Flat Earthers gather in New Zealand

Flat Earthers hold a conference in Auckland, with speakers from around the globe.

Flat Earth celebrities have flown across the globe to speak at the Flat Earth Expo in Auckland, New Zealand. Flat Earthers believe that we live on a flat plane rather than the accepted globe model. Flat Earthers also believe that most evidence to the contrary is controlled by a giant conspiracy of which NASA is at the forefront.

The Flat Earth model has the north pole in the centre of a flat circular disc and the South Pole as not existing at all. Instead, they believe that Antarctica is a giant encircling ice wall that hems in the world’s oceans. They point out that nearly all of us have never visited Antarctica, thus we rely on the testimony of a few who claim to have visited the frozen continent, and who are mostly lying to us and are part of the conspiracy. Flat Earthers are quick to point out that it is illegal to visit Antarctica. Whether this is true or not, the fact is, it is illegal to do a number of things in any protected wilderness areas of the world of which Antarctica is a special one.

This conference in Auckland comes with a huge opportunity. Flat Earthers flying to New Zealand from the Northern Hemisphere have a unique opportunity to prove to themselves that the Earth is not flat and instead the mostly accepted globe. They only need to travel via South America to New Zealand and note the hours spent getting there will be way less than their Flat Earth model would have you believe. You see, the Flat Earth disc with no south pole has New Zealand, Australia, South America, and Africa many times apart in distance from each other as the globe suggests, simply because, instead of reducing down to a single point we call the South Pole, the area of land in the Southern Hemisphere expands out to the giant ice wall circumference of the whole disc. This projection is similar to how we view Canada, Russia, or even Antarctica on most world maps where they are many times larger on these maps than they are in reality . This is because maps have difficulty projecting a 3D globe onto their 2D canvas. In essence, the Flat Earth model is a 2D construct as it is a flat surface albeit disc shape, so it has the Southern Hemisphere as being much larger in area than it really is.

Sitting in an isolated spot in the Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand gives these Flat Earthers travelling to Auckland the unique opportunity to debunk their own belief. But how many will actually test this out? I am thinking perhaps a few, but most of these guys will just be looking forward to rubbing shoulders with their Flat Earth brothers when they get here and on-route looking out toward the flat horizon because they are simply not flying high enough to see the curve.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,821 through 1,840 (of 6,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #831053
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kathi:  I wasn’t moving…my family went early to a campsite and set up camp around a picnic table and stayed there specifically to watch the whole event. 

    Your statement is accurate and true and scriptural. You guys didn’t move an inch. But I meant according to the spinning ball earth model to which you subscribe, you moved a couple hundred miles during the event of the eclipse – because the ground on which you stood moved that much.  Nearer to clearer now?

    #831054
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Another method (I think) is to attach another file somewhere, and it seems that your attachments will reappear in the first post. Is that correct though? I am not 100% sure how you accumulated all attachments in the first post, but you would know.

    I’m quite sure I don’t know!  😀  They just attach wherever and whenever they want to.  For example, your Mount Ruapehu is now attached to the OP, and I didn’t do anything with it.  Sometimes they attach to the next three posts after I insert them in one post.  Sometimes they attach to the OP.  Not all of them, just the ones that want to I guess.  🙂

    #831055
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hey T8, thanks for your direct answers.  I’ll get to them tomorrow, but please don’t forget this one that you left out…

    Mike:  Jehovah told us that He created two lights – the greater to govern the day, and the lesser to govern the night.

    T8:  There you go being literal again and assuming that which is not written.

    Mike:  Which part of my blue words above is not written?

    What is your answer to that very simple question?

    #831059
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Okay Mike, I will play around with the words a bit more to suit.
    The moon is literally a light, but not the source of that light.

    Are you the light of the world? Is Jesus the light of the world? Are either the source of light?

    God is light.

    Obviously you can be light, while still not being the source of that light.

    The moon is a lesser light simply because it reflects the sun’s light. Your version is the moon is a machine of some kind. Show me the proof.

    And how is it that you can shine a laser on the moon and have it reflect back?

    Ringed by footprints, sitting in the moondust, lies a 2-foot wide panel studded with 100 mirrors pointing at Earth: the “lunar laser ranging retroreflector array.” Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong put it there on July 21, 1969, about an hour before the end of their final moonwalk.

