Flat Earthers gather in New Zealand

Flat Earthers hold a conference in Auckland, with speakers from around the globe.

Flat Earth celebrities have flown across the globe to speak at the Flat Earth Expo in Auckland, New Zealand. Flat Earthers believe that we live on a flat plane rather than the accepted globe model. Flat Earthers also believe that most evidence to the contrary is controlled by a giant conspiracy of which NASA is at the forefront.

The Flat Earth model has the north pole in the centre of a flat circular disc and the South Pole as not existing at all. Instead, they believe that Antarctica is a giant encircling ice wall that hems in the world’s oceans. They point out that nearly all of us have never visited Antarctica, thus we rely on the testimony of a few who claim to have visited the frozen continent, and who are mostly lying to us and are part of the conspiracy. Flat Earthers are quick to point out that it is illegal to visit Antarctica. Whether this is true or not, the fact is, it is illegal to do a number of things in any protected wilderness areas of the world of which Antarctica is a special one.

This conference in Auckland comes with a huge opportunity. Flat Earthers flying to New Zealand from the Northern Hemisphere have a unique opportunity to prove to themselves that the Earth is not flat and instead the mostly accepted globe. They only need to travel via South America to New Zealand and note the hours spent getting there will be way less than their Flat Earth model would have you believe. You see, the Flat Earth disc with no south pole has New Zealand, Australia, South America, and Africa many times apart in distance from each other as the globe suggests, simply because, instead of reducing down to a single point we call the South Pole, the area of land in the Southern Hemisphere expands out to the giant ice wall circumference of the whole disc. This projection is similar to how we view Canada, Russia, or even Antarctica on most world maps where they are many times larger on these maps than they are in reality . This is because maps have difficulty projecting a 3D globe onto their 2D canvas. In essence, the Flat Earth model is a 2D construct as it is a flat surface albeit disc shape, so it has the Southern Hemisphere as being much larger in area than it really is.

Sitting in an isolated spot in the Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand gives these Flat Earthers travelling to Auckland the unique opportunity to debunk their own belief. But how many will actually test this out? I am thinking perhaps a few, but most of these guys will just be looking forward to rubbing shoulders with their Flat Earth brothers when they get here and on-route looking out toward the flat horizon because they are simply not flying high enough to see the curve.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,001 through 1,020 (of 6,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #826525
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    D4T:  Nick, why then am I upholding Scripture and you seem to be upholding the teachings of man?

    The Scripture says that the sun has a circuit that it goes forth and that it runs its race but you hold to the teaching that the earth moves around the sun. Who is hearing the words of men?

     

    Nick: Hi Dig4,

    You may imagine that you are upholding the truth of God.

    But instead you are offering your limited understandings of revelation.

    God has chosen to reveal little of His awesome creation to mankind but you grasp straws.

    You try to build a house from these few facts but it can only become a straw house unrelated to the truth of God.

    Do not kid yourself that God is grateful for the works of your own hands.

     

    Pretty harsh and condemning words from a man who’s only reason for believing the crap he’s using to put down the other man is that godless men have told him some things, and he believes them over the words of scripture.  Nick, you believe in a fairy tail universe; one that has no fellowship with the truth of scripture.  To paraphrase Nicola Tesla, you believe in a universe concocted by men who have followed one mathematical equation after the other, successfully building an entire world that has no relation to reality.  Come back to the scriptures.  Let them be your authority.

    #826526
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Hey Mike. Yes it would make some difference, but how much is not known by myself.

    Then use your God-given common sense and think it out for yourself, T8.  They’re asking us to believe that a few thousand miles of tilt will overcome increasing the distance from the heat source by 3.1 million miles!  And then they’re going to tell you the tiny difference in the angles at which the sunlight hits the earth will overcome this blatant discrepancy?

