand out and are the part of the core reasons for Jesus first coming on the earth in the first place, to DIE and be resurrected by his Father.

    #88700
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 03 2008,10:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,09:55)
    Then you will need to speak to lightenup, NH, t8, Mrs, David, and many others who are not Trinitarians!

    It is only the Unitarians who reject preexistence.


    It's interesting that you would point this out.

    All that you mentioned believe some form of “Jesus was someone different before his birth.”

    It's really a form of incarnation versus true birth, in my opinion (speaking from a non-trinitarian view).

    David believes Jesus was Micheal, Nick and t8 believe Jesus was a spirit son, I'm not sure what LU believes yet, and Irene believes along the same lines as Nick but slightly different.

    All of these forms, when combined with Mary at conception, CHANGE by her contribution. In other words, Michael was fused together with Mary's DNA, as was the spirit son that God beget alone, and so on.

    Preexistence puts mud in the waters. Unless of course, you are a trinitarian. To me, that is the only preexistent story that makes sense (and I use that term lightly). :;):


    t8 believes that he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. So I guess that if he is not before all things, then did an angel hold all things together?

    t8 believes that through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. So if he wasn't there, then nothing was made. Yet many things were made and long before 2000 years ago too.

    t8 believes that Jesus had God's nature, but did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross! Then God exalted him to the highest place and eventually that all will confess that Yeshua is lord.

    #88706
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 04 2008,00:06)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 03 2008,10:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,09:55)
    Then you will need to speak to lightenup, NH, t8, Mrs, David, and many others who are not Trinitarians!

    It is only the Unitarians who reject preexistence.


    It's interesting that you would point this out.

    All that you mentioned believe some form of “Jesus was someone different before his birth.”

    It's really a form of incarnation versus true birth, in my opinion (speaking from a non-trinitarian view).

    David believes Jesus was Micheal, Nick and t8 believe Jesus was a spirit son, I'm not sure what LU believes yet, and Irene believes along the same lines as Nick but slightly different.

    All of these forms, when combined with Mary at conception, CHANGE by her contribution.  In other words, Michael was fused together with Mary's DNA, as was the spirit son that God beget alone, and so on.

    Preexistence puts mud in the waters.  Unless of course, you are a trinitarian.  To me, that is the only preexistent story that makes sense (and I use that term lightly).   :;):


    t8 believes that he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. So I guess that if he is not before all things, then did an angel hold all things together?

    t8 believes that through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. So if he wasn't there, then nothing was made. Yet many things were made and long before 2000 years ago too.

    t8 believes that Jesus had God's nature, but did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross! Then God exalted him to the highest place and eventually that all will confess that Yeshua is lord.


    Is it also fair to say that you believe God beget Jesus alone, in heaven, prior to his birth? And that he is indeed a “spirit son”?

    I know Nick believes this, it is recorded many times over. I had thought you two agreed on that score? I'll have to do some research and see. If I am incorrect, please forgive me.

    If he was begotton before the worlds….what would that make him? Certainly a pre-cursor to the “Jesus” we know who was born to Mary (in my opinion).

    Hey, good to see you t8!
    Mandy

    #88711
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 03 2008,08:06)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 03 2008,10:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 03 2008,09:55)
    Then you will need to speak to lightenup, NH, t8, Mrs, David, and many others who are not Trinitarians!

    It is only the Unitarians who reject preexistence.


    It's interesting that you would point this out.

    All that you mentioned believe some form of “Jesus was someone different before his birth.”

    It's really a form of incarnation versus true birth, in my opinion (speaking from a non-trinitarian view).

    David believes Jesus was Micheal, Nick and t8 believe Jesus was a spirit son, I'm not sure what LU believes yet, and Irene believes along the same lines as Nick but slightly different.

    All of these forms, when combined with Mary at conception, CHANGE by her contribution.  In other words, Michael was fused together with Mary's DNA, as was the spirit son that God beget alone, and so on.

