There are two points that need to be mentioned.1) That it is OK to take your time if you say so. Just a short note to say that you wish the debate to continue and that you are busy now, is good enough.2) That I can reopen the debate and if the outcome is different, then I will edit the Debate Log to reflect that.As is plain to see, the system…[Read more]

Cool.Thanks.

No probs.No pressure then. Sort out the other stuff first.Cheers.

So that explains your posts SF. They are a product of your age.

WJ, where is your faith in your Trinity Doctrine.You cannot call your god by the grammatically correct terms, “THEM” & “THEY”. Instead you call God “HIM” & “HIS”, even though you are referring to 3 persons.Shame on you for not practicing what you preach.Shame on you for not even giving an answer as to why you do not call your Trinity God,…[Read more]

WJ, I am just checking.Are you still engaging in this debate?If so, then I can wait for your answers.There are 2 outstanding questions and they are on this page.I just need to know whether this debate is being conceded by you or if you still wish to engage in it.If it is the former, then the debate will be closed and the result will be logged in…[Read more]

Quote (SimplyForgiven @ April 04 2011,05:00)When God talked about the Angels in Heb1, did that INCLUDE MOSES, THE SPYS OF JEREICO, JACOB, PAUL, PETER? YES OR NO??Perhaps not specifically, but Jesus, John the Baptist, and other men are called angels in scripture.Malachi the prophet was obviously a messenger of God and look at his name.

WJ.I seem to remember recently reading a post from Mike that answered your first question.It had an explanation containing info explaining the difference with YHWH/LORD and lord (kurios).Did you read that?

Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 23 2011,15:32)Mike, The verse includes 1:1b with 1:1c to make that distinction.If we changed the word 'God' to man it would read:In the beginning was the word, and the word was with the man, and the word was man.  You don't need an 'a' or a 'the' in the 'c' part of the verse.That is true.This is Keith's view:a) In the…[Read more]

WJ, definite articles exist in the Greek text and indefinite ones do not.There is no definite article in John 1:1c, that is a given.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 24 2011,02:49)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 22 2011,19:22)Now that we all know it IS a grammatical possibility, whether some of us like it or not, are we ready to move on?MikeI have never agreed that it is Grammatically possible but only that “they say” it is possible.So move on if you like, but get your facts…[Read more]

I think Mike is only trying to get people to answer honestly.If people were more honest, then perhaps Mike would not have to try and squeeze out honest answers from others.

Stu are you still here arguing against a God that supposedly doesn't exist.I mean, why waste your time?I can tell you now that you will not receive a Nobel Prize for arguing about something you do not believe exists.You are better off discovering something than discovering nothing within your limited range.BTW, even with your limited range, your…[Read more]

Quote (Istari @ April 06 2011,01:51)Hi Sophia,As always, truth is a double edged sword…It is certainly true what you say – and it certainly applies to many here (no names from any you mentioned – or could be all)However, often what seems like those things you mention are seen that way because the observer is not knowledgeable about the subject…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ April 05 2011,09:07)Keith,It tells us that there is only day in eternity…no more nights.NASBIs 60:19″No longer will you have the sun for light by day, Nor for brightness will the moon give you light; But you will have the LORD for an everlasting light, And your God for your glory.Revelation 21:23 The city does not need the sun…[Read more]

That is a wise and true saying.

This so-called pagan crap comes from the inspired scriptural verse: 2 Peter 1:4.We can partake in divine nature. It is what it says and it is what I say too.You can call that what you like, but I don't even know of a pagan who would call that crap.BTW, you gave up debating “Kangaroo Jack versus t8 on Christ's divinity”. I know it was because you…[Read more]

Kangaroo Jack.You came in all guns blazing, but it appears you have run out of bullets.It is only a pity that you were not able to acknowledge that you were wrong about your interpretation of 1 John 5:20 20 We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true…[Read more]

True that.This whole place is testy.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 03 2011,14:22)I don't think it should be “paranoia” t8.  I think it should be a very real threat:  ANSWER HONESTLY AND DIRECTLY, OR GET A TILE.There are only two things that could possibly happen from a rule like this:1.  People will start answering honestly and directly to avoid tiles.2.  People who are afraid to ans…[Read more]