    Use your mind, man.  God gave it to you for a reason.  This is just one of the many traps they’ve caught themselves in.  They built their unscriptural theory on mathematics, not observation.  And every time observation gets in the way of the theory they built, they try to cover it up with complete absurdities that no thinking person should believe for a second.

     

    So tell me why you believe it.  Seriously… why?

    #826527
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Air is also matter, and it is pulled towards earth’s centre and rotates with the earth. A balloon is also attracted towards the centre of Earth but it overcomes that by being lighter than the air around it.

    The idea of gravity is that all objects of mass attract all other objects of mass.  Why?  Who knows.  The entire idea that mass would would attract mass by some unseen, unknown force is the veriest nonsense.  If I climb high up on a mountain, I don’t start getting pulled sideways towards the huge mass of the mountain – even though I’m much farther away from the pull of the center of the earth at the time.  Mountains don’t pull people sideways, and the earth doesn’t pull people down due to this magical force Newton concocted from pure imagination.

     

    But let’s talk about that balloon for a minute…  A balloon filled with helium has mass.  The “law” of gravity says ALL mass attracts ALL OTHER mass.  So if that were true, while the attraction of the balloon to the earth might be less rapid due to the lower amount of mass contained in the balloon, the balloon will nevertheless still be attracted by the earth’s gravity, and pulled down eventually.  But that doesn’t happen, does it?  The helium-filled balloon will never fall to the earth until the helium has leaked out of it. And those helium atoms that leaked out will never fall to the earth – even though they have mass, and the “law” of gravitation says they must.

     

    T8:  Does the balloon just zip away at 1500 km/h? If not, then it too demonstrates that the atmosphere is moving with the Earth. 

    That’s circular reasoning.  You first assume the earth is spinning at 1500 km/h, and then deduce that if the balloon doesn’t take off at that speed, the atmosphere must be moving with the 1500 km/h earth.

    #826528
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Heaven is generally considered up and Hell below.

    Yes, heaven and God are up, and Hades/Sheol is down.

    T8:  Not a physical up and down in the whole Universe.

    So then the Bible is wrong once again?  Because the Bible clearly distinguishes up from down, yet you believe in a world where those things either don’t exist, or are relative.  Align yourself with scripture instead of with godless men.

    T8:  Up and down implies gravity which is what you are arguing against right?

    Not at all.  Up and down imply that God created a world where there is a true up, and a true down, and things of greater density move down through various media (air, water, oil, sand, rock) until they reach a medium that has equal or greater density than themselves. Gravity doesn’t have an up and down, as all objects of mass are attracted to all others, and it doesn’t matter if the object doing the attracting is above or below the object it’s attracting.

    #826529
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hey, why is the site all of a sudden taking me back to page one of the thread every time I make a post… instead of to the page it is posted on like it used to?

    #826530
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    David:  Im very new to this.  What of ships seemingly going over the horizon?

    They don’t.  Look on YouTube for “zooming ships back into view” or something like that.  I usually include the words “flat earth”.  Here’s a 1 minute video my search just produced…

    Here’s a 19 second video doing the same thing with the sun that was “disappearing over the horizon”…

     

    Also remember that, on a ball, you can’t have a curve on the Y axis without having an equal curve on the X axis as well.  So if a ship really disappeared behind the horizon from your point of view (the Y axis) at about 3 miles, and you can, at the same time, see left to right for 10 miles (the X axis), you’d be able to observe the curve that caused the ship to disappear from your view.  Like this…

     

    Here’s another way of looking at it…

    Say you’re person A, and you just watched a ship disappear over the curved horizon.  Person B would be able to see you on the left, the ship in the middle, and the curved water that the ship just went over to move out of your view.

     

     

     

    #826533
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Nick:  Hi Mike,

    Men know more than God?

    No Nick.  That’s your view – that men who tell tales of a huge universe with a spinning ball earth orbiting the sun know more than God.  My view is that God knows more, and so I believe Him instead of those men you believe.

