Thanks Bod.

Yes Kerwin we should try hard to enter the narrow way. We should seek the truth with all our heart. We should love God first and mankind as we love ourselves.

There are perhaps an infinite amount of ways we can err. We need to be always mindful because we can easily slip and fall.

@miia
I believe that there are signs in the sun and the moon now, in particular the Tetrad period we are currently in.

Since that began, this period of time has seen huge changes to the Middle East and possible threats to Israel with wars and rumours of wars. Possibly even a Sunni Shia War.

I think it is significant times we are living in. As…[Read more]

@mila, I believe that there are signs in the sun and the moon now, in particular the Tetrad.

Since that began, this period of time has seen huge changes to the Middle East and possible threats to Israel.

I think it is significant times we are living in. As for Russia, they may well invade parts of Western Europe, they are already in a proxy war…[Read more]

@mila, I beleive that there are signs in the sun and the moon now, in particular the Tetrad.

Since that began, this period of time has seen huge changes to the Middle East and possible threats to Israel.

I think it is significant times we are living in. As for Russia, they may well invade parts of Western Europe, they are already in a proxy war…[Read more]

I read a headline yesterday regarding a possible coup and/or disappearance of Putin.

I didn’t read the article but if any of it is true, we will know soon enough.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/563489/Vladimir-Putin-Disappearance-Missing-Russia

@Miia & others

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basical…[Read more]

@Miia

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@edj

Could you keep your 5-fold doctrine out of this topic and leave it in one of the dedicated topics instead. I think it will only confuse things here and force people off topic. Thanks.

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘th…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Jehovah Witnesses re-interpret this verse to say, “…and the Word was a god” to suit their own teaching…. (that Jesus was really Michael the archangel)…

If you don’t agree with this definitive verse, how would you re-word it to explain what you believe concerni…

[Read more]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Jehovah Witnesses re-interpret this verse to say, “…and the Word was a god” to suit their own teaching…. (that Jesus was really Michael the archangel)…

If you don’t agree with this definitive verse, how would you re-word it to explain what you believe concerni…

[Read more]