    Preexistence puts mud in the waters.  Unless of course, you are a trinitarian.  To me, that is the only preexistent story that makes sense (and I use that term lightly).   :;):


    t8 believes that he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. So I guess that if he is not before all things, then did an angel hold all things together?

    t8 believes that through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. So if he wasn't there, then nothing was made. Yet many things were made and long before 2000 years ago too.

    t8 believes that Jesus had God's nature, but did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross! Then God exalted him to the highest place and eventually that all will confess that Yeshua is lord.


    Hi t8,
    When I found Heaven.net and read your writings I felt a sense of relief. I found another person that I was like-minded with. I agree with everything that you have said in this post and I rejoice with that. Thank you for having this site and for coming back from wherever you were.

    To all who would care to know more about what I believe:

    I am leaning towards there being two that are called “Yahweh”, one is the Father and one is the Son.

    The Father is the Most High and the Son is from Him and not equal to Him.

    I believe that the Son didn't always exist but was the only one born directly of God before the foundation of the world as the Most High God's only begotten living heavenly son.

    I believe that in the Son's beginning, He was empty but became filled with all the fullness of God.

    I also believe the Son to be the literal Spiritual Light that exposes the truth to mankind and visibly represents His Father, as a heavenly being that can take on different forms.

    I believe that the Son took on flesh, even emptied Himself and humbled Himself in a way necessary to become like man, even a baby.

    I believe that the Son became a bondservant and was sacrificed and died for man's sins, and then rose again to be the first to return to the Father of all the dead.

    I believe that the Son is the Head of the church and is worthy as I worship and praise Him as my Lord which ultimately gives pleasure, worship and praise to His/my Father.

    These beliefs are mine but of course do not completely include everything I believe about the Son of God and the Most High God.

    Blessings!

    #88716
    Ptr745
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I am leaning towards there being two that are called “Yahweh”, one is the Father and one is the Son.

    There cannot be two Yahweh's

    ISAIAH 455 I am the LORD (Yahweh), and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:
    6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD (Yahweh), and there is none else.

    The person speaking here, Yahweh, says there is none else.

    #88719
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Ptr745 @ May 03 2008,16:49)

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I am leaning towards there being two that are called “Yahweh”, one is the Father and one is the Son.

    There cannot be two Yahweh's

    ISAIAH 455 I am the LORD (Yahweh), and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:
    6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD (Yahweh), and there is none else.

    The person speaking here, Yahweh, says there is none else.


    I totally agree that there is no one else as a Most High God, it is Yahweh the Father of Christ. And there is also no one else like His only begotten son,Yahweh the son of the Most High God, either. Both are unique and the Most High is exactly that-the most high God and there is no other. He is over His Son and all things.

    Blessings!

    #88720
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    Thanks for sharing all that you believe.

    I will not pick a part your belief system.  Suffice it to say that we do not agree with one another.  I do not believe that Mary was just a flesh-factory that allowed Jesus to don skin, but that she actually contributed to her son and added her DNA.  This is true conception and birth.  Otherwise, why would God even bother to have his son go through this process?  Why not just “beam him down”?

    That being said though, I can see where the scriptures point towards your belief.  I also see where they point towards mine.  Nothing is, “clear” as some are led to believe.  Therefore, I truly cannot find fault with your belief other than to say we do not agree and I see it a bit different, which I have shared.

    Take care,
    Mandy

    #88721
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Kathi,

    What do you think “Yahweh” means?

    #88723

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)
    Jhn 6:38 – For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me.

    So WJ and Mrs., what part of the preexisting Son of God, came down to earth?

    That’s easy.

    Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. (Phil 2:6-8)

    What is the form of God? Jesus says, “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. (John 4:24)

    The basic nature of God is Spirit; however that is not all he is.

    The definition of nature is…

    1 a: the inherent character or basic constitution of a person or thing : ESSENCE
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nature

    Jesus was “Spirit” just like the Father! In fact the very nature and essence of Jesus was and is God.

    The NIV reads…
    Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, (held on to).  (Phil 2:6)
    John understood the nature of Jesus before the incarnation.