    #826535
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene:  Mike…. you also then must believe JESUS RAISED HIMSELF FROM THE DEAD…

    No Gene, God raised Jesus from the dead.

    Gene:  …you can’t seem to see the truth in this FE thing EITHER.

    I’ve been showing you the truth of the matter… things you can verify all by yourself instead of taking someone else’s word for it.  Things you can also verify with scripture, instead of believing the deceptions of godless men.  And I will continue to show you many more things as time permits.

    #826537
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Gravity is a non-tangible thing right?

    Since it is an imaginary invention, it can be anything you want it to be.  In reality, there is no such thing as gravity.

    #826539
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Gravity is a law… And if you rubbish the Law of Gravity, are you really rubbishing the lawmaker indirectly?

    Gravity came from the imagination of a man in 1687.  It was devised as a way to support the godless heliocentric model, because a mechanism was needed to explain why all these supposed planets would continue to orbit around each other.  Did you even know that Newtonian gravity is way different than Einsteinian gravity?  And we’re told that gravity doesn’t jibe with quantum mechanics at all… let alone string theory.  How good is a natural “law” that has to keep being revised and altered?  Gravity is no “law”, and has nothing to do with God.

    T8:  We need to fear the creator or respect him. Remember that angels who are greater than us at the moment wouldn’t dare speak badly of God and I would imagine that would include not criticise that which he made with his own hand.

    Amen!  Especially those things He told us He made with His own hand – like pillars on which the earth sits fixed in place, lights that run on appointed circuits over the earth, and a firmament that encloses the earth like a tent, keeping it separate from the waters of heaven above it.  When you say things like King David – who was anointed with and often spoke by God’s Spirit – just didn’t understand how the real word is, you run the risk of criticizing the actual world God made with his own hands.  And why?  For no other reason than men have told you the world is different than how God Himself described it.

    #826540
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  For the invisible things of Him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and godhead; so that they are without excuse.

    …does a Flat Earth reflect his eternal power or just his power? That very finite Earth and dome reflects power, but infinite power?

    And now you’re arguing as so many of the atheists evolutionists did on that other forum where D4T and I did battle.  So many of their comments were philosophical pondering , like, “If God was real, then why didn’t he make this thing better, or that thing differently?”  

    Should men have been given wings?  Or perhaps eyes as sharp as the eagle’s?  Maybe the ability to change skin shape and color, like chameleons?  Surely if God had done it that way, His “infinite power” would be revealed, right?

    You are free to ponder on these things all you want, but the final authority belongs to God and His written word.  And that word describes the world as we all experience it every day… flat and stationary with lights that move over us in the heavens.

    #826541
    Ed J
    Participant

    Here’s a debate on flat earth…

    #826542
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Newton discovered gravity and his calculations work every time.

    Newton invented gravity (which came from “gravitas” – which simply means “weight”) from his mind, and the calculations certainly don’t work every time, which is why we now also have Einsteinian gravity to go along with Newtonian gravity.  Besides, you’re using circular reasoning again.  If we first assume there is this force called gravity, and then apply it to the things we actually observe, is it any wonder that the “calculations work every time”?  For example, I could change the 24 hour day to a 48 hour day, divide the hours and minutes by two, and prove to you that my version is the correct one because “the calculations work every time”.

     

    T8:  But he couldn’t picture it. It was Einstein that gave us the picture.

    First it was assumed there was a “material” that all things moved through on earth. They called it “the ether”, and it was the means by which light, sound, and heat traveled from one place to another.  But when the Michelson-Morley experiment showed that the earth was fixed and stationary, the heliocentrists lost their minds.  Albert Einstein to the rescue.  Not only did he explain away the clear results of the experiment by positing that the mechanical arms of the machine shrunk during the experiment, thereby giving the “false” results that the earth was stationary, but he also just up and did away with the long-held idea of the ether.  Just like that, it was gone because Einstein said so.  So now we’re left with the absurd idea that while sound cannot travel in the vacuum of space, heat and light somehow can.