    #831062
    Admin
    Keymaster

    I’m quite sure I don’t know! 😀 They just attach wherever and whenever they want to. For example, your Mount Ruapehu is now attached to the OP, and I didn’t do anything with it. Sometimes they attach to the next three posts after I insert them in one post. Sometimes they attach to the OP. Not all of them, just the ones that want to I guess. 🙂

    Ah, thanks for that. I suspect then that they attach to all the posts that you apply an attachment, maybe because you are the author of the topic. If ‘Add Media’ was working, then it wouldn’t be so much of an issue because attachments are meant for documents, spreadsheets, and things you cannot embed into the post.

    #831063
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Perspective should not be ignored

    Mike, my answer to many of your questions is the same answer. Perspective.

    The sun rises and sets, as well as circuits overhead as does the moon. The earth is flat from our perspective and far away objects get smaller when in reality are not. It’s perspective and God speaks to us not only through our own limited language, but also from our perspective a lot of the time. Simple as that.

    From God’s perspective, the universe could well revolve around him as he should be at the centre, not us. And who knows how many worlds he has created. He is above, not below in his perspective. And we know he can reside in all things, so his spirit may be the centre of every atom. We are not the centre and neither are we above. We are the footstool compared with his heaven and I am sure he can see all things at once. Just know that we can enter heaven if we are redeemed, so I expect that things would look different once there.

    #831064
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    God created two lights

    If you require an even simpler answer then try this.

    God created two lights. It doesn’t say that God created two lights that generate light themselves.

    He said a greater and a lesser.

    We know that God is greater because he is the source and we are images and lesser.

    We are not told the nature of each body apart from the fact that both are lights which they are.

    A full moon certainly lights up the night somewhat compared to no moon for example.

    The verse is too simple to apply an exact nature to these lights, only that light comes from both.

    Who know, maybe the sun is a gateway to the heavens and the light actually comes from there.

    You have to keep an open mind when you read a simple statement. In other words there is not enough detail to go into detail about.

    #831065
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mike,

    you said:

     Do birds fly where the sun, moon, and stars are?  No.

    Did God create the sun, moon, and stars and place them in the firmament?  Yes

    Therefore, do birds also fly IN the firmament?  Of course not

    my response:

    The birds do not fly as high as the sun, moon and stars, true.

    God created and the sun, moon and the stars and placed them in the expanse/firmament, true.

    Birds DO fly in the expanse/firmament. The expanse stretches from the earth to the end of outer space wherever that is.

    Mike, God called the “raqia” “shamayim” therefore…raqia = shamayim (Gen 1:8). Now all I have to do is show you that birds fly IN the shamayim and this discussion is over and you need to admit that birds do indeed fly IN the firmament/expanse/raqia/shamayim.

    Proverbs 30:19

    New International Version
    the way of an eagle in the sky (shamayim), the way of a snake on a rock, the way of a ship on the high seas, and the way of a man with a young woman.

    New Living Translation
    how an eagle glides through the sky, how a snake slithers on a rock, how a ship navigates the ocean, how a man loves a woman.

    English Standard Version
    the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a serpent on a rock, the way of a ship on the high seas, and the way of a man with a virgin.

    Berean Study Bible
    the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a snake on a rock, the way of a ship at sea, and the way of a man with a maiden.

    New American Standard Bible
    The way of an eagle in the sky, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the middle of the sea, And the way of a man with a maid.

    King James Bible
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.

    Christian Standard Bible
    the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a snake on a rock, the way of a ship at sea, and the way of a man with a young woman.

    Holman Christian Standard Bible
    the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a snake on a rock, the way of a ship at sea, and the way of a man with a young woman.

    International Standard Version
    The way an eagle flies in the sky, the way of a serpent on a rock, the way of a ship on the high seas, and the way of a man with a young woman.

    NET Bible
    the way of an eagle in the sky, the way of a snake on a rock, the way of a ship in the sea, and the way of a man with a woman.

    New Heart English Bible
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent on a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maiden.

    Aramaic Bible in Plain English
    The way of an eagle in the sky, the way of the snake upon a rock, the way of the ship in the heart of the sea and the way of a man in his youth.