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:1)

    More on this here…
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin&#8230;.;t=1375

    I believe John borrowed the term “Logos” the Word from Rev 19:13.
    Many scholars believe the gospel of John was written about 20 years after he saw Jesus in Revelation 19:13.

    John ascribed the name “Logos” to Jesus because he is the very “essence” of all that the living Word of God is. In fact all the Word of the Father proceeds by, through and from Jesus. Jesus is not merely a spoken word or a thought or a plan. For all things were and are upheld by that word.

    Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his (Yeshua's) power… (Heb 1:3)

    Also everything consist in and by him, Jesus.

    And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.  (Col 1:17)

    The living Word, the Words of the Father belong to Jesus, and the Words of Jesus belong to the Father. The Father speaks nothing apart from Jesus and Jesus speaks nothing apart from the Father. They are one and cannot be separated.

    Men want to confuse the nature of Jesus by confusing the words “By”, and “Through” or “In”. For example every thing Jesus does is in, by and through the Father. Yet everything the Father does is in, by and through Jesus.  

    The Greek word “Dia” can be interpreted “By” or “Through” or “In”.

    It is the same word that is used here…

    For of him, and through (Dia) him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen. (Rom 11:36)

    This verse in its context could mean the Father or Jesus. Since the NT writers almost always used the word (Kuios) or Lord speaking of Jesus then evidence could lean more to Jesus in this passage because of Romans 11:34.

    Also Paul uses the same word “Dia” in 1 Cor. 8:6 ascribing attributes of God to Jesus.

    But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by (Dia) whom are all things, and we by (Dia)  him.

    It’s astounding that Paul would ascribe these attributes in the same breath to Jesus as he describes the Father. To the Hebrew mind to elevate Jesus with attributes of God in this fashion would be blasphemous.

    Either way, if it is the Father then we see that all things were of him and through him and to him. If it is Jesus then all things are of him and through him and to him. They are one.

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)

    The Holy Spirit came unto Mary and she conceived a human baby. Are you saying that Yeshua is the Holy Spirit?

    No, I am saying that the Spirit of Jesus is the same essence as the Father’s. Are you saying the Holy Spirit is not God, or seperate from the Father? Think about that! Then reconcile that with the many scriptures that show the Holy Spirit is not the Father.

    Scriptures clearly teach that there is only “One Spirit” that we have received. A close look at scriptures shows the three persons, Father, Son and Comforter are that “One Spirit”.

    (2 Cor 16:16, Phil 1:19, John 15:26)

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)

    You want to take verse 38 literally, then tell me what literal part of the preexisting Son came down to become Yeshua of Nazareth?

    Wherefore when he cometh into the world, (Preexistence, the Word that was with God and was God) he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me: In burnt offerings and [sacrifices] for sin thou hast had no pleasure.
    Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God. (Heb 10:5-7)

    When the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and she conceived at that very moment the Word/God who was with God and in the form of God, Spirit, took on the form of a servant (Phil 2) and came into human flesh and was Tabernacled among us, (John 1:14) or took on the likeness of sinful flesh, and the man Jesus (Soul and Body) is born, and being found in fashion as a man humbled himself to do the Fathers will even to the death of the cross. However the Word/God which is Spirit did not diminish in his nature as God, since Spirit cannot become flesh and flesh cannot become Spirit, and so we have “God in the flesh”.

    Therefore John says…

    And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt (Tabernacled) among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)

    Then John says…
    No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only,,who is at the Father's side, has made him known. John 1:18

    Jesus claimed that no one had seen the Father except he himself.

    When did he see the Father? (John 6:46) The Father was in heaven.

    So the Word/God that was with God as Spirit is still the Word/God that dwells in a body. The Spirit of man is human, the Spirit of Jesus is God. (Rom 8:9, Phil 1:19, 2 Cor 13:5, Col 1:27, Gal 4:19) Yet the soul and body of Jesus is man.

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)

    What WE KNOW came down from heaven was the fullfillment of Yah's plan.