    So he did away with the means by which these things can travel to save the heliocentric model from collapse due to Michelson-Morley – and all of a sudden heat and light CAN travel through absolutely nothing… when they couldn’t before.  🙂  But then we had to do another turn-around…

    T8:  Well it turns out that space is not nothing either and it even has a measurable weight.

    In short, heavy objects like the sun sink deep into this substance we call space and that attracts smaller objects toward it. So what stops them from falling toward the heavy object all the way. It is the small objects own gravitational force that stops that and the two objects gain equilibrium which becomes the orbital distance between them.

    So now we’re back to space being “something” instead of the “nothing” that heat and light couldn’t travel through.  Almost as if we’ve come right back to the ether – except we can’t call it that because if that exists, Michelson-Morley proved the earth was stationary.  So now it’s a “fabric” – and doesn’t just include space, but time as well.  Here’s what T8 is trying to describe…

     

    But if space is a “fabric”, then it has friction.  And if it has friction, then the balls rolling around the sunken ball in the middle will lose steam, and roll into the big ball at the bottom of the cone.  I don’t know what T8 means by “the small objects own gravitational force that stops that” .  It sounds as if he’s using gravity as a force by which the balls repel each other, instead of attracting each other.  Perhaps he’ll explain later on.

    Also, look at the image above.  What if an object was flying through space from the bottom to the top?  Would it have to rip through the “fabric” that the sun is squishing into a cone?  Do all suns and planets have their own little sheet of fabric they can deform into cones by means of their mass?  Or is the entire universe one huge 2-dimensional sheet of fabric, with all the objects of mass making their own dents in it wherever they are in space?

    What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

    #826544
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Indeed you do.

    And your efforts seem to be in vain.

    We cannot change your false beliefs either as they are your beliefs.

    #826545
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Time passes.

    Brainstorms subside.

    May you find peace and the true path.

    #826546
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Ed:  Here’s a debate on flat earth…

    That was from the recent European Flat Earth Conference.  I didn’t watch the debate, but heard it wasn’t conclusive because the flat earthers were asking the physics students about how gyros prove the earth is flat (which they certainly do), but the students didn’t really know about gyros and how they worked.  So while it might on the surface look like a victory for the flat earthers, it wasn’t because the students couldn’t answer to something they hadn’t even looked into.  It does, however, make the point that there are hundreds of things just like gyros that prove the earth is flat, but few ever look into them while most just go on blindly believing whatever mainstream scientism tells them.  Again, I’m not judging, because I was one of those people until a few short months ago.

    I also heard that the European Flat Earth Conference focused mainly on what people call the “Pac-Man Earth” – where the sun goes from A-B, disappears, and reappears at A again to do it all over again.  I am very unfamiliar with this model, and only know that the majority of the flat earthers from whom I glean a lot of my information do not subscribe to it.

    #826547
    Ed J
    Participant

    T8, do you agree that Genesis says God MADE the sun, moon, and stars on day FOUR? Yes or No, please?

    Hi Mike, NO

    “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day” (Gen 1:16)

    The light he called “Day” happened on DAY 1 Mike…

    And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.
    And the evening and the morning were the first day.” (Gen 1:5)

    ____________
    God bless
    Ed J

    #826548
    Anthony
    Participant
    • Hi ALL: A time of great deception will occur on earth just before the Second Advent of Christ. It will be a time when the flat earther’s ( The Church of night and day on the fourth day) will give up and the body of Christ will teach them. God bless
    #826549
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Ed,

    So LIGHT and the DAY were created before the two great lights.

    Did you think the DAY needed the two lights created first?

     

    #826550
    Ed J
    Participant

    You cannot use one verse to dogmatically snuff out another verse

Viewing 20 posts - 1,001 through 1,020 (of 6,414 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account