    JPS Tanakh 1917
    The way of an eagle in the air; The way of a serpent upon a rock; The way of a ship in the midst of the sea; And the way of a man with a young woman.

    New American Standard 1977
    The way of an eagle in the sky, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the middle of the sea, And the way of a man with a maid.

    Jubilee Bible 2000
    The track of the eagle in the air; the track of the serpent upon the rock; the track of the ship in the midst of the sea; and the track of the man in the maid.

    King James 2000 Bible
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maiden.

    American King James Version
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent on a rock; the way of a ship in the middle of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.

    American Standard Version
    The way of an eagle in the air; The way of a serpent upon a rock; The way of a ship in the midst of the sea; And the way of a man with a maiden.

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    The way of an eagle in the air, the way of a serpent upon a rock, the way of a ship in the midst of the sea, and the way of a man in youth.

    Darby Bible Translation
    The way of an eagle in the heavens, the way of a serpent upon a rock, the way of a ship in the midst of the sea, and the way of a man with a maid.

    English Revised Version
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.

    Webster’s Bible Translation
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid.

    World English Bible
    The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent on a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maiden.

    Young’s Literal Translation
    The way of the eagle in the heavens, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the heart of the sea, And the way of a man in youth.

    Mike, please admit that the eagle flies in the raqia which is called shamayim according to Proverbs 30:19.

     

    #831066
    Lightenup
    Participant

    t8 and Mike,

    If the moon had its own light, an eclipse would not be able to take it away but when the moon is fully in the solar eclipse or fully in the lunar eclipse stage, the moon’s surface that faces the earth is completely dark for a relatively short time.

    #831071
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I think Mike is just going to say something along the lines of a power cut or the moon is rebooting.

    #831072
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Explain this Flat Earthers

    I have watched a series of videos that debunk the Flat Earth. The fifth video has some questions for Flat Earthers that I would like Mike to attempt answering, while I am looking for some answers to his questions. I posted these videos a few pages back, but added in the latter videos later on upon watching them first, so they may have been missed. So reposting them here. Just try to ignore the insulting tone of the videos and focus on the science and math.

    1)

    2)

    3)

    4)

    5)

    #831074
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The above videos pretty much wraps up the debate IMO.

    Does anyone want to disprove the arguments made in them.

    If not, then this is enough proof for me that the Earth is a sphere and not a disk.

    What about you Mike and Dig?

    #831129
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The sad part about this is the fact that this guy associates this and other conspiracies with Christians and the Bible, when most Christians do not believe this stuff at all. It is a bad witness IMO. I noticed another video from this guy debunking afterlife experiences. This is an example of how foolishness has unintended consequences.

    Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough?

    As followers of Christ, we should of course believe scripture, but remain open to new discoveries too. Scripture is not written as a full scientific document anyway, it is very brief allowing for many options in between the main points with even the main points having a number of possible variations. Be open minded and teachable. Clearly we are told that knowledge shall increase. Acting in an ignorant way and remaining stubborn on one’s scientific views taken from one’s own view of some brief verses in scripture is foolish when it stops you from changing your mind on things once discovered. At this point you have become an ignoramus in their eyes and your gospel as worthless. Sir Isaac Newton, arguably the greatest scientist of all time invented the scientific method and yet devoted more time to reading and studying scripture than studying science alone.

    It’s not like Evolution which is a theory and we can agree is just plain wrong for a ton of reasons. The Globe Earth is the only model that makes mathematical sense, and there is lots of observational evidence too. Once we who are the light subscribe to a Flat Earth and the reason given is because the Bible, that paints the Bible in poor light and it reflects badly on all Christians for believing that book. We need to be wise people. There are souls out there that do not know God and some of them have been given a good reason to reject the gospel because ‘the Bible’. Sad.

    #831131
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    T8: “The above videos pretty much wraps up the debate IMO. Does anyone want to disprove the arguments made in them. If not, then this is enough proof for me that the Earth is a sphere and not a disk.”

     

    Do you mean call everyone that thinks different than you a retard and then shut down the debate? If that’s the point then no, it ain’t over.

    Did the guy once mention that it is an equidistant map? No. Did he treat it like one or do calculations like it was one? Nope. Can you say strawman? Sure, I knew you could.

