Quote Is it not better to have an honest conversation and be open to change?I have seen no evidence that anyone here is in the slightest way open to change. It's more like, “I know what I know, so don't confuse me with the facts or logic.”Actually, I was speaking to everyone.I may be incorrect about everything I believe, but for your all's sake, I…[Read more]

God knows.

Quote HEY !!! Iam not addressing your moniker.Iam speaking to your demeanor overall ….. and the longer this type of dialogue exists between us the more obvious it becomes to me that there is absolutely nothing to be learned from you…jtWell, at least we have that in common!

Screw you! Is that concise enough?!?

Quote Don't you think it would be better for you to explain your doctrinal beliefsEd JI'm pretty sure that you've read most of my posts, which ones don't you think explain my doctrinal beliefs? I'm not expounding on someone else's doctrinal beliefs.Do any of you people understand English?!? Every responce I've gotten, except from seekingtruth,…[Read more]

Quote Will you also correct the word of God?I do not seek to correct the Word of God, however many translations of that Word need much correcting, especially the one almost everyone defers to, the AKJV. Without a doubt the AKJV is the least accurate translation out there. However, I do suspect that those who insist that it is the only version to…[Read more]

Ed J would be a good start.

I'm not at all sensitive about my moniker, that was simply a general FYI as many have questioned the moniker rebellman and have often made a big deal that rebell is spelled wrong or ask what I'm rebelling against, but I can't see any reason to begin your post with “Hello Rebel” when that's not the moniker.Quote Find yourself a warm comfortable…[Read more]

By the way, if anyone cares, my name is Richard.KerwinYour quote above was directed to “terraricca” or Pierre. While I frequently find myself in disagreement with your opinions, I usually do understand what you're trying to say. This is not the case with Pierre as his English usage is atrocious and when combined with his total lack of…[Read more]

WmI really appreciate your attitude, I only wish I reflected that attitude more, I tend to be very brusque, it's not that I don't care about people, but I find it extremely diffcult to tolerate false brethren, especially on this site, as everyone I've encoutered so far consider themselves authorities (with the possible exception of yourself,…[Read more]

For clarification: If Christ was the first thing created, he would have had to have created himself. Col 1:16 (NIV) “For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

PierreYou really need to stop. You have no idea of what you're talking about. I try so hard to not get into this, but you're constantly making false claims. Jesus is the “only begotten of the Father,” Adam, on the other hand was created from the dust of the earth, he did not issue out of (this is what to beget means) the Father. You are correct…[Read more]

Hi everyone!The last post here was quite a while ago, so I hope I'm not just whistling in the dark.Follows is a quote from my post in “Preexistence (part 2):Quote So, how is God going to do this. Since the penalty was death, a death is required to satisfy justice. But, God can't die! (God's omnipotence notwithstanding, as by his own rules, God…[Read more]

Hi everyone!The last post here was quite a while ago, so I hope I'm not just whistling in the dark.Follows is a quote from my post in “Preexistence (part 2):Quote So, how is God going to do this. Since the penalty was death, a death is required to satisfy justice. But, God can't die! (God's omnipotence notwithstanding, as by his own rules, God…[Read more]

KerwinI thought I understood English (I've spoken it all my life and I got straight A's in English classes in school), but if you are speaking English, I guess I'm wrong. Because I can't seem to decipher your posts, I may be way off base here, but the one thing that keeps popping up in your posts seems to be that whatever it is you're saying is…[Read more]

Quote Hebrew was the first language used to bring God’s word to the world.Ed JIt would be beneficial to everyone, but especially to you, if you would at least get your facts straight before spewing out garbage.The first language used to bring God’s word to the world was not Hebrew, unless that's what Adam spoke and there is no indication anywhere …[Read more]

FYI: Neither my name nor moniker is Rebel as I am not rebelling against anything – rebellman is merely a moniker with little relavant meaning to anything here and rebell is an acronym of my name… r(ichard)e(edward)bell(my last name). So don't be flippant, it's disresectful.Hi ya theodorej,Don't really care what you theorize as to the end times,…[Read more]

WmWOW! I'd be willing to bet that wherever and whenever you posted that, you got slammed from a dozen directions, not because it's incorrect, but because nobody understood it! Don't get me wrong, as I do understand what you are saying, though I do disagree on a couple of points. However, this is the attitude that I spoke of elsewhere, that if two…[Read more]

PierreWhat language do you actually speak, that is what is your first language, because it certainly is not English as it is painfully clear that you do not understand English even a little bit or else you would say such completely assinine things.Quote Ps 103:21 Praise the LORD, all his heavenly hosts, you his servants who do his will.…[Read more]

PierreIf, as you assert, Jesus preexisted then Col. 1:16 is just such proof that he did something by his own power: “For by him were all things created… all things were created by him, and for him… by him all things consist.” These passages explicitly (explicit being defined as: stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or…[Read more]