Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 15 2007,08:43)Hi W, So if the scholars are few and scattered then they are wrong just because they are not following the majority view?NHWhy dont you take up the task then?Show me why over 600 scholars should be mistrusted.Do you have a degree in Biblical Greek or Hebrew or Arabaic languages?Neither do I so I either study…[Read more]

David You say…Quote Today it's the NIV.  Who knows what you'll discover tomorow.  My point is that it's foolish to blindly follow the majority or stick to large numbers to be correct when we know, from the Bible itself that majorities are often wrong, that Satan is ruling this world and has great influence, that wicked men have always tried to p…[Read more]

DavidYou say…Quote Nooooooooo..   I've explained this a few times now.  I don't seem to think that the NIV “must have mistranslated John 1:1” just because they clearly had unpure motives and were influenced by less then perfect reasons, namely money.My assertion, once again, is simply that you keep stating: “Listen, there's so many scholars.  …[Read more]

David You say…Quote I think I asked you for all the non credible translations.  Do you assert that  the NWT is the only one?  Because if you're basing this on John 1:1, you could include several more.  It almost seems as though you are biased in it, in not mentioning the many others that don't translate it “the Word was God.”You asked for “On…[Read more]

DavidYou say…Quote WJ, so Just like that, you've discarded 100 scholars?  Your number has dropped from 600 credible scholars to 500.More of your misrepresentation. I never said to take away the 100 in my list, I said if “You” take out your disputed version then “You” still have over 500 whcih “you” have not given evidence that they were…[Read more]

Quote I did not make a personal atack on you, but I will state again. Concerning your willingness to recieve truth when shown to you, your method of biblical interpretaion, and your adhearance to pagan practices instituted by constantine are wacked. Somebody please tell me what the definition of a “personal attack” is?

Quote I did not make a personal atack on you, but I will state again. Concerning your willingness to recieve truth when shown to you, your method of biblical interpretaion, and your adhearance to pagan practices instituted by constantine are wacked.BTW.Do you have any degrees in Hebrew, Greek or Latin? What is your credentials?This is a real…[Read more]

Quote (martian @ May 15 2007,02:06)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 12 2007,17:53)Quote (Is 1:18 @ May 12 2007,17:29)Quote (martian @ May 10 2007,10:32)Oh yeah,I was warned about you. They said your beliefs were wacked!!!  You should not try so hard to prove them right!Ad hominemIs 1:18Nice word. Thanks!This seems to be what happens a lot around…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,15:41)Hi w, No they wanted to stone him for blasphemy according to the Law. Why would anyone want to stone the Son of God? He is not God.NHBecause they believed he claimed to be God!Of course you like them dont believe him either!

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,15:34)Hi W, So you agree with them? Would you have picked up a stone too?NHYes I agree what they say was his claims, but you are the one in their camp to not believe that he is God!They didnt believe him and wanted to stone him.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,14:58)Hi W, His enemies believed he was saying he was God though he told them he was the Son.They hated him and sought to kill him. Abhor the spirit of antichristNHLook again. His enemys believed he was saying he was equal to God therfore to them he was saying he was God!So they sought to kill him saying he had…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 24 2007,07:03)Hi, The Father is God. Jesus is a man.Just because we see the Father reflected perfectly in the Son we do not say they are the same. That would make the Father man.Rom 1″ 21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,14:03)Hi, How odd it is that men will not believe the truth. They would seem to prefer those who accused him of making himself equal with God.NHWe agree he was God, they didnt believe he was.Whos camp are you in?

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,12:04)Hi W,You say”Does God glorify Jesus?” If Jesus is your God who is the God you speak of here?NHHeb 1:8*But unto the Son he (God) saith , Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever*: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.John 1:1In the beginning was the Word, and the *Word was with God, and the…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 14 2007,11:09)Hi w, I am glad you appreciate that God is not Jesus. God gives glory to whoever or whatever He chooses.Even the sun and the moon and the stars have their given glory.NHYour Jesus is not my God.My Jesus is Lord and God!

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 13 2007,19:31)Hoi W, Does God worship Jesus or do I misunderstand you?One God W, the Father of Jesus by His Spirit.NHAnswer a question with a question?Does God glorify Jesus?

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 13 2007,17:37)Hi W,Then do you not know the God of Jesus? He said TRUE WORSHIPERS will worship that God.NHYes and I also know the Monogenes Son of God, who the Father honours as God and would have us do the same.How about you NH?Do you honour the Son as you honour the Father?It is his commandment you know?

Quote (942767 @ May 13 2007,07:36)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 12 2007,18:40)Quote (942767 @ May 12 2007,11:55)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 11 2007,07:30)Question for the Arian followers, (those who do not have a Trinitarian view).How do you reconcile the folowing scriptures from an Arian view?Rom 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the…[Read more]

David you say…Quote So, would a translation like ASV be not credible or the New English Bible or the KJV etc, if they don't “hold closer to the name and translate it Yahweh or Yehowah” as you say.Or is it only with regard to the NWT that your are biased?No. The argument about the name is yours. I am not saying that any translation because they h…[Read more]

David you say…Quote You yourself are creating a straw argument here.  It's rather sad.  The NIV didn't have an issue with how to pronounce God's name.  The issue was:1. Do the right thing, the thing they “should have.”2. Go with poplularity so people would accept it and read it.So, my point is made, which you refuse to respond to or ackn…[Read more]