    Can you put those arguments into your own words, kind of like the point of this debate; what can you see and discern for yourself.

    Look, it’s really simple guys. In order for the earth to be a sphere it has to have a curve. However, when we try to find it, it just isn’t there. Maybe start there.

     

     

    #831136
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Pay attention Dig. I said to ignore the insults and focus on the math and science he is producing. Believe me, if there was a more civil video series showing these facts, I would have shown that instead. The truth, math, and science doesn’t care about your feelings. Truth is true no matter how we feel about it.

    But you want to start again, wipe these facts away and debate from the ground up from our own experience. But that is a very narrow view of the world Dig. Further, we are not really well equipped to overrule science given our lack of budget and time, not to mention education.

    Of course there is merit to checking things out from our perspective as that is basically what you are saying. But I find that a bit ironic too as perspective was pretty much ruled out by Mike and he preferred literal. These videos are literal. Can you counter the arguments he makes or not?

    To see the curve of the Earth takes way more than little experiments in our flat earth experience of this globe. But sure, while I believe the war is won, we can contend in smaller battles from our own perspective and bring these into truth too.

    #831139
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    T8: “To see the curve of the Earth takes way more than little experiments in our flat earth experience of this globe. But sure, while I believe the war is won, we can contend in smaller battles from our own perspective and bring these into truth too.”

     

    You said “focus on the math“. OK, the curve should be able to be calculated then, right? The globalist’s math says that it is 8″ per mile squared. That means in 1 mile it is 8″ and in two miles it is 32″ and in three miles it is 6 feet or 72”! That’s the math – DO YOU DISPUTE IT?

    If not then we can or should be able to observe the curve. We don’t. Why?

    Where is the curve?

    #831140
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    How do you explain this? A rail gun that can fire a projectile over a hundred and twenty five miles away in a straight line?

     

    https://youtu.be/4x73vaeNU5c

     

    It isn’t a smart projectile it’s a dumb projectile, it just goes really really fast! Where’s the curve! Huh?

     

     

    #831142
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    This rail gun goes over 6,600 feet of illedged curvature to hit its target! How does it do that on a line of sight weapon?

    6,600 feet of curvature is over a mile “hump” in the globe! Again, where’s the curve? Let’s start here. And don’t call me a retard for looking at working science and figuring out that it doesn’t line up with theoretical science.

     

    #831144
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    Here’s another experiment. Real experiment.

    For all you Ausies out there.

    #831147
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  If [the lunar wave] is legit, it could be interference of some kind. Interference takes place in the atmosphere. Could also be the video software… Could be heatwave between the camera and moon or maybe it is similar to the background radiation you see on an old TV set. 

    Looks to me like an electromagnetic pulse… like somebody set off a high altitude EMP bomb, and we’re seeing the shock wave as it passes in front of the moon.  I have no point to make about the lunar waves because I don’t know enough about them.  I only brought it up because you made me think of it when you mentioned (sarcastically) that maybe the moon reboots.  Maybe it does.  Enoch says it does – in so many words – so maybe your sarcastic comment is actually accurate.

    T8:  As for the moon, yes your answer is desperate because a large body that reflects light is still a light. It doesn’t have to be the source of the light to be a light. 

    Okay… now we’re getting somewhere.

    1.  Do you think my understanding of the sun as its own light source is also “desperate”?   
    2. If not, what makes my understanding of the moon as its own light source “desperate”?
    3. What scriptural reason do you offer for understanding the sun as its own light source, and the moon as an object that merely reflects the sun’s light?

    And I still want a DIRECT and HONEST answer to the following…

    Mike:  Jehovah told us that He created two lights – the greater to govern the day, and the lesser to govern the night.

    T8:  There you go being literal again and assuming that which is not written.

    Mike:  Which part of my blue words above is not written?

    T8, I completely understand your reasoning that an object which reflects another’s light can still be considered a “light”.  I understand that, and have asked three questions above to glean some more info about that.  So I don’t need you to repeat that in various different wordings.  I just want a simple, straightforward, honest answer to the bolded blue question above.  Thanks.

     

Viewing 20 posts - 1,821 through 1,840 (of 6,414 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account