    Where is the scripture that says “Yah’s  plan came down from heaven”. Jesus didn’t say “I am the plan of my Father which has come down from heaven”. He said…

    For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. (John 6:38)

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)

    What we know that came down from heaven was Yah's Spirit living and working in Yeshua.

    So the Father left heaven? You say “was Yah's Spirit living and working in Yeshua.”

    So if the Spirit was living and working in Yeshua, was it the Fathers personal Spirit or was it the Holy Spirit that Jesus said he would send “From” the Father? (John 15:26) Yes the Father was working in and through Jesus; however Jesus was working in and through the Father. Jesus is and was the same essence as the Father and the Holy Spirit, because of this he had the Spirit without measure.

    Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. (John 5:19)

    Jesus does whatever he sees the Father doing. Jesus does nothing without the Father, neither does the Father do anything without Jesus. They are inseparable in nature as God.

    And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God (the Word that was with God and was God) was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (1 Tim 3:16)

    Quote (Jodi @ May 03 2008,09:04)

    What we do know is the details to the conception and birth of Yeshua, none of which state anything about a preexisting Son coming down to transform into a human baby.

    This is what you know and believe, and you have that right!

    Blessings!

    #88725

    Quote (t8 @ May 03 2008,08:06)

    t8 believes that Jesus had God's nature, but did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross! Then God exalted him to the highest place and eventually that all will confess that Yeshua is lord.

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    Hi t8,
    When I found Heaven.net and read your writings I felt a sense of relief.  I found another person that I was like-minded with.  I agree with everything that you have said in this post and I rejoice with that.  Thank you for having this site and for coming back from wherever you were.

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    To all who would care to know more about what I believe:

    I am leaning towards there being two that are called “Yahweh”, one is the Father and one is the Son.

    Hi Lightenup.

    I agree. Zechariah 14 as well as many other passages shows this to be true.

    Isa 1:18 explains this very well.

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin&#8230;.;t=1860
     

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    The Father is the Most High and the Son is from Him and not equal to Him.

    Equal in what way? In nature can you tell me how they are not the same?

    For instance, if you have children are they any less human than you are?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I believe that the Son didn't always exist but was the only one born directly of God before the foundation of the world as the Most High God's only begotten living heavenly son.


    Is there a scripture for this?  ??? Was the Father pregnant with the son? Nature would seem to contradict this. Besides if all things were created by or through Jesus and without him was not anything made that was made. (John 1:3), wouldn’t the all things include “Time, Space and Matter”, and if he created time then how could he have had a beginning?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I believe that in the Son's beginning, He was empty but became filled with all the fullness of God.  

    Is there a scripture for this?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I also believe the Son to be the literal Spiritual Light that exposes the truth to mankind and visibly represents His Father, as a heavenly being that can take on different forms.

    Amen. But if he is less than the Father in nature, then his light would be less than the light of the Father. Is there a scripture that says Yeshua is a lesser light?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I believe that the Son took on flesh, even emptied Himself and humbled Himself in a way necessary to become like man, even a baby.

    But did he diminish his nature before he came in the flesh? If he did then wouldn’t this mean he is not the same person that previously existed?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I believe that the Son became a bondservant and was sacrificed and died for man's sins, and then rose again to be the first to return to the Father of all the dead.

    Did the Word/God the Spirit of Jesus die? Jesus was the “Eternal life” that was with the Father, (1John 1:1-3) was he not? Did he not have Eternal life? Didn’t he say he had the power to lay down his life and to take it up again? If his Spirit was dead, how could he do this?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    I believe that the Son is the Head of the church and is worthy as I worship and praise Him as my Lord which ultimately gives pleasure, worship and praise to His/my Father.

    How does this work with a jealous God that says “thou shalt worship the Lord thy God   and him only shall you serve”?

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 04 2008,06:34)

    These beliefs are mine but of course do not completely include everything I believe about the Son of God and the Most High God.

    Blessings!

    Just curious. ???

    Blessings.

Viewing 20 posts - 2,501 through 2